Juanita Jones wrote:
Synbad wrote:
The Rhino wrote:
All well and good rhetorically.
The same people calling for us to be ruthless and win at all costs are the same ones from last season wondering why we kept Jamo on during the Eagles game, or played Waite whilst injured, or brought Curnow back on in the Saints game, or bemoan why we only "flog" the bottom sides, whilst overlooking that we played four quarters against the top sides every time.
Can't have it both ways.
funny!
lame players don't win games!
trying not to get hurt before the finals is weak!
ruthless is what should have been the mantra against St kilda.
if a fit player got injured during that game its part of any game !
playing crippled is not!
not training when it rains is not even ruthless! its normal!
different!
you need a hard edge to win flags!
Were the Dawks ruthless when they rested half their team against the shockers a few years back?
If Judd got injured in the Saints game you would have gone ballistic that we played him in a nuff nuff game.
is this before or after they proved to the competition and themselves they can win a flag and crush a side that has humiliated they before the football world for a decade?
you get an injury and all players still should run out there the next week with full belief!
cottonball belief when you have achieved nothing to write home about is no recipe for success!.
killing sides you should and have buried you time and time again does!
we are not there yet but we act like we are!
go out! play the game fierce! if you sustain an injury that's bad luck!you still have a competition with what you have and you play it out and gain respect and confidence.
picking and choosing when to go and when not to go collectively does not gain you that!
small meaningful things make big things.
weak things are always weak!
hawthorn should let us win!
Clarkson should let the fev kick his century!
you believe that?