Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Sun Jun 15, 2025 4:34 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 194 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon May 13, 2013 10:55 am 
Offline
Wayne Johnston
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 04, 2005 1:26 am
Posts: 8024
Location: Melbourne
Pretty spot on BKB. I get the feeling they thought they'd have all these gun new kids that they got for nothing who play 20+ games and blitz who they can then trade in 2013,2014+ for the experienced players they need.

What they forgot though is no matter how good your picks might look, stats are that @20% of draftees never play a game and a massive 50% play less than 20 games. So even given the position of their picks, relying on a team of nearly all kids exposes you to the reality that in their case, even despite the early picks, reality is that at least 30% are going to fail. Add to that the fact that unlike experienced teams where you can bring in kids in a measured fashion, they've thrown there's to the wolves.

Given the pure weight of early picks, they can't fail to hit and they have some real superstars. But I don't think they are going to get the results they obviously planned for. And they run the risk of finishing of kids because of the lack of support for them on field.

And I also reckon that they played hardball on trading, offering little to the clubs of the players they were after.

_________________
Everything before the word "but" is horseshit - J Snow


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 13, 2013 3:34 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter

Joined: Thu May 11, 2006 6:11 pm
Posts: 14994
teknodeejay wrote:
Big Kahuna Boot wrote:
..now they're struggling, their senior players aren't much chop, and the PR machine is in swing trying to blame the other clubs for them only having kids.. ..and honestly speaking, Daisy is mid-range in his career, but Krooz and Carlisle are still in their first part of their careers, and so even this BS arguement of theirs, is still mentioning young up and coming players.. ..there's no truely experienced bunch of leaders to help them out in his list of names..


Silvagni done a number on them.

$1M per year for Scully...

That's worse than the 3 year Waite deal we all carry on about.

We had Judd for around $1M a year.

Cloke would have been about $1M a year.

Scully?

They stuffed up.

And dont forget daddy's salary is also under their salary cap.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 13, 2013 5:36 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2005 8:15 pm
Posts: 4842
Kouta wrote:
:garthp:


:darylb:

_________________
Just because I'm offended, doesn't mean I'm wrong.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 13, 2013 6:48 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:41 pm
Posts: 63509
bondiblue wrote:
Donstuie wrote:
It was Brian Taylor
Quote:
Brian Taylor just confirmed the player was Mathew kruezer.He knocked it back.Mike Sheehan knew of it 6 weeks ago but not the amount of Money involved.


I'll ask BT about it next time I see him.
That's gold.


While you're at it, can you tell him to shut his oversized cakehole, and just let the match unfold without the addition of his inanities?

_________________
And so while others miserably pledge themselves to the pursuit of ambition and brief power, I will be stretched out in the shade, singing.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 13, 2013 7:01 pm 
Offline
formerly King Kenny
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 06, 2009 8:35 pm
Posts: 20076
They can have some of our guys this year.

Hampson for Devon Smith or Taylor Adams

Watson for Matthew Buntine


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 14, 2013 9:09 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:41 pm
Posts: 63509
King Kenny wrote:
They can have some of our guys this year.

Hampson for Devon Smith or Taylor Adams

Watson for Matthew Buntine


Not sure I want a player named after pressed lunch meat.

_________________
And so while others miserably pledge themselves to the pursuit of ambition and brief power, I will be stretched out in the shade, singing.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 14, 2013 9:31 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 14, 2007 6:10 pm
Posts: 33618
Location: COMFORTABLY DISSATISFIED
Have to admit I'mreally worried about Kreuz, and this thread has made some valid points.

Right now he's a bit of a nothing player really, and while it can be argued that injuries have never allowed him a good run at it, do we really think this is a problem that is just going to miraculously disappear?

In the cold light of day, Kreuz right now is:
- A forward who can't take a mark
- A ruckman who is behind Warnock
- A midfielder who is too bulky and slow

The guy should have all the attributes to be one of the elite big men of the competition, either in ruck or forward, but I'm fearing that time is running out for us to see anything near his full potential.

_________________
WADA medical director Dr Alan Vernec describes Essendon* FC drug case as biggest scandal in team sport the world of sport has seen. #WC2WB

#GUILTY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 14, 2013 3:47 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter

Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 6:54 pm
Posts: 14686
Location: The Vodka Train
^^^

..i would have thought, that in the cold light of day Krooz is a ruckman, and that is it.. ..he's a very good ruckman, and any disadvantage in regards to rucking is balanced by his around the ground ability.. ..how we are able to use him in concert with Knockers is to be established still, but it's a ruck combo we ought to be working towards.. ..he was rushed back in, but we've seen enough of him playing as a fit ruckman to know he is quality..

..trying to turn him into a KPF won't work, but he can provide a target as a ruck pushing fwd, and also could be dangerous provided we have an established KPF providing direction and presence, which he proved in his 1st couple of seasons while we had Fev..

..and let's be honest, Knockers hasn't proven himself durable, so would you be happy with the alternative rucking solution when [not if] Knockers is injured, AND Krooz is moved on..?..

_________________
..if you can't be good, be good at it..


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 14, 2013 5:10 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:32 am
Posts: 10573
Kruezer needs to understand to put the team 1st and stop wanting to play 1st ruck cause that's what he wants!
He needs to bite the bullet and learn to play CHF. He has all the tools but no desire.
Does this and he prospers, does not and well .....
Warnock is our best no.1 tap ruckman and has been since Jacobs left.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 14, 2013 5:14 pm 
Offline
formerly cj69

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:52 am
Posts: 7893
SurreyBlue wrote:
Kruezer needs to understand to put the team 1st and stop wanting to play 1st ruck cause that's what he wants!
He needs to bite the bullet and learn to play CHF. He has all the tools but no desire.
Does this and he prospers, does not and well .....
Warnock is our best no.1 tap ruckman and has been since Jacobs left.



The issue is Kruezer is a ruckman, Hampson is a ruckman, Warnock is a ruckman. We can only play ONE.

Not one of them is a forward at any level. Rucks aren't forwards. Its like mids being full backs. Doesn't work!!!!!


..................and for me it's Warnock as No.1 by a mile!

_________________
#NewBlues beginning 25th August 2015


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 14, 2013 5:15 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:32 am
Posts: 10573
Kruezer is not a ruckman! Hampson is yes and a better one than Kruezer.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 14, 2013 5:17 pm 
Offline
formerly cj69

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:52 am
Posts: 7893
SurreyBlue wrote:
Kruezer is not a ruckman!


He isn't???

Well we wasted the No.1 pick on the worst CHF in history. :banghead:

_________________
#NewBlues beginning 25th August 2015


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 14, 2013 7:13 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 7:13 pm
Posts: 21075
Location: Missing Kouta
Donstuie wrote:
Have to admit I'mreally worried about Kreuz, and this thread has made some valid points.

Right now he's a bit of a nothing player really, and while it can be argued that injuries have never allowed him a good run at it, do we really think this is a problem that is just going to miraculously disappear?

In the cold light of day, Kreuz right now is:
- A forward who can't take a mark
- A ruckman who is behind Warnock
- A midfielder who is too bulky and slow

The guy should have all the attributes to be one of the elite big men of the competition, either in ruck or forward, but I'm fearing that time is running out for us to see anything near his full potential.

Why are you always so negative and reactionary?

You complain about the Jacobs trade, yet you suddenly don't rate the player who was the main reason he left. If we traded him and got unders, you probablyt whinge some more.

Kreuzer was our best ruck and ahead of Warnock before he injured his thumb.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 14, 2013 7:30 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 5:18 pm
Posts: 3411
Location: East Perth, WA
ThePsychologist wrote:
SurreyBlue wrote:
Kruezer is not a ruckman!


He isn't???

Well we wasted the No.1 pick on the worst CHF in history. :banghead:


He might be an ok CHB....

_________________
when you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth

Feelgood Hit of the Winter - GHRP-2, GHRP-6, CJC-1295, AOD-9604, Humanofort and Hexarelin


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 14, 2013 7:36 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2006 8:28 pm
Posts: 1642
Location: .?../*%$#@
yibbida wrote:
ThePsychologist wrote:
SurreyBlue wrote:
Kruezer is not a ruckman!


He isn't???

Well we wasted the No.1 pick on the worst CHF in history. :banghead:


He might be an ok CHB....


Huge Fall from grace from a potential star ruckman to an apparent not so sure perhaps an ok CHB


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 14, 2013 7:53 pm 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 08, 2005 1:09 am
Posts: 5245
Wow we are getting desperate now talking about Kruezer being a potential CHB :oops:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 14, 2013 7:56 pm 
Offline
Bert Deacon
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 07, 2006 7:36 pm
Posts: 557
Location: In the coach's box
Short memories on here.. fall from grace?

Kreuz was in great from prior to thumb injury and clearly seen as our no.1 ruck. I think he still is as he offers more in all facets and isn't a one trick pony like Warnock. He was rushed back too soon... why the rush? Why couldn't we play Rowe last night who apart from one quiet game against the crows had been good?

I would trade Warnock before Kreuz.

_________________
17 4 10


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 14, 2013 8:22 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
SurreyBlue wrote:
Kruezer is not a ruckman! Hampson is yes and a better one than Kruezer.

youre kidding...... again!!!... :lol:

hampson has no idea where he is gunna ruck the ball to.
to me he reminds me of a volleyball player blocking at the net.. come to think of it.. he marks like that too

hampson is seriously limited in his footy prowess.
better ruck than Kreuzer pffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffft

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 14, 2013 8:48 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 14, 2007 6:10 pm
Posts: 33618
Location: COMFORTABLY DISSATISFIED
Kouta wrote:
Donstuie wrote:
Have to admit I'mreally worried about Kreuz, and this thread has made some valid points.

Right now he's a bit of a nothing player really, and while it can be argued that injuries have never allowed him a good run at it, do we really think this is a problem that is just going to miraculously disappear?

In the cold light of day, Kreuz right now is:
- A forward who can't take a mark
- A ruckman who is behind Warnock
- A midfielder who is too bulky and slow

The guy should have all the attributes to be one of the elite big men of the competition, either in ruck or forward, but I'm fearing that time is running out for us to see anything near his full potential.

Why are you always so negative and reactionary?

You complain about the Jacobs trade, yet you suddenly don't rate the player who was the main reason he left. If we traded him and got unders, you probablyt whinge some more.

Kreuzer was our best ruck and ahead of Warnock before he injured his thumb.

Not that it has any relevance here, but the only thing I've ever complained with the Jacobs trade is how we were reamed on it. I welcome you to point out any time I've said anything to the contrary.

And there's nothing "sudden" about my worries about Kreuz at all. In fact I've been very supportive and patient of him for a long time. I just think people have every right to worry about his long-term future, and right now I don't know how he fits into things.

If this is "negative and reactionary" then I shudder to think what you think of others on here.

_________________
WADA medical director Dr Alan Vernec describes Essendon* FC drug case as biggest scandal in team sport the world of sport has seen. #WC2WB

#GUILTY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 15, 2013 8:52 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter

Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 6:54 pm
Posts: 14686
Location: The Vodka Train
SurreyBlue wrote:
Kruezer needs to understand to put the team 1st and stop wanting to play 1st ruck cause that's what he wants!
He needs to bite the bullet and learn to play CHF. He has all the tools but no desire.
Does this and he prospers, does not and well .....
Warnock is our best no.1 tap ruckman and has been since Jacobs left.


..Krooz is a quality 1st Ruck, and with the amount of games that Knockers' misses, he's just as likely to play main ruck as Knockers is..

..he has plenty of desire, and is not a player to sulk and let his form drop due to not playing in his preferred position.. ..it's just he does not have the KPF smarts, either at CHF or FF.. ..he's always been a ruck, and is an onballer due to his footy nous for working with midfielders.. ..it's just like thinking a tall KPF/KPD can make it as a ruckman, cos 'they have the attributes'.. ..it's an understanding of the position which Krooz lacks..

..in regards to Knockers being our best ruck since Jacobs left, i reckon i can name more influential games from Krooz in that time period, than you can for Knockers.. .... ..and this includes him rehabbing and recovering from the acl..

..Knockers wins more taps than Krooz, but unless i'm mistaken, i'm fairly sure they're about the same for hitout to adv percentages.. ....and the majority of players that have comeback from an ACL have for the most part said it took them a year, to year and a half to be right back to their best after returning from their ACL.. ..and pre-thumb, Krooz's 2013 form showed that he was.. ..he was running free, jumping, leaping high in the ruck, great first touch below his knees, he fumbled less than our top mids.. ..was crunching players in his tackles, when others were weak with theirs.. .... ..i can remember games where Knockers has had 2 possessions.. ..2.. ..you can get as many hitout as you like, but 2 touches for a game.. ..c'mon.. ... ..even Krooz as obviously hindered, and on top of that played out of position, could manage for than 2 touches..

_________________
..if you can't be good, be good at it..


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 194 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 29 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group