Synbad wrote:
4th chicken
u staked your whole credibility in arguing that Lance was the man to hold onto..
You have a glaring history of backing the wrong horses..its hard to take you or anything you say seriously...
please... put an end to your deluded logic
Casboult may have improved in every year and he may have been 24 which he isnt any more...
Why dont you just say his age... his 25... not 24 start of the season...Do people talk about your age as what you were on New years eve 6 months later if youve turned over a year??
But so has everybody improved...
The question is...is he a guy that you would bet to save your life in a final?
And will he ever be somebody you want in a final kicking crucial goals for you....
He destroyed StKilda... woo pee do!!!
One of the things people need to get a grip on is 'perspective'
When Casboult does this consistently he gets the recognition...
hes into his 25th year.. and hes a C grader.. hardly anything to get excited about...
Synbad... -
IICR, Lance was discussed some 10+ years ago in the context of list options - Your favourite coach at the time (pagan) had gutted the list of older/mature bodies and we were paying the price. It was in that context, he was more value to our list than to trade off for another mid pick 18yo - particularly if he could remain injury free. Given our drafting history over the past 10 yrs, I'm still quite comfortable with that position.
But yes, feel free to bring up irrelevant items where we've had differing viewpoints from yesteryear - I'm sure that contributes to the discussion at hand...
Back to casboult...
Why would I call Casboult 24? - because he is. Born March 15th 1990 means he is currently 24 and 3 months. At the start of our season (rd 1- 16th march, 2014) he was 24 yrs and 1 day old - but yeah, sure lets call him 25...
As to your other points
Has everyone improved? - clearly not - we wouldn't be way outside of the eight otherwise
Would I bet on him to save my life in a final? Ignoring the fact that I don't bet...
3 weeks ago? no.
Now? - sure. 9.1 in his last 10 shots at goal = a man in good goal kicking form...
In the context of his career and where he will end up - who knows how good he will become. But I'm fairly confident that barring injuries (the exact same caveat I placed on whitnall posts all those years ago), we have a long term player on our hands. He will be a lot better/more consistent when he has managed another 20 games.
You asked why he hasn't played more at his age. I've actually provided you with valid reasons as to why he hasn't. Casboult has come from a long way back and despite having 2 long term knee injuries has improved each year. For myself, his continual improvement and the strong marking/amount of shots on goal he gets mean that he has shown enough to suggest that barring injury (that caveat again), casboult will be in the 22 as a solid contributor for the next 4-5 years.
Feel free to bring up this position in 10 or so years whenever you have a bone to pick with me
