Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Mon Jun 16, 2025 9:26 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 356 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 ... 18  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Apr 09, 2013 8:02 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:00 pm
Posts: 24635
Location: Kaloyasena
Asp wrote:
AGRO wrote:
I can't believe our recruiting has been so bad, but our player development is woeful.

Is Stephen Wells from Geelong such a recruiting genius or are Geelong (and Collingwood for that matter) able to develop pick 30+ selections better than everyone else.

They pick better players. And Collingwood have just recruited the best in the business (in my opinion) in Matt Rendell.



Maybe so but I can't believe they get so many pick 30+ selections so right, as Synbad alludes to its all about culture and development, Geelong and Collingwood have it (in spades) we don't.

_________________
"Hence you will not say that Greeks fight like heroes but that heroes fight like Greeks"?

Winston Churchill


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 09, 2013 8:07 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:04 am
Posts: 28377
Location: *Currently banned*
Fox Footy 360 just had up on screen this game being at Metricon. I wish!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 09, 2013 8:16 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2007 9:09 pm
Posts: 6047
club29 wrote:
Synbad wrote:
club29 wrote:
We just have to engage the Cats in a tough contest and take them head on. We are no good until we can do that.
Lets armwrestle the best at it and see how we go. See how far we are off or prove we can match it with the best.

We need to become a horrible team to play against.

agree club

we need to win the scratch and gouge gaes against the good sides before were any good


Too many of wins over the years have been big fluky comebacks or freak wins against the occasional top team off their game. It throws us off what really is required to win big finals like games. When fev was around it was real bad as we (fans included) partied like prelim 99 and got cheeky in the media. Then come out and lose the next week. If that comeback against the tigers had of came off it would have been the same. Cracks papered over.

This week id love a real tough game where we hold our own right to the end. Low scoring would be even better. 70 tackles each. Game style that is consistant all game.

THIS!

_________________
It's never as good as it looks and it's never as bad as it seems.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 09, 2013 8:23 pm 
Offline
Bruce Comben
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 02, 2013 8:18 pm
Posts: 24
Location: wa
can somebody please tell me who picks the team on game day, name the panel and who has final word


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 09, 2013 8:37 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:04 am
Posts: 28377
Location: *Currently banned*
papa wrote:
can somebody please tell me who picks the team on game day, name the panel and who has final word


Synbad, Club and Benji.

Synbad.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 09, 2013 8:41 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Mon May 31, 2010 10:07 pm
Posts: 1984
AGRO wrote:
Maybe so but I can't believe they get so many pick 30+ selections so right, as Synbad alludes to its all about culture and development, Geelong and Collingwood have it (in spades) we don't.


This. Compare with the players the Dees have taken over the last 5 years. They weren't all spud picks.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 09, 2013 8:59 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2006 8:28 pm
Posts: 1642
Location: .?../*%$#@
verbs wrote:
papa wrote:
can somebody please tell me who picks the team on game day, name the panel and who has final word


Synbad, Club and Benji.

Synbad.
:lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 09, 2013 9:10 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 2:09 pm
Posts: 17219
Asp wrote:
AGRO wrote:
I can't believe our recruiting has been so bad, but our player development is woeful.

Is Stephen Wells from Geelong such a recruiting genius or are Geelong (and Collingwood for that matter) able to develop pick 30+ selections better than everyone else.

They pick better players. And Collingwood have just recruited the best in the business (in my opinion) in Matt Rendell.


Not convinced. The draft is overrated. Development is underrated.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 09, 2013 9:18 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter

Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 6:54 pm
Posts: 14686
Location: The Vodka Train
frank dardew wrote:
Kahuna agree with what you say and maybe at 90 years of age I was naive to think that Mick may give us an almost instant return on our earlier investment - but after the first 2 games Im more convinced than ever that our group is bar Melbourne the most mentally fragile one in the AFL and Micks greatest challenge is to rectify that -I reckon it is easier to program rather than de-program so if he is going to stamp this team with his ethos/a killer instinct a hard mental edge its better within reason to do it with young players/newbies who may embrace it than some of the others that have let us down in the past
Wish we didnt have to but the reality is that we have to -and whilst a broken record about it the FACT that we couldnt improve our list over the last summer was criminal when arguably all of geelong collingwood hawthorn and the swans


..yup, spot on.. ..no point debating how we got to this point, except to be sure we don't continue with these mistakes.. ..but now, if we start to fast track development, which may very well be required, we all need to be o.k with the very real situation.. ..not one step back, 2 forward.. ..but a jog back a bit, and then move forward.. ..i think we need to be ready to 'wear losses'..

..we need to get games into the kids.. ..Watson, we need him to make it, but more importantly we need to know if he will or won't.. ..if he will, fast track him.. ..for a big lug that doesn't look AFL capable on the surface, he hasn't been dominated all game long, the odd contest in a game yeah sure, obviously.. ..but overall he hasn't had a forward get a hold of him and score big.. ..so if we're gonna be carrying players, yes by all rights have it be kids, and not under-done players that may be short lived.. ..Watson in particular is crucial to get a 'ruling' on, for how it effects Henderson's role in the team..

_________________
..if you can't be good, be good at it..


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 09, 2013 9:18 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 22, 2010 5:52 pm
Posts: 2289
Location: Geelong
For those with the inclination it's worth watching the Collingwood match on replay. With the passion of "who's going to win" removed it's easier to get a fairer perspective. We played pretty well. Biggest problem was lack of composure in the 4th - way too many kicks just thrown on the boot. This was across the team.

IMO we should keep almost the same team - give them a chance to grow and develop together. My only changes would be Scotland in, (not sure for who, Laidler looks underdone, but it probably comes down to matchups ).

McLean in, Bell sub -- just for rotation, rate both similarly at the moment.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 09, 2013 9:24 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter

Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 6:54 pm
Posts: 14686
Location: The Vodka Train
DocSherrin wrote:
Asp wrote:
AGRO wrote:
I can't believe our recruiting has been so bad, but our player development is woeful.

Is Stephen Wells from Geelong such a recruiting genius or are Geelong (and Collingwood for that matter) able to develop pick 30+ selections better than everyone else.

They pick better players. And Collingwood have just recruited the best in the business (in my opinion) in Matt Rendell.


Not convinced. The draft is overrated. Development is underrated.


.agree to a certain extent, but draft is important that you recruit the type you need, stick in the type and yer ok..

_________________
..if you can't be good, be good at it..


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 09, 2013 9:24 pm 
Offline
Laurie Kerr

Joined: Tue Sep 07, 2010 7:50 pm
Posts: 107
In: Hampson, Scotland, Curnow, Buckley
Out: Casboult, Davies, McLean, Bootsma

Hampson is available and should come in for Casboult. Casboult lost at sea both games and Rowe showed more. Casboult and Hampson should not be in the same forwardline IMO. Rowe and Hampson will hopefully work well together. it would also be nice to see a forward on a strong lead in the forward 50 one day soon!!!!

Davies has to go and like Joseph shouldn't get another run in navy blue. He doesn't have it. He and Joseph buckle under pressure. Scotland will be a very welcome addition to our half back line

McLean appears back to his old ways and should never be the sub IMO. The sub should inject some run or something into the game. McLean is not this player. Looked very slow the week before. Time to give Curnow a go, and if he fails, then the better choice of them all, Ellard, should be ready to go.

Bootsma needs time in the two's. Will be a player but needs a spell and with Hendo, Jamo, Laidler (hopefully better for the run) and Scotland back there we should be good. Although White or Duigan are more obvious replacements, I'd love to see Buckley get a guernsey and show us what he's made of in a big game. Would be good with him and Jeffy running around in the forwardline. He'd prob be the sub anyway if he came in...

Lucky: Touhy and Armfield - Whilst I'm an Army fan you can always rely on him giving the opposition at least one goal. He handballed poorly straight to Harry-O and a goal resulted. About a minute before it happened I said to my Collingwood mate, "I bet Army gives a goal away soon..." Awful stuff. And Touhy needs to fire up a bit. Whilst I think Lucas will make it, he's been to the Bryce Gibbs "school of carrelling" and because he is not tenacious at the man, they slip his tackles so easily. He needs to toughen up and go at the man harder or Mick won't have him in there too much longer. Simmo and Carrots need a rocket.

There is still so much improvement that can come from these players and still some good ins to come, but with a new game plan it will take some time. We did very well to stay in touch with a quality pies side til the dying minutes. Unfortunately I think we'll be 0-5 and all will be relatively narrow losses, but if we are ruthless against the Dees and come home with a bang, you never know what could happen...

P.S. I cannot wait til Menzel is ready to debut!!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 09, 2013 10:02 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 8:42 pm
Posts: 2465
Location: Princess Park
A lot of blame seems to be directed at the youngsters, Bootsma, Lucas, Casboult - I think more heat should be directed at Simmo, Laids, Carrots and Murph. These are the guys we need to play well. Expecting Bootsma to hold his ground and to do well is a big call. Maybe more support from our leaders will take some pressure of the youngsters.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 09, 2013 10:32 pm 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:52 am
Posts: 9105
Location: Nth Fitzroy
verbs wrote:
papa wrote:
can somebody please tell me who picks the team on game day, name the panel and who has final word


Synbad, Club and Benji.

Synbad.


:lol:

Benji is chairman. Synbad and I are just his yes men.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 09, 2013 10:32 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 23, 2009 8:30 pm
Posts: 23921
BigKev wrote:
For those with the inclination it's worth watching the Collingwood match on replay. With the passion of "who's going to win" removed it's easier to get a fairer perspective. We played pretty well. Biggest problem was lack of composure in the 4th - way too many kicks just thrown on the boot. This was across the team.

IMO we should keep almost the same team - give them a chance to grow and develop together. My only changes would be Scotland in, (not sure for who, Laidler looks underdone, but it probably comes down to matchups ).

McLean in, Bell sub -- just for rotation, rate both similarly at the moment.



Lachie's goal was fabulous.
It really looked like we ran out of legs, and they sipped some beneficial green tea.
Are they just fitter at this stage?

_________________
That’s not a political statement — it’s a harsh reality, and we must act,” she said. “He is a clear and present danger to the things that keep us strong and free. I support impeachment.”


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 09, 2013 10:46 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:00 pm
Posts: 24635
Location: Kaloyasena
Smurph wrote:

McLean appears back to his old ways and should never be the sub IMO. The sub should inject some run or something into the game. McLean is not this player. Looked very slow the week before.





Please explain what McLean's new ways are.

_________________
"Hence you will not say that Greeks fight like heroes but that heroes fight like Greeks"?

Winston Churchill


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 09, 2013 10:47 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:06 pm
Posts: 35881
Location: Half back flank
Stokes, Varcoe, Motlop, Christensen, Duncan



Bloody quick side...

_________________
#DonTheStash


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 09, 2013 10:52 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2012 3:29 pm
Posts: 7074
CK95 wrote:
Stokes, Varcoe, Motlop, Christensen, Duncan



Bloody quick side...



Yarran, Walker, Garlett & Armfield go alright too. Missing Betts for obvious reasons.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 09, 2013 10:55 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:06 pm
Posts: 35881
Location: Half back flank
Agree


Carlton by 107 points

_________________
#DonTheStash


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 09, 2013 11:09 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2006 8:28 pm
Posts: 1642
Location: .?../*%$#@
CK95 wrote:
Agree


Carlton by 107 points


i reckon that's slightly wishful thinking..... Carlton by 104 points is more realistic


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 356 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 ... 18  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Hamster, Sydney Blue and 50 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group