Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Fri Jun 13, 2025 4:56 pm

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 162 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 24, 2006 10:07 am 
Offline
Rod McGregor

Joined: Mon Apr 17, 2006 5:27 pm
Posts: 169
Location: Brunswick
do you think he will get a game this week


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 24, 2006 10:17 am 
Offline
Trevor Keogh

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 3:04 pm
Posts: 717
Location: kensington
Synbad wrote:
ballistic blues wrote:
Setanta is a waste of space....... i couldn't help but feel embarrassed for the bloke he had no idea out there. Play the kid when he is ready or can read the play, because he looked like a bloke who grew up playing hurling and never kicked a footy, oh wait he did no wonder he played the way he did


Embarassed for Setanta???

Before you take the splinter out of Setantas eye in the embarassment stakes howaout you take the plank out of your own.
Why be embarassed for someone who has done resoundingly well in two and a half years on the back of 100 mins of football???

You should take a good hard look at your 16 years of exisistence.
Setanta looked pretty lost out there on Friday night.. but its not like we made it easy for him.. and he has deserved his spot in the team.

Dont be embarassed for Setanta.. and youre the waste of space..


Rubbish he deserved a spot in the side what the hell has he done to be rewarded a spot before others, what has Livo and Wiggo done wrong? like to hear and see the reaction of those players that Setanta deserves a spot before them.

Synbad your telling me you didn't feel slight embarrassed especially when you talk him up so much.

Unlike you Synbad i am not fooled.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 24, 2006 10:24 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:59 pm
Posts: 2966
Location: La La Land
Setanta did struggle on Friday, he looked out of place, he did not know where to run & he did it all on his own in the forward line. In the 3rd quarter our fearless leader Kouta let his player drop back which meant Setanta was battling against 2 or sometimes 3 defenders with little help from our other forwards. I do believe Setanta should be playing in the seniors but only with Fev & Waite in the team. Setanta cannot play on the best defender just yet so he shouldn't have been asked to do the job he tried to do on the weekend. It did make him look stupid & I just hope his confidence isn't shot because of it.

_________________
Witty signature required.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 24, 2006 10:27 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 12:01 pm
Posts: 34519
Location: The Brown Wedge
Synbad wrote:
You should take a good hard look at your 16 years of exisistence.
Setanta looked pretty lost out there on Friday night.. but its not like we made it easy for him.. and he has deserved his spot in the team.


...and how should we make it easier for him, His 2 games to date have been against lowly ranked opposition in a position that he is designed to play. I can't see it getting any easier for him. Maybe if it were against Geelong or saints or Essendon* but fact is he polayed on a nobody and got towelled up nicely.

Maybe it's Lance's fault or Dennis or maybe just the culture of the club.

Here's an idea, maybe he, along with Norman, Laurie and all the re treads just haven't cut it. Let's now develop the draft picks we know wil make it and move forward.

_________________
end of message


Last edited by The Duke on Mon Apr 24, 2006 12:54 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 24, 2006 10:36 am 
Offline
Rod McGregor

Joined: Mon Apr 17, 2006 5:27 pm
Posts: 169
Location: Brunswick
Ballisitic does have a point there, Livo along with Wiggins have not put a foot wrong and battled so hard for so long that they must feel some disappointment from the disbelief and lack of confidence shown by Denis.

I think what Synbad ment by we didn't make it easier for is that the delivery and the game plan made it more difficult for him, but that alone is no excuse he should have never had played and i think has caused more harm than good.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 24, 2006 10:40 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 7:17 am
Posts: 17381
Location: the Yarran's fertile shores
Livo and Wiggins have never kicked 7's, 5's and 4's for the bullants, and never indicated they could fill a forward role in the firsts that are missing their 2 best forwards

_________________
Love Cricket? Love me


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 24, 2006 12:35 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 12:44 am
Posts: 2662
The Tyrant wrote:
showbag wrote:
Synbad wrote:
Ok but if we drop Setanta to being in Prenda...
Or drop Russell to bring in Longmuire id spew!!!

Because we will be playing guys that are not part of the future.

Drop Setanta and bring in Bower i can swallow.
Drop Russell and bring in Blackwell.. that too i can swallow.. (different kind of swallow than Billy Drongos though)


Synbad...why did we draft Longmuir then?


Because were were stupid and make a shocking mistake.

Its like the Murray Vance issue. "But there must have been some reason why we picked Vance which makes things ok?"

yeah, the reason is: we thought he would be good, and he wasn't. And Longmuir isn't. Nor is Chambers. And Saddington probably isn't either, just like Bowyer, Johnson, Kenna and Mott before him. I wouldn't think Teague and Scotland have much of a future in the team after this season either.

We all want reasons... but the reality is we F@%&#! up and drafted crap players who aren't any good.

Thats one of the reasons why we're the worst team in the league. We had a shit list when Pagan took over, and he's heaped on more shit in his time than he has substance.

Now, I know many of you will say "But Tyrant.... draft penalties etc etc". Fair enough. I'm not going to get into whether or not the strategy was right or not (IT WASN'T!!!!)... that argument is immaterial to the obvious fact that 99.9% of our retreads are no good


Nice selective quoting there tyrant so you could push your own boring barrow again, instead of actually answering my question. :roll: You obviously haven't seen Longmuir play very often ... and certainly never when he is fit.

Isn't Maclaren a retread? Saddinton? Stevens? Carrazzo? should we have all of them playing in the magoos too so as you can see Edwards or Flint have a crack at the big time? Aisake is pretty young - surely we can get him off the rookie list instead of persiting with old man French every week.

...so whilst we're talking about narrow minded, tunnell visioned flawed strategies .... :roll:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 24, 2006 12:45 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2005 1:20 am
Posts: 8172
Location: PMQ
showbag wrote:
The Tyrant wrote:
showbag wrote:
Synbad wrote:
Ok but if we drop Setanta to being in Prenda...
Or drop Russell to bring in Longmuire id spew!!!

Because we will be playing guys that are not part of the future.

Drop Setanta and bring in Bower i can swallow.
Drop Russell and bring in Blackwell.. that too i can swallow.. (different kind of swallow than Billy Drongos though)


Synbad...why did we draft Longmuir then?


Because were were stupid and make a shocking mistake.

Its like the Murray Vance issue. "But there must have been some reason why we picked Vance which makes things ok?"

yeah, the reason is: we thought he would be good, and he wasn't. And Longmuir isn't. Nor is Chambers. And Saddington probably isn't either, just like Bowyer, Johnson, Kenna and Mott before him. I wouldn't think Teague and Scotland have much of a future in the team after this season either.

We all want reasons... but the reality is we F@%&#! up and drafted crap players who aren't any good.

Thats one of the reasons why we're the worst team in the league. We had a shit list when Pagan took over, and he's heaped on more shit in his time than he has substance.

Now, I know many of you will say "But Tyrant.... draft penalties etc etc". Fair enough. I'm not going to get into whether or not the strategy was right or not (IT WASN'T!!!!)... that argument is immaterial to the obvious fact that 99.9% of our retreads are no good


Nice selective quoting there tyrant so you could push your own boring barrow again, instead of actually answering my question. :roll: You obviously haven't seen Longmuir play very often ... and certainly never when he is fit.

Isn't Maclaren a retread? Saddinton? Stevens? Carrazzo? should we have all of them playing in the magoos too so as you can see Edwards or Flint have a crack at the big time? Aisake is pretty young - surely we can get him off the rookie list instead of persiting with old man French every week.

...so whilst we're talking about narrow minded, tunnell visioned flawed strategies .... :roll:


puhlease.

i have seen longmuir fully fit, playing his best footy, and let me tell you. im still not impressed, i can only imagine carlton traded for him in a bid to lure the talented brother over at a later date.

Maclaren is a retread, sure, but in a position we are lacking. Saddington is a retread as we have a small number of taller defenders. Stevens and Carrazzo are retreads because our midfield was garbage.

the difference is Longmuir is a retread, playing shit footy, in a position that we have more than one option in. lets see...possible of playing in longmuirs position--
Lappin
Davies
Hopefully-Bower/Edwards

basically anyone.
maybe even setanta once he learns where to run and how to make space.

_________________
Back like a raging case of pubic lice


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 24, 2006 12:56 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 7:17 am
Posts: 17381
Location: the Yarran's fertile shores
showbag wrote:
Isn't Maclaren a retread? Saddinton? Stevens? Carrazzo? should we have all of them playing in the magoos too so as you can see Edwards or Flint have a crack at the big time? Aisake is pretty young - surely we can get him off the rookie list instead of persiting with old man French every week.


Nice extremist and absolute synposis of my argument, which overlooks all the subtleties and, yes, the overall premise of my point. Greg Williams was a "re-tread" too, I suppose. And Barassi.

The definition of "re-tread" is essentially one whereby the player recruited has basically run his race at the club we got him from. Every guy we picked up from other clubs from 2002-now fits that category besides Stevens, and Scotland, McGrath and McLaren to a lesser extent. I know Scotland, McGrath and McLaren were probably still wanted by their clubs, but they haven't and won't be missed by them (as much as Stevens has been missed by Port). Thats your definition of re-tread. Guys who have lost their positions at the original club and were given a lifeline by Carlton. Longmuir definitely fits into that boat. A cheap trade for a guy who was about to be cut. Playing not many games in 5 years generally indicates how little your club values your input... especially when they recruit players in your position (Medhurst and Farmer).

Not all "re-treads" are duds. Some go on to be great players. Sadly, ours ARE duds. Carrazzo doesn't qualify as a full re-tread because he wasn't "tread" in the Geelong seniors so we don't know what he had to offer senior footy.... but he was a gamble that looks like its paying off. The others just aren't.

Yes, showbag, you're right to assume that I have just crawled out from under a bridge, and haven't seen any of Troy Longmuir's career.. but am basing this on old footy records that people throw off the bridge as they drive over me. I certainly have never seen Troy Longmuir, a player with zero physical presence, no capacity for distance running, and only one trick in his bag (ie, high leaping) play a good game.

And I certainly never saw Beasy, another guy with a great leap and many similarities with Longmuir, get de-listed after never making the grade.

And I'm certainly unable to define "selected quoting", as anything beyond just pressing the 'quote" button and simplifying your post to answer the question you raise. You know, where you ask a question, then answer it yourself. How dare I try and answer the question in front of us.

Jordan Doering dominates the VFL. Brett Backwell polled excellently in medal the year we delisted him. Setanta's kicked 7s 5s and 4s for the Ants and a lot of people think he's shit.

So far, there is nothing on Longmuir's CV to inspire confidence besides the fact that he can jump and has had some very very patient coaches in his career.

_________________
Love Cricket? Love me


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 24, 2006 1:03 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2005 1:20 am
Posts: 8172
Location: PMQ
The Tyrant wrote:
Yes, showbag, you're right to assume that I have just crawled out from under a bridge, and haven't seen any of Troy Longmuir's career.. but am basing this on old footy records that people throw off the bridge as they drive over me. I certainly have never seen Troy Longmuir, a player with zero physical presence, no capacity for distance running, and only one trick in his bag (ie, high leaping) play a good game.


and there my friends, is the winner into the corner of the baseline.

_________________
Back like a raging case of pubic lice


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 24, 2006 1:36 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:06 pm
Posts: 35865
Location: Half back flank
The Tyrant wrote:
So far, there is nothing on Longmuir's CV to inspire confidence besides the fact that he can jump and has had some very very patient coaches in his career.


Rubbish - he's got Excel (Advanced) & St John's First Aid

_________________
#DonTheStash


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 24, 2006 1:41 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 7:17 am
Posts: 17381
Location: the Yarran's fertile shores
CK95 wrote:
The Tyrant wrote:
So far, there is nothing on Longmuir's CV to inspire confidence besides the fact that he can jump and has had some very very patient coaches in his career.


Rubbish - he's got Excel (Advanced) & St John's First Aid


In that case, he should be able to find a spot for himself in my Carlton spreadsheet, and mend my broken heart

_________________
Love Cricket? Love me


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 24, 2006 2:21 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2005 1:20 am
Posts: 8172
Location: PMQ
He also held down part itme work at hungry jacks (with glowing references) and volunteered at an old folks home in the summer of '99.

he is always punctual and is a people person.

_________________
Back like a raging case of pubic lice


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 24, 2006 8:14 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:28 pm
Posts: 3768
Quote:
that argument is immaterial to the obvious fact that 99.9% of our retreads are no good.


Yes Lappin and French are definitely no good. :roll:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 24, 2006 8:40 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 7:17 am
Posts: 17381
Location: the Yarran's fertile shores
BlueWorld wrote:
Quote:
that argument is immaterial to the obvious fact that 99.9% of our retreads are no good.


Yes Lappin and French are definitely no good. :roll:


sorry... the ones recruited by Pagan (though I suppose French technically might have been)... and again, if you READ the posts, you'll see that I identified "re-treads" as guys no longer needed by their clubs, and either about to be or were delisted by them. French and Lappin don't fit into that category.

Really people... you have to READ the posts before responding

_________________
Love Cricket? Love me


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 24, 2006 9:14 pm 
Offline
Trevor Keogh
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 05, 2005 9:28 pm
Posts: 791
Location: Funky Town
Don’t write Setanta off yet! He has played 2 games in his career. In these 2 games he was our key forward.. He looked out of place but he is not going to kick a bag when we the team had no forward structure.
I did like Setantas enthusiasm and the way he attacked the ball and made some good tackles even when he was outnumbered.
I do agree that Setanta should play for the twos this week but bring him back when we have FEV and Waite are firing.

He looked good in the NAB game against Geelong because he was our secondary forward.

_________________
"Dont count the games, make the games count"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 24, 2006 9:31 pm 
Offline
Adrian Gallagher
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 12, 2006 5:42 pm
Posts: 50
Location: Princes Park
Some of you guys are pretty tough. Setanta has only played footy for about 4 years yet he shows more promise than some of the other wastes of space there who will NEVER make it - Livo, Prenda, Wiggins (need I go on).

By the way - I don't blame these guys as they go out there every week and give 110% effort (they are just not up to it)! I blame the coaching staff who keep these people on!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 24, 2006 9:49 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:28 pm
Posts: 3768
The Tyrant wrote:
BlueWorld wrote:
Quote:
that argument is immaterial to the obvious fact that 99.9% of our retreads are no good.


Yes Lappin and French are definitely no good. :roll:


sorry... the ones recruited by Pagan (though I suppose French technically might have been)... and again, if you READ the posts, you'll see that I identified "re-treads" as guys no longer needed by their clubs, and either about to be or were delisted by them. French and Lappin don't fit into that category.

Really people... you have to READ the posts before responding


Lappin was shopped around by Saints because of his poor attitude. May have been delisted had we not taken him. French was playing second or third fiddle at Port. I hope I've READ the post and am allowed to respond.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 24, 2006 9:55 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 7:17 am
Posts: 17381
Location: the Yarran's fertile shores
BlueWorld wrote:
The Tyrant wrote:
BlueWorld wrote:
Quote:
that argument is immaterial to the obvious fact that 99.9% of our retreads are no good.


Yes Lappin and French are definitely no good. :roll:


sorry... the ones recruited by Pagan (though I suppose French technically might have been)... and again, if you READ the posts, you'll see that I identified "re-treads" as guys no longer needed by their clubs, and either about to be or were delisted by them. French and Lappin don't fit into that category.

Really people... you have to READ the posts before responding


Lappin was shopped around by Saints because of his poor attitude. May have been delisted had we not taken him. French was playing second or third fiddle at Port. I hope I've READ the post and am allowed to respond.


shopped around doesn't mean "no good". We shopped around Fevola, but any team who might have picked him up could hardly consider him a "re-tread"

And French was 3rd or 4th string behind some champion-standard competition. Being 3rd or 4th string doesn't necessarily mean you're not good. French was no where near being delisted by Port, and thats the difference.

AND, they're not exactly good examples of re-treads Pagan has recruited... because only French can claim partial claim to that.

So, perhaps if you could narrow your objections to within the scope of my contention, then I could respond. Otherwise, I'm not hearing any support for Longmuir, Chambers, Brett Johnson et.al

_________________
Love Cricket? Love me


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 24, 2006 9:59 pm 
Offline
Bob Chitty
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:44 pm
Posts: 890
Fabulous wrote:
Don’t write Setanta off yet! He has played 2 games in his career. In these 2 games he was our key forward.. He looked out of place.


Why do you want us to help this guy become a footballer in the seniors? Surely you try to do things in the VFL or the VFL seconds, not the AFL!!

_________________
Stay tuned We're in for a BUMPY ride


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 162 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: azzurro, ByteDanceSpider, Google [Bot] and 37 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group