cimm1979 wrote:
BigBlueWave wrote:
cimm1979 wrote:
BigBlueWave wrote:
I won't surprise me in the least if the next big move from the super duper coach is to appoint Mark Neeld as an assistant. Oh Yea ...

So what about those marginalized important players BBW.
Haven't heard who they are?
Oh ... ok ... I thought you might want to dispute where we are given that we have a stronger and less injured playing list this year.
I don't think much of Duigan as a player so I am not talking about him. Laidler on the other hand was our best defender 1.5 years ago. I don't accept the crap about being versatile ... there are currently players in the team that are not judged on that criteria. The guy just hasn't been given a chance ... yet he continues to select blokes like Bootsma in big games against strong opponents. DOH!
Then the super duper coach selects Yarran as a sub in a big game we had to win ... Yarran's response was poor ... but he should never have been sub. Have a look at the players MM selected ahead of Yarran. Ultimately this extremely poor decision probably cost us 2 games ... and behind the scenes from what I hear ... I wouldn't be surprised if Yarran is looking for a new club.
Did you want to discuss anything else?
So, basically Laidler.
I liked Laidler as a player. Thought he made our backline a bit more organized.
But can you tell me if he's the same player after his serious knee op?
The facts are you don't know why he can't get a run so you put it down to a coaching error.
So, out of 44 players we have one guy who's not up to it, another guy who we are not sure is up to it and a third guy who we know is up to it but has been spelled for disciplinary issues.
That's your case?
BBW, you need to make your statements more reasonable or people won't take you seriously.
Oops. Too late.
Last year, in the face of ENORMOUS amount of evidence (losing to basket case teams by 10 goals, etc), it's "nah, wait, give him time, he's just Bomber Thompson in 2006", etc, etc. Nek minnit, in the face of a hardness that hasn't been seen in at least 12 years, renewed enthusiasm for the contest by most players, improved showing by most players, no holds barred discipline in the playing group, and improved showing against most teams, it's "No, wait. Please don't let the evidence deceive you; my prejudices are more accurate!!"
Take it seriously??? Phhht!!!!! as a comedy routine, maybe.....
_________________
Never argue with idiots. They drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience!!!
After Monday and Tuesday, even the calendar says W T F .........
Visit
http://fromthemoshpit.com/