sinbagger wrote:
Braithy wrote:
sinbagger wrote:
Braithy wrote:
exactly, re cripps. there was media around voss in a presser saying cripps has been into him about getting pittonet in the team
like you say ... it's not about him, its about the team. charlie has been playing for himself and his coleman for a while now. for a team who isn't the fastest or most skilled; our advantage was we were sacrificing personal goals and glory for the better of team success.
i think these last 2 weeks (losses) we've strayed too far from that team ethos, and we're being lit up bcos of it.
I think you’re taking it a bit far. Anyway, if selfishness gives Charlie ten shots on goal every game I’m all for it. I think one of the reasons we’re being smashed at clearances is not because of selfishness, it’s because of rule changes. Our game (and Pittos game) is built on first use of the ball, but the rules now favour being second to the ball and we haven’t adjusted.
charlie played a bit more selflessly on the weekend. also helped, that his opponent was 5'11 and not very strong.
but his 2nd efforts and chasing and tackling for most of the season has been super selfish. i'm starting to wonder if your eyes are actually painted on
Well, you said the team has been too selfish the last two weeks and highlighted Charlie, but now you say he was ok this week but it was actually the rest of the season you were talking about?
Is your brain actually painted on?
lol ... you're incredible. and not in a good way. you would argue black was white. it's so tiresome.
the mids have been selfish, and charlie too. charlie has been really poor this year. i've lost count of the times he's completely given up on a play after he drops a mark (or is fouled) and the ball is still in contest.
he gets blasted in the media, gets a favourable match up and gets 10 shots on goal. a complete outlier on his season. you have to go back to last year for the last time he had 10 shots on goal.
after the finals he had last year, i guess i was expecting more from him, but at times he only seems to care about his coleman.