Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Sat May 10, 2025 7:04 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2275 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67 ... 114  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2024
PostPosted: Sat Sep 21, 2024 11:19 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 24699
Location: Bondi Beach
Braithy wrote:
bondiblue wrote:

They are playing KPF for the top 6 teams....not really spuds. I respect any player who crosses the line. Those who arent good are soon dismissed. Carlton on the other hand is known to keep players in the hope they become KPDs or get over their injuries.

The May Lever is the best example from circa 2024 of shorter defenders, but its May's strength to take No 1 KPF that helps them out. Like I said its a case of strength vs height. Have to have one or the other to play KPD. Have to ask have you ever seen Lever left to defend one on one? Hopeless, Lost, anxious and very upset when he's left to fend for mimself. Every player has their achilles heel. He loves the space, to leave his man and jump for the spoil or mark.

As for looking at oppo KPD's, I have, they all have at least one very tall KPD (198-200) and one strong KPD (193-6) or 2 very talls, or even 3.

I know your argument about Footscray's unicorns playing 3 KPFs...but the fact is they exist more than you know or want me to believe. Don't worry if you think they are spuds today or unicorns. Most important thing to do in this exercise is see if they exist and what we have to counter them next year.

I think fresh young talls at Hawks are still young and developing, and may be ripe when Frost, Battle and Barrass end their careers, but at Carlton we are looking for a ready made KPD to replace Young, and one intercept mark better than Kemp and Gov. Hence Haynes. That Young improvement is key. I have faith in Young TBH, but I know 90% of Carlton supporters hate him. I have the same faith in SOS to play KPF-Ruck because TDK is our No 1 ruck, but don't know if Young and SOS are the answers TBH.



young is such a tease. he can string together good to very good games, and then he can play himself into the two's and off the list he so bad.

i wish he'd be consistent. the last 3 games he played this season were good. so good, that i'd rather chase houston and persist with him for another year. but cfc thinks otherwise and put him on the trade block.

can't wait for the season to end and the trade period to kick start.


I get the Young tease bit, but on the flipside I question whether the everchanging game plans of Voss as the reason for Young's "confusion", or, do the changes in game plan, caused maybe because of injury, is when we see the defense slaughtered with oppo forward entries and every defender looks vulnerable. Maybe Young is good enough to play FB. I think he is, and the midfield defending needs to improve moreso than Young.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2024
PostPosted: Sat Sep 21, 2024 11:26 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 24699
Location: Bondi Beach
Couldnt help but be impressed by Allie Allir's aerial work and general one on one defending. He's 194cm, proving he doesn't need the height to compete against the 195 types like Amartey and McDonald.

Then I look at Ports KPD Ratugolea who is 197cm and he looked lost, so his issue is more footy IQ imo. Furthermore 195cm Zerk Thatcher looked weak too as a KPD.

Maybe they needed a 200cm Dustin Fletcher type (I know, a he was a unicorn).

Size does matter in terms of height and/or weight, but so does strength to make a good KPD. What's more, Footy IQ, is also an important ingredient: footballer vs athlete.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2024
PostPosted: Sat Sep 21, 2024 11:26 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 7:40 pm
Posts: 7185
bondiblue wrote:
Braithy wrote:
bondiblue wrote:

They are playing KPF for the top 6 teams....not really spuds. I respect any player who crosses the line. Those who arent good are soon dismissed. Carlton on the other hand is known to keep players in the hope they become KPDs or get over their injuries.

The May Lever is the best example from circa 2024 of shorter defenders, but its May's strength to take No 1 KPF that helps them out. Like I said its a case of strength vs height. Have to have one or the other to play KPD. Have to ask have you ever seen Lever left to defend one on one? Hopeless, Lost, anxious and very upset when he's left to fend for mimself. Every player has their achilles heel. He loves the space, to leave his man and jump for the spoil or mark.

As for looking at oppo KPD's, I have, they all have at least one very tall KPD (198-200) and one strong KPD (193-6) or 2 very talls, or even 3.

I know your argument about Footscray's unicorns playing 3 KPFs...but the fact is they exist more than you know or want me to believe. Don't worry if you think they are spuds today or unicorns. Most important thing to do in this exercise is see if they exist and what we have to counter them next year.

I think fresh young talls at Hawks are still young and developing, and may be ripe when Frost, Battle and Barrass end their careers, but at Carlton we are looking for a ready made KPD to replace Young, and one intercept mark better than Kemp and Gov. Hence Haynes. That Young improvement is key. I have faith in Young TBH, but I know 90% of Carlton supporters hate him. I have the same faith in SOS to play KPF-Ruck because TDK is our No 1 ruck, but don't know if Young and SOS are the answers TBH.



young is such a tease. he can string together good to very good games, and then he can play himself into the two's and off the list he so bad.

i wish he'd be consistent. the last 3 games he played this season were good. so good, that i'd rather chase houston and persist with him for another year. but cfc thinks otherwise and put him on the trade block.

can't wait for the season to end and the trade period to kick start.


I get the Young tease bit, but on the flipside I question whether the everchanging game plans of Voss as the reason for Young's "confusion", or, do the changes in game plan, caused maybe because of injury, is when we see the defense slaughtered with oppo forward entries and every defender looks vulnerable. Maybe Young is good enough to play FB. I think he is, and the midfield defending needs to improve moreso than Young.


One hundred percent . Young cops shit because of slackness further up the ground . Bit of victim shaming really .

_________________
All my dangerous friends


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2024
PostPosted: Sat Sep 21, 2024 1:47 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2005 4:04 pm
Posts: 7466
Location: Bendigo
Mickstar wrote:
bondiblue wrote:
Braithy wrote:
bondiblue wrote:

They are playing KPF for the top 6 teams....not really spuds. I respect any player who crosses the line. Those who arent good are soon dismissed. Carlton on the other hand is known to keep players in the hope they become KPDs or get over their injuries.

The May Lever is the best example from circa 2024 of shorter defenders, but its May's strength to take No 1 KPF that helps them out. Like I said its a case of strength vs height. Have to have one or the other to play KPD. Have to ask have you ever seen Lever left to defend one on one? Hopeless, Lost, anxious and very upset when he's left to fend for mimself. Every player has their achilles heel. He loves the space, to leave his man and jump for the spoil or mark.

As for looking at oppo KPD's, I have, they all have at least one very tall KPD (198-200) and one strong KPD (193-6) or 2 very talls, or even 3.

I know your argument about Footscray's unicorns playing 3 KPFs...but the fact is they exist more than you know or want me to believe. Don't worry if you think they are spuds today or unicorns. Most important thing to do in this exercise is see if they exist and what we have to counter them next year.

I think fresh young talls at Hawks are still young and developing, and may be ripe when Frost, Battle and Barrass end their careers, but at Carlton we are looking for a ready made KPD to replace Young, and one intercept mark better than Kemp and Gov. Hence Haynes. That Young improvement is key. I have faith in Young TBH, but I know 90% of Carlton supporters hate him. I have the same faith in SOS to play KPF-Ruck because TDK is our No 1 ruck, but don't know if Young and SOS are the answers TBH.



young is such a tease. he can string together good to very good games, and then he can play himself into the two's and off the list he so bad.

i wish he'd be consistent. the last 3 games he played this season were good. so good, that i'd rather chase houston and persist with him for another year. but cfc thinks otherwise and put him on the trade block.

can't wait for the season to end and the trade period to kick start.


I get the Young tease bit, but on the flipside I question whether the everchanging game plans of Voss as the reason for Young's "confusion", or, do the changes in game plan, caused maybe because of injury, is when we see the defense slaughtered with oppo forward entries and every defender looks vulnerable. Maybe Young is good enough to play FB. I think he is, and the midfield defending needs to improve moreso than Young.


One hundred percent . Young cops shit because of slackness further up the ground . Bit of victim shaming really .

Young’s problem is that he’s had to be dragged, kicking & screaming into a CHB role. The penny hasn’t quite dropped. He sees himself as a third man up interceptor (he said as much when he left the Dogs) and, in fairness, it’s a great mismatch with his size & athleticism… not so great for his teammates that are left on an island with the bigger man.

Our key defenders all play a bit too selfish. Even Weitering, at times, will stay with his direct opponent, defending an 80m kick.

Vossy sets that high defensive line, because it’s a winner’s mentality. But it only takes a couple of skill errors on the rebound & the back six go into self preservation mode.

_________________
"The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter" - Winston Churchill.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2024
PostPosted: Sat Sep 21, 2024 2:17 pm 
Offline
Horrie Clover

Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2021 2:17 pm
Posts: 374
young good mark but to SLOW


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2024
PostPosted: Sat Sep 21, 2024 2:24 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 7:40 pm
Posts: 7185
Crusader wrote:
Mickstar wrote:
bondiblue wrote:
Braithy wrote:
bondiblue wrote:

They are playing KPF for the top 6 teams....not really spuds. I respect any player who crosses the line. Those who arent good are soon dismissed. Carlton on the other hand is known to keep players in the hope they become KPDs or get over their injuries.

The May Lever is the best example from circa 2024 of shorter defenders, but its May's strength to take No 1 KPF that helps them out. Like I said its a case of strength vs height. Have to have one or the other to play KPD. Have to ask have you ever seen Lever left to defend one on one? Hopeless, Lost, anxious and very upset when he's left to fend for mimself. Every player has their achilles heel. He loves the space, to leave his man and jump for the spoil or mark.

As for looking at oppo KPD's, I have, they all have at least one very tall KPD (198-200) and one strong KPD (193-6) or 2 very talls, or even 3.

I know your argument about Footscray's unicorns playing 3 KPFs...but the fact is they exist more than you know or want me to believe. Don't worry if you think they are spuds today or unicorns. Most important thing to do in this exercise is see if they exist and what we have to counter them next year.

I think fresh young talls at Hawks are still young and developing, and may be ripe when Frost, Battle and Barrass end their careers, but at Carlton we are looking for a ready made KPD to replace Young, and one intercept mark better than Kemp and Gov. Hence Haynes. That Young improvement is key. I have faith in Young TBH, but I know 90% of Carlton supporters hate him. I have the same faith in SOS to play KPF-Ruck because TDK is our No 1 ruck, but don't know if Young and SOS are the answers TBH.



young is such a tease. he can string together good to very good games, and then he can play himself into the two's and off the list he so bad.

i wish he'd be consistent. the last 3 games he played this season were good. so good, that i'd rather chase houston and persist with him for another year. but cfc thinks otherwise and put him on the trade block.

can't wait for the season to end and the trade period to kick start.


I get the Young tease bit, but on the flipside I question whether the everchanging game plans of Voss as the reason for Young's "confusion", or, do the changes in game plan, caused maybe because of injury, is when we see the defense slaughtered with oppo forward entries and every defender looks vulnerable. Maybe Young is good enough to play FB. I think he is, and the midfield defending needs to improve moreso than Young.


One hundred percent . Young cops shit because of slackness further up the ground . Bit of victim shaming really .

Young’s problem is that he’s had to be dragged, kicking & screaming into a CHB role. The penny hasn’t quite dropped. He sees himself as a third man up interceptor (he said as much when he left the Dogs) and, in fairness, it’s a great mismatch with his size & athleticism… not so great for his teammates that are left on an island with the bigger man.

Our key defenders all play a bit too selfish. Even Weitering, at times, will stay with his direct opponent, defending an 80m kick.

Vossy sets that high defensive line, because it’s a winner’s mentality. But it only takes a couple of skill errors on the rebound & the back six go into self preservation mode.


Yep , we agree .

_________________
All my dangerous friends


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2024
PostPosted: Sat Sep 21, 2024 2:31 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2013 2:16 pm
Posts: 14333
Location: Sydney
Crusader wrote:
.
Our key defenders all play a bit too selfish. Even Weitering, at times, will stay with his direct opponent, defending an 80m kick.
.


Interesting comment. When we were flying and we had a five game stretch of conceding between 70 and 74 points, one thing that got pointed out by King (or someone of his ilk) was how disciplined our defenders, especially Weitering, were at not allowing themselves to be dragged down field by their opponents; recognising where the areas of greatest threat were and being willing to concede the low risk zones. Not sure whether we changed our plans, the players got spooked or stopped working together, but something got lost along the way to make us regularly concede 100+ in the last third of the season.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2024
PostPosted: Mon Sep 23, 2024 12:46 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:13 pm
Posts: 1138
Location: Narre Warren VIC
Everyone is talking about the Super Draft of 2024 but what good is it for us?

I have just learned that we only have picks 11 & 31, then nothing until the late 60's. How is that possible? did we end up giving up Draft picks for Recycled players yet again from previous years?


And do the Campo Boys come in at this Draft? or do they automatically go into our list?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2024
PostPosted: Mon Sep 23, 2024 7:03 am 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 1:09 pm
Posts: 5848
bondiblue wrote:
bluebo baggers wrote:
Wasn’t there also talk of the third McCartin brother, Charlie, who was playing down at Lorne under Ed Curnow? Did that ever go anywhere and did he end up playing any VFL?



Shhhhhhhhhh

Just played two VFL games for Sydney
https://vfl.aflmstats.com/player/Charlie_McCartin

_________________
░L░I░N░K░I░N░B░I░O ░


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2024
PostPosted: Mon Sep 23, 2024 7:12 am 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 3:08 pm
Posts: 3248
bondiblue wrote:
Braithy wrote:
bondiblue wrote:

They are playing KPF for the top 6 teams....not really spuds. I respect any player who crosses the line. Those who arent good are soon dismissed. Carlton on the other hand is known to keep players in the hope they become KPDs or get over their injuries.

The May Lever is the best example from circa 2024 of shorter defenders, but its May's strength to take No 1 KPF that helps them out. Like I said its a case of strength vs height. Have to have one or the other to play KPD. Have to ask have you ever seen Lever left to defend one on one? Hopeless, Lost, anxious and very upset when he's left to fend for mimself. Every player has their achilles heel. He loves the space, to leave his man and jump for the spoil or mark.

As for looking at oppo KPD's, I have, they all have at least one very tall KPD (198-200) and one strong KPD (193-6) or 2 very talls, or even 3.

I know your argument about Footscray's unicorns playing 3 KPFs...but the fact is they exist more than you know or want me to believe. Don't worry if you think they are spuds today or unicorns. Most important thing to do in this exercise is see if they exist and what we have to counter them next year.

I think fresh young talls at Hawks are still young and developing, and may be ripe when Frost, Battle and Barrass end their careers, but at Carlton we are looking for a ready made KPD to replace Young, and one intercept mark better than Kemp and Gov. Hence Haynes. That Young improvement is key. I have faith in Young TBH, but I know 90% of Carlton supporters hate him. I have the same faith in SOS to play KPF-Ruck because TDK is our No 1 ruck, but don't know if Young and SOS are the answers TBH.



young is such a tease. he can string together good to very good games, and then he can play himself into the two's and off the list he so bad.

i wish he'd be consistent. the last 3 games he played this season were good. so good, that i'd rather chase houston and persist with him for another year. but cfc thinks otherwise and put him on the trade block.

can't wait for the season to end and the trade period to kick start.


I get the Young tease bit, but on the flipside I question whether the everchanging game plans of Voss as the reason for Young's "confusion", or, do the changes in game plan, caused maybe because of injury, is when we see the defense slaughtered with oppo forward entries and every defender looks vulnerable. Maybe Young is good enough to play FB. I think he is, and the midfield defending needs to improve moreso than Young.

I’m with you Bondi….he is worth investing in my book. It costs one more to buy than to invest in what’s already there. Keep him


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2024
PostPosted: Mon Sep 23, 2024 8:32 am 
Online
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:42 pm
Posts: 6926
london blue wrote:
I’m with you Bondi….he is worth investing in my book. It costs one more to buy than to invest in what’s already there. Keep him



i'm with you guys ... but i wonder the whole riff between young a few guys on the list (weiters and charlie mostly) is stamping his tickets outta here?


if it's true, we've strayed from the team first mentality that got us to the prelim in '23.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2024
PostPosted: Mon Sep 23, 2024 8:51 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 17951
Crusader wrote:
Young’s problem is that he’s had to be dragged, kicking & screaming into a CHB role. The penny hasn’t quite dropped. He sees himself as a third man up interceptor (he said as much when he left the Dogs) and, in fairness, it’s a great mismatch with his size & athleticism… not so great for his teammates that are left on an island with the bigger man.


He may see himself as a 3rd man up interceptor but he doesn't have the skill set. It's obvious what the opposition think of his skills. When we're transitioning the ball out of D50, he's the one defender they happily zone off. His own team mates will assess every possible option before kicking the ball to him. Yes his size and athleticism are great but he needs to use those to his advantage as a lock down defender. The fact that he hasn't done it is what stops him being a best 22 player IMHO.

You cant have an interceptor who makes the decisions (or lack of) that Lewis Young does. Imagine him getting it 20 times per game. Kicking it 42m to a 50/50 contest may count as an effective disposal but it wont get you a regular gig in the AFL if you're not an elite defender. Hence why the club has apparently told him to look elsewhere.
It's a shame as he has the makings of an excellent lock down player. As you said, he has size and athleticism but he needs more strength. If he could put on 7-8kg and become a strong defensive key, I'd suggest he could be of great value but perhaps he wont/cant adapt.

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2024
PostPosted: Mon Sep 23, 2024 10:44 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 05, 2005 10:49 am
Posts: 1621
We need to trade players to get a leg up in 2024 draft , as it may be barren for a while after Tassy entering the competition. Leave F1st for trades. Most other teams will be doing the same.

_________________
Go Blue Boys


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: List Management 2024
PostPosted: Mon Sep 23, 2024 11:12 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:29 am
Posts: 2209
jezzarules wrote:
bondiblue wrote:
bluebo baggers wrote:
Wasn’t there also talk of the third McCartin brother, Charlie, who was playing down at Lorne under Ed Curnow? Did that ever go anywhere and did he end up playing any VFL?



Shhhhhhhhhh

Just played two VFL games for Sydney
https://vfl.aflmstats.com/player/Charlie_McCartin


Pretty good mail he is no chance to be picked up by us


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

_________________
I support Carlton, Fulham and I'm an accountant - my mate calls me a 3 time loser.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2024
PostPosted: Mon Sep 23, 2024 11:45 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2011 4:05 pm
Posts: 2698
Blue Vain wrote:
Crusader wrote:
Young’s problem is that he’s had to be dragged, kicking & screaming into a CHB role. The penny hasn’t quite dropped. He sees himself as a third man up interceptor (he said as much when he left the Dogs) and, in fairness, it’s a great mismatch with his size & athleticism… not so great for his teammates that are left on an island with the bigger man.


He may see himself as a 3rd man up interceptor but he doesn't have the skill set. It's obvious what the opposition think of his skills. When we're transitioning the ball out of D50, he's the one defender they happily zone off. His own team mates will assess every possible option before kicking the ball to him. Yes his size and athleticism are great but he needs to use those to his advantage as a lock down defender. The fact that he hasn't done it is what stops him being a best 22 player IMHO.

You cant have an interceptor who makes the decisions (or lack of) that Lewis Young does. Imagine him getting it 20 times per game. Kicking it 42m to a 50/50 contest may count as an effective disposal but it wont get you a regular gig in the AFL if you're not an elite defender. Hence why the club has apparently told him to look elsewhere.
It's a shame as he has the makings of an excellent lock down player. As you said, he has size and athleticism but he needs more strength. If he could put on 7-8kg and become a strong defensive key, I'd suggest he could be of great value but perhaps he wont/cant adapt.


I agree BV. From what I see regularly of Young is he doesn't like body contact, jumps like a basketballer - appears unwilling to physically hurt an opposition and when he does get the ball he often looks like a rabbit caught in the headlights.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2024
PostPosted: Mon Sep 23, 2024 12:49 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 24699
Location: Bondi Beach
jezzarules wrote:
bondiblue wrote:
bluebo baggers wrote:
Wasn’t there also talk of the third McCartin brother, Charlie, who was playing down at Lorne under Ed Curnow? Did that ever go anywhere and did he end up playing any VFL?



Shhhhhhhhhh

Just played two VFL games for Sydney
https://vfl.aflmstats.com/player/Charlie_McCartin



I have no doubt McCartin will come good. He's got the physical attributes plus maturity.

I expect Cats and other teams to be keen on him this Draft.

Back in 2017, after selecting Dow at 3, LOB at 10, SOS had his eyes set on the mature Tim Kelly with his next pick pick 30. Unfortunately Cats got him with their pick 24. Cats traded Kelly 2 seasons later for 2 first round picks.

On the bright side we drafted TDK with pick 30.

McCartin is not worth pick 11, and there's a good chance he may be gone by our pick 30. Hence I'd love 2 picks in the 20's to add to our pick 11 before Ben Camporeale.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2024
PostPosted: Mon Sep 23, 2024 3:54 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 05, 2005 10:49 am
Posts: 1621
Agree pick 11 and 2 picks in 20's an ideal scenario and combined with Camporeale twins, a great haul.

_________________
Go Blue Boys


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2024
PostPosted: Mon Sep 23, 2024 5:42 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2005 4:04 pm
Posts: 7466
Location: Bendigo
bmaurizio wrote:
Agree pick 11 and 2 picks in 20's an ideal scenario and combined with Camporeale twins, a great haul.

Carroll, Owies, Young & Kennedy are the ‘offerings’. I can’t see how any of them yield a pick in the 30s never mind 20s. Maybe if they all go we might build a points bank to then move as a package deal… whole new set of problems with that, however.

The northern academies will be stacked again, so Gold Coast might have interest in next year’s first pick…

I’m just not seeing it.

_________________
"The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter" - Winston Churchill.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2024
PostPosted: Mon Sep 23, 2024 6:24 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 24699
Location: Bondi Beach
Crusader wrote:
bmaurizio wrote:
Agree pick 11 and 2 picks in 20's an ideal scenario and combined with Camporeale twins, a great haul.

Carroll, Owies, Young & Kennedy are the ‘offerings’. I can’t see how any of them yield a pick in the 30s never mind 20s. Maybe if they all go we might build a points bank to then move as a package deal… whole new set of problems with that, however.

The northern academies will be stacked again, so Gold Coast might have interest in next year’s first pick…

I’m just not seeing it.


I'm expecting the unexpected. Its about the now, not next year's expiring contracts.
I can't see Austin/ Carlton being relatively inactive, beyond the twins.

But we need to fix things for the now too.

There's upgrades to be had because there's Academy kids for the taking.

WE have to try and get better picks than Ben's. Huge opportunity in the Draft, but we may be Trading more for all we know; picks for players.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2024
PostPosted: Mon Sep 23, 2024 6:30 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:32 am
Posts: 10479
Young seeing himself as a 3rd interceptor is just not true. Absolute rubbish.
Also, please show me where this has been said!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2275 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67 ... 114  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Braithy, Google [Bot] and 96 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group