Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Sat May 10, 2025 4:28 pm

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2166 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74 ... 109  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Aug 30, 2012 9:12 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 17951
BlueMark wrote:
BV. Malthouse took a very average team and took them to four Grand finals and consistant finals appearences.



I dont understand that argument Mark. If it was an average team, who's fault is that?
The senior coach is responsible for player and list development.

The reality is Malthouse had 14 years at Collingwood. More than enough opportunity to build his own team. He won 1 grand final in 14 years at the best resourced club in the country.
If thats the criteria, Mark Williams is twice the coach Malthouse is.

If you're happy with Malthouse, great. Me, I'd like to see oyur club get off their arses and put everyone through a thorough interview process.
Why is everyone so scared of that?
Is it because Malthouse may not be the best candidate?

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 30, 2012 9:15 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 17951
edit

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Last edited by Blue Vain on Thu Aug 30, 2012 9:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 30, 2012 9:16 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 23, 2009 8:30 pm
Posts: 23911
teagueyubeauty wrote:
Malthouse is turning me off with his constant dribble he's coming up with lately. Wife's crying, kids crying, putting his head in the noise again blah blah blah.

FFS, HTFU.

Doesn't sound like someone 100% committed, or wanting to be.....

I'm feeling it could be the biggest mistake ever.....


He could just be a hammy actor? over cooking it? :razz:

_________________
That’s not a political statement — it’s a harsh reality, and we must act,” she said. “He is a clear and present danger to the things that keep us strong and free. I support impeachment.”


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 30, 2012 9:16 pm 
Offline
formerly cj69

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:52 am
Posts: 7893
BV I understand you don't like him and thats fine but anyway you look at it his record is fairly impressive.

Premierships are bloody hard to win and getting harder and he has three.

Has any side he ever coached bottomed out?

_________________
#NewBlues beginning 25th August 2015


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 30, 2012 9:21 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:37 pm
Posts: 19228
Location: afl.virtualsports.com.au
ThePsychologist wrote:
BV I understand you don't like him and thats fine but anyway you look at it his record is fairly impressive.

Premierships are bloody hard to win and getting harder and he has three.

Has any side he ever coached bottomed out?


You would have to say given the resources available to each coach that Choco is more impressive?

2005 they bottomed out/tanked.

_________________
"You are being watched. The government has a secret system. A machine that spies on you every hour of every day. I know because I built it." - Finch


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 30, 2012 9:22 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 2:09 pm
Posts: 17210
club29 wrote:
Pokie money is just the sort of money that could sway the Roos family..................not.


You don't shop at Woolworths then I gather? Or set foot in one of 283 ALH venues throughout Australia? One thing the Roos family would be aware of is the philanthropy of Bruce Mathieson which goes largely unnoticed compared to his other business/pleasure pursuits because it doesn't sell news.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 30, 2012 9:22 pm 
Offline
formerly cj69

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:52 am
Posts: 7893
Effes wrote:
ThePsychologist wrote:
BV I understand you don't like him and thats fine but anyway you look at it his record is fairly impressive.

Premierships are bloody hard to win and getting harder and he has three.

Has any side he ever coached bottomed out?


You would have to say given the resources available to each coach that Choco is more impressive?

2005 they bottomed out/tanked.


I reckon Chocco is a bloody good coach as well.

_________________
#NewBlues beginning 25th August 2015


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 30, 2012 9:25 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 17951
ThePsychologist wrote:
BV I understand you don't like him and thats fine but anyway you look at it his record is fairly impressive.

Premierships are bloody hard to win and getting harder and he has three.

Has any side he ever coached bottomed out?


i remember the same thing being said about Pagan.
impressive record. Sides dont bottom out.

Its not about me not liking individuals. its about me wanting us to do the right thing for a change.
FFS, we have an opportunity to finally do things properly. To actually set up a comprehensive interview process and give ourselves every opportunity to get things right.
We bemoan board members not being accountable to the members. we bemoan the club looking after their mates. And the one time we have the chance to do it right, we shit ourselves and go back to the quick fix.

Why cant we interview Malthouse along with a dozen others? Whats the problem?

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 30, 2012 9:28 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 17951
Effes wrote:
ThePsychologist wrote:
BV I understand you don't like him and thats fine but anyway you look at it his record is fairly impressive.

Premierships are bloody hard to win and getting harder and he has three.

Has any side he ever coached bottomed out?


You would have to say given the resources available to each coach that Choco is more impressive?

2005 they bottomed out/tanked.


Absolutely.
I'd love to see Williams get the opportunity to apply.

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 30, 2012 9:29 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:37 pm
Posts: 19228
Location: afl.virtualsports.com.au
ThePsychologist wrote:
Effes wrote:
ThePsychologist wrote:
BV I understand you don't like him and thats fine but anyway you look at it his record is fairly impressive.

Premierships are bloody hard to win and getting harder and he has three.

Has any side he ever coached bottomed out?


You would have to say given the resources available to each coach that Choco is more impressive?

2005 they bottomed out/tanked.


I reckon Chocco is a bloody good coach as well.


He should get a lot of the credit for the development of the GWS youngsters.

Why wouldn't we be pursuing him just as hard (if not harder) than Malthouse?

Or put all the candidates through an interview process?

Comes back to the trash that Sticks is talking

Quote:
He said the club could not afford a rookie coach because its best players were running out of time.

"If we're going to strike, we need to in the next couple of years."


Why does it have to be in the next couple of years? The best clubs strive to be successful all the time...Geelong/Sydney - they don't limit themselves by setting a window. :roll:

Geelong continue drafting youngsters and back themselves in to develop them. Most people thought Geelong's 'window' was shut after GAJ left but then they go and win another flag (on the back of a lot of younger players).

Tony Shaw talks shit most of the time but he was right when he said

"It's going to be based on some ego-driven board members who want to cover their backside by getting someone with a massive name into that club to cover their backside over the next three years."

_________________
"You are being watched. The government has a secret system. A machine that spies on you every hour of every day. I know because I built it." - Finch


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 30, 2012 9:32 pm 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:52 am
Posts: 9098
Location: Nth Fitzroy
DocSherrin wrote:
club29 wrote:
Pokie money is just the sort of money that could sway the Roos family..................not.


You don't shop at Woolworths then I gather? Or set foot in one of 283 ALH venues throughout Australia? One thing the Roos family would be aware of is the philanthropy of Bruce Mathieson which goes largely unnoticed compared to his other business/pleasure pursuits because it doesn't sell news.


I do shop at woolworths. Not sure what the other thing is.

You told me that Roos wouldnt be swayed by money. I thought pokie money would be even worse. Roos being a little 'new age'.

I was trying to side with you and you turned on me.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 30, 2012 9:32 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 21, 2005 5:15 pm
Posts: 7275
Blue Vain wrote:
ThePsychologist wrote:
BV I understand you don't like him and thats fine but anyway you look at it his record is fairly impressive.

Premierships are bloody hard to win and getting harder and he has three.

Has any side he ever coached bottomed out?


i remember the same thing being said about Pagan.
impressive record. Sides dont bottom out.

Its not about me not liking individuals. its about me wanting us to do the right thing for a change.
FFS, we have an opportunity to finally do things properly. To actually set up a comprehensive interview process and give ourselves every opportunity to get things right.
We bemoan board members not being accountable to the members. we bemoan the club looking after their mates. And the one time we have the chance to do it right, we shit ourselves and go back to the quick fix.

Why cant we interview Malthouse along with a dozen others? Whats the problem?

I don't agree with your comments about Malthouse but you're spot on in regards to the highlighted bit...

_________________
“I would rather have questions that can't be answered than answers that can't be questioned.” ― Richard Feynman


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 30, 2012 9:34 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Sun May 27, 2007 1:48 pm
Posts: 1556
Location: Under the Earth`s Sun...now.
Blue Vain wrote:

If you're happy with Malthouse, great. Me, I'd like to see oyur club get off their arses and put everyone through a thorough interview process.
Why is everyone so scared of that?
Is it because Malthouse may not be the best candidate?

Agree BV, but a proper process will never happen with Sticks and this board.
Would have been good timing for him to walk and not let his mate take all the blame.
The place needs fumigating.


Last edited by Princes Park Whistler on Thu Aug 30, 2012 9:35 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 30, 2012 9:35 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 21411
Location: North of the border
They should chuck a bucket load of money at John Longmire he has rebuilt the swans in 2 to 3 years everyone expected them to bottom out once Roos left
Better prospect than Malthouse

_________________
If you allow the Government to change the Laws in an emergency
They will create an Emergency to change the Laws


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 30, 2012 9:36 pm 
Offline
Laurie Kerr

Joined: Wed Jul 08, 2009 7:38 pm
Posts: 135
Blue Vain wrote:
ThePsychologist wrote:
BV I understand you don't like him and thats fine but anyway you look at it his record is fairly impressive.

Premierships are bloody hard to win and getting harder and he has three.

Has any side he ever coached bottomed out?


i remember the same thing being said about Pagan.
impressive record. Sides dont bottom out.

Its not about me not liking individuals. its about me wanting us to do the right thing for a change.
FFS, we have an opportunity to finally do things properly. To actually set up a comprehensive interview process and give ourselves every opportunity to get things right.
We bemoan board members not being accountable to the members. we bemoan the club looking after their mates. And the one time we have the chance to do it right, we shit ourselves and go back to the quick fix.

Why cant we interview Malthouse along with a dozen others? Whats the problem?




Sorry have only read the last part of this thread but how do we know that they havent /will interview all candidates ?

on saying that i think the MM deal has been done weeks ago - gut feeling


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 30, 2012 9:39 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:37 pm
Posts: 19228
Location: afl.virtualsports.com.au
Sydney Blue wrote:
They should chuck a bucket load of money at John Longmire he has rebuilt the swans in 2 to 3 years everyone expected them to bottom out once Roos left
Better prospect than Malthouse


I don't know if Leigh Tudor is ambitious or media savvy but he has worked under Roos, Lyon, Longmire, Thompson.

You're right though - do you think the Swans said "Shit Goodesy, Kirky, Hally, Micky are all coming to an end let's try and squeeze a flag out....after that we're [REDACTED]!". Nah they went and drafted Reid, Parker, Jetta etc and through smart trading got Kennedy, McGlynn and Mumford.

I get @#$%&! angry because this club doesn't seem to look at what other clubs have been able to do through smart decision making.

The club suffers from a saviour syndrome.......as though it is still the VFL.

_________________
"You are being watched. The government has a secret system. A machine that spies on you every hour of every day. I know because I built it." - Finch


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 30, 2012 9:41 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 17951
Pecker wrote:
Blue Vain wrote:
ThePsychologist wrote:
BV I understand you don't like him and thats fine but anyway you look at it his record is fairly impressive.

Premierships are bloody hard to win and getting harder and he has three.

Has any side he ever coached bottomed out?


i remember the same thing being said about Pagan.
impressive record. Sides dont bottom out.

Its not about me not liking individuals. its about me wanting us to do the right thing for a change.
FFS, we have an opportunity to finally do things properly. To actually set up a comprehensive interview process and give ourselves every opportunity to get things right.
We bemoan board members not being accountable to the members. we bemoan the club looking after their mates. And the one time we have the chance to do it right, we shit ourselves and go back to the quick fix.

Why cant we interview Malthouse along with a dozen others? Whats the problem?




Sorry have only read the last part of this thread but how do we know that they havent /will interview all candidates ?

on saying that i think the MM deal has been done weeks ago - gut feeling



You seriously believe the club would have interviewed assistant coaches behind Rattens back and the football world didnt know about it?
Nothing happens at Carlton without it being reported in the papers next day. Nothing.

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 30, 2012 9:43 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:37 pm
Posts: 19228
Location: afl.virtualsports.com.au
Pecker wrote:
Sorry have only read the last part of this thread but how do we know that they havent /will interview all candidates ?


Sneaky leakers

Just on sticks.....when he got asked the question: "would ratten have gotten sacked if MM wasn't available", he was thinking to himself how could he best answer this question without admitting that they are after MM, but he couldn't. He simply could not think quickly enough on his feet and thus came out with "that's a hard call". The guy simply is not sharp enough to have that position. You need someone that can look the media in the eye and then immediately say "we had to let go of ratten based on the performance of the club this year - it has nothing to do with MM or anyone else".

Whilst that almost certainly would be a lie, thats what you have to say.

_________________
"You are being watched. The government has a secret system. A machine that spies on you every hour of every day. I know because I built it." - Finch


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 30, 2012 9:43 pm 
Offline
Horrie Clover

Joined: Tue Jun 19, 2007 7:36 pm
Posts: 323
Location: WAGGA WAGGA
Happy to have MM hope he brings Scotty Burns with him to take over in 2 years


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 30, 2012 9:52 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2005 8:39 am
Posts: 7507
Location: Within the Tao except when I am here.
Blue Vain wrote:
BlueMark wrote:
BV. Malthouse took a very average team and took them to four Grand finals and consistant finals appearences.



I dont understand that argument Mark. If it was an average team, who's fault is that?
The senior coach is responsible for player and list development.

The reality is Malthouse had 14 years at Collingwood. More than enough opportunity to build his own team. He won 1 grand final in 14 years at the best resourced club in the country.
If thats the criteria, Mark Williams is twice the coach Malthouse is.

If you're happy with Malthouse, great. Me, I'd like to see oyur club get off their arses and put everyone through a thorough interview process.
Why is everyone so scared of that?
Is it because Malthouse may not be the best candidate?


!st point- Malthouse took over a very ordinary filth outfit and took to it to Grand finals.
2nd point- he them rebuilt that team and got to and won a GF despite never having any real access to lower draft picks
3rd point- tend to agree re interveiw process, however Malthouse has a proven track record in building culture and a hardness in his teams, the very qualities the current list lacks.

_________________
A pessimist sees the difficulty in every opportunity; an optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty" -Winston Churchill

L.M 35-06


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2166 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74 ... 109  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 89 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group