Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Mon Jun 16, 2025 9:20 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 451 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 ... 23  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Mar 22, 2013 5:06 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 7:13 pm
Posts: 21075
Location: Missing Kouta
DenimUndies wrote:
Kouta wrote:
kezza wrote:
Punter22 wrote:
So are we now comparing Kreuzer with Cox? Lets get serious.

I agree with comments above that at the time of the pick it was the right pick. Looking back with 20/20 hindsight, there is no way known I would have made that pick.

Without Kreuzer, it's entirely possible that Jacobs wouldn't have seen the logjam and may have been persuaded to stay. So we might well have had a ruck division of Jacobs, Warnock and Hampson with Cotchin alongside Judd, Murph, Gibbs and carrots.

I know which option I would rather take.

Before the deluge of vitriol floods in, i love Kreuzer, love his work ethic and attitude, and accept injuries have hampered him. It just doesn't tip the balance for me in this debate.

Good post, i agree with pretty much all you have mentioned. Hindsight is a wonderful thing, life is full of what ifs.
Would our side be better with Cotchin, Selwood, Pendelbury, Tahlia, Rich etc? Probably.

Image

#Cazzesman


As a matter of interest I wonder which of the 2 would have been chosen, had MM been coaching us at the time rather than Ratts.

Wayne Hughes would have picked Kreuzer.

As pointless as asking if Hardwick would have asked for Kreuzer if he was at Richmond six years ago.

Mick didn't storm into Visy Park and ask for Jaksch, Corr or Lonergan last year to fill a need. He trusted Rogers to pick Menzel. No different to Mick allowing Hine to take Thomas ahead of Pendlebury who is the better footballer.

Kreuzer was ranked at one by most clubs, but keep the redundant hindsight up.


I believe the Tigers wanted Kreuzer.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 22, 2013 11:35 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2007 5:02 pm
Posts: 1649
Retrospective draft considerations about who should have been selected ahead of who are always pointless...

People should look at the draft more simply: did we draft a good player? In MK the answer is yes.

It is very rare that the #1 pick is the best player in the draft. Not many of them have been. It should only mean that you get a gun player and we got three. All have room for improvement but all would walk into any team in the league. The rest is irrelevant.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 23, 2013 10:54 am 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 25157
Location: Bondi Beach
Kouta wrote:
DenimUndies wrote:
Kouta wrote:
kezza wrote:
Punter22 wrote:
So are we now comparing Kreuzer with Cox? Lets get serious.

I agree with comments above that at the time of the pick it was the right pick. Looking back with 20/20 hindsight, there is no way known I would have made that pick.

Without Kreuzer, it's entirely possible that Jacobs wouldn't have seen the logjam and may have been persuaded to stay. So we might well have had a ruck division of Jacobs, Warnock and Hampson with Cotchin alongside Judd, Murph, Gibbs and carrots.

I know which option I would rather take.

Before the deluge of vitriol floods in, i love Kreuzer, love his work ethic and attitude, and accept injuries have hampered him. It just doesn't tip the balance for me in this debate.

Good post, i agree with pretty much all you have mentioned. Hindsight is a wonderful thing, life is full of what ifs.
Would our side be better with Cotchin, Selwood, Pendelbury, Tahlia, Rich etc? Probably.

Image

#Cazzesman


As a matter of interest I wonder which of the 2 would have been chosen, had MM been coaching us at the time rather than Ratts.

Wayne Hughes would have picked Kreuzer.

As pointless as asking if Hardwick would have asked for Kreuzer if he was at Richmond six years ago.

Mick didn't storm into Visy Park and ask for Jaksch, Corr or Lonergan last year to fill a need. He trusted Rogers to pick Menzel. No different to Mick allowing Hine to take Thomas ahead of Pendlebury who is the better footballer.

Kreuzer was ranked at one by most clubs, but keep the redundant hindsight up.


I believe the Tigers wanted Kreuzer.


They didn't call it the "kreuzer Cup" for nothing.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 23, 2013 4:47 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2007 9:09 pm
Posts: 6047
My last go at the round 1 team....

Tuohy Jamo Laidler
Yarran White Gibbs
Simmo Judd Lucas
Garlett Hendo Robbo
Betts Casboult Walker

Kreuzer Carrazzo Murphy

Inter: Armfield Brock Warnock

Sub: Bell


Hammer vs Warnock is the one I keep flip flopping on. I still have the feeling that MM will prefer Hammer in round 1 because he is a bit more dangerous than 206 as a forward, plus he may want to see how badly Warnock wants it in the early VFL games, but I keep coming back to the idea that when we win games in 2013 it will be due to our mids - and 206 gives them better service with his taps.

Hendo to start forward but he can go behind the ball late in quarters when Kreuzer goes forward. If White is getting towelled up, he and Hendo may need to swap roles.

I doubt it will happen, but I have pushed Duigan out. Gibbs to rotate off HB with Simmo, Judd and Carrazzo. Bell as Sub.

_________________
It's never as good as it looks and it's never as bad as it seems.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 23, 2013 5:48 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Sun Dec 23, 2007 11:51 am
Posts: 1291
aboynamedsue wrote:
My last go at the round 1 team....

Tuohy Jamo Laidler
Yarran White Gibbs
Simmo Judd Lucas
Garlett Hendo Robbo
Betts Casboult Walker

Kreuzer Carrazzo Murphy

Inter: Armfield Brock Warnock

Sub: Bell


Hammer vs Warnock is the one I keep flip flopping on. I still have the feeling that MM will prefer Hammer in round 1 because he is a bit more dangerous than 206 as a forward, plus he may want to see how badly Warnock wants it in the early VFL games, but I keep coming back to the idea that when we win games in 2013 it will be due to our mids - and 206 gives them better service with his taps.

Hendo to start forward but he can go behind the ball late in quarters when Kreuzer goes forward. If White is getting towelled up, he and Hendo may need to swap roles.

I doubt it will happen, but I have pushed Duigan out. Gibbs to rotate off HB with Simmo, Judd and Carrazzo. Bell as Sub.


If Duigan plays, who misses out?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 23, 2013 5:57 pm 
Offline
Geoff Southby

Joined: Tue Nov 03, 2009 7:24 pm
Posts: 5537
Location: Bridge, Starship Enterprise
Why would Henderson play forward. All preseason he has played back with White as a swingman. At no time has he been foward. So why confuse the issue when the players are still learning the game plan.

_________________
"Get ready, Teddy - you're on": Ron Barassi half time 1970 Grand Final


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 23, 2013 6:23 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:26 am
Posts: 14730
Location: Comparing orange boners with Hirdy
Because TC says so silly Teddy.
Just like waite in the midfield, collins and ellard in the bp - why wont they listen to us?

_________________
Greg Swann wrote:
Essendon* cheated, simple as that


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 23, 2013 6:40 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2007 9:09 pm
Posts: 6047
Teddy Hopkins wrote:
Why would Henderson play forward. All preseason he has played back with White as a swingman. At no time has he been foward. So why confuse the issue when the players are still learning the game plan.

Hendo spent some time forward in the Freo game actually. But I admit it is unlikely he will start forward in round 1 because of MM's focus on defence.

That team I posted earlier is what I would like to see, not what I expect to see.

_________________
It's never as good as it looks and it's never as bad as it seems.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 23, 2013 6:45 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2007 9:09 pm
Posts: 6047
ColourMan wrote:
aboynamedsue wrote:
My last go at the round 1 team....

Tuohy Jamo Laidler
Yarran White Gibbs
Simmo Judd Lucas
Garlett Hendo Robbo
Betts Casboult Walker

Kreuzer Carrazzo Murphy

Inter: Armfield Brock Warnock

Sub: Bell


Hammer vs Warnock is the one I keep flip flopping on. I still have the feeling that MM will prefer Hammer in round 1 because he is a bit more dangerous than 206 as a forward, plus he may want to see how badly Warnock wants it in the early VFL games, but I keep coming back to the idea that when we win games in 2013 it will be due to our mids - and 206 gives them better service with his taps.

Hendo to start forward but he can go behind the ball late in quarters when Kreuzer goes forward. If White is getting towelled up, he and Hendo may need to swap roles.

I doubt it will happen, but I have pushed Duigan out. Gibbs to rotate off HB with Simmo, Judd and Carrazzo. Bell as Sub.


If Duigan plays, who misses out?


Bell, Garlett, Armfield, White or Tuohy I guess. Walker might be surprise omission. I tend to think Lucas is fairly safe.

_________________
It's never as good as it looks and it's never as bad as it seems.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 23, 2013 7:43 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2007 9:09 pm
Posts: 6047
Megaman wrote:
Because TC says so silly Teddy.
Just like waite in the midfield, collins and ellard in the bp - why wont they listen to us?

You're so right! Hendo as a forward is insane talk. Complete left field gibberish! What was I thinking?

_________________
It's never as good as it looks and it's never as bad as it seems.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 23, 2013 8:05 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:26 am
Posts: 14730
Location: Comparing orange boners with Hirdy
:lol: its crazy talk abns

_________________
Greg Swann wrote:
Essendon* cheated, simple as that


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 23, 2013 8:32 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2007 9:09 pm
Posts: 6047
I'm a bad person.

_________________
It's never as good as it looks and it's never as bad as it seems.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 23, 2013 10:32 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Sat Aug 27, 2011 2:06 pm
Posts: 1098
There are suggestions on supercoach forums that Menzel may be a surprise selection. That would be a surprise.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 24, 2013 8:11 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 03, 2009 11:24 am
Posts: 2416
Location: Melbourne
Teddy Hopkins wrote:
Why would Henderson play forward.

As silly as it sounds, it's a better option than Hampson playing forward.

_________________
Premierships: 1869, 1871, 1873, 1874, 1875, 1877, 1887, 1906, 1907, 1908, 1914, 1915, 1938, 1945, 1947, 1968, 1970, 1972, 1979, 1981, 1982, 1987, 1995.

"GIBBS."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 24, 2013 11:47 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 10:48 pm
Posts: 4447
Location: Perth
Extremely nervous already. Going to be a long week, even with a Thurs game.

Want nothing more than to come out and get the job done convincingly. Not all that confident we will though. Hope I'm wrong.

I hate being a nervous Nellie. Maybe I should try George Costanza's the opposite approach?

My name is Mat, I am a carlton supporter and we will win the flag this year :lol:

_________________
We are on our way back...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 24, 2013 2:57 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 10:56 am
Posts: 19501
Location: Progreso, Yucatan, MEXICO
Two outsiders up already

_________________
Let slip the Blues of war (with apologies to William Shakespeare) (and Sir Francis Bacon, just in case)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 24, 2013 3:51 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 21, 2005 5:15 pm
Posts: 7360
Directions to the worry room please...

_________________
“I would rather have questions that can't be answered than answers that can't be questioned.” ― Richard Feynman


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 24, 2013 4:28 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Sat Sep 09, 2006 2:01 pm
Posts: 2099
Teddy Hopkins wrote:
Why would Henderson play forward. All preseason he has played back with White as a swingman. At no time has he been foward. So why confuse the issue when the players are still learning the game plan.


White is a handy forward at best, but Hendo has a touch of class and at least Casboult won't get the best defender. :yikes: We have better tall backs than tall forwards at the CFC at the moment.

White and Hendo can always swap if things go awry at either end.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 24, 2013 8:58 pm 
Offline
Garry Crane
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2011 9:08 pm
Posts: 293
Location: Behind Enemy Lines - SA
Blues Clues wrote:
Teddy Hopkins wrote:
Why would Henderson play forward. All preseason he has played back with White as a swingman. At no time has he been foward. So why confuse the issue when the players are still learning the game plan.


White is a handy forward at best, but Hendo has a touch of class and at least Casboult won't get the best defender. :yikes: We have better tall backs than tall forwards at the CFC at the moment.

White and Hendo can always swap if things go awry at either end.


I think Mick has shown this will be the case going forward - he has tried it in a few games so far in the pre-season. It's not a bad option really. Not a good one though either...

The point would just be to have another tall to provide a contest. I think if White and Casboult are up fwd, the hope is that they kick 2-3 between them, and Betts et al kick a bag with some midfielders chiming in too.

_________________
"Don't ask yourself what the world needs. Ask yourself what makes you come alive and then go do that. Because what the world needs is people who have come alive." - Howard Thurman


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 25, 2013 7:22 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2011 3:17 pm
Posts: 2646
Rowe, Hampson and Casboult should be the prefered options up forward.
White isn't a KP he's third tall at best.
Rowe and Hendo can swap forward defending positions if needed with Casboult or Hampson taking some ruck duties.
The final equation I see is Casboult and Rowe.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 451 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 ... 23  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: bluechampion, famousblueraincoat, Yarsii and 58 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group