Blue Vain wrote:
Braithy wrote:
harry would make a good CHB. soft as butter like his brother, but still ... he's a proper athlete, A+ hands, proper height and has a peach of a left foot when field kicking.
You're watching a different player to me. Harry is a poor field kick IMHO. A poor kick is the last thing our defence needs. His strength is his endurance, speed and contested marking. Leave him where he does his best work.
I don't understand the negativity towards our forward line. We're the highest scoring team in the AFL, despite being 9th for inside 50's, we're second in the league for creating scores from our forward half and we're 3rd in the AFL for inside 50 tackles. So the forward line is our one strength IMO. Get some players who can actually kick the ball half decent to our forwards and they'd be unstoppable.
When our midfield get's up and going, we're a serious football side with the strength forward of centre. You don't throw that away with hail mary's this late in the season.
You don't take away something that is working to fix something that isn't. You end up with problems on both lines. Get our midfield to defend properly, sort out our abysmal defensive 50 stoppages (stoppage and defensive coaches!) and our defence will get by.
i think one of our problems is that our midfield struggles to play a defensive game and an attacking game which suits transition and forward entry at the same time for the length of a full game.
we need the midfield spread, run and carry and handball chains that look so good when we are doing it at elite level (which surprised me when i saw it against Geelong and one other game), but seems like when they do that they aren’t getting back to restrict opposition ball movement between the arcs. either our midfield lacks for a bit of talent other than Walsh and Cripps, or running power/fitness, or ability to play multiple roles depending on who has the ball and where on the park the ball is moving to.
we need the midfield running in packs and one or two of them providing fat side options so we aren’t bombing it up the lines all the time. bc when we go up the lines with long and slow kicks then for the 1 in 6 times that gets from deep in our defensive half to just short of the forward arc, we invariably bomb it again in to Harry and Charlie (and anybody else y’all who happens to have wondered down there eg a resting TDK).
is it implausible that or mids can play above average defence and elite forward transition and switch between the two as required and for a whole game? or elite defence and above average forward transition for a whole game as required against teams when we are behind or trying to stop momentum?
i would love to know what AFL coaches say about these questions when behind closed doors! i’m just a mug punter but it feels like 3 or 4 of our mids have to play blinders for us to play at our best (or even scratch out a win in the current ugly patch).
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk