Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Fri Jun 20, 2025 10:38 pm

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 399 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 ... 20  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Aug 29, 2010 10:01 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:52 pm
Posts: 2044
We can beat the Swans we can't beat Paul Roos & that is who we are playing. An absolute litmus test for Brett Ratten.
He must not be predictable at the selection table or with match day tactics. Coach to win.

- Gibbs to the midfield for some part of the game
- I would bring in the O'hailpin so that we have the option to move Waite back, If setanta can't play there. Bower just isn't a key backman & if we win who is going to hold Hall or Collingwood forwards?
- Mclean or Hadley have to play.....Yarran goes
-


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 29, 2010 10:02 pm 
Offline
formerly BlueRob
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 12:45 pm
Posts: 3073
Oh know... a replay of last years final... bradshaw killed us.

_________________
I am as mad as hell and I'm not going to take it any more!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 29, 2010 10:44 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:41 pm
Posts: 63509
livolover wrote:
Nothing to really be cheerful about re. Carlton and 2010.

Anyone celebrating the fact of "falling" into the finals is IMO missing the bigger picture !

I remember a certain team who finished 8th, played finals and thought all was good this time last year ???

Are we headed down the same path ???


Mate, you wouldn't be cheerful about Carlton if you were asked to hand over the Cup to Juddy this September, and offered a heady from Megan Gale as a sweetener.

_________________
And so while others miserably pledge themselves to the pursuit of ambition and brief power, I will be stretched out in the shade, singing.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 29, 2010 10:45 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:41 pm
Posts: 63509
camelboy wrote:
I spose KK is unhappy he had to wait until September to see Carlton play in Sydney. :razz:


Nah, I'm good. Remember, I got to see them play (poorly) in February. And even got to get a pic of BabyK with Wiggo.

Speaking of which.

IN: WIGGO.

_________________
And so while others miserably pledge themselves to the pursuit of ambition and brief power, I will be stretched out in the shade, singing.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 29, 2010 11:11 pm 
Offline
Horrie Clover

Joined: Sat Sep 17, 2005 12:24 am
Posts: 336
Well its finals time now. Time for the match committee to get serious.

From the seconds the following players are worth a look (in no particular order)

Jacobs, Thornton, Hadley, McLean, Walker

Who played poorly in seniors

Hampson, Carazzo (Injured)?

If we are to beat the Swans we need to play our hard bodies. So Davies, Ellard have to go, through no fault on their behalf.

Also there is no way that you can take injured players to a final, so Carazzo is out.

So this how I would go.

In - Jacobs, Hadley, Walker, McLean

Out - Hampson, Carazzo, Davies, Ellard

Betts is damn luckey to stay in last 10 weeks have been terrible.

So how do we line up

FB Andrew Walker Michael Jamison Aaron Joseph

HB Jordan Russell Paul Bower Heath Scotland

C Kade Simpson Brock McLean Shaun Grigg

HF Bryce Gibbs Lachie Henderson Chris Yarran

FF Mitch Robinson Jarrad Waite Jeff Garlett

R Robert Warnock Chris Judd Marc Murphy

Bench Sam Jacobs Dennis Armfield Eddie Betts Richard Hadley

Emg David Ellard Marcus Davies Shaun Hampson


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 29, 2010 11:31 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 25231
Location: Bondi Beach
The more I look at it the more I like our chances.

IN: Thornton Hadley Walker
OUT: Carrazzo (hamstring) Yarran Davies

I don't think Grigg is a great tagger, but if it could only work. I suppose you'd try him on Goodes.
Gibbs freed up to play in the midfield is a real bonus. Let them worry about Gibbs. He's due for a big one.

We have to take the game on.
We can beat them at the clearances without Kreuzer.
We have the pace. If only Ratts would allow them to take risks.

Yarran doesn't have the strength to take on the Swans.
Whilst Davies' promotion has been good for him, he made too many mistakes last week.
The stakes are too high for development purposes, but Ratts would've played Thornton if he had no intention to play Davises in finals.

The Swans backline has 2 KP talls at 192 cm each: Grundy and Richards VS Waite 194 and Henderson 196
The 2 back pockets are fast but small at around 183cm: Shaw and Bevan VS Hampson 203 with pace and Betts 174.
The back flankers for them are both 188 cm: Kennelly and Malceski VS Scotland and Garlett or Robinson may play defensive forward.

I think we will win the ruck and midfield battle if we all play hard and fast footy.
We have to stop them from getting first hands on the footy.

My midfield consists of Judd Murphy Gibbs Simpson and Grigg, Hadley, Ellard and Joseph to rotate as the inside mids.
Hopefuuly we can also throw in Betts, Scotland, Walker and Garlett through the midfield to sustain the intensity on the ball.
I am not confident Carrazzo will make it. I hope he does play. I really hope (like all of us) that Betts finds the goals in the finals.

I think Jacobs will be a liability at the full fwd line once the ball hits the deck. The Swans are quick in the backline.
That's why I'm expecting Hampson to hold his spot. He will be much better this week. I'm sure. He needs to be against Shaw.
That'll be a great mismatch. Hampson has the pace to keep the pressure on Shaw. Dunno if he can turn like Shaw though.
I really want Thornton in for Davies.

FINALS. is synonymous with Carlton.
I hope we win this and the next and surprise in the prelim; then they's all know the Blues are back.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 30, 2010 12:19 am 
Offline
Geoff Southby

Joined: Tue Nov 03, 2009 7:24 pm
Posts: 5537
Location: Bridge, Starship Enterprise
Some great differences of opinion here. I would keep it reasonably simple.

Use Gibbs at his creative best in the middle.

Walker into the side BUT NOT IN DEFENCE. Play him on the wing where he can run.

T-Bird in to steady Bower and Jamison.

McLean in to release Juddy.

Out - Davies, Carazzo, Yarran.

Grigg tags Goodes, Ellard tags Jack. Game over.

:thumbsup:

_________________
"Get ready, Teddy - you're on": Ron Barassi half time 1970 Grand Final


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 30, 2010 12:25 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter

Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 6:54 pm
Posts: 14686
Location: The Vodka Train
verbs wrote:

This reminds me of the time Russell beat Johnstone because he was injured, or the time he beat Johnson because he was injured.

Goodes is yesterday's hero.


..Russ has backed it up the next two times.. ..Gibbs hasn't the next two times.. ..personally i don't really wanna stick the Gibblet with negating roles.. ..not run-with, not defender.. ..not wait til he gets the ball 'in time and space' off a hbf.. ..i want him creating play from the middle, on the ball..

_________________
..if you can't be good, be good at it..


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 30, 2010 1:48 am 
Offline
Bert Deacon

Joined: Wed May 21, 2008 5:03 pm
Posts: 573
Location: Camberwell
Whats with the calls for Grigg to tag Goodes? Since when has he ever been used in such a role where he has to tag such a damaging player who plays mid and also pushes forward...i dont recall Grigg being used in defence at all...

_________________
Carlton Premiers '10


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 30, 2010 8:45 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter

Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 6:54 pm
Posts: 14686
Location: The Vodka Train
..Goodes match-up is possibly the most concerning match-up for me.. ..a lot may depend upon how Roosy will utilise his star player..

_________________
..if you can't be good, be good at it..


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 30, 2010 8:48 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:39 pm
Posts: 15848
caulfieldrover wrote:
Ellard have to go



:lol:

_________________
"I had to eat"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 30, 2010 9:02 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 9:51 am
Posts: 4919
Big Kahuna Boot wrote:
..Goodes match-up is possibly the most concerning match-up for me.. ..a lot may depend upon how Roosy will utilise his star player..


I agree, we don't have an obvious macth up. Roos will use him in the middle and get him to push forward, he absolutley smashed us last time. In fact if you look at their midfield it has a fair bit of quality, Jack, Hannabery, Goodes, McVeigh. We have a chance if Mumford does not play and we can smash them in the ruck otherwise it will be all over for this year.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 30, 2010 9:08 am 
Offline
Geoff Southby

Joined: Tue Nov 03, 2009 7:24 pm
Posts: 5537
Location: Bridge, Starship Enterprise
jt wrote:
Whats with the calls for Grigg to tag Goodes? Since when has he ever been used in such a role where he has to tag such a damaging player who plays mid and also pushes forward...i dont recall Grigg being used in defence at all...


Its a matter of the players at your disposal. Who matches up to Goodes? Gibbs has done well on him in the past but he is just to valuable in a run with role. Grigg is deceptively strong, tall, and quick. Just hasn't got too much footy nous yet.

The other option is Bower in a run with role. Considering he is not in great form at the moment that may not be a bad idea either. Get him into the play and with his dash will exhaust Goodes.

_________________
"Get ready, Teddy - you're on": Ron Barassi half time 1970 Grand Final


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 30, 2010 9:13 am 
Offline
Geoff Southby

Joined: Tue Nov 03, 2009 7:24 pm
Posts: 5537
Location: Bridge, Starship Enterprise
woof wrote:
Big Kahuna Boot wrote:
..Goodes match-up is possibly the most concerning match-up for me.. ..a lot may depend upon how Roosy will utilise his star player..


I agree, we don't have an obvious macth up. Roos will use him in the middle and get him to push forward, he absolutley smashed us last time. In fact if you look at their midfield it has a fair bit of quality, Jack, Hannabery, Goodes, McVeigh. We have a chance if Mumford does not play and we can smash them in the ruck otherwise it will be all over for this year.


I reckon Roos is worried about out midfield.

Judd, Murphy, Gibbs (hopefully), Simpson, Scotland, Grigg, Ellard, Carazzo/McLean/Hadley, Garlett, Betts.

And even if Mumford plays, Warnock the WARLOCK

:thumbsup: :thumbsup: :thumbsup:

_________________
"Get ready, Teddy - you're on": Ron Barassi half time 1970 Grand Final


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 30, 2010 10:31 am 
Offline
Ken Hands

Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2005 2:17 pm
Posts: 461
Location: Glen Waverley
Walker in to tag Goodes? Has the tank, is 190cm and might be able to hurt him the other way?

He has at least been called upon to play as a tagger in the past

_________________
Cheerio to my friends KN, BC, TT, GP, DK, AE, MS, SC, TC, JL, MO & LF


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 30, 2010 10:33 am 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 3:08 pm
Posts: 3258
The sheer presence of Bondi Blue at the game Sunday will establish our home ground advantage.

Give it to 'em Bondi !!!!!!!...........they wont know what hit 'em.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 30, 2010 10:53 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Fri Dec 15, 2006 8:22 am
Posts: 2760
Grigg has played defensively before and done well - played defensive forward on Heath Shaw and killed him. Having said that, it was a long time ago & I wouldn't use him that way now.

Walker should come in and play on Goodes. He can match him in the air, his speed, strength as well as anyone and can hurt him bursting the other way. He can play go with Goodes forward, back or through the midfield. He has the endurance & speed to annoy Goodes by not leaving his side. The weaknesses - and there will be no matter who plays on him - are Walker's tackling and being caught on the rebound if Walker runs off him and kicks poorly.
Solution: 1) Walker's tackling goal is to stop the guy. Not to win possession, not to win a free kick just DO NOT LET HIM PASS YOU. This might slightly alter the way Walker thinks about his tackling role.
2) Whilst Walker's kicking has improved, we must make sure that everytime Walker bursts forward, one of us from our defensive side runs forward to cover Goodes so he is not alone for the rebound and cannot link the ball forward for them. If Goodes runs forward, the key is to cover the loose man who has taken the spot where Walker has run from, BUT Walker must know to sprint back just as quickly as he burst forward so we only have to cover for a few seconds.
Alternatively, I would play Walker on the wing. Give the tagging role to Grigg or Gibbs. Grigg could be good b/c you don't need to be as good as Goodes in order to stop him. You just have to be able to run with him, annoy him and compete physically, in the air to mae a contest of it until the troops arrive.

Whoever said Ellard should be dropped b/c not hard enough body, he laid 12 tackles last week!!
Ellard for Kieran Jack. I'd have Simpson matched to O'Keefe. Robinson on Malceski (I think Robinson would just make Kennelly play better!)

Thornton should come in for Davies, for several reasons mentioned by other posters.

Am 50/50 on Hadley. Based on form, doesn't seem to me that McLean is ready. If Hadley comes in, I guess it is either for Yarran or Robinson. Would be reluctant to drop either of these two.
Robinson - you know will give a contest but his finishing may be poor.
Yarran - you know his finishing and class could be the difference but not sure if he will contest with enough intensity.
Hadley - sort of a conservative combination, not quite as fierce as Robinson and without the finish of Yarran but confident he will give a bit of both....

In: Thornton, Walker
Out: Davies, Carrazzo.

(If Carrazzo is ok to play, Walker may come in for Yarran or Robinson...)

I THINK WE CAN WIN THIS. We lost to them in our down period. If we play like we have played the past few weeks, we can win!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 30, 2010 11:36 am 
Offline
formerly BlueRob
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 12:45 pm
Posts: 3073
Starting to think about the Ashes.

_________________
I am as mad as hell and I'm not going to take it any more!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 30, 2010 11:38 am 
Offline
Garry Crane

Joined: Sat Sep 08, 2007 5:16 pm
Posts: 276
How's this for a radical idea?

Start Robbo on Goodes. We know that if Goodes loses his cool he goes all sulky and starts trying to play for frees, and throw his weight around, thus taking his mind off the game.

This is assuming Goodes starts on ball. Robbo just annoys the hell out of him for the first 5-10, then we go with Walker.

Thoughts?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 30, 2010 11:49 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2007 2:37 pm
Posts: 1932
Blue Steel wrote:
How's this for a radical idea?

Start Robbo on Goodes. We know that if Goodes loses his cool he goes all sulky and starts trying to play for frees, and throw his weight around, thus taking his mind off the game.

This is assuming Goodes starts on ball. Robbo just annoys the hell out of him for the first 5-10, then we go with Walker.

Thoughts?



Really does he?

I wouldn't stir up Goodes, you are just asking for it if you do.

_________________
Koperek.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 399 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 ... 20  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 22 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group