Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Sun May 04, 2025 3:33 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 265 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ... 14  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Jul 29, 2024 11:27 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 24662
Location: Bondi Beach
Sydney Blue wrote:
jezzarules wrote:
Sydney Blue wrote:
No 1 contributor to the loss

Bigger contributions to the loss
-, Midfield not being able to get clearance (despite often having in their hands)
- tackles - need to stick more
- need more run & carry. We often kick too soon or if trying to handball chain we do too many (usually giving back to the guy who was hot)
- F50 entries (always an issue) bombing long instead of spotting up players. If Charlie is double teamed we should have loose guys elsewhere and should have a tactic to play through whoever's opponent is zoning off.
- Q1 we went helter skelter and earned plenty of chances but needed to cool the jets for finishing off ( which we did in Q2)
- Kemp I like but he dropped a bunch of marks where he'd done well to compete but the ball consistently spilled to them close to goal
- Speaking of Kemp, playing him undersized (again) on Esava does us no favours. Should have been switched with Young from the start.
- Ollie I lost count of his direct turnovers
- We are playing a territory game which partly explains the bombing long etc but this relies on pressure applied to keep it in and hold the territory. If we can't apply pressure we need to revert to possession game but we're not good at that so we need the pressure.
Do you actually watch Young play.
If you start the game 1 man down you never recover.
There is a reason Weiters does not want him down back.
He is the ultimate Chicken little.
I nearly fell off the chair when he took a contested mark on the wing without ducking his head.
When he ran forward with the centre clearance he was so afraid of body contact he just coughed the ball up.
Had an eternity to find an option on the wing /hf and completely froze.

We lost by 14 points he cost us at least 30

Sent from my SM-F926B using Tapatalk


If you look at who took the marks and who kicked the goals, it wasn't Young's opponent.
Young's opponent was a combo of Allir and Zerks Thatcher. They didnt kick goals.
They double teamed Charlie whilst Harry's opponent to be, Esava, went to the forwardline.

Young didn't help, with his tentativeness but he didn't and couldn't directly cost us 30 points/ 5 goals, when Kemps and Gov's opponents kicked 5 goals and the midfield group cost us 3 goals. That's 8 goals, and they did earn a couple goals naturally from good play. They only kicked 11 goals. I would have preferred Young to lock down Esava or Georgadis than playing the extra man in defence, along with the another 4 small forwards.

It seems to me Vossy waved the white flag during the 3rd when the dam wall seemed to be at breaking point. We couldn't get the ball out of their half in the 2nd half. From that perspective, keeping Port to 11 goals looks good.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 29, 2024 11:29 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 24662
Location: Bondi Beach
dadadadada wrote:
Mickstar wrote:
SurreyBlue wrote:
Hornet wrote:
Young is the scapegoat this game whether he plays or not... Kemp second favorite... lol

Meanwhile I'm more worried about N. Faicos breaking the all time possessions world record

Our biggest issue is the midfield... not just clearances but the lack of team defence when we don't have the ball... it's embarrassing how easy we get carved up between the arcs.


:thumbsup:


Yes , Young is an easy out . Between the arcs and around stoppages as you point out is number one problem glaringly so . Walsh MUST go to the wing for mine to provide that connection that we badly miss . After all , Acres can't do it all .


I have been saying this for a while. We lack width and the outskirts of the contest is a huge problem (very evident in the Port and Western Bulldogs games). With his running power we will still see Walsh in the midfield but more so on the outskirts of contested situations. I don't believe Walsh had a second half fadeout due to his back but more the stuffing is getting knocked out of him. Cerra is good at preventing the easy clearance exit so let's get him back there.

And on the topic of Young lets not make him the easy scapegoat. He doesn't have a forward craft ... his mix should have been a combination of Back and Ruck. McGovern with his aerial ability would have been been able to provide better contests up forward and bring the ball to ground. I think Voss has played around with Young's confidence and he is a better player than what he is showing. I was staggered that Durdin (who has played hardly any football in 2 years) was selected ahead of Young when we played North Melbourne.

We will beat Collingwood.


:thumbsup:

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 29, 2024 11:41 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 24662
Location: Bondi Beach
Blue Vain wrote:
I'm not overly concerned about this week at the moment. We're experts at spoiling Collingwood's party and Pendle's 400th is the perfect target.
We need to get the hunger back. It's not overly structural. It's pressure and contest. When we get our pressure around 200, most can't go with us.

I don't believe you can maintain high pressure for an extended time. Look at Sydney as well. Teams suffer a lull but the opportunity is there to go again. Some tough games coming (Hawks and Saints are flying) but the reality is, it's 6 wins to get to a grand final. 4 of those games against teams currently out of the 8.
We've shown we can go on 6-8 game runs of high intensity footy. It needs to start this week.

I'm definitely not a fan of Young but he has to play. Kemp has coughed up a shitload of goals the past month and as tough as it sounds, he has cost us games. He can't play this week. We need a tall to mind Mason Cox and Young is the best choice.

Charlie was huge. Elijah looked good on the wing rotation and I'd go with that again. But him and Ollie can jam the Hollands brothers waxing system they have going. You dispose to the best option, not the lesser option because it's your @#$%&! brother.
Ollie, Kemp and Cunners out. Harry, Acres and Martin in. Cowan to Elliott. I'd even consider Binns for Cottrell.

I know I'll cop some grief for this but Cripps has to step up as our midfield leader this week. It good to bully little blokes but when players like Dunkley and Wines go with him at centre bounces, he has to power through it. He attended 92% of the centre bounces for 1 centre clearance. As a team we had 1 centre clearance in the second half to 6. If you want the most opportunities, you need to perform or get out and give someone else a go at being top banana. 7 stoppage clearances are great but the middle of the ground is where we need him to get back his best. His job is not to run past calling for cheap handballs but to be a beast at centre bounces.
Same with Pitto, no tackles, no centre clearances. Fire the @#$%&! up.

Tough, aggressive, pressure footy. It's this teams DNA. Get it back and we're on a roll again.


:thumbsup: Spot on.

Have to get back to our basics.

IMO, for defensive craft its either Marchbank or Young, and Marchbank is not big enough for Cox or Cameron, whereas Young can lockdown and make up the shortfall in height Marchbank lacks. Young had one goals kicked against him last time he played against Cox, when he got kind of rag dolled. I hope he leaned from that because he definitely can close down Cox. Hoping Vossy gives Young some angry pills before the game.

I want Boyd back to lockdown Hill, and Cowan on Elliot on and release Saad from a lockdown role. Saad's opponent likely Schutz. They are the danger men.

Martin must be close to peak fitness by now.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 29, 2024 11:49 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 24662
Location: Bondi Beach
Dodo27 wrote:
Dodo27 wrote:
Reflecting on this Week's round of footy, I can see all the Contenders for the 8th did what they need to do and got the Win, regardless of where they played or whom they came against.

Only Two Teams were exposed and rightly so should be called " Pretenders ". Carlton & Essendon***.


This week, we are playing against Pendles 400, not against the Pies. What a massive occasion and the worst possible time for us. They will play like crazy and want to win it for their Captain. Unless we get some players back, We will Lose :(


They have secured a top 2 Spot 6 weeks a go, they got nothing to worry about. They need to lose next 3 Games again before maybe they will lose top Spot.

Big difference between us & Them. If we lose this week, we could easily drop out of the 8th


If we won games we could've won against Dogs, Port and GWS, we'd be on top of the ladder. Swans knew we were on their heels with 7 games to go. You don't muck around with form. Injury catches up with teams who have enjoyed a good run with injury. Swans were trying to win against Dogs and will try and finish 2 games clear with one round to go, if they can.

Every top team in the 8 has had its ups and downs. We are no different. We missed Harry Acres TDK & Williams, Doc and SOS would be handy and Martin is a wildcard.

A lot to play out, starting with this next game.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 29, 2024 11:53 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 24662
Location: Bondi Beach
GreatEx wrote:
Surely Swans are pretenders too? On a worse 5 game run than us, beaten far more easily this weekend by a lower ranked side.



Right on GE.

Every team in the top 8 have had their ups and downs.

Dogs look great atm. They're going up with a full list to choose from and pressure on spots, whilst the other teams are hindered by injury and form.

First Final is 5 weeks away. A lot changes after 5 weeks, as it does in that 5 weeks.

I have no doubt our boys know what needs to be done to win, as opposed to last year when they didn't know if their best was good enough to compete with the best in Finals, let alone know they could win.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 29, 2024 11:59 am 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 1:09 pm
Posts: 5817
bondiblue wrote:
I have no doubt our boys know what needs to be done to win, as opposed to last year when they didn't know if their best was good enough to compete with the best in Finals, let alone know they could win.

Hope so but not sure. Seems to me our current issues are largely around uncertainty with selection, game style and tempo, matchups etc. We've been reactionary and unsettled lately.

_________________
░L░I░N░K░I░N░B░I░O ░


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 29, 2024 11:59 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 24662
Location: Bondi Beach
Juanita Jones wrote:
Pitto's lack of intensity may have something to do with the fact that there is no one who is going to oust him from the team while TDK is banged up and recovering.


He became complacent?

Possibly, but I don't think so. He looked good in the 1st 2 quarters, and even took a couple marks.
He has too much pride and need to prove his value to a team looking to play Finals.
But who knows?

The HO were 13 each to advantage and Pitto had 7 clearances.

I would have liked to see him bash and hurt opposition players on the floor, like he did vs Richmond, and squeeze a few tackles, instead of zero.

He needs to redeem himself of the defensive front, no doubt.

There's no room for complacency, and if there is, the culprit wont be playing Finals, because there is and will be pressure on spots, knowing TDK will be back.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 29, 2024 12:05 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 24662
Location: Bondi Beach
jezzarules wrote:
bondiblue wrote:
I have no doubt our boys know what needs to be done to win, as opposed to last year when they didn't know if their best was good enough to compete with the best in Finals, let alone know they could win.

Hope so but not sure. Seems to me our current issues are largely around uncertainty with selection, game style and tempo, matchups etc. We've been reactionary and unsettled lately.


Its time to shore up.

Get back to what worked, and what works.

No doubt the boys know what they have experienced. Whether they do anything about it, well, I can see why you're not sure. No one is.
I think we are in a better place to improve between the ears given we know what we did when we were clear with our objectives.

The certainty with selection comes in the form of the return of our CHF Harry, our AA wingman Acres, best BP Boyd, and x factor Martin. All of them should be back this week. There's reason to be confident we have our best pieces returning.

Then there's our best small utility Williams, who will be back in H & A, and our best Ruck/Fwd TDK returns for Finals.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 29, 2024 1:11 pm 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:52 am
Posts: 9092
Location: Nth Fitzroy
Just need to put together a 24 that can keep the pressure rating up for a lot longer than it has been in recent weeks.
Whether we believe that clubs would do hard training blocks throughout seasons and leading into to finals doesnt really matter. We can just look at winning and losing streaks by all clubs this year. Rarely over 7 wins on the trot and often the streak ends with a dramatic falling off the cliff. Patchy at best for a month before miraculously looking the goods again for another solid month or two. I think the Swans and Blues have the best timed slump/or hard training block and that was probably afforded to them by being ahead by a couple of games at the top of the ladder early July.
I believe our form will start trending upwards this weekend and it will be on the back of being able to run better and apply pressure for longer.


Last edited by club29 on Mon Jul 29, 2024 2:07 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 29, 2024 1:55 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2021 12:58 pm
Posts: 1919
Braithy wrote:
where's all this thought coming that we're in a fitness block? or going thru some conditioning stint?


i hope that's the case. that's so much better than we're running out of gas and are goneski.


I think it's another excuse and a sign of denial.

Unless the training block includes training sessions on how not to defend stoppage. lol.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 29, 2024 2:00 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 21382
Location: North of the border
bondiblue wrote:
Sydney Blue wrote:
jezzarules wrote:
Sydney Blue wrote:
No 1 contributor to the loss

Bigger contributions to the loss
-, Midfield not being able to get clearance (despite often having in their hands)
- tackles - need to stick more
- need more run & carry. We often kick too soon or if trying to handball chain we do too many (usually giving back to the guy who was hot)
- F50 entries (always an issue) bombing long instead of spotting up players. If Charlie is double teamed we should have loose guys elsewhere and should have a tactic to play through whoever's opponent is zoning off.
- Q1 we went helter skelter and earned plenty of chances but needed to cool the jets for finishing off ( which we did in Q2)
- Kemp I like but he dropped a bunch of marks where he'd done well to compete but the ball consistently spilled to them close to goal
- Speaking of Kemp, playing him undersized (again) on Esava does us no favours. Should have been switched with Young from the start.
- Ollie I lost count of his direct turnovers
- We are playing a territory game which partly explains the bombing long etc but this relies on pressure applied to keep it in and hold the territory. If we can't apply pressure we need to revert to possession game but we're not good at that so we need the pressure.
Do you actually watch Young play.
If you start the game 1 man down you never recover.
There is a reason Weiters does not want him down back.
He is the ultimate Chicken little.
I nearly fell off the chair when he took a contested mark on the wing without ducking his head.
When he ran forward with the centre clearance he was so afraid of body contact he just coughed the ball up.
Had an eternity to find an option on the wing /hf and completely froze.

We lost by 14 points he cost us at least 30

Sent from my SM-F926B using Tapatalk


If you look at who took the marks and who kicked the goals, it wasn't Young's opponent.
Young's opponent was a combo of Allir and Zerks Thatcher. They didnt kick goals.
They double teamed Charlie whilst Harry's opponent to be, Esava, went to the forwardline.

Young didn't help, with his tentativeness but he didn't and couldn't directly cost us 30 points/ 5 goals, when Kemps and Gov's opponents kicked 5 goals and the midfield group cost us 3 goals. That's 8 goals, and they did earn a couple goals naturally from good play. They only kicked 11 goals. I would have preferred Young to lock down Esava or Georgadis than playing the extra man in defence, along with the another 4 small forwards.

It seems to me Vossy waved the white flag during the 3rd when the dam wall seemed to be at breaking point. We couldn't get the ball out of their half in the 2nd half. From that perspective, keeping Port to 11 goals looks good.


Cost us 5 scoring opportunities - not conceding

_________________
If you allow the Government to change the Laws in an emergency
They will create an Emergency to change the Laws


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 29, 2024 2:24 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 24662
Location: Bondi Beach
Sydney Blue wrote:
bondiblue wrote:
Sydney Blue wrote:
jezzarules wrote:
Sydney Blue wrote:
No 1 contributor to the loss

Bigger contributions to the loss
-, Midfield not being able to get clearance (despite often having in their hands)
- tackles - need to stick more
- need more run & carry. We often kick too soon or if trying to handball chain we do too many (usually giving back to the guy who was hot)
- F50 entries (always an issue) bombing long instead of spotting up players. If Charlie is double teamed we should have loose guys elsewhere and should have a tactic to play through whoever's opponent is zoning off.
- Q1 we went helter skelter and earned plenty of chances but needed to cool the jets for finishing off ( which we did in Q2)
- Kemp I like but he dropped a bunch of marks where he'd done well to compete but the ball consistently spilled to them close to goal
- Speaking of Kemp, playing him undersized (again) on Esava does us no favours. Should have been switched with Young from the start.
- Ollie I lost count of his direct turnovers
- We are playing a territory game which partly explains the bombing long etc but this relies on pressure applied to keep it in and hold the territory. If we can't apply pressure we need to revert to possession game but we're not good at that so we need the pressure.
Do you actually watch Young play.
If you start the game 1 man down you never recover.
There is a reason Weiters does not want him down back.
He is the ultimate Chicken little.
I nearly fell off the chair when he took a contested mark on the wing without ducking his head.
When he ran forward with the centre clearance he was so afraid of body contact he just coughed the ball up.
Had an eternity to find an option on the wing /hf and completely froze.

We lost by 14 points he cost us at least 30

Sent from my SM-F926B using Tapatalk


If you look at who took the marks and who kicked the goals, it wasn't Young's opponent.
Young's opponent was a combo of Allir and Zerks Thatcher. They didnt kick goals.
They double teamed Charlie whilst Harry's opponent to be, Esava, went to the forwardline.

Young didn't help, with his tentativeness but he didn't and couldn't directly cost us 30 points/ 5 goals, when Kemps and Gov's opponents kicked 5 goals and the midfield group cost us 3 goals. That's 8 goals, and they did earn a couple goals naturally from good play. They only kicked 11 goals. I would have preferred Young to lock down Esava or Georgadis than playing the extra man in defence, along with the another 4 small forwards.

It seems to me Vossy waved the white flag during the 3rd when the dam wall seemed to be at breaking point. We couldn't get the ball out of their half in the 2nd half. From that perspective, keeping Port to 11 goals looks good.


Cost us 5 scoring opportunities - not conceding


So, you don't think Young will make a good CHF? Not even close to Harry's ability?

Young should have played back as a lockdown on one of the talls, and when Pitto needed a chop out, throw Kennedy or Cripps like Vossy does when TDK is the sole ruck. All I can guess is Vossy wanted to see what Young could do as a KPF.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 29, 2024 2:32 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 24662
Location: Bondi Beach
Actually came to post that I just read that whilst the Aussie Olympians have to endure hard cardboard beds and a menu consisting of 60% vegan, which most high performance athletes are not, the magic ingredient to overcome fatigue and half the price of a coffee, and not a doping red flag to be found: Baking soda.

Athletes have been consuming baking soda to protect muscle fibres from building up lactic acid, which accelerates fatigue; the difference between winning Gold or silver.

Poms have been consuming baking soda for a while now, but Aussie Boxers have discovered that baking soda really works for some, for another of the 12 man Boxing Team it gave him a bad bout of diarrhea.

Over to you Andrew Russell to find out which players this works for, and importantly, the ones it doesn't work for.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 29, 2024 2:38 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2021 12:58 pm
Posts: 1919
Yep let's have six outs this week due to diarrhoea :lol:

Brings a new meaning to shitting the bed vs Collingwood.


Last edited by Traveller86 on Mon Jul 29, 2024 2:38 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 29, 2024 2:38 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 21382
Location: North of the border
5 kicks 6 handballs - 3 marks non of them contested - 3 hitouts none to advantage - 4 clangers and 3 free kicks against

He is 25 year old going on 26 - is 202 cm tall and weighs over 100kg - he was drafted in 2016 so 7-8 years in the system

Weitering doesn't want him down back as he is a liability

He is the most vanilla player we have had on our list for a very long time

_________________
If you allow the Government to change the Laws in an emergency
They will create an Emergency to change the Laws


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 29, 2024 3:17 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 24662
Location: Bondi Beach
Sydney Blue wrote:
5 kicks 6 handballs - 3 marks non of them contested - 3 hitouts none to advantage - 4 clangers and 3 free kicks against

He is 25 year old going on 26 - is 202 cm tall and weighs over 100kg - he was drafted in 2016 so 7-8 years in the system

Weitering doesn't want him down back as he is a liability

He is the most vanilla player we have had on our list for a very long time


Fair enough. What's the alternative.

We have to learn to play as a short team. Something the Bulldogs team did in 2016.
Hang on. They noew have 3 KPFs and 3 KPFs and English in their line up.
They've just demolished 1st 2nd and 3rd in consecutive weeks.

Young is not the answer. He's a break glass option. More of a lockdown back than a great CHF target.
I prefer Young to Cain Ackland any day. But I agree re he's Vanilla, but not the most.

I have never seen the quote, nor heard Weitering say he doesn't want Young playing with him. Never.
Until you do, you shouldn't be running with BF rumours as facts.
Rumour started after one field discussion Lever and May have every week because they care.
When asked, Weitering denied any such thing happening and all the players are really close.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 29, 2024 3:57 pm 
Offline
Horrie Clover

Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2021 2:17 pm
Posts: 370
our forwards need to bring PRESSURE /TACKLE TACKLE do not let that ball exit from our forward line with ease.GWS fwds 17 tackles our fwds 5 and i think Footscray stats were similar


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 29, 2024 4:35 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2021 12:58 pm
Posts: 1919
jpulice1969 wrote:
our forwards need to bring PRESSURE /TACKLE TACKLE do not let that ball exit from our forward line with ease.GWS fwds 17 tackles our fwds 5 and i think Footscray stats were similar


It's so obvious to even the most novice footy spectator out there, so why aren't they doing anything about it?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 29, 2024 5:05 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 24662
Location: Bondi Beach
Cincotta has to sit on Nick Daicos everywhere imo.

Chinka has the speed and discipline and the strength to do well in that battle. I don't mind Nick leading Chinka to the ball.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 29, 2024 5:09 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 24662
Location: Bondi Beach
I want the return of the Blue collar midfield when Walsh was out injured: Cripps Hewett Kennedy. Play hard play dirty at stoppages.
Cerra and Walsh can be on the outside and help with the clearances

Walsh can play wing and Cerra can come in from HF. Elijah to be in the mix to allow Kennedy to play forward.
Chugga was great when forward. albeit part time. 7 score involvements, 2 goals, and was a marking target taking 2 good marks, one absolute speccy.

If Martin is a surprise selection, no doubt he will be the 3rd tall, but I want as strong and tough and hurt the opposition mids.

Time for us to be unsociable.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 265 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ... 14  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 78 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group