Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Mon Jun 16, 2025 2:28 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 231 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Oct 17, 2012 5:21 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2006 11:39 am
Posts: 30269
Location: riding shotgun on Agros Karma Train
King hit

_________________
Between our dreams and actions lies this world


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 17, 2012 5:45 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 31, 2007 8:15 pm
Posts: 6748
Location: Echuca
kingkerna wrote:
King hit

In any yike someone is going to throw the first punch. If that finishes it , then so be it. My definition of a king hit is hitting somone looking the other way, or hitting them from behind.
What's relevant is why did Scotland hit this supposed innocent victim ?

_________________
The problem with Socialism is, you eventually run out of other people's money.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 18, 2012 12:33 pm 
Offline
Garry Crane
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 28, 2009 12:37 am
Posts: 263
Location: Now back in Adelaide
Goltzenberg wrote:
This club culture talk is BS. Sydney and Geelong have a culture we want? Yeah?
Sydney - They are in a city where no one would recognize a AFL player and cause issues if they saw them out and media doesn't care about them
Geelong - Who was the guy caught with drugs? Stokes. Who was that guy wth a alcohol problem? Johnson.

As I mentioned in another thread on Culture and Values, Geelong DID make examples of Stokes and Stevie J, and they both came back to football better for it, in Johnson's case, AA, premiership player and Norm Smith medallist.

I guess it depends on whether you want to have a rabble at the club, or a cohesive team with a single direction and goal. Blokes who play football are pretty much like the rest of society, they aren't perfect and stuff up from time to time. Given that an incident has occurred, then reinforcing that a certain sort of behaviour is unacceptable can be a positive thing for the club.

_________________
also on twitter @m_j_short


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 18, 2012 2:58 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 14, 2007 6:10 pm
Posts: 33618
Location: COMFORTABLY DISSATISFIED
mjs wrote:
I guess it depends on whether you want to have a rabble at the club, or a cohesive team with a single direction and goal.

I think people want a return to the 1970s/80s where you can have a cohesive team who still get on the piss after games and get into trouble in their own time.

This just isn't reality anymore though. The excuses need to stop.

_________________
WADA medical director Dr Alan Vernec describes Essendon* FC drug case as biggest scandal in team sport the world of sport has seen. #WC2WB

#GUILTY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 18, 2012 4:04 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2006 11:39 am
Posts: 30269
Location: riding shotgun on Agros Karma Train
murraycray wrote:
kingkerna wrote:
King hit

In any yike someone is going to throw the first punch. If that finishes it , then so be it. My definition of a king hit is hitting somone looking the other way, or hitting them from behind.
What's relevant is why did Scotland hit this supposed innocent victim ?

king hit = guy didn't know it was coming

_________________
Between our dreams and actions lies this world


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 18, 2012 4:11 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 31, 2007 8:15 pm
Posts: 6748
Location: Echuca
kingkerna wrote:
murraycray wrote:
kingkerna wrote:
King hit

In any yike someone is going to throw the first punch. If that finishes it , then so be it. My definition of a king hit is hitting somone looking the other way, or hitting them from behind.
What's relevant is why did Scotland hit this supposed innocent victim ?

king hit = guy didn't know it was coming


Then he's an idiot. Lets agree to disagree. :wink:

_________________
The problem with Socialism is, you eventually run out of other people's money.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 18, 2012 6:55 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 25157
Location: Bondi Beach
kingkerna wrote:
murraycray wrote:
kingkerna wrote:
King hit

In any yike someone is going to throw the first punch. If that finishes it , then so be it. My definition of a king hit is hitting somone looking the other way, or hitting them from behind.
What's relevant is why did Scotland hit this supposed innocent victim ?

king hit = guy didn't know it was coming


The footage didn't look good.

King hit. No question. Not the right way to handle any situation ...unless it was 10 against 2 and a few had to be taken out before the real stuff happened out the front. Violence has its place, but I prefer it doesn't happen. Usually the good guy loses.

I don't want Scotland suspended from H&A because I am a bias Carlton supporter and admire Scotland the footballer and CFC B&F.

If it was a player from another team, such as Hurley, then I would want him suspended and gaoled too.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Oct 19, 2012 9:58 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 22, 2010 5:52 pm
Posts: 2289
Location: Geelong
I don't think that the issue is whether or not Scotland's actions were acceptable. Our legal system has said that they're not and has imposed a punishment.

The issue for me is whether the AFL is entitled to impose further punishment for something that doesn't really have anything directly to do with the competition. I think that the AFL is confused and inconsistent on this front. They've imposed severe penalties on people without a conviction, (eg Cousins), and yet done nothing about someone found guilty of an extremely violent action, (eg Jurrah). They don't seem to really know what their policy on this is.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Oct 19, 2012 3:48 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 31, 2007 8:15 pm
Posts: 6748
Location: Echuca
Possibly time to knock this thread on the head , as in lock ?

_________________
The problem with Socialism is, you eventually run out of other people's money.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 08, 2012 7:57 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 14, 2007 6:10 pm
Posts: 33618
Location: COMFORTABLY DISSATISFIED
H&A ban imminent
Jon Ralph wrote:
CARLTON is aware it will have to hand Heath Scotland a home-and-away suspension for his January brawl, as the AFL examines transcripts of his assault case.

The Blues and AFL initially were at loggerheads, with the league demanding heavy punishment and Carlton pondering a suspension during the NAB Cup.

AFL investigations officer Brett Clothier, who has three other investigations under way, has the transcripts of last month's hearing in which Scotland received a two-year good behaviour bond.

When Clothier gets back to the Blues, they will agree on a penalty that sets an example against violence, with Carlton aware that must be stronger than a fine and NAB Cup suspension.

Now we're going to be forced to 'compromise' with the AFL, and our initial decision to stubbornly dig in our heels is going to look all the more stupid.

_________________
WADA medical director Dr Alan Vernec describes Essendon* FC drug case as biggest scandal in team sport the world of sport has seen. #WC2WB

#GUILTY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 08, 2012 11:17 am 
Offline
Bert Deacon
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2007 12:23 pm
Posts: 506
Isn't the criminal system for these matters not the kangaroo court that is the tribunal. If it is a serious matter then he goes to gaol and doesn't play.

Perhaps Anderson should just get personally involved in dispensing justice again. Judge Dread eat your heart out.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 08, 2012 12:25 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 7:13 pm
Posts: 21075
Location: Missing Kouta
Donstuie wrote:
Now we're going to be forced to 'compromise' with the AFL, and our initial decision to stubbornly dig in our heels is going to look all the more stupid.

Nothing stubborn about the club not going off half cocked and suspending Scotland from day one.

The hand wringers and Caroline Wilson will bring up the Saints sacking Jason Gram to say what we should have done. :wink: :screwy:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 08, 2012 2:15 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 14, 2007 6:10 pm
Posts: 33618
Location: COMFORTABLY DISSATISFIED
Kouta wrote:
Donstuie wrote:
Now we're going to be forced to 'compromise' with the AFL, and our initial decision to stubbornly dig in our heels is going to look all the more stupid.

Nothing stubborn about the club not going off half cocked and suspending Scotland from day one.

I'd have much preferred the club make a bold statement regarding the behaviour of players without the need for AFL intervention, instead of trying to convince them "it was no big deal" and making a fool of themselves in the process.

_________________
WADA medical director Dr Alan Vernec describes Essendon* FC drug case as biggest scandal in team sport the world of sport has seen. #WC2WB

#GUILTY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 08, 2012 2:38 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 7:03 pm
Posts: 4251
Location: Around the Corner
Agreed donstuie. It was a no-brainer to rub him out for a couple early on and be done with it.

Like it or not, the die has been cast in this respect. If blokes are getting club imposed bans for taking a sleeping tablet, ending up in court after king hitting someone is the minimum requirement.

My only major concern is the lack of HBF types we have on the list to cover for him.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 08, 2012 9:29 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 25157
Location: Bondi Beach
Punter22 wrote:
Agreed donstuie. It was a no-brainer to rub him out for a couple early on and be done with it.

Like it or not, the die has been cast in this respect. If blokes are getting club imposed bans for taking a sleeping tablet, ending up in court after king hitting someone is the minimum requirement.

My only major concern is the lack of HBF types we have on the list to cover for him.


You're a funny bastard Punter....good one. :lol:

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 09, 2012 9:32 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 7:03 pm
Posts: 4251
Location: Around the Corner
bondiblue wrote:

You're a funny bastard Punter....good one. :lol:


Don't know about the funny bit... :wink:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 09, 2012 6:39 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 25157
Location: Bondi Beach
Punter22 wrote:
bondiblue wrote:

You're a funny bastard Punter....good one. :lol:


Don't know about the funny bit... :wink:


Maybe funny looking :idea:

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 09, 2012 7:39 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 7:03 pm
Posts: 4251
Location: Around the Corner
bondiblue wrote:
Punter22 wrote:
bondiblue wrote:

You're a funny bastard Punter....good one. :lol:


Don't know about the funny bit... :wink:


Maybe funny looking :idea:


Who have you been speaking to??? :oops:

As a side issue, why haven't they announced this yet? Two week holiday, he's a very naughty boy, been taught a lesson etc etc


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 09, 2012 11:31 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 3:39 pm
Posts: 1703
Location: Darwin
Was it really a "King Hit" (ie punching someone who is not aware that it is coming). I ask because I have seen and heard media reports talking about a "king hit" when the footage clearly shows two people going toe to toe thumping one another - clearly not a king hit by any definition I have heard. Also heard Robbo on TV refer to a "king hit" seemingly thinking that this referred to a knock out punch regardless of it being amongst a flurry of punches by both persons involved.

Didn't Scotlands alleged punch occur during an altercation where the other party had assaulted his brother? Would like to hear more before passing judgement.

_________________
“Before you criticise someone, you should walk a mile in their shoes. That way, when you criticise them, you're a mile a way and you have their shoes."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Nov 10, 2012 4:28 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 25157
Location: Bondi Beach
I haven't seen footage of the stand up fight like you have NT, but I did see the 'king hit'.
Looked like a 'king hit' in that IIRC Scotland approached the group of 3 (?) guys, and he threw a punch at one of them, and the recipient didn't look like he was expecting it. Scotland looked so short the recipient probably didn't see the dwarf. Didn't look like the punch was aimed to kill, but to shake up the other fella and lethim know Scotto's brother had fearless back up.

I don't know what to make of it, because there's more to the story than the 10 seconds I've seen of it.

What I do know is that if someone had been very nasty towards my brother and my brother didn't seserve the violent treatment he received from 1 or more, I'd go in and support him...with a packed punch..probably...probably worse, I'd arrange for some troops to come in and do the dirty work....but then again I don';t know if I'd have the control to restrain myself...and I don't have a brother.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Last edited by bondiblue on Sun Nov 11, 2012 9:08 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 231 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Majestic-12 [Bot] and 49 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group