Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Fri Jun 13, 2025 11:29 pm

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 705 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 ... 36  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Trust Malthouse
PostPosted: Mon Jun 17, 2013 3:16 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:36 am
Posts: 8161
:grin:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trust Malthouse
PostPosted: Mon Jun 17, 2013 3:30 pm 
Offline
Vale 1953-2020
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 11, 2005 1:23 am
Posts: 11671
cimm1979 wrote:
BigBlueWave wrote:
cimm1979 wrote:
BigBlueWave wrote:
I won't surprise me in the least if the next big move from the super duper coach is to appoint Mark Neeld as an assistant. Oh Yea ... :clap: :grin:


So what about those marginalized important players BBW.

Haven't heard who they are?


Oh ... ok ... I thought you might want to dispute where we are given that we have a stronger and less injured playing list this year. :thanks:

I don't think much of Duigan as a player so I am not talking about him. Laidler on the other hand was our best defender 1.5 years ago. I don't accept the crap about being versatile ... there are currently players in the team that are not judged on that criteria. The guy just hasn't been given a chance ... yet he continues to select blokes like Bootsma in big games against strong opponents. DOH! :thanks: :screwy: :hitcomputer:

Then the super duper coach selects Yarran as a sub in a big game we had to win ... Yarran's response was poor ... but he should never have been sub. Have a look at the players MM selected ahead of Yarran. Ultimately this extremely poor decision probably cost us 2 games ... and behind the scenes from what I hear ... I wouldn't be surprised if Yarran is looking for a new club.

Did you want to discuss anything else?


So, basically Laidler.

I liked Laidler as a player. Thought he made our backline a bit more organized.

But can you tell me if he's the same player after his serious knee op?

The facts are you don't know why he can't get a run so you put it down to a coaching error.

So, out of 44 players we have one guy who's not up to it, another guy who we are not sure is up to it and a third guy who we know is up to it but has been spelled for disciplinary issues.

That's your case?

BBW, you need to make your statements more reasonable or people won't take you seriously.

Oops. Too late.

Last year, in the face of ENORMOUS amount of evidence (losing to basket case teams by 10 goals, etc), it's "nah, wait, give him time, he's just Bomber Thompson in 2006", etc, etc. Nek minnit, in the face of a hardness that hasn't been seen in at least 12 years, renewed enthusiasm for the contest by most players, improved showing by most players, no holds barred discipline in the playing group, and improved showing against most teams, it's "No, wait. Please don't let the evidence deceive you; my prejudices are more accurate!!"

Take it seriously??? Phhht!!!!! as a comedy routine, maybe.....

_________________
Never argue with idiots. They drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience!!!

After Monday and Tuesday, even the calendar says W T F .........
Visit http://fromthemoshpit.com/


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trust Malthouse
PostPosted: Mon Jun 17, 2013 3:41 pm 
Offline
formerly BlueRob
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 12:45 pm
Posts: 3073
cimm1979 wrote:
BigBlueWave wrote:
cimm1979 wrote:
BigBlueWave wrote:
I won't surprise me in the least if the next big move from the super duper coach is to appoint Mark Neeld as an assistant. Oh Yea ... :clap: :grin:


So what about those marginalized important players BBW.

Haven't heard who they are?


Oh ... ok ... I thought you might want to dispute where we are given that we have a stronger and less injured playing list this year. :thanks:

I don't think much of Duigan as a player so I am not talking about him. Laidler on the other hand was our best defender 1.5 years ago. I don't accept the crap about being versatile ... there are currently players in the team that are not judged on that criteria. The guy just hasn't been given a chance ... yet he continues to select blokes like Bootsma in big games against strong opponents. DOH! :thanks: :screwy: :hitcomputer:

Then the super duper coach selects Yarran as a sub in a big game we had to win ... Yarran's response was poor ... but he should never have been sub. Have a look at the players MM selected ahead of Yarran. Ultimately this extremely poor decision probably cost us 2 games ... and behind the scenes from what I hear ... I wouldn't be surprised if Yarran is looking for a new club.

Did you want to discuss anything else?


So, basically Laidler.

I liked Laidler as a player. Thought he made our backline a bit more organized.

But can you tell me if he's the same player after his serious knee op?

The facts are you don't know why he can't get a run so you put it down to a coaching error.

So, out of 44 players we have one guy who's not up to it, another guy who we are not sure is up to it and a third guy who we know is up to it but has been spelled for disciplinary issues.

That's your case?

BBW, you need to make your statements more reasonable or people won't take you seriously.


Oops ... sorry ... didn't I say Yarran as well. There are more examples. But I would have thought 2 as serious as those would have sat you up in your seat.

In any case the even more serious problem has been the pathetic coaching decisions that have cost us games.

But like I said ... We live in hope.

_________________
I am as mad as hell and I'm not going to take it any more!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trust Malthouse
PostPosted: Mon Jun 17, 2013 3:44 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2005 10:14 am
Posts: 22357
Keep swinging!

_________________
dane's trolling again


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trust Malthouse
PostPosted: Mon Jun 17, 2013 3:50 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 8:12 pm
Posts: 15582
Location: Upper Swan.
BigBlueWave wrote:
cimm1979 wrote:
BigBlueWave wrote:
cimm1979 wrote:
BigBlueWave wrote:
I won't surprise me in the least if the next big move from the super duper coach is to appoint Mark Neeld as an assistant. Oh Yea ... :clap: :grin:


So what about those marginalized important players BBW.

Haven't heard who they are?


Oh ... ok ... I thought you might want to dispute where we are given that we have a stronger and less injured playing list this year. :thanks:

I don't think much of Duigan as a player so I am not talking about him. Laidler on the other hand was our best defender 1.5 years ago. I don't accept the crap about being versatile ... there are currently players in the team that are not judged on that criteria. The guy just hasn't been given a chance ... yet he continues to select blokes like Bootsma in big games against strong opponents. DOH! :thanks: :screwy: :hitcomputer:

Then the super duper coach selects Yarran as a sub in a big game we had to win ... Yarran's response was poor ... but he should never have been sub. Have a look at the players MM selected ahead of Yarran. Ultimately this extremely poor decision probably cost us 2 games ... and behind the scenes from what I hear ... I wouldn't be surprised if Yarran is looking for a new club.

Did you want to discuss anything else?


So, basically Laidler.

I liked Laidler as a player. Thought he made our backline a bit more organized.

But can you tell me if he's the same player after his serious knee op?

The facts are you don't know why he can't get a run so you put it down to a coaching error.

So, out of 44 players we have one guy who's not up to it, another guy who we are not sure is up to it and a third guy who we know is up to it but has been spelled for disciplinary issues.

That's your case?

BBW, you need to make your statements more reasonable or people won't take you seriously.


Oops ... sorry ... didn't I say Yarran as well. There are more examples. But I would have thought 2 as serious as those would have sat you up in your seat.

In any case the even more serious problem has been the pathetic coaching decisions that have cost us games.

But like I said ... We live in hope.


He's the third guy in my example. The guy who's good enough but spelled for poor discipline.

_________________
I hope Essendon* folds.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trust Malthouse
PostPosted: Mon Jun 17, 2013 4:03 pm 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:52 am
Posts: 9105
Location: Nth Fitzroy
The Blues v Saints game a few years back was a game we got tough in. The WC final showed a bit of steel. Never really had to get tough against bombers as we smashed them most times in the last few years.
Won a tough game against the Swans at the SCG two years ago.

So the game against the Hawks was good in that we matched them in intensity for most of it is still a one off. Lets not get ahead of ourselves. We still fell away.

I think we are on the right track but lets not go overboard. Not all players have improved. Some have gone the other way. Others are still up and down.
We still dont win close games. The Hawks still had our measure. Our coaches still make glarring mistakes.

Last friday was encouraging but we have a long way to go.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trust Malthouse
PostPosted: Mon Jun 17, 2013 4:22 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2011 3:17 pm
Posts: 2645
club29 wrote:
The Blues v Saints game a few years back was a game we got tough in. The WC final showed a bit of steel. Never really had to get tough against bombers as we smashed them most times in the last few years.
Won a tough game against the Swans at the SCG two years ago.

So the game against the Hawks was good in that we matched them in intensity for most of it is still a one off. Lets not get ahead of ourselves. We still fell away.

I think we are on the right track but lets not go overboard. Not all players have improved. Some have gone the other way. Others are still up and down.
We still dont win close games. The Hawks still had our measure. Our coaches still make glarring mistakes.

Last friday was encouraging but we have a long way to go.


An astute, precise and logical assessment made by an objective party I presume. :clap:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trust Malthouse
PostPosted: Mon Jun 17, 2013 5:00 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 9:51 am
Posts: 4919
club29 wrote:
So the game against the Hawks was good in that we matched them in intensity for most of it is still a one off. Lets not get ahead of ourselves. We still fell away.


I actually thought the true test in the Hawthorn game came when Murphy got crunched, similar to Carrazzo getting crunched by Lonegran in the previous year.
We fell apart in the Essendon* game, we stuck at it in this game with Robbo a casualty as well.
Something is going on.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trust Malthouse
PostPosted: Mon Jun 17, 2013 5:10 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 8:12 pm
Posts: 15582
Location: Upper Swan.
I suspect if there are any Pickett/Brown/Guerra types going cheap at the end of the year we might look at them.

You can't turn clean footballers who are largely indifferent to each others well being into blood thirsty team players.

They can get better, but the sh1t gene is missing.

_________________
I hope Essendon* folds.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Trust Malthouse
PostPosted: Mon Jun 17, 2013 5:39 pm 
Offline
Serge Silvagni

Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2012 3:12 pm
Posts: 942
BigBlueWave wrote:
I won't surprise me in the least if the next big move from the super duper coach is to appoint Mark Neeld as an assistant. Oh Yea ... :clap: :grin:

They worked well at the pies

2011 runner up
2010 premier


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Trust Malthouse
PostPosted: Mon Jun 17, 2013 6:10 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2005 12:17 am
Posts: 1053
Location: Deutschland
club29 wrote:
I hate when managers do it in the soccer and it looked equally as weak the other night IMO.
.


I hate it too in soccer but it works. Have you seen the run United got from referees under Fergie?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Trust Malthouse
PostPosted: Mon Jun 17, 2013 6:23 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2005 12:17 am
Posts: 1053
Location: Deutschland
cimm1979 wrote:
I don't think we are any chance to make finals unless we win both of our next two and that's unlikely.

The Saints loss will be the one that killed us.


If we win one of our next two we will still be a big chance for finals. Have you seen West Coast's draw? Incredibly tough. If not them, who will displace us?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trust Malthouse
PostPosted: Mon Jun 17, 2013 6:27 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
you need to go into finals with momentum of winning.. not cos there are not 8 good sides in the afl...

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trust Malthouse
PostPosted: Mon Jun 17, 2013 6:53 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2008 1:06 pm
Posts: 3995
Location: Steven Seagal's Martial Arts Academy
The Spornstar wrote:
cimm1979 wrote:
I don't think we are any chance to make finals unless we win both of our next two and that's unlikely.

The Saints loss will be the one that killed us.


If we win one of our next two we will still be a big chance for finals. Have you seen West Coast's draw? Incredibly tough. If not them, who will displace us?


I wouldn't rule out anyone yet.

We have: bye, Sydney, pies.

If we lose all those and are still in the 8, it will be bloody good luck!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trust Malthouse
PostPosted: Mon Jun 17, 2013 7:55 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:26 am
Posts: 14729
Location: Comparing orange boners with Hirdy
dane wrote:
BigBlueWave wrote:
The whole Malthouse saga is becoming a train wreck.

One bad decision after another ... alienation of several important players at the club ... out coached on multiple occasions in critical matches ... terrible tactical decisions which continue to cost us games ... the list goes on and on and on.

Obviously a big fat fail in terms of where this team should be given less injuries and a stronger list than last year.

Lets hope that we don't have to use the 10 year plan that the Super Duper coach has employed at other clubs.

Lets hope for the best ... start planning for next year ... this year looks to be over.

We live in hope ... rather than trust.


:donk: :donk: :donk:

Stick to ya guns!

Lol Daneo, when you've got a cracking track record of bagging guys like BBW you keep plugging away

_________________
Greg Swann wrote:
Essendon* cheated, simple as that


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trust Malthouse
PostPosted: Mon Jun 17, 2013 9:44 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 14, 2007 6:10 pm
Posts: 33618
Location: COMFORTABLY DISSATISFIED
I'm confident that we will see a leaner (and meaner?) list by the time next preseason comes around, with the players and coaches that Mick wants to put his plans into place properly. Just remember how frustrated we were at how stuck we were during last offseason, I think Mick would've felt it just as much if not more.

_________________
WADA medical director Dr Alan Vernec describes Essendon* FC drug case as biggest scandal in team sport the world of sport has seen. #WC2WB

#GUILTY


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trust Malthouse
PostPosted: Mon Jun 17, 2013 10:12 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 11:01 pm
Posts: 3561
dane wrote:
I'm a malthouse fan.
He is what needed to happen.


5 years too late

_________________
If I want your opinion, I'll give it to you!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trust Malthouse
PostPosted: Mon Jun 17, 2013 10:15 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 11:01 pm
Posts: 3561
grrofunger wrote:
I dont know why ratten keeps posting here, thought he'd be over at hawk talk or whatever they call their shitty website


Well I know where he won't be...waiting by the phone answering the call from the Melb Footy Club.

_________________
If I want your opinion, I'll give it to you!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trust Malthouse
PostPosted: Mon Jun 17, 2013 10:19 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 11:01 pm
Posts: 3561
BigBlueWave wrote:
I won't surprise me in the least if the next big move from the super duper coach is to appoint Mark Neeld as an assistant. Oh Yea ... :clap: :grin:


No different to Haw appointing Ratts
What's your point super duper disliker of MM?

_________________
If I want your opinion, I'll give it to you!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Trust Malthouse
PostPosted: Tue Jun 18, 2013 11:14 am 
Offline
formerly BlueRob
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 12:45 pm
Posts: 3073
99prelim wrote:
BigBlueWave wrote:
I won't surprise me in the least if the next big move from the super duper coach is to appoint Mark Neeld as an assistant. Oh Yea ... :clap: :grin:


No different to Haw appointing Ratts
What's your point super duper disliker of MM?


Oh really ... :?

_________________
I am as mad as hell and I'm not going to take it any more!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 705 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 ... 36  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: hey_charger and 59 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group