Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Fri May 30, 2025 8:06 pm

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 168 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat Mar 29, 2025 2:44 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 24903
Location: Bondi Beach
Braithy wrote:
Two reasons why our 2nd half for and against is 8 goals for, 24 against.

We are being figured out and out manoeuvred in the coaching box - the fact we had 12 interchanges left deep in the 4th while dogs had 2 - tells me game management and coaching is all gone to shit.

And we are lacking fitness/ didn’t work hard enough in the summer.

Either way it’s a shitshow


I can't believe that we had 12 interchange left. We need to keep our players fresh. We need to rotate. We need to spread the load. We need maximum intensity

I think we have too many small forwards. Fog 68%, GT Evans 61%, Motlop 78% GT (2 disposals 2nd half) GT would have been less if Williams didnt come off after his 20% GT, which had been 65% in his last 2 games.

Our second halves so far.

Carlton 8.19.67...........27 shots
Oppose 22.12.156.......34 shots

7 more shots at goal in the 2nd half.

I know we have more F50 entries than our opposition in all 3 rounds thus far, but I wonder what the comparison would be in the 2nd half of games?

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 29, 2025 2:50 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 24903
Location: Bondi Beach
Braithy wrote:
bondiblue wrote:
Braithy wrote:
carntheblues wrote:
Jono182 wrote:
There is just no ability to adjust to the other coach during the game. It Bevo leaves dogs throw the sink at him.

Was actually amazing how he shut us down.



Actually it wasn't. He did not shut us down, there were no positional moves he made. He had no plan B (for Braithy) they just made the most of their opportunities which they missed earlier, plus got some lucky umpiring decisions that went their way.


Motlop was taken out of the game - with an hard tag, and dogs stopped the ability of our run and corridor use by beveridge setting up differently in his zone. He planted an extra man in the corridor and that man would trail back to be an extra man in defense.

Beverdige allowed us to win stoppage (where we had an extra man) but he cut off the corridor and backed his extra defender (most of the time jones) to intercept/ turnover and then run/ spread hard from the contest and hit us coast to coast

In the first qtr beveridge used more man to man and clogged the flanks which allowed us to look inside and take the corridor. Since we haven’t used the corridor all year this opening took dogs by surprise.

That is by definition, dogs coaching adjusting. And us (Voss) just watching it all unfold and not blink like a deer in the headlights at the oncoming car.


Hard tag on Motlop. I find that difficult to swallow. Sure, an opponent but a hard tag? Because he had 4 disposals in the first and 3 in the 2nd?

Accept all the other stuff you saw. You must have been at the ground. Can't see that sort of stuff on TV.


Everywhere Motlop went his opponent shadowed him. And Motlop doesn’t have the tank to get up the field and lose them on the way back and doesn’t have the explosiveness to shake his man around stoppage/ in traffic

All night dogs played a mix of man and zone defense …

Motlop didn’t seem to have a direct opponent in the 1st qtr and he’d be in the centre bounce for some and then drift to the wing and then forward from there all by his lonesome. After qtr time everywhere he went a dogs player followed him and then they’d switch from the wing to the forward position

Beveridge is a super smart tactician. He identified Motlop as the link from wing to forward and put a stop to it. From the ground Motlop felt like he was on fire in the 1st qtr. he seemed to be everywhere


Thanks braithy

Smart Bevo

I'm sure the type of personnel Voss has at his disposal hinders his ability to move the magnets. We haven't got elite speed where we need it. Eg Motlop. I know we both agree on that front too. Fog isnt quick (he is tough and smart), Evans isn't quick. Williams is, but got injured, Durdin is but he's been injured). None of Cripps Hewett and Walsh are quick.

Guess its all about contest and pressure. That's our one wood, and after that plan B, which you reckon got closes down. I see why you make the point Vossy is like a deer in headlights.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 29, 2025 7:31 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2006 3:20 pm
Posts: 1817
I might be in the minority but I honestly thought we were pretty good last night. We just failed to capitalize in that 3rd quarter
when we were on top. Acres butchered 4 inside 50 entries but
we know what we get with him.
It doesn't feel like we are that far away. We ran the premiership favourites to within a few goals last week and we were pretty good again yesterday. We have key players underdone or missing.
I'm usually doom and gloom but I think we are going ok.
One positive is the form of Cerra. Sos looking like he belongs in defence. Kemp might just turn out to be a pretty good forward.
Looking forward to seeing what he can do when both Harry and Charlie play along side him.
One area of concern is still our lack of a crumbing forward. And defending from d50 stoppages still horrible. Tidy up those two areas and all of a sudden we find 2 or three goals.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 29, 2025 7:43 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 7:40 pm
Posts: 7258
daggs001 wrote:
I might be in the minority but I honestly thought we were pretty good last night. We just failed to capitalize in that 3rd quarter
when we were on top. Acres butchered 4 inside 50 entries but
we know what we get with him.
It doesn't feel like we are that far away. We ran the premiership favourites to within a few goals last week and we were pretty good again yesterday. We have key players underdone or missing.
I'm usually doom and gloom but I think we are going ok.
One positive is the form of Cerra. Sos looking like he belongs in defence. Kemp might just turn out to be a pretty good forward.
Looking forward to seeing what he can do when both Harry and Charlie play along side him.
One area of concern is still our lack of a crumbing forward. And defending from d50 stoppages still horrible. Tidy up those two areas and all of a sudden we find 2 or three goals.


Right on Daggs . 100 % the first 5 minutes of the third quarter killed us . We went back to long bomb it into the forward line and that was the game lost there . Old habits die hard . I like the tone of your post and as you say it is not all gloom and doom .

_________________
All my dangerous friends


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 29, 2025 8:17 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:42 pm
Posts: 7104
Agree fellas. The problem is; it’s a continuing theme. We get figured out too easily after HT and our box doesn’t adjust.

We’re too slow… not just by foot, but also by mind and tactics in the box. It’s been like this forever


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 29, 2025 8:21 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 7:40 pm
Posts: 7258
Braithy wrote:
Agree fellas. The problem is; it’s a continuing theme. We get figured out too easily after HT and our box doesn’t adjust.

We’re too slow… not just by foot, but also by mind and tactics in the box. It’s been like this forever


Gotta disagree on that one Braithy . We didn't get figured out , we just reverted to old habit of the long bomb and shot ourselves in the foot . Self inflicted misery .

_________________
All my dangerous friends


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 29, 2025 8:29 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:42 pm
Posts: 7104
Mickstar wrote:
Braithy wrote:
Agree fellas. The problem is; it’s a continuing theme. We get figured out too easily after HT and our box doesn’t adjust.

We’re too slow… not just by foot, but also by mind and tactics in the box. It’s been like this forever


Gotta disagree on that one Braithy . We didn't get figured out , we just reverted to old habit of the long bomb and shot ourselves in the foot . Self inflicted misery .


Look a little deeper mick. Why are we long-bombing to contest?

Bcos there’s no run or overlap from behind and everyone upfield is marked bcos we send an extra to the stoppage, and they send that extra to defense. They collect the turnover and rebound hard.

The long bomb is bcos there’s no one on offer short and there’s no run and overlap from behind.


This is 100,000% a coaching issue and possible a player laziness (we’re not working for each other) issue.

Our culture sucks, basically.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 29, 2025 8:39 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 6:36 am
Posts: 6343
daggs001 wrote:
I might be in the minority but I honestly thought we were pretty good last night. We just failed to capitalize in that 3rd quarter
when we were on top. Acres butchered 4 inside 50 entries but
we know what we get with him.
It doesn't feel like we are that far away. We ran the premiership favourites to within a few goals last week and we were pretty good again yesterday. We have key players underdone or missing.
I'm usually doom and gloom but I think we are going ok.
One positive is the form of Cerra. Sos looking like he belongs in defence. Kemp might just turn out to be a pretty good forward.
Looking forward to seeing what he can do when both Harry and Charlie play along side him.
One area of concern is still our lack of a crumbing forward. And defending from d50 stoppages still horrible. Tidy up those two areas and all of a sudden we find 2 or three goals.

You obviously only watch Carlton games


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 29, 2025 9:09 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 7:40 pm
Posts: 7258
Braithy wrote:
Mickstar wrote:
Braithy wrote:
Agree fellas. The problem is; it’s a continuing theme. We get figured out too easily after HT and our box doesn’t adjust.

We’re too slow… not just by foot, but also by mind and tactics in the box. It’s been like this forever


Gotta disagree on that one Braithy . We didn't get figured out , we just reverted to old habit of the long bomb and shot ourselves in the foot . Self inflicted misery .


Look a little deeper mick. Why are we long-bombing to contest?

Bcos there’s no run or overlap from behind and everyone upfield is marked bcos we send an extra to the stoppage, and they send that extra to defense. They collect the turnover and rebound hard.

The long bomb is bcos there’s no one on offer short and there’s no run and overlap from behind.


This is 100,000% a coaching issue and possible a player laziness (we’re not working for each other) issue.

Our culture sucks, basically.


Don't want to be argumentative but I have to disagree again . In the first half we did everything you mentioned and for some strange reason through no pressure we went back to the old long bomb . There were a heap of alternatives . That third quarter we frucked ourselves up . It was no brilliant tactic from Bevo . We shot ourselves in the foot . We handed victory to them .

_________________
All my dangerous friends


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 29, 2025 9:44 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:13 pm
Posts: 1154
Location: Narre Warren VIC
The Miserable Story of Carlton - Illustrated in a simple Photo- 20 Years and counting


Attachments:
486783945_671662715817960_3331740033258848149_n.jpg
486783945_671662715817960_3331740033258848149_n.jpg [ 155.6 KiB | Viewed 5656 times ]
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 30, 2025 11:41 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2017 1:55 pm
Posts: 6433
To be fair.
We could've really used Matt Kennedy the last 3 rounds, however when the players are all fit and in form he doesn't have a spot in the team.
The possible oversight is we will never be fully fit with a handful of our players and Bam Bam was a very good middle tier player.
He fits in well at the dogs because they already have outside speed so his pace is not as much of an issue.
Happy for him to be playing well and the best of luck to him.
Unfortunately these things happen, it just hurts more when we keep injury prone players on the list and we are not winning.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 30, 2025 12:24 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:42 pm
Posts: 7104
Mickstar wrote:
Braithy wrote:
Mickstar wrote:
Braithy wrote:
Agree fellas. The problem is; it’s a continuing theme. We get figured out too easily after HT and our box doesn’t adjust.

We’re too slow… not just by foot, but also by mind and tactics in the box. It’s been like this forever


Gotta disagree on that one Braithy . We didn't get figured out , we just reverted to old habit of the long bomb and shot ourselves in the foot . Self inflicted misery .


Look a little deeper mick. Why are we long-bombing to contest?

Bcos there’s no run or overlap from behind and everyone upfield is marked bcos we send an extra to the stoppage, and they send that extra to defense. They collect the turnover and rebound hard.

The long bomb is bcos there’s no one on offer short and there’s no run and overlap from behind.


This is 100,000% a coaching issue and possible a player laziness (we’re not working for each other) issue.

Our culture sucks, basically.


Don't want to be argumentative but I have to disagree again . In the first half we did everything you mentioned and for some strange reason through no pressure we went back to the old long bomb . There were a heap of alternatives . That third quarter we frucked ourselves up . It was no brilliant tactic from Bevo . We shot ourselves in the foot . We handed victory to them .


I don’t have the numbers but the dogs - at least on the eye test - lifted their pressure after qtr time. We had much less time on the ball. They reduced our run and carry and overlap and sent an extra man in defence and used the rebound.

Agree we handed them victory, but the way I saw it was bcos coaching didn’t adjust to the dogs 2nd qtr adjustments.

We just keep trying to stuff a round peg into a square hole when it comes to our coaching and tactics


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 30, 2025 1:08 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 24903
Location: Bondi Beach
Braithy wrote:
Mickstar wrote:
Braithy wrote:
Mickstar wrote:
Braithy wrote:
Agree fellas. The problem is; it’s a continuing theme. We get figured out too easily after HT and our box doesn’t adjust.

We’re too slow… not just by foot, but also by mind and tactics in the box. It’s been like this forever


Gotta disagree on that one Braithy . We didn't get figured out , we just reverted to old habit of the long bomb and shot ourselves in the foot . Self inflicted misery .


Look a little deeper mick. Why are we long-bombing to contest?

Bcos there’s no run or overlap from behind and everyone upfield is marked bcos we send an extra to the stoppage, and they send that extra to defense. They collect the turnover and rebound hard.

The long bomb is bcos there’s no one on offer short and there’s no run and overlap from behind.


This is 100,000% a coaching issue and possible a player laziness (we’re not working for each other) issue.

Our culture sucks, basically.


Don't want to be argumentative but I have to disagree again . In the first half we did everything you mentioned and for some strange reason through no pressure we went back to the old long bomb . There were a heap of alternatives . That third quarter we frucked ourselves up . It was no brilliant tactic from Bevo . We shot ourselves in the foot . We handed victory to them .


I don’t have the numbers but the dogs - at least on the eye test - lifted their pressure after qtr time. We had much less time on the ball. They reduced our run and carry and overlap and sent an extra man in defence and used the rebound.

Agree we handed them victory, but the way I saw it was bcos coaching didn’t adjust to the dogs 2nd qtr adjustments.

We just keep trying to stuff a round peg into a square hole when it comes to our coaching and tactics


So, everything the players did was perfect? It was all coaching?

I've seen the replay. Fk. Go and have a look at the last 10 minutes and tell me if it was coaching or players at the very end.

Just look at the players and tell if they were playing like winners, without blaming the coach for their decision. They are accountable. I'm sick of letting players off the hook.

Its not just the realistic, or as you would like to call the "delusional positive" supporters who see those things that are obvious.

Here's someone from outside the boiling pot:

Quote:
Voss was left to lament his side giving away eight free kicks for the quarter, including two holding the ball decisions, two marking infringements, a high tackle, a push in the back and a clear ruck infringement.

Blake Acres also put a rushed kick inside-50 out of bounds on the full in the forward pocket.

Even when they were leading on the scoreboard, the Blues looked in a hurry going forward and struggled to find an uncontested mark which may have allowed them to take a breath and better set up the ground ahead of them.

As important as Young was throughout the night, he fluffed a kick directed towards Charlie Curnow inside-50 which went to the advantage of opponent Rory Lobb.

Lobb took the intercept mark 20m from Carlton’s goal and seconds later the ball was in the hands of Sam Darcy who slotted the goal at the other end and put the Bulldogs in front for the first time in the game.

Veteran recruit Nick Haynes also had two kicks he would like to take back, which led to two other Bulldogs goals in the final five minutes.

After winning a big one-on-one contest against Aaron Naughton, Haynes kicked the ball down the line seemingly aiming for Patrick Cripps.

The ball well fell short of Cripps, who gave away a free kick in a tackle from behind on Bailey Williams after the Bulldog gathered the loose ball in front of him.

Williams played on with a handball to Sam Davidson, who kicked inside 50 where Naughton marked and put his side back in front with a tick over four minutes to play.

After another intercept mark moments later, Haynes attempted a 20m chip pass to Ollie Hollands which was cut off and ended up in James O’Donnell’s match-sealing major.


https://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/afl/afl-round-3-chris-cavanagh-analyses-western-bulldogs-victory-over-carlton/news-story/92adc2afe3b973d55072d47d3ec09f19

How much did we lose by again?

4 frees in their F50 in the last quarter. There's heaps written and reported on the Butchering Blues. They can't hit a straight forward pass by foot and hand. That's what's taxing them.

Its a game of inches. Decision making better improve by an inch or two amongst the playing group.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 30, 2025 1:10 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:32 am
Posts: 10529
My concern is that we aren’t fit enough to run games out and hence we revert to kick and hope late in games. The trend this year is alarming.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 30, 2025 1:24 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 24903
Location: Bondi Beach
Sidefx wrote:
To be fair.
We could've really used Matt Kennedy the last 3 rounds, however when the players are all fit and in form he doesn't have a spot in the team.

Unfortunately these things happen, it just hurts more when we keep injury prone players on the list and we are not winning.


True. Kennedy was a great middle tier player/ depth player when we had a fit list available. It can be argued Carlton replaced Kennedy with Jagga Smith.

To be fair, we can't get rid of all injury prone players but got rid of all those who were out of contract: Marchbank, Cuningham, Martin. Getting rid of them along with trading Kennedy and Owies and replenishing that experience/ depth with Haynes and Evans is going to leave us exposed if we were hit by more than 4 injuries. sais it in the preseason.

Of the injury prone players on our list, only Pittonet and Fantasia are out injured. They aren't the reason we lost, but I get where you are coming from. There's others who are playing and uninjured.


End of this year Fantasia and Gov's contracts expire. Gov is another injury prone player, who avoids contact to preserve his career.
End of 2026 Williams' contract expires. He's the other injury prone player on our list. Lets see if Durdin continues to be injured, because his contract also expires.

End of this year we clear the decks, and save between $2-$3M in salary depending if TDK stays or goes. We can find a ruck and Fwd/Ruck for that sort of money. Then we are left with Williams Pittonet and Durdin due to contracts. Combined they cost approx $1.3M. We could fill holes and get a good mid and a good small for that money.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 30, 2025 1:31 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 24903
Location: Bondi Beach
SurreyBlue wrote:
My concern is that we aren’t fit enough to run games out and hence we revert to kick and hope late in games. The trend this year is alarming.


Maybe.

Again, we are putting the spotlight on the S&G, looking for excuses, rather than looking square at the players

It takes serious commitment and good fitness to defend the ball, and to get the ball forward to create scoring shots.

Player clangers by hand foot or brain is what give us no return for all that effort. Worse still, when we hand the ball to the opposition, we then have to chase tail all the way back spending petrol tickets, when we could be celebrating a goal, lifting the confidence, lifting the energy and team spirit while we jog back to the centre to start proceedings over again.

Maybe there's a bit more of that. I tend to think the latter TBH.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 30, 2025 1:37 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2011 3:17 pm
Posts: 2645
SurreyBlue wrote:
My concern is that we aren’t fit enough to run games out and hence we revert to kick and hope late in games. The trend this year is alarming.


We have too many players that panic, either perceived or actual

We are no good under pressure. Have a look at our past. We can’t save games, we can’t win games we should be winning, we can’t win games need to win, we give up huge leads in pressure games.

Under pressure we fold which is really sad.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 30, 2025 1:39 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:42 pm
Posts: 7104
bondiblue wrote:
Braithy wrote:
Mickstar wrote:
Braithy wrote:
Mickstar wrote:

Gotta disagree on that one Braithy . We didn't get figured out , we just reverted to old habit of the long bomb and shot ourselves in the foot . Self inflicted misery .


Look a little deeper mick. Why are we long-bombing to contest?

Bcos there’s no run or overlap from behind and everyone upfield is marked bcos we send an extra to the stoppage, and they send that extra to defense. They collect the turnover and rebound hard.

The long bomb is bcos there’s no one on offer short and there’s no run and overlap from behind.


This is 100,000% a coaching issue and possible a player laziness (we’re not working for each other) issue.

Our culture sucks, basically.


Don't want to be argumentative but I have to disagree again . In the first half we did everything you mentioned and for some strange reason through no pressure we went back to the old long bomb . There were a heap of alternatives . That third quarter we frucked ourselves up . It was no brilliant tactic from Bevo . We shot ourselves in the foot . We handed victory to them .


I don’t have the numbers but the dogs - at least on the eye test - lifted their pressure after qtr time. We had much less time on the ball. They reduced our run and carry and overlap and sent an extra man in defence and used the rebound.

Agree we handed them victory, but the way I saw it was bcos coaching didn’t adjust to the dogs 2nd qtr adjustments.

We just keep trying to stuff a round peg into a square hole when it comes to our coaching and tactics


So, everything the players did was perfect? It was all coaching?

I've seen the replay. Fk. Go and have a look at the last 10 minutes and tell me if it was coaching or players at the very end.

Just look at the players and tell if they were playing like winners, without blaming the coach for their decision. They are accountable. I'm sick of letting players off the hook.

Its not just the realistic, or as you would like to call the "delusional positive" supporters who see those things that are obvious.

Here's someone from outside the boiling pot:

Quote:
Voss was left to lament his side giving away eight free kicks for the quarter, including two holding the ball decisions, two marking infringements, a high tackle, a push in the back and a clear ruck infringement.

Blake Acres also put a rushed kick inside-50 out of bounds on the full in the forward pocket.

Even when they were leading on the scoreboard, the Blues looked in a hurry going forward and struggled to find an uncontested mark which may have allowed them to take a breath and better set up the ground ahead of them.

As important as Young was throughout the night, he fluffed a kick directed towards Charlie Curnow inside-50 which went to the advantage of opponent Rory Lobb.

Lobb took the intercept mark 20m from Carlton’s goal and seconds later the ball was in the hands of Sam Darcy who slotted the goal at the other end and put the Bulldogs in front for the first time in the game.

Veteran recruit Nick Haynes also had two kicks he would like to take back, which led to two other Bulldogs goals in the final five minutes.

After winning a big one-on-one contest against Aaron Naughton, Haynes kicked the ball down the line seemingly aiming for Patrick Cripps.

The ball well fell short of Cripps, who gave away a free kick in a tackle from behind on Bailey Williams after the Bulldog gathered the loose ball in front of him.

Williams played on with a handball to Sam Davidson, who kicked inside 50 where Naughton marked and put his side back in front with a tick over four minutes to play.

After another intercept mark moments later, Haynes attempted a 20m chip pass to Ollie Hollands which was cut off and ended up in James O’Donnell’s match-sealing major.


https://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/afl/afl-round-3-chris-cavanagh-analyses-western-bulldogs-victory-over-carlton/news-story/92adc2afe3b973d55072d47d3ec09f19

How much did we lose by again?

4 frees in their F50 in the last quarter. There's heaps written and reported on the Butchering Blues. They can't hit a straight forward pass by foot and hand. That's what's taxing them.

Its a game of inches. Decision making better improve by an inch or two amongst the playing group.



Yet, by and large this is the same team that won 9 in a row, running and carrying and taking the game on. Was up by 5 goals in a prelim playing the same way.

Now we are meant to believe in they can’t make a 20m pass by foot?

I’m not buying it. The game plan is stunting their play. I know playing fast you play by instinct. Some olayers, maybe even most players prefer that way of play

The slowed down, kick to contest, change flanks once a qtr style of play, allows to much time for thought. Too much time for the opposition to flood back and remove options.

Let the players play. Let them run. Bring kids in to the team.

12 interchanges left deep into the 4th qtr is woeful game management. It’s actually negligent and unacceptable imoNo wonder players were out on their feet.


Last edited by Braithy on Sun Mar 30, 2025 1:42 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 30, 2025 1:40 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 24903
Location: Bondi Beach
redback wrote:
SurreyBlue wrote:
My concern is that we aren’t fit enough to run games out and hence we revert to kick and hope late in games. The trend this year is alarming.


We have too many players that panic, either perceived or actual

We are no good under pressure. Have a look at our past. We can’t save games, we can’t win games we should be winning, we can’t win games need to win, we give up huge leads in pressure games.

Under pressure we fold which is really sad.


As Sydney Blue would call them "soft cocks".

A big part of the problem is between their ears.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 30, 2025 1:55 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2018 7:19 am
Posts: 2192
Location: Melbourne
bondiblue wrote:
redback wrote:
SurreyBlue wrote:
My concern is that we aren’t fit enough to run games out and hence we revert to kick and hope late in games. The trend this year is alarming.


We have too many players that panic, either perceived or actual

We are no good under pressure. Have a look at our past. We can’t save games, we can’t win games we should be winning, we can’t win games need to win, we give up huge leads in pressure games.

Under pressure we fold which is really sad.


As Sydney Blue would call them "soft cocks".

A big part of the problem is between their ears.

Or legs :smoking:

_________________
Our tradition demands success!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 168 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: windy and 29 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group