Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Sun May 04, 2025 3:37 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 489 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 ... 25  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Sep 18, 2023 10:34 am 
Offline
Wayne Johnston
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 9:35 am
Posts: 8938
Location: Melbourne
Drewgirl wrote:
I think. Marchbank or Cincotta out. Prefer Marchbank to go out. And Cunningham out - no brainer there. He shouldnt even get another contract let alone be in a prelim.

McKay, Martin - in. Kennedys hard body is required in a prelim. Hollands stays as sub.


We’re gonna need our small - medium defenders against the Lions fleet of small forwards. Cincotta has to stay unless we’re replacing him with another small defender, ie Boyd


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

_________________
:lol: :-D :) :? :( :x :evil:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 18, 2023 10:46 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:32 am
Posts: 10461
GreatEx wrote:
Land of the Giants, huh? ;) fair point about SoS but I'd be seriously worried about the lack of run in that side. Reckon I'd have to drop Pitto, as much as he played Gawn to perfection, maybe we can get away with not bullying OMac, whom I rate. Either that or drop a tall defender for Fisher or Hollands (Doc to HB). Or both!


I think you make good points on Pitto or tall defender. I think Brisbane will include 3 talls - Daniher, Hipwood and Gunston. IMO, Weitering, Kemp and Marchbank stay. MCGovern for Rayner is a good match up as he can go with him in the air. As for Pitto - love big lug, not only does he keep TdK fresh and allows us to use him in key times, but he gives our inside mids first crack. This is a big advantage. Hence my team - fix the forward line and give Charlie the additional support with JSoS/Harry and we will be more potent. When Harry or Charlie move up the ground for the midfield connection, they need JSoS to assist the other in the forward line. This is the model that has worked. TdK is looking better and better as well up forward but he's not there as yet.


Last edited by SurreyBlue on Mon Sep 18, 2023 11:02 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 18, 2023 10:59 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 24662
Location: Bondi Beach
jake_h03 wrote:
Humpers wrote:
Who plays on Charlie Cameron?
He soundly beat Newman earlier in the season and I'm not sure Saad or Docherty would be ideal matchups. Maybe a good reason to bring Boyd in to the side? We don't want to be hearing "Country Roads" by John Denver all night.


Yeah I was thinking the same. Horses for courses. Boyd is probably our best lock down small defender and offers some rebound as well. I thought Cincotta was badly exposed against Pickett too. Easily could have finished with 5 goals. We also have Raynor, Bailey, McCarthy to deal with. Cincotta is probably better suited to Raynor or Bailey than Cameron


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro



Did you go to the game jake?

Cincotta blanketed Pickett in the first half.
I don't think Pickett got free because of Cincotta's weakness.

Dees opened up the game and went wider after the first half. Tried to open us up.
Pickett was having shots from stupid spots and was part of the reason they lost the game.

No way Pickett could have "easily" kicked 5. He had 8 kicks. Behinds are not difficult to kick. Selfish, and Dees fans know it.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 18, 2023 11:07 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2013 2:16 pm
Posts: 14263
Location: Sydney
BamBam7 wrote:
I feel like we'll regret not finding a spot for Kennedy. He doesn't get enough credit for the things he does off the ball, nor for how good he uses the football, in both uncontested and contested situations.

He also has a knack for hitting hard, but fair. He's built for finals footy.

There's also the added bonus of being able to throw him on ball, should the need arise.

With Martin coming back in alongside Motlop, I think Owies should be the one who misses out instead.

Granted, I wouldn't be suggesting that Kennedy start forward ahead of Owies prior to Round 1. But that's the point, it isn't Round 1, it's a Preliminary Final.


Owies might be more effective with McKay back in, ball will be hitting the deck a bit more often than it did with Curnow being overwhelmed (surprised by the SB stats, but it certainly felt like we weren't generating much ground ball). It's a tough call. Owies is a reliable 1-2 goal a game scorer and his omission would leave us with just one specialist small forward, but I also agree that Kennedy gives us tackling pressure and a reliable set shot, so it's not like we'd be giving up all of Owies's best assets. Also Kennedy is a bit fresher than some of the other blokes so using him as a sub might be undermining that advantage. Glad it's someone else's job to decide this one.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 18, 2023 11:28 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 24662
Location: Bondi Beach
Sydney Blue wrote:
jake_h03 wrote:
Harry and Martin are the two certain changes. I would think Kennedy probably makes way for Harry since he effectively took his role in the team.

For Martin it has to be one of Owies, Cuningham, or Fogarty. I think as a group we don’t quite get enough out of these guys. They all play their role but too often they don’t impact the game. When you get 5-10 touches, you have to make them count and last night all 3 of these guys butchered multiple chances, particularly Fogarty.

Motlop is a cut above that group IMO. He’s so much more dangerous around goal and he only needs a few touches to hurt the opposition. He also leads the team in F50 tackles, so he’s an automatic selection for mine. Thought it was madness he didn’t start against Sydney and last night he showed why he should have.

I think Owies stays because he always manages to pop up with his goal or two. I would probably drop Fogarty, his kicking is just so ordinary and he doesn’t hurt the opposition when he gets the ball. At least Cunners can impact the game IF he manages to get his hands on the ball. But I suspect they’ll drop Cuningham. Cottrell is safe due to his running power and his game vs Sydney.

Outside that I can’t see us making any more changes. Could be tempting to drop a tall defender for another small given Brisbane’s plethora of dangerous small forwards. Kemp, Gov, and Cincotta were way too loose at times last night and struggled on the smaller more nimble types. I hate the thought of one of them on Charlie Cameron, Raynor, Bailey, McCarthy, Ah Chee. They really do have an embarrassment of riches in their small-medium forward stocks. That’s the biggest threat in this game IMO.

Kemp needs to learn when to punch and when to mark. Again last night he got out marked trying to pluck one from behind in D50. He also left his man and got stuck in no man’s land a few times. Needs to balance his offensive and defensive mindset and be a bit more accountable.

I still don’t think Pitto is in our best 22 once Harry is back and would rather JSOS, but can understand not wanting to bring in a player into a prelim who hasn’t played for 2 months. Pitto is a pretty limited footballer and does some really dumb things. He knocked it straight down the throat of Melbourne players too much last night, a couple of times completely uncontested too.

The sub has to be a runner. Hollands did well last night giving us that extra run when everyone was spent and giving us an extra number at the contest. I would still lean towards Dow as I think he can win the ball at the source late in the game. He’s had a huge impact coming on as a sub this season.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Pitto is in our best 22
Watch the game FFS
He was huge last night kept there most influential player and best ruck in the league pretty quiet

Sent from my SM-F926B using Tapatalk


I'm with you Sydney
Pitto was huge last night.
That was the talk around me at the game, even a Dees fan said Gawn doesn't like playing against Pitto and Kreuzer types.

Pitto wore down Gawn.
Gawn taps went to Carlton mids too.
Pitto taps went to Carlton players too.
Its the nature of ruck play. Happens to all rucks, but singling out Pitto is not cricket imo.

When the business end of the game came, Pitto won the last 2 taps in the centre bounce, to our favour, against a player who was taller, but had been pumbled over 100 minutes, and couldnt get over Pitto, nor push Pitto away to tap the ball Dees way.

Pitto stood up when it counted. You can't take that away from him.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 18, 2023 11:29 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 24662
Location: Bondi Beach
Molly wrote:
Just popping in to say hello.

Many of you on this site have been through so much. I remember hanging on Synbad’s every word around trade period. Hell, I remember hanging on every trade period while we tried to find some side in September who we could possibly barrack for against Collingwood or *.

I remember taking deep joy from the * supplements scandal with many of you, I am sure we all took greater pleasure because we knew our own cause at Princes Park was so hopeless. We rode the waves of promise. Denis Pagan was going to save us, Greg Swann was going to save us, Chris Judd was going to save us. Mick Malthouse was never going to save us, but David Buttifant might have. Marc Murphy was going to play in a flag, Bryce Gibbs was number one pick in a super draft, Matty Kreuzer was the best young tall in years. There was the Fev Brownlow scandal. Great players like Scotland, Houlihan, and Betts came and went without any success.

And on this website, you all hung in there. Each and every one of you.

This team cracks in for the guernsey as well as any Carlton side I can remember. As supporters, we no longer expect success. We are just damn well praying for it.

At the Gabba is a free hit. The lads will crack in hard and go for it all over again. Meanwhile, we should sit down with a smile on our faces as we watch them. We’ve all been waiting for it for a hell of a long time.

Well done to everyone on TC for keeping the faith over the past two decades. It has been quite the ride. Go Blues. Two more games!


Good onya Molly

TC legend.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 18, 2023 11:38 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 24662
Location: Bondi Beach
aboynamedsue wrote:
cortez wrote:
Can't see Pitto being dropped, I thought he went okay. If he wasn't in the ruck in the last minute we could well have lost, beat Gawn in 2 ruck contests.

I couldn’t believe Gawn didn’t hit those balls into space. Either he was absolutely buggered or Pittonet played it perfectly - or maybe a bit of both?


Pitto went straight for Gawn, body on body and had the strength to push Gawn off his line and took advantage of the backward movement to win the tap, both centre bounces.

Gawny had to belt the ball forward with so little time left, but didn't.

Well done Pitto.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 18, 2023 11:45 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 24662
Location: Bondi Beach
jake_h03 wrote:
bondiblue wrote:
This is huge. Prelim Final. :smoking:

No favourite in this kind of game for me despite backing a lions to win the flag in the preseason.

I’ve got game sorted, flights sorted, accomodation sorted.

I cannot believe the Navy Blue Army
Heaps of Carltonians booked the best accomodation last week; yes, before the Dees win.

Good luck finding reasonable, let alone good accomodation.

Brisbane can’t handle the Navy Blue Army. Fancy playing a Final in a country town. 60000 Carlton fans will miss out on tickets.

The MCG is the best Arena in the world to showcase a Prelim Final. It’s a neutral ground and available to play a Prelim.

Have a good feeling about this game. I still have faith in this list.


Sorry but playing a prelim at G when we finished 5th and they finished 2nd would be ludicrous. They've earnt the right to a home prelim.

Plus it will make our story so much better. Bottom 4 at round 15, then 15th to 5th on a 9 game winning streak. First finals win in a decade against Sydney. Back up to beat many people's flag favourite in Melbourne at the G. Then have to travel to the Gabba for the toughest assignment in footy. Then back to the G to beat the filth in the first Carlton Collingwood Grand Final in nearly half a century.

Playing Brisbane at the G would be cheating us of our full glory.


Yeah I get the reasoning for the Gabba, but my point shouldnt be viewed as ludicrous, if you see read my reasoning.

Its about the neutrality and availability of the best arena in the country enabling an extra 60,000 fans to witness it live. That's all.

I'm lucky enough to get tickets for Lions game from AFL Corporate contacts. Do you think its the every day supporters who go every week to Lions games and Blues games who will be attending this game? 38,000 tickets...10,000 corporate tickets leaves 28,000 for teams who have combined 150,000 members. Most will miss the opportunity. I feel for them. That's all.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 18, 2023 11:54 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2006 8:22 am
Posts: 2736
I think the bigger picture which will drive selection for Voss is that we have an excellent defence and powerful midfield. He will keep it to minimal changes, assuming the injured boys are right to go.
We only have to click a few small things into place and we can put an extra 5 or 6 goals on the board - primarily forward handball, hitting short targets inside 50.
We have to back our solid defence to hold up as they have all year.
I’m more concerned about McLuggage and Neale than I am about Daniher and Cameron. I’d sic Hewitt onto McLuggage.
I think we can beat Daniher in the air, and we just need to be mindful of not letting Cameron cheapies out the back.
They are a very good and well balanced team. So are we.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 18, 2023 12:04 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 11:01 pm
Posts: 3560
Braithy wrote:
jpulice1969 wrote:
if we use the same style game plan as previous finale we are GONE ( very very lucky dees game). WE need show more run and carry and can we have 1 forward that leads to ball carrier.



agreed. it will take our best to be in this game. thinking how we played collingwood during the win streak.


Exhibit A...Martin will play out of his skin bc of his brain fade against Sydney
Exhibit B...McKay will play to his potential. His time is NOW
Exhibit C...Owies will feel the pressure of his spot more than anybody (Cunningham dropped IMO) Owies will have a night out (3 goals + goal assists)

We go into the game with NOTHING to be complacent about. The footy gods helped us but also kept our feet on the ground

_________________
If I want your opinion, I'll give it to you!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 18, 2023 12:09 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 11:01 pm
Posts: 3560
BamBam7 wrote:
I feel like we'll regret not finding a spot for Kennedy. He doesn't get enough credit for the things he does off the ball, nor for how good he uses the football, in both uncontested and contested situations.

He also has a knack for hitting hard, but fair. He's built for finals footy.

There's also the added bonus of being able to throw him on ball, should the need arise.

With Martin coming back in alongside Motlop, I think Owies should be the one who misses out instead.

Granted, I wouldn't be suggesting that Kennedy start forward ahead of Owies prior to Round 1. But that's the point, it isn't Round 1, it's a Preliminary Final.


I love Kennedy but think he may miss out

Martin can go on the ball or behind the ball, which means we still have Motlop and Owies inside F50...IMVHO

_________________
If I want your opinion, I'll give it to you!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 18, 2023 12:13 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 24662
Location: Bondi Beach
SurreyBlue wrote:
GreatEx wrote:
Land of the Giants, huh? ;) fair point about SoS but I'd be seriously worried about the lack of run in that side. Reckon I'd have to drop Pitto, as much as he played Gawn to perfection, maybe we can get away with not bullying OMac, whom I rate. Either that or drop a tall defender for Fisher or Hollands (Doc to HB). Or both!


I think you make good points on Pitto or tall defender. I think Brisbane will include 3 talls - Daniher, Hipwood and Gunston. IMO, Weitering, Kemp and Marchbank stay. MCGovern for Rayner is a good match up as he can go with him in the air. As for Pitto - love big lug, not only does he keep TdK fresh and allows us to use him in key times, but he gives our inside mids first crack. This is a big advantage. Hence my team - fix the forward line and give Charlie the additional support with JSoS/Harry and we will be more potent. When Harry or Charlie move up the ground for the midfield connection, they need JSoS to assist the other in the forward line. This is the model that has worked. TdK is looking better and better as well up forward but he's not there as yet.


I agree with you Surrey re backline.

I thought Gov has been the weakest of the 4 tall defenders in the last 2 weeks. Sure he's done a few good things, but bloody loose as a goose, and his timing hasn't been great. Gov and Raynor is a smart move, if Gov can stick close when he has to.

No to SOS for lots of reasons. I don't think our fortune changed when SOS got injured. I think other teams worked out where our outlets are and closed them.

I don't know why Fisher would be considered in Finals. Vossy will not give Fisher the free ride without an opponent, to be a spare in defense and leave our forwards outnumbered in Finals. Can't press doing that.

Doubt Vossy will change backline. I would love it if Boyd was playing against Cameron but it wont happen. Backline is settled.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 18, 2023 12:46 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 9:35 am
Posts: 8938
Location: Melbourne
bondiblue wrote:
jake_h03 wrote:
Humpers wrote:
Who plays on Charlie Cameron?
He soundly beat Newman earlier in the season and I'm not sure Saad or Docherty would be ideal matchups. Maybe a good reason to bring Boyd in to the side? We don't want to be hearing "Country Roads" by John Denver all night.


Yeah I was thinking the same. Horses for courses. Boyd is probably our best lock down small defender and offers some rebound as well. I thought Cincotta was badly exposed against Pickett too. Easily could have finished with 5 goals. We also have Raynor, Bailey, McCarthy to deal with. Cincotta is probably better suited to Raynor or Bailey than Cameron


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro



Did you go to the game jake?

Cincotta blanketed Pickett in the first half.
I don't think Pickett got free because of Cincotta's weakness.

Dees opened up the game and went wider after the first half. Tried to open us up.
Pickett was having shots from stupid spots and was part of the reason they lost the game.

No way Pickett could have "easily" kicked 5. He had 8 kicks. Behinds are not difficult to kick. Selfish, and Dees fans know it.


Rubbish. If not for Pickett’s lack of discipline giving away frees and 50s, he was easily the best forward on the ground. He had a part in just about everything good Melbourne did.

He would have had the first goal of the game after Cincotta overplayed him and gave away a free. Advantage was given and Langdon kicked the goal. He missed a shot by inches at the end of the second. He almost assisted Fritsch minutes later but the shot missed by inches again. He missed another gettable shot early in the third after Cincotta lost him on the lead. He assisted Smith for their 5th goal after Cincotta lost his feet in the marking contest. He assisted Fritsch for their 6th goal a few minutes later. He kicked their 7th goal. He kicked their 8th goal. He assisted Fritsch for their 9th goal. He hit the post in the dying minutes for what would have been their 10th goal and the match sealer.

And that’s just what I can remember. Pretty sure he had at least one more shot that went OOF.

I’m sorry but that is a whisker away from being an absolute day out. Pickett was the most dangerous forward on the ground and Cincotta was all at sea. On another day Melbourne win and Pickett is close to best on ground (only behind May).

I love Cinc but he couldn’t go with Pickett and is lucky he missed some gettable chances and was so ill disciplined. Charlie Cameron, Raynor, and Bailey may not be so forgiving.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

_________________
:lol: :-D :) :? :( :x :evil:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 18, 2023 12:58 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 9:35 am
Posts: 8938
Location: Melbourne
bondiblue wrote:
jake_h03 wrote:
bondiblue wrote:
This is huge. Prelim Final. :smoking:

No favourite in this kind of game for me despite backing a lions to win the flag in the preseason.

I’ve got game sorted, flights sorted, accomodation sorted.

I cannot believe the Navy Blue Army
Heaps of Carltonians booked the best accomodation last week; yes, before the Dees win.

Good luck finding reasonable, let alone good accomodation.

Brisbane can’t handle the Navy Blue Army. Fancy playing a Final in a country town. 60000 Carlton fans will miss out on tickets.

The MCG is the best Arena in the world to showcase a Prelim Final. It’s a neutral ground and available to play a Prelim.

Have a good feeling about this game. I still have faith in this list.


Sorry but playing a prelim at G when we finished 5th and they finished 2nd would be ludicrous. They've earnt the right to a home prelim.

Plus it will make our story so much better. Bottom 4 at round 15, then 15th to 5th on a 9 game winning streak. First finals win in a decade against Sydney. Back up to beat many people's flag favourite in Melbourne at the G. Then have to travel to the Gabba for the toughest assignment in footy. Then back to the G to beat the filth in the first Carlton Collingwood Grand Final in nearly half a century.

Playing Brisbane at the G would be cheating us of our full glory.


Yeah I get the reasoning for the Gabba, but my point shouldnt be viewed as ludicrous, if you see read my reasoning.

Its about the neutrality and availability of the best arena in the country enabling an extra 60,000 fans to witness it live. That's all.

I'm lucky enough to get tickets for Lions game from AFL Corporate contacts. Do you think its the every day supporters who go every week to Lions games and Blues games who will be attending this game? 38,000 tickets...10,000 corporate tickets leaves 28,000 for teams who have combined 150,000 members. Most will miss the opportunity. I feel for them. That's all.


Yes, it’s always a shame when fans miss out on tickets. But the idea of playing the game at the MCG is still ludicrous, IMO of course.

MCG is not neutral. It’s one of our home grounds, and with home and away games, we probably play as many games at the G as Brisbane do at the Gabba. But even if it was neutral, it would be robbing Brisbane of their home ground advantage which they have earned. Brisbane have not lost at the Gabba this year. They have an 85% winning record there since 2019. It’s an absolute fortress for them and they should not have to give that up to play at our home ground


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

_________________
:lol: :-D :) :? :( :x :evil:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 18, 2023 1:07 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:12 am
Posts: 10373
Location: Coburg
easy demolish Canberra and build a huge stadium there.

_________________
This type of slight is alien in the more cultured part of the world - Walsh. Its up there with mad dogs, Englishmen and the midday sun!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 18, 2023 1:07 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:42 pm
Posts: 6886
i think there's pressure on saturday night for charlie. he's had two really ordinary finals games. we've somehow won them, despite his poor account. at times he wasn't even competitive Vs the dees.


i feel like our forwards are going to have to be better than theres for us to win and it all starts with CC. he needs a bag.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 18, 2023 1:09 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 24662
Location: Bondi Beach
jake_h03 wrote:
bondiblue wrote:
jake_h03 wrote:
Humpers wrote:
Who plays on Charlie Cameron?
He soundly beat Newman earlier in the season and I'm not sure Saad or Docherty would be ideal matchups. Maybe a good reason to bring Boyd in to the side? We don't want to be hearing "Country Roads" by John Denver all night.


Yeah I was thinking the same. Horses for courses. Boyd is probably our best lock down small defender and offers some rebound as well. I thought Cincotta was badly exposed against Pickett too. Easily could have finished with 5 goals. We also have Raynor, Bailey, McCarthy to deal with. Cincotta is probably better suited to Raynor or Bailey than Cameron


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro



Did you go to the game jake?

Cincotta blanketed Pickett in the first half.
I don't think Pickett got free because of Cincotta's weakness.

Dees opened up the game and went wider after the first half. Tried to open us up.
Pickett was having shots from stupid spots and was part of the reason they lost the game.

No way Pickett could have "easily" kicked 5. He had 8 kicks. Behinds are not difficult to kick. Selfish, and Dees fans know it.


Rubbish. If not for Pickett’s lack of discipline giving away frees and 50s, he was easily the best forward on the ground. He had a part in just about everything good Melbourne did.

He would have had the first goal of the game after Cincotta overplayed him and gave away a free. Advantage was given and Langdon kicked the goal. He missed a shot by inches at the end of the second. He almost assisted Fritsch minutes later but the shot missed by inches again. He missed another gettable shot early in the third after Cincotta lost him on the lead. He assisted Smith for their 5th goal after Cincotta lost his feet in the marking contest. He assisted Fritsch for their 6th goal a few minutes later. He kicked their 7th goal. He kicked their 8th goal. He assisted Fritsch for their 9th goal. He hit the post in the dying minutes for what would have been their 10th goal and the match sealer.

And that’s just what I can remember. Pretty sure he had at least one more shot that went OOF.

I’m sorry but that is a whisker away from being an absolute day out. Pickett was the most dangerous forward on the ground and Cincotta was all at sea. On another day Melbourne win and Pickett is close to best on ground (only behind May).

I love Cinc but he couldn’t go with Pickett and is lucky he missed some gettable chances and was so ill disciplined. Charlie Cameron, Raynor, and Bailey may not be so forgiving.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro


Gosh. You have a great memory jake, or selective. Regardless, I can't recall that much.
Maybe I was too critical of Pickett and his selfishness. And too supportive of Chinky.

I thought Chinky did a lot of good things. I was sitting with one of his mates in his Dees colours.
Maybe my, and his mates Blue/ Chinky coloured glasses were on.

Dees mates are shitty with Pickett, and I'm not bringing up any of the points you made with them. Let them suffer.

So.....don't put Chinky on Cameron then.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 18, 2023 1:14 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 24662
Location: Bondi Beach
jake_h03 wrote:
bondiblue wrote:
jake_h03 wrote:
bondiblue wrote:
This is huge. Prelim Final. :smoking:

No favourite in this kind of game for me despite backing a lions to win the flag in the preseason.

I’ve got game sorted, flights sorted, accomodation sorted.

I cannot believe the Navy Blue Army
Heaps of Carltonians booked the best accomodation last week; yes, before the Dees win.

Good luck finding reasonable, let alone good accomodation.

Brisbane can’t handle the Navy Blue Army. Fancy playing a Final in a country town. 60000 Carlton fans will miss out on tickets.

The MCG is the best Arena in the world to showcase a Prelim Final. It’s a neutral ground and available to play a Prelim.

Have a good feeling about this game. I still have faith in this list.


Sorry but playing a prelim at G when we finished 5th and they finished 2nd would be ludicrous. They've earnt the right to a home prelim.

Plus it will make our story so much better. Bottom 4 at round 15, then 15th to 5th on a 9 game winning streak. First finals win in a decade against Sydney. Back up to beat many people's flag favourite in Melbourne at the G. Then have to travel to the Gabba for the toughest assignment in footy. Then back to the G to beat the filth in the first Carlton Collingwood Grand Final in nearly half a century.

Playing Brisbane at the G would be cheating us of our full glory.


Yeah I get the reasoning for the Gabba, but my point shouldnt be viewed as ludicrous, if you see read my reasoning.

Its about the neutrality and availability of the best arena in the country enabling an extra 60,000 fans to witness it live. That's all.

I'm lucky enough to get tickets for Lions game from AFL Corporate contacts. Do you think its the every day supporters who go every week to Lions games and Blues games who will be attending this game? 38,000 tickets...10,000 corporate tickets leaves 28,000 for teams who have combined 150,000 members. Most will miss the opportunity. I feel for them. That's all.


Yes, it’s always a shame when fans miss out on tickets. But the idea of playing the game at the MCG is still ludicrous, IMO of course.

MCG is not neutral. It’s one of our home grounds, and with home and away games, we probably play as many games at the G as Brisbane do at the Gabba. But even if it was neutral, it would be robbing Brisbane of their home ground advantage which they have earned. Brisbane have not lost at the Gabba this year. They have an 85% winning record there since 2019. It’s an absolute fortress for them and they should not have to give that up to play at our home ground


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro


Good point you make, and I get it.

I hope 30,000 of their loyal fans enjoy the TV coverage.

I also hope Bluebaggers who have booked all that accomodation in Brizzy, with no guaranteed tickets have fun filling the pockets of Accor and qantas and also enjoy the tv coverage.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 18, 2023 1:15 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 24662
Location: Bondi Beach
I'm going.
You're going too jake.
Lucky us.

Go Blues.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 18, 2023 1:46 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2006 8:22 am
Posts: 2736
I reckon there’ll be a lot more Blues fans than they’re used to having cheer for the away team!
I’m more concerned about the Lions form than I am about the venue we’re playing at.
And I’m glad it’s a bit earlier than night time slot - we can blitz them early before the nighttime moisture settles in. They might be a little slow to hit their straps after the week off sunning themselves on the beach :-D


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 489 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 ... 25  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 78 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group