Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Fri Jun 27, 2025 9:34 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 6401 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79 ... 321  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Sakc Malthouse!!!
PostPosted: Wed Apr 16, 2014 2:27 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
just on chris yarran... he has a long way to go and he realises it... he isnt over the line still....

very few are ...

jeffy is miles behind him..... hopefully he turns it around for himself...

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sakc Malthouse!!!
PostPosted: Wed Apr 16, 2014 2:32 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:53 am
Posts: 17519
Location: Left Cuckistan
So can I just confirm that we now want a complete top to bottom review of everything about the club, except for Malthouse?

_________________
The only way for some people to understand is for them to be on the receiving end

Left wing moralists
In self serving denial
They shit me no end


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sakc Malthouse!!!
PostPosted: Wed Apr 16, 2014 2:33 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
Effes wrote:
Synbad wrote:
Ok my words ..

now your words.....

"Will MM allow the club to appoint a senior assistant and have a greater say in things?"


Mick wants shit coaches does he? Theyre your words.
Who could we have had that Mick said no too... apart from the guys that were here before ?
We went after Ling / OBree / McLeod .. they didnt think what we offered was worth it.

Why do you think ... think about this very carefully effes... because you will be tested... for wishful thinking......

why do you think.... we have capuano and barker for 5 or 6 years?
a)because mick loves crap assistants? (think who collingwood set him up with and he didnt have a problem with them being there)
b)because theyre his friends and he brought them to the club?
c)because we are penny pinching.....??

Too much big footy....... stay away from it youll rot your brain......


No surprise Brown and Richardson didn't stay...they're much better than what MM brought with him...(Wiley)

The quality of coaching staff went backwards when Richardson and Brown departed and MM came in.



actually some of that is money based effes.
saving money......

richardson and brown havent been main coaches in flag sides.. and learnt their stuff in collingwoods system.. where they were never going to nudge out malthouse or brown.. and have since moved on.

we will see how great richardson is now.

will he last ten years and win a flag???

only time will tell

the % ers are not with him.. and u know i look at the % instead of the unsustainable...

Lets not call him a coaching genius yet??... his chance is now... good bloke!!!.. but hasnt proven anything in his coaching career apart from he is a good assistant coach...

Lets just see...

Brown?.. im not sure what hes doing right now.. i doubt he is revolutionising the game.. what do you think??... fill me in if you know something.....

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sakc Malthouse!!!
PostPosted: Wed Apr 16, 2014 2:35 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:37 pm
Posts: 19529
Location: afl.virtualsports.com.au
Remember this is what we're getting with any review unless he changes

viewtopic.php?p=1310019#p1310019

Quote:
He was going off his head a couple of seasons ago and an assistant coach told him to re-focus. He sacked him.
Since then, there is a rule in the coaches box that no-one is allowed to look at Mick when he's going off his head. Does that sound like the behaviour of a logical person?


viewtopic.php?p=1309996#p1309996

Quote:
I talk to several of his previous assistant coaches and most tell me he's a self absorbed fruit cake.
What do you know that they don't?

_________________
"You are being watched. The government has a secret system. A machine that spies on you every hour of every day. I know because I built it." - Finch


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 16, 2014 2:37 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2008 6:46 am
Posts: 28227
Heavs wrote:
So can I just confirm that we now want a complete top to bottom review of everything about the club, except for Malthouse?

Complete top to bottom review should happen, but won't happen.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sakc Malthouse!!!
PostPosted: Wed Apr 16, 2014 2:39 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:37 pm
Posts: 19529
Location: afl.virtualsports.com.au
Synbad wrote:
Effes wrote:
Synbad wrote:
Ok my words ..

now your words.....

"Will MM allow the club to appoint a senior assistant and have a greater say in things?"


Mick wants shit coaches does he? Theyre your words.
Who could we have had that Mick said no too... apart from the guys that were here before ?
We went after Ling / OBree / McLeod .. they didnt think what we offered was worth it.

Why do you think ... think about this very carefully effes... because you will be tested... for wishful thinking......

why do you think.... we have capuano and barker for 5 or 6 years?
a)because mick loves crap assistants? (think who collingwood set him up with and he didnt have a problem with them being there)
b)because theyre his friends and he brought them to the club?
c)because we are penny pinching.....??

Too much big footy....... stay away from it youll rot your brain......


No surprise Brown and Richardson didn't stay...they're much better than what MM brought with him...(Wiley)

The quality of coaching staff went backwards when Richardson and Brown departed and MM came in.



actually some of that is money based effes.
saving money......

richardson and brown havent been main coaches in flag sides.. and learnt their stuff in collingwoods system.. where they were never going to nudge out malthouse or brown.. and have since moved on.

we will see how great richardson is now.

will he last ten years and win a flag???

only time will tell

the % ers are not with him.. and u know i look at the % instead of the unsustainable...

Lets not call him a coaching genius yet??... his chance is now... good bloke!!!.. but hasnt proven anything in his coaching career apart from he is a good assistant coach...

Lets just see...

Brown?.. im not sure what hes doing right now.. i doubt he is revolutionising the game.. what do you think??... fill me in if you know something.....


Paid Richardson's contract while he helped Port progress. :lol:

Brown is at North under Scott - bolstered their lineup with Brown and Leigh Tudor over summer.

Some coaches don't feel threatened...they actually seek out quality.

_________________
"You are being watched. The government has a secret system. A machine that spies on you every hour of every day. I know because I built it." - Finch


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sakc Malthouse!!!
PostPosted: Wed Apr 16, 2014 2:40 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
Heavs wrote:
So can I just confirm that we now want a complete top to bottom review of everything about the club, except for Malthouse?

no i want a top to bottom review

but i would think the review wouldnt destroy malthouses reputation.....

im not sure it will say he ruined carlton.. and the list

the review is one thing....

the other is im the messenger in whats going on heaves.... i know ur not overtly intelligent.. and u dont get alot... but all im expressing is whats going on.

that doesnt mean i dont want a review of the club from top to bottom.

u know ... i dont really hang out with alot of stupid people.... yes.. u can call me elitist... though i know some i dont really put my self at the point where i have to listen to their stupidity...
in here im stuck with all kinds of people... from the thinkers like moshe cret doc gws etc// rhino etc... to the really unintelligent who cant separate that im trying to get people to understand whats going on around the club atm... by whats been said internally by someone who has a few decades of experience including recent flags etc... and my yearning for a review.

youre really not a smart guy are you Heavs?? do you feel insulted by my remark knowing the stupidity of what u just said???

u know.. i dont usually knock about with the dim... im stuck with u... but i respect you right to be here.. dont get me wrong... just cant respect the mind and thought process.

any more comments and questions by you heaves??

ill do my best to answer you

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sakc Malthouse!!!
PostPosted: Wed Apr 16, 2014 2:41 pm 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 20, 2007 2:57 pm
Posts: 5338
Location: Melbourne
redback wrote:
Why Collingwood Supporters Dislike Mick Malthouse
I used to respect Mick Malthouse, says Adam Hallinan. As the coach of Collingwood he delivered our 15th premiership, which we had been waiting 20 years for.
Opposition supporters just don’t get it. They are saying that we are average to treat a coach that delivered us a premiership with disdain. Let me try and explain our point of view.
In 2009 the now famous succession plan was signed off by Mick that would see him become the director of coaching for three years following the conclusion of the 2011 season, with Nathan Buckley taking over as senior coach. At that point in time Malthouse was the longest serving coach at a club ever without winning a premiership (10 years). In giving Mick another guaranteed 2 years as senior coach the ‘Pies were doing good by Mick. Yes we seemed to be in a healthy state at the time, but nobody looks back on losing preliminary finals as a success (or Grand Finals either going further back).
Under the plan, Nathan Buckley arrived at Collingwood for the 2010 as an assistant coach. Collingwood won the 2010 premiership, thanks mainly to the performance of the forward line, where intense pressure was applied to the opposition restricting the exit of the foot ball from Collingwood’s forward 50. The forward line coach in 2010 was…..Buckley. Coincidence?


LOL....

_________________
James Hird and Essendon* FC - #FOREVERDRUGCHEATS


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sakc Malthouse!!!
PostPosted: Wed Apr 16, 2014 2:47 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
effes not too sure what u understand re the contracts.

we didnt pay our richardson except some change

he was picked up by port...

its like saying port are paying for richardson now.. because he was contracted.

even ratts getting a job meant we paid the balance.

i know youre a smart guy because i know you personally...youre smart a thinker and very bright.... but please dont fall into the trap of blind hatred.....

it will just make u sound dumb.....

think about things ......

put them into context

you cant argue we have a culture of laziness and softness

we dont beat the top teams.... we usually beat richmond.. and the gentle teams

we fall over at crucial hurdles over and over again

other teams have been busy enhancing their lists.. and we dont have much coming through so we are slipping....

effort when they find effort we will worry about your gameplan

nothing new in footy

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sakc Malthouse!!!
PostPosted: Wed Apr 16, 2014 2:50 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:37 pm
Posts: 19529
Location: afl.virtualsports.com.au
Synbad wrote:
effes not too sure what u understand re the contracts.

we didnt pay our richardson except some change

he was picked up by port...

its like saying port are paying for richardson now.. because he was contracted.

even ratts getting a job meant we paid the balance.

i know youre a smart guy because i know you personally...youre smart a thinker and very bright.... but please dont fall into the trap of blind hatred.....

it will just make u sound dumb.....

think about things ......

put them into context

you cant argue we have a culture of laziness and softness

we dont beat the top teams.... we usually beat richmond.. and the gentle teams

we fall over at crucial hurdles over and over again

other teams have been busy enhancing their lists.. and we dont have much coming through so we are slipping....

effort when they find effort we will worry about your gameplan

nothing new in footy


I just want to know - will MM be subject to a review like all other aspects of the club (if there even is a review) - will it look at assistants? Will it look at how coaches have been appointed in the past?

_________________
"You are being watched. The government has a secret system. A machine that spies on you every hour of every day. I know because I built it." - Finch


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sakc Malthouse!!!
PostPosted: Wed Apr 16, 2014 2:53 pm 
Offline
formerly Virgin Blue

Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2010 10:40 am
Posts: 1628
Synbad wrote:
just on chris yarran... he has a long way to go and he realises it... he isnt over the line still....

very few are ...

jeffy is miles behind him..... hopefully he turns it around for himself...


Jeff can start by hardening the @#$%&! up

Everytime he backs off a contest it is like a turnover to the other side's benefit

Gibbs goes in the basket too when he opts to prop back and tackle instead of going the hard ball


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sakc Malthouse!!!
PostPosted: Wed Apr 16, 2014 2:58 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
Gavin brown went to a club with an open cheque book to find the best coaches available across the land effes.
He now resides and occupies a place in the pantheon of modern coaches ..... Arden street.

Well im one who would love a review.... i doubt they can make malthouse look bad in any review.. considering what he said on record ... board minutes to the board starting from pretty early last year

yes they can look at his gameplan.. but how do u judge a gameplan that won a flag a couple of years ago... with players commited.. to two years with players that have shown little commitment and resistance over a decade???

dont get me wrong.. if an independent review of the club was made from top to bottom was made im sure malthouse would be looked at.

but im not sure the auditors would have your kind of fetish in the role mick has played around the club failing for the best part of two decades.....

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sakc Malthouse!!!
PostPosted: Wed Apr 16, 2014 3:02 pm 
Offline
Vale 1953-2020
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 11, 2005 1:23 am
Posts: 11671
redback wrote:
Why Collingwood Supporters Dislike Mick Malthouse
I used to respect Mick Malthouse, says Adam Hallinan. As the coach of Collingwood he delivered our 15th premiership, which we had been waiting 20 years for.
Opposition supporters just don’t get it. They are saying that we are average to treat a coach that delivered us a premiership with disdain. Let me try and explain our point of view.
In 2009 the now famous succession plan was signed off by Mick that would see him become the director of coaching for three years following the conclusion of the 2011 season, with Nathan Buckley taking over as senior coach. At that point in time Malthouse was the longest serving coach at a club ever without winning a premiership (10 years). In giving Mick another guaranteed 2 years as senior coach the ‘Pies were doing good by Mick. Yes we seemed to be in a healthy state at the time, but nobody looks back on losing preliminary finals as a success (or Grand Finals either going further back).
Under the plan, Nathan Buckley arrived at Collingwood for the 2010 as an assistant coach. Collingwood won the 2010 premiership, thanks mainly to the performance of the forward line, where intense pressure was applied to the opposition restricting the exit of the foot ball from Collingwood’s forward 50. The forward line coach in 2010 was…..Buckley. Coincidence?

Collingwood supporters dislike Mick Malthouse because they're a bunch of toothless feral unemployed uneducated slack-arse morons..........






















What's YOUR excuse?

_________________
Never argue with idiots. They drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience!!!

After Monday and Tuesday, even the calendar says W T F .........
Visit http://fromthemoshpit.com/


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sakc Malthouse!!!
PostPosted: Wed Apr 16, 2014 3:02 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
effes youre putting the cart before the hoirse..

im sure if there was an independent review of the whole footy club malthouse and coaching would be looked at....

not sure of the point of this... everybody would be ....

but im also sure he would come out smelling roses... because
a) he didnt appoint himself
b) is on record with the only honest list analysis
c) his record is pretty good


im sure others might have alot of criticising due to how they have gone about things and their practices including choosing coaches over the year...

theyre two separate issues...

i know what youre saying.....

please understand what im saying....

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 16, 2014 3:04 pm 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 20, 2007 2:57 pm
Posts: 5338
Location: Melbourne
Rexy wrote:
Effes wrote:
Time for a return to smashball

I've got no doubt Mick is now working on a new methodology for the years ahead.
There will be a playing list cull in Sept/Oct, but the rebuild has already begun.


And Mick stated as much on FC the other night without using the word 'rebuild'.
When asked about rebuilding, his answer was something like' We brought in 4 first rounders last year in Everrit, Docherty, Thomas and Cripps'.

_________________
James Hird and Essendon* FC - #FOREVERDRUGCHEATS


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sakc Malthouse!!!
PostPosted: Wed Apr 16, 2014 3:09 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 30, 2013 7:11 pm
Posts: 3858
Location: Μάνη Ελλάδα
Synbad wrote:

Well im one who would love a review.... i doubt they can make malthouse look bad in any review.. considering what he said on record ... board minutes to the board starting from pretty early last year


I assume that a review of Malthouse and his actions and inactions will focus on his time at Carlton (ie commencing after he returned from his book launching tour in 2012)

Why would a review look at Malthouse's coaching record prior to arriving at carlton? How would that be relevant?

One would assume that Malthouse was recruited because of his previous record.

i wonder in a proper top-down review, how long Malthouse can protect his mate Wiley for? One would assume that the position of coaching and development DIRECTOR will also be reviewed and put under the microscope.

Maybe a review will be a typical carlton response - lets get rid of Barker and Capuanno. we just noticed that they have been here too long

So have some of thee board members - they seem like permanent fixtures at the club...

Oligarchical Statues.

_________________
Vice President, International Extreme Sarcasm Society (IESS)


Last edited by Cretylus on Wed Apr 16, 2014 3:13 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sakc Malthouse!!!
PostPosted: Wed Apr 16, 2014 3:11 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 23, 2009 8:30 pm
Posts: 23924
Effes wrote:
Synbad wrote:
Effes wrote:
Synbad wrote:
Ok my words ..

now your words.....

"Will MM allow the club to appoint a senior assistant and have a greater say in things?"


Mick wants shit coaches does he? Theyre your words.
Who could we have had that Mick said no too... apart from the guys that were here before ?
We went after Ling / OBree / McLeod .. they didnt think what we offered was worth it.

Why do you think ... think about this very carefully effes... because you will be tested... for wishful thinking......

why do you think.... we have capuano and barker for 5 or 6 years?
a)because mick loves crap assistants? (think who collingwood set him up with and he didnt have a problem with them being there)
b)because theyre his friends and he brought them to the club?
c)because we are penny pinching.....??

Too much big footy....... stay away from it youll rot your brain......


No surprise Brown and Richardson didn't stay...they're much better than what MM brought with him...(Wiley)

The quality of coaching staff went backwards when Richardson and Brown departed and MM came in.



actually some of that is money based effes.
saving money......

richardson and brown havent been main coaches in flag sides.. and learnt their stuff in collingwoods system.. where they were never going to nudge out malthouse or brown.. and have since moved on.

we will see how great richardson is now.

will he last ten years and win a flag???

only time will tell

the % ers are not with him.. and u know i look at the % instead of the unsustainable...

Lets not call him a coaching genius yet??... his chance is now... good bloke!!!.. but hasnt proven anything in his coaching career apart from he is a good assistant coach...

Lets just see...

Brown?.. im not sure what hes doing right now.. i doubt he is revolutionising the game.. what do you think??... fill me in if you know something.....


Paid Richardson's contract while he helped Port progress. :lol:

Brown is at North under Scott - bolstered their lineup with Brown and Leigh Tudor over summer.

Some coaches don't feel threatened...they actually seek out quality.

and we won't attract the best and brightest while MM reigns at our club.

_________________
That’s not a political statement — it’s a harsh reality, and we must act,” she said. “He is a clear and present danger to the things that keep us strong and free. I support impeachment.”


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sakc Malthouse!!!
PostPosted: Wed Apr 16, 2014 3:17 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
Cretylus wrote:
Synbad wrote:

Well im one who would love a review.... i doubt they can make malthouse look bad in any review.. considering what he said on record ... board minutes to the board starting from pretty early last year


I assume that a review of Malthouse and his actions and inactions will focus on his time at Carlton (ie commencing after he returned from his book launching tour in 2012)

Why would a review look at Malthouse's coaching record prior to arriving at carlton? How would that be relevant?

One would assume that Malthouse was recruited because of his previous record.

i wonder in a proper top-down review, how long Malthouse can protect his mate Wiley for? One would assume that the position of coaching and development DIRECTOR will also be reviewed and put under the microscope.

Maybe a review will be a typical carlton response - lets get rid of Barker and Capuanno. we just noticed that they have been here too long

actually wouldnt start till after the book review cretylus.. as u well know ... u cant be eployed till u commence work.... at the time of the book review he wasnt employed by the carlton footy club... u might as well begin his review of his time at the carlton footy club when he played his first game wth stkilda.

look i just told them all.. away from in here i only know smart people and not trippers...... why are u ruining it ????....

or are u just playing the devils advocate... or the town fool or something???

why would someones review begin from before they begin their contract????

i wanna be a hermit!!!!... that way i dont get to deal with this kind of nonsense

ok for the last time... when ur job starts on 1-1-20 it doesnt begin on the 29-12-19

when u want to point blame u need to look elsewhere....

Thats how the world goes.. an uve done exactly the same thing....

u dont commence your stuff before u commence....

its supernatural

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sakc Malthouse!!!
PostPosted: Wed Apr 16, 2014 3:31 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 30, 2013 7:11 pm
Posts: 3858
Location: Μάνη Ελλάδα
Synbad wrote:
Cretylus wrote:
Synbad wrote:

Well im one who would love a review.... i doubt they can make malthouse look bad in any review.. considering what he said on record ... board minutes to the board starting from pretty early last year


I assume that a review of Malthouse and his actions and inactions will focus on his time at Carlton (ie commencing after he returned from his book launching tour in 2012)

Why would a review look at Malthouse's coaching record prior to arriving at carlton? How would that be relevant?

One would assume that Malthouse was recruited because of his previous record.

i wonder in a proper top-down review, how long Malthouse can protect his mate Wiley for? One would assume that the position of coaching and development DIRECTOR will also be reviewed and put under the microscope.

Maybe a review will be a typical carlton response - lets get rid of Barker and Capuanno. we just noticed that they have been here too long


actually wouldnt start till after the book review cretylus.. as u well know ... u cant be eployed till u commence work.... at the time of the book review he wasnt employed by the carlton footy club...l


Robert Wiley was...

he actually started when the players officially started the 2012 preseason (Nov 1)

So I suppose the review of Wiley as director will be over a slightly longer period than Mick as coach.

It would be far simpler to conduct a review that includes a review of Mick's book review and launch...

The sausage sizzles dont need to be reviewed in my view.

Maybe the sausage sizzles can be handed over to the Young Carlton Professionals Think tank to analyse and try to improve for the future when we win a premiership.

_________________
Vice President, International Extreme Sarcasm Society (IESS)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Sakc Malthouse!!!
PostPosted: Wed Apr 16, 2014 3:38 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
Cret,,,, he would have had him as his confidante.
The club would have made him whatever...
if the club had alot of money they would have splurged on the development coach and taken the headmaster like they had the year before
You need to understand ... the club makes decisions...
The club can make anyone development guy and put Wiley in the box with mm cos mm wants him.
But the club not having money makes Wiley wear 2 hats.

This club doesnt have the money people think they have..

Your 21 million in the red.. was a write down by collo.

Basically the 21 million in the red we were in wasnt 21m in real terms but in paper terms.
Thats not putting the real debt to retirement....

Weve put around 3 mill away...
The rest was a write down and money given to us by the AFL to get out of PP...and a one million we never paid back to the AFL

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 6401 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79 ... 321  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot], Keithy, keogh, windy and 37 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group