Same as Barker...should have been canned years ago.
But Carlton promoted him.

_________________
dane's trolling again

Agree x1000

_________________
O say does that star spangled banner yet wave.

SACK EVERYONE AND LET US RUN THE JOINT = immediate dynasty of flags

How about, don't let the head of the footy department undertake a review of his own flower footy department.

At least that = honesty and a genuine desire to improve.

_________________
O say does that star spangled banner yet wave.

That's one of the key functions of his job...

_________________
29 different attributes,
And only 7 that you like;
20 ways to see the world,
Or 20 ways to start a fight.

Wow. I should totally try negotiating that into my own contract:

"Will conduct review of own performance, and award bonuses and contract extensions accordingly"

_________________
O say does that star spangled banner yet wave.

Will review functioning of subordinates then report to board...

_________________
29 different attributes,
And only 7 that you like;
20 ways to see the world,
Or 20 ways to start a fight.

Ours is arguably the worst performing footy department in the past several years, ever since he was appointed as its head, and you're trying to justify him undertaking the review?

_________________
O say does that star spangled banner yet wave.

Was review about subordinates or about department as a whole? Important distinction

_________________
#NewBlues beginning 25th August 2015

Bingo.

_________________
O say does that star spangled banner yet wave.

Worst case scenario, someone has poorly communicated the purpose of the review. The board and CEO have a constitutionally entrenched responsibility for the entire football club, so your entire debate is one of semantics and thus a moot point.

_________________
29 different attributes,
And only 7 that you like;
20 ways to see the world,
Or 20 ways to start a fight.

Why is that funny? I am asking a genuine question about the review. What were the terms?

If it was about revewing subordinates then McKay should be doing it. If it's about the entire football department he shouldn't be.

It's obvious that your attacking the person rather than discussing the issue.

_________________
#NewBlues beginning 25th August 2015

Even if we accept that McKay is the right person to review the performance of his subordinates (a case can be made that even they should be reviewed by an unbiased third party who was not involved in their mentoring, direction, oversight, etc), I, like Psych, would like to know if McKay was given the task of reviewing the entire footy department, himself included.

Is that too much to ask jimmae?

_________________
O say does that star spangled banner yet wave.

I wouldn't of thought so. I still don't get the joke.

I honestly really have trouble understanding his comments and what his point is most of the time.

_________________
#NewBlues beginning 25th August 2015

Pretty sure there is no argument.

The Australian (granted Greg Denham) says Don Pyke - WCE tactic specialist is in the running.

Because what you're asking for is an audit...

_________________
29 different attributes,
And only 7 that you like;
20 ways to see the world,
Or 20 ways to start a fight.

No he isn't. Are we speaking a different language?

The question is about the terms for the review. Was it just for McKay subordinates or a review of the entire department. Is that too hard to ask?

_________________
#NewBlues beginning 25th August 2015

When McKay is submitting a report of his own department, he is reporting back on his own performance, but not determining his own fate beyond the information in the report. The board and the CEO ultimately make the call so they'd be stupid to not do their own due diligence (not lazy or poor governance, down right @#$%&! stupid), and it's going to be difficult for him to fudge data that makes it look like he's doing a good job.

When you want someone to do it independent of those facets of the organisation, that is a departmental audit.

These are fundamental points that you shouldn't need me to explain if you can form the questions you're asking, unless you think McKay is some sort of idiot savant when it comes to concocting a conspiracy.

_________________
29 different attributes,
And only 7 that you like;
20 ways to see the world,
Or 20 ways to start a fight.

I'll ask again.

The question is about the terms for the review. Was it just for McKay subordinates or a review of the entire department.

_________________
#NewBlues beginning 25th August 2015