Pafloyul wrote:
Synbad wrote:
Warnock is a risk... but the dividends we stand to gain are massive and could not go past that.
Maybe, but I have my doubts. Then again, when was the last time we gave up one of our own for the overall good of the club, and I'm not talking Judd. It's all one way and it is unsustainable for want of a better word. It weakens the lower end of your list disastrously at best. At worst the player turns out inadequate for your needs to top it off. They have us chasing after what’s-his-name from Freo in the paper now.
We made a mistake not trading Lance - it's too late to trade Fev now - if we were to do it it should have been done at the end of 06.
You talk about not trading for picks...I agree it's something we should be trying to do but who should we be trading?
I still think we should try to keep developing our own and even add more picks in.
It seems every trade period I get scared we'll trade picks away...last year it was Kerr...who will it be this year?
FWIW I approve of the Warnock trade based on what I've seen of him...I don't think many Carlton supporters have seen him play. He showed enormous ability during 2007 when Sandilands was out injured.
You never seem to have all ruckmen up and running at once so it is good to have four rucks on the list.
I just hope we don't go thinking we're one trade away from being a top 4 team/challenger...you should back your recruiters and development coaches in and keep the first round pick.
I look at a team like Adelaide and see what they've done without high picks - they have backed their recruiters/development staff and are building a very deep list, all without early picks.