Sydney Blue wrote:
jake_h03 wrote:
Harry and Martin are the two certain changes. I would think Kennedy probably makes way for Harry since he effectively took his role in the team.
For Martin it has to be one of Owies, Cuningham, or Fogarty. I think as a group we don’t quite get enough out of these guys. They all play their role but too often they don’t impact the game. When you get 5-10 touches, you have to make them count and last night all 3 of these guys butchered multiple chances, particularly Fogarty.
Motlop is a cut above that group IMO. He’s so much more dangerous around goal and he only needs a few touches to hurt the opposition. He also leads the team in F50 tackles, so he’s an automatic selection for mine. Thought it was madness he didn’t start against Sydney and last night he showed why he should have.
I think Owies stays because he always manages to pop up with his goal or two. I would probably drop Fogarty, his kicking is just so ordinary and he doesn’t hurt the opposition when he gets the ball. At least Cunners can impact the game IF he manages to get his hands on the ball. But I suspect they’ll drop Cuningham. Cottrell is safe due to his running power and his game vs Sydney.
Outside that I can’t see us making any more changes. Could be tempting to drop a tall defender for another small given Brisbane’s plethora of dangerous small forwards. Kemp, Gov, and Cincotta were way too loose at times last night and struggled on the smaller more nimble types. I hate the thought of one of them on Charlie Cameron, Raynor, Bailey, McCarthy, Ah Chee. They really do have an embarrassment of riches in their small-medium forward stocks. That’s the biggest threat in this game IMO.
Kemp needs to learn when to punch and when to mark. Again last night he got out marked trying to pluck one from behind in D50. He also left his man and got stuck in no man’s land a few times. Needs to balance his offensive and defensive mindset and be a bit more accountable.
I still don’t think Pitto is in our best 22 once Harry is back and would rather JSOS, but can understand not wanting to bring in a player into a prelim who hasn’t played for 2 months. Pitto is a pretty limited footballer and does some really dumb things. He knocked it straight down the throat of Melbourne players too much last night, a couple of times completely uncontested too.
The sub has to be a runner. Hollands did well last night giving us that extra run when everyone was spent and giving us an extra number at the contest. I would still lean towards Dow as I think he can win the ball at the source late in the game. He’s had a huge impact coming on as a sub this season.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Pitto is in our best 22
Watch the game FFS
He was huge last night kept there most influential player and best ruck in the league pretty quiet
Sent from my SM-F926B using Tapatalk
I'm with you Sydney
Pitto was huge last night.
That was the talk around me at the game, even a Dees fan said Gawn doesn't like playing against Pitto and Kreuzer types.
Pitto wore down Gawn.
Gawn taps went to Carlton mids too.
Pitto taps went to Carlton players too.
Its the nature of ruck play. Happens to all rucks, but singling out Pitto is not cricket imo.
When the business end of the game came, Pitto won the last 2 taps in the centre bounce, to our favour, against a player who was taller, but had been pumbled over 100 minutes, and couldnt get over Pitto, nor push Pitto away to tap the ball Dees way.
Pitto stood up when it counted. You can't take that away from him.