Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Mon May 12, 2025 11:33 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 981 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 ... 50  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Mar 21, 2013 5:05 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 5:28 pm
Posts: 4914
Big Kahuna Boot wrote:
..eventually yes, doubtful for next season.. ..we don't have the kpps to make top4 yet..

..unless we have luck with injuries, and others don't.. ..but all things being equal, no.. ..our kpp stocks still aren't up to scratch..


I think it's more about the durability of our KPP's.
When Jamison, Henderson, Kreuzer and Waite are all fit and on the park our KPP stocks are OK.
Hopefully the likes of Casboult and Watson can improve substantially this year.

_________________
There is no footy god


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 21, 2013 5:18 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter

Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 6:54 pm
Posts: 14686
Location: The Vodka Train
Humpers wrote:
Big Kahuna Boot wrote:
..eventually yes, doubtful for next season.. ..we don't have the kpps to make top4 yet..

..unless we have luck with injuries, and others don't.. ..but all things being equal, no.. ..our kpp stocks still aren't up to scratch..


I think it's more about the durability of our KPP's.
When Jamison, Henderson, Kreuzer and Waite are all fit and on the park our KPP stocks are OK.
Hopefully the likes of Casboult and Watson can improve substantially this year.


..that was part of my point, our experienced kpp's aren't the most durable, and the others are all inexperienced.. ..krooz is actually pretty durable, it took an acl to make him miss months, otherwise i don't think he's injury prone per'se.. ..considering he played almost 2 and a half years upon debut, for such a young kpp that's high durability right there i reckon..

..i'm hoping Hendo's injury problems are part of a young man growing into his body, where as players of the ages like waite and jamo, seem to just be injury prone and/or lack the high fortitude to withstand AFL battering..

..i think we still lack a solid FF option, a lot is riding on Mitchell being good enough.. ..we can play others thru that position, but they're makeshift and not actual FF's.. ..and i think our KPD stocks trend more towards CHB and outside of Jamo at FB we don't have much..

..it takes kpps a few years to really develop, the sooner we can get games into our young kpps [provided they're worthy], the better.. ..good thing is, MM has shown over the years that he's prepared to give kids consistent opportunity, and knows it requires patience.. ..the issue with our current list is we don't have experienced durable kpp's to help lighten the kids' load when they line up as kpps..

_________________
..if you can't be good, be good at it..


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 22, 2013 5:14 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
BigBlueWave wrote:
TruBlueBrad wrote:
Blue Vain wrote:
woof wrote:
Malthouse has already taken an average list too back to back grand final appearances, Blue Vain is cracking champagne bottles because Rats got us to 5th.
I think this year will be a bit of a roller coaster ride until the new gameplan has sunk in.


You're struggling with your basic comprehension again.

I'm not celebrating Ratts getting us to 5th because I believe we have a potential top 4 list. Ratts had his flaws and while I think the board made a knee jerk decision, I'm content that they moved him on.
My concern is the same people who bagged Ratts for not taking the next step and getting us into the top 4 are now saying we have an average list.
Which is it?
Do we have an average list? If so, its a bit rich to be bagging Ratten for failing. Or we have a quality list and we should be aiming for top 4. You can't have both.
IMO, its the latter but plenty of people are suddenly making excuses.


Well said as always BV.


+1

What is really starting to bug me is the way the media are now, at long last commenting on how our season last year was ruined by injuries and that Ratts was very unfortunate. Yet ... when it suited them, they bagged him and pushed so much for Malthouse ... anything to sell a paper. The media SUCKS is so many ways ... and people just believe it.

Ok ... I won't get started on the Herald Sun ... the outright worst newspaper in Australia.

Malthouse has a very good list to work with ... and he will be judged accordingly. I just hope that he is up to it ... we all want to see the navy blue on GF day no matter who is coaching.

Everyone knew Ratten couldn't coach'
Even port didn't give him a gig'

Losing to Johnny come lately teams and Port had nothing to do with injuries.

The media didn't sack Rotten...... He was unsatisfactory-Five years and we were never looking dangerous against the good teams.
He couldn't even develop leadership. He wasn't ever a great leader himself and had no clue.
He sent us backwards with his time wasting.
Even his list management was a shambles.
Tactically poor with little innovation'
Blend personality and little intellect.........
Had to go!!!!!______In my opinion at LEAST three years too late-

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 22, 2013 6:50 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 17954
Yep. A lot of that is probably true Synbad. And I'm not here to push Rattens barrow. He had plenty of faults and the process to appoint him or lack of process) was indicative of recent Carlton.
But the hypicrisy of some posters is staggering.
We want Ratten sacked because he undeperformed yet we're making excuses for Malthouse. It was a good list last year but suddenly its not.

And by the way, yes you're right, even Port didnt give Ratten the main job. But from memory, apart from Carlton, the hordes werent knocking on Micks door either so lets hope thats not an indicator.

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 22, 2013 7:07 am 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 9:27 am
Posts: 28528
Location: Free Beer!!
The process to appoint Malthouse was pretty similar to the one to appoint Ratten as well.

_________________
"The ability to speak doesn't make you intelligent." Qui-Gon Jinn 15-05-2005

"there’s more chance of me becoming the full forward for the [Western Bulldogs] than there is of any change in the Labor Party." Julia Gillard 18-05-2010


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 22, 2013 7:20 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 9:51 am
Posts: 4919
TruBlueBrad wrote:
The process to appoint Malthouse was pretty similar to the one to appoint Ratten as well.


And the one to appoint Pagan , and the one the appoint Brittain and the one to appoint Parkin ..... do you see a trend?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 22, 2013 7:31 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 11:17 am
Posts: 18496
Location: threeohfivethree
I'm not looking for excuses and neither is Malthouse last time I checked.

I think the list has top four potential (as do six or seven other teams) and so does Mick.

How about we let him coach and see what happens rather than trying to preempt it?

_________________
“When a clown moves into a palace, he doesn't become a king. The palace turns into a circus.”
Turkish Proverb


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 22, 2013 9:10 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2007 9:09 pm
Posts: 6047
Blue Vain wrote:
We want Ratten sacked because he undeperformed yet we're making excuses for Malthouse. It was a good list last year but suddenly its not.


I didn't expect us to finish top 4 last year. My pre-season prediction last year was that we were a bottom half of the 8 kind of side, but may sneak into top 4 with an above average run of luck...or we could miss the finals altogether if we had a below average run of luck.

My prediction for us this year has not changed from last year. The change of coach has not changed my expectations from this time last year. However, looking to the medium-to-longer term, the change of coach I think will be for the best.

And just because that is what I expect, does not mean that is what I want. I would dearly love us to be premiers in 2013. I just don't see it with the team at the moment (which was built by Ratten, but is currently undergoing renovations by Malthouse....what we do not know yet is if those renovations are minor or major)....

_________________
It's never as good as it looks and it's never as bad as it seems.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 22, 2013 9:34 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 2:09 pm
Posts: 17210
aboynamedsue wrote:
I would dearly love us to be premiers in 2013. I just don't see it with the team at the moment (which was built by Ratten, but is currently undergoing renovations by Malthouse....what we do not know yet is if those renovations are minor or major)....


I think we'll have to call the plumber in early sue (major leakage), but once that's repaired it should be good to go. I don't expect the reno's to be completed until May...after that we should be comfortable with the new plans and the finish on the exterior will look superb. I'd suggest we'll do some cleaning out next summer and perhaps even look at going to market and buying something bigger.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 22, 2013 9:40 am 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:04 am
Posts: 28377
Location: *Currently banned*
Bombing long for easy marks by defenders. Shoddy renos.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 22, 2013 10:03 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 2:09 pm
Posts: 17210
verbs wrote:
Bombing long for easy marks by defenders. Shoddy renos.


You should probably take a look at the Adelaide NAB Cup game rather than the final to get a better gauge how the team will play.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 22, 2013 10:31 am 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:04 am
Posts: 28377
Location: *Currently banned*
DocSherrin wrote:
verbs wrote:
Bombing long for easy marks by defenders. Shoddy renos.


You should probably take a look at the Adelaide NAB Cup game rather than the final to get a better gauge how the team will play.


I prefer the Fremantle game.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 22, 2013 10:50 am 
Offline
Robert Walls
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2008 1:06 pm
Posts: 3992
Location: Steven Seagal's Martial Arts Academy
DocSherrin wrote:
aboynamedsue wrote:
I would dearly love us to be premiers in 2013. I just don't see it with the team at the moment (which was built by Ratten, but is currently undergoing renovations by Malthouse....what we do not know yet is if those renovations are minor or major)....


I think we'll have to call the plumber in early sue (major leakage), but once that's repaired it should be good to go. I don't expect the reno's to be completed until May...after that we should be comfortable with the new plans and the finish on the exterior will look superb. I'd suggest we'll do some cleaning out next summer and perhaps even look at going to market and buying something bigger.


Get Phil & Amity from The Block!
= FLAGS!!!!!
:lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 22, 2013 10:52 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 2:09 pm
Posts: 17210
verbs wrote:
DocSherrin wrote:
verbs wrote:
Bombing long for easy marks by defenders. Shoddy renos.


You should probably take a look at the Adelaide NAB Cup game rather than the final to get a better gauge how the team will play.


I prefer the Fremantle game.


You might prefer the Freo game, but remember that was inferior opposition. That was virtually their reserves side. Adelaide was pretty close to full strength.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 22, 2013 10:55 am 
Offline
Robert Walls
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2008 1:06 pm
Posts: 3992
Location: Steven Seagal's Martial Arts Academy
GWS wrote:

How about we let him coach and see what happens rather than trying to preempt it?



I don't think that's the way TC works
:lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 22, 2013 11:56 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 22, 2010 5:52 pm
Posts: 2289
Location: Geelong
BigBlueWave wrote:
TruBlueBrad wrote:
Blue Vain wrote:
woof wrote:
Malthouse has already taken an average list too back to back grand final appearances, Blue Vain is cracking champagne bottles because Rats got us to 5th.
I think this year will be a bit of a roller coaster ride until the new gameplan has sunk in.


You're struggling with your basic comprehension again.

I'm not celebrating Ratts getting us to 5th because I believe we have a potential top 4 list. Ratts had his flaws and while I think the board made a knee jerk decision, I'm content that they moved him on.
My concern is the same people who bagged Ratts for not taking the next step and getting us into the top 4 are now saying we have an average list.
Which is it?
Do we have an average list? If so, its a bit rich to be bagging Ratten for failing. Or we have a quality list and we should be aiming for top 4. You can't have both.
IMO, its the latter but plenty of people are suddenly making excuses.


Well said as always BV.


+1

What is really starting to bug me is the way the media are now, at long last commenting on how our season last year was ruined by injuries and that Ratts was very unfortunate. Yet ... when it suited them, they bagged him and pushed so much for Malthouse ... anything to sell a paper. The media SUCKS is so many ways ... and people just believe it.

Ok ... I won't get started on the Herald Sun ... the outright worst newspaper in Australia.

Malthouse has a very good list to work with ... and he will be judged accordingly. I just hope that he is up to it ... we all want to see the navy blue on GF day no matter who is coaching.


See I have a different view BBW. IMO we got Mick to figure out whether or not we've got a good list. I don't think we really know. For mine, the whole idea of getting a bloke who's coached flags at a couple of clubs was that he should be able to look at our list, over time, and work out what's required for a shot at #17. He's going to need at least a season to do this.

Unless of course we really do have a great list in which case I'll have #17 this year thank you. :wink:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 22, 2013 12:19 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2008 11:40 am
Posts: 4088
Location: Reclining always
West Coast in 1989 finished 11th, Mick took over in 1990 and they finished 3rd. The next year they were premiers. Given the list comparisons, I think this is more what we could expect. At Collingwood he took a year longer to get to the grand final, but I think that was complicated by a raft of retirements and a list overhaul in 2001.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 22, 2013 12:22 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
Blue Vain wrote:
Yep. A lot of that is probably true Synbad. And I'm not here to push Rattens barrow. He had plenty of faults and the process to appoint him or lack of process) was indicative of recent Carlton.
But the hypicrisy of some posters is staggering.
We want Ratten sacked because he undeperformed yet we're making excuses for Malthouse. It was a good list last year but suddenly its not.

And by the way, yes you're right, even Port didnt give Ratten the main job. But from memory, apart from Carlton, the hordes werent knocking on Micks door either so lets hope thats not an indicator.

I think we want ratten sacked because he wasted give years and some in developing leadership, confidence'game plan, etc.
We're not even sure what Bryce Gibbs is capable of doing.

After over five years still alot of questions about our list BV-

Make no mistake this is Ratten's confused list.

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 22, 2013 12:22 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
Blue Vain wrote:
Yep. A lot of that is probably true Synbad. And I'm not here to push Rattens barrow. He had plenty of faults and the process to appoint him or lack of process) was indicative of recent Carlton.
But the hypicrisy of some posters is staggering.
We want Ratten sacked because he undeperformed yet we're making excuses for Malthouse. It was a good list last year but suddenly its not.

And by the way, yes you're right, even Port didnt give Ratten the main job. But from memory, apart from Carlton, the hordes werent knocking on Micks door either so lets hope thats not an indicator.

I think we want ratten sacked because he wasted give years and some in developing leadership, confidence'game plan, etc.
We're not even sure what Bryce Gibbs is capable of doing.

After over five years still alot of questions about our list BV-

Make no mistake this is Ratten's confused list.

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 22, 2013 1:23 pm 
Offline
formerly BlueRob
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 12:45 pm
Posts: 3072
Hmmmm ...

Assumtion:
Everyone knew Ratten couldn't coach : Oh really

Under Ratten we made steady progress ... except for a year where we were completely destroyed by injuries ... even the media now admits this. Our greatest coach ... David Parkin ... many times stated that Ratten had a great football brain for coaching. So did another premiership coach ... Robert Walls. But obviously you know more about Ratten than they do.
S0 ... using the word 'Everyone' is not just an overstatement ... it is completely incorrect ... hahah ... laughable.

Assumption:
Even port didn't give him a gig'

This shows a little bit of ignorance ... sorry Synbad. Ratten knocked back the Port job as did other candidates who also knew they were a complete basket case.

OK ...

How many years did it take for Tricky Micky to win his first premiership?
How many years did it take Bomber Thomson to win his first premiership?


Carlton missed a huge opportunity to have a young coach and a favorite son, coach this team (which he built) into a successful erra. Instead we went out and appointed a Collingwood coach. Even you could coach this team to premiership Synbad and now Tricky Micky will reap the rewards ... If he does not succeed in the next 2 years ... then its a BIG FAIL.

Lets hope that he does succeed. We all want whats best for the mighty Blues.

_________________
I am as mad as hell and I'm not going to take it any more!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 981 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 ... 50  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Crusader, Google [Bot] and 100 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group