Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Fri Jun 13, 2025 5:34 pm

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 231 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ... 12  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Jul 09, 2013 9:04 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2005 8:15 pm
Posts: 4842
Synbad wrote:
JackWorrall wrote:
Agreed that the drafting history looks dreadful, and obviously the recruiters have to bear some of the responsibility, but player development has to also be brought into question.

After many of these drafts, many here were saying what a great job the recruiters had done.

yeah cos everyone was slipping to us.. did anyone wonder that noone was slipping they were just passed on???


That's right, we were selecting certain all Australian U/18s but many of us didn't realise that sometimes the same logic applies as to why drafting Morrish Medal winners is not always a good idea. There's much more to than simply drafting players with junior accolades, especially when you give away so many picks in the meat of the draft.

You only have to read the rundown post draft each year to get a hint of how underwhelming we've done. That might sound superficial but you get the hint that Carlton have never really 'rebuilt' at all. We've simply topped up but with a few more kids than we used to.

Carlton virtually admitted one year that it was seeking players in the draft that the other clubs didn't want. They described it as drafting players that might slip when other teams were seeking certain 'types'. Now I maintain that if they were good enough, they probably wouldn't get through regardless. It sounds more like we were seeking scraps because we are cheap and scared of doing the hard work. We've probably treated most drafts the same way.

_________________
Just because I'm offended, doesn't mean I'm wrong.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 09, 2013 9:32 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
Pafloyul wrote:
Synbad wrote:
JackWorrall wrote:
Agreed that the drafting history looks dreadful, and obviously the recruiters have to bear some of the responsibility, but player development has to also be brought into question.

After many of these drafts, many here were saying what a great job the recruiters had done.

yeah cos everyone was slipping to us.. did anyone wonder that noone was slipping they were just passed on???


That's right, we were selecting certain all Australian U/18s but many of us didn't realise that sometimes the same logic applies as to why drafting Morrish Medal winners is not always a good idea. There's much more to than simply drafting players with junior accolades, especially when you give away so many picks in the meat of the draft.

You only have to read the rundown post draft each year to get a hint of how underwhelming we've done. That might sound superficial but you get the hint that Carlton have never really 'rebuilt' at all. We've simply topped up but with a few more kids than we used to.

Carlton virtually admitted one year that it was seeking players in the draft that the other clubs didn't want. They described it as drafting players that might slip when other teams were seeking certain 'types'. Now I maintain that if they were good enough, they probably wouldn't get through regardless. It sounds more like we were seeking scraps because we are cheap and scared of doing the hard work. We've probably treated most drafts the same way.



That was the talls draft
Watson
McArthy
Mitchell.

basically they all slipped to us.. cos everyone else had already taken talls... so didnt need any that year.. which let allowed them all to slip down to us

we hit the tall jackpot that year.... eureka!!!

robbo was also a top 10 pick that slipped down to us

and kane lucas was a gun mid that slipped down to us

.... i wonder why they all slipped down to us....

the other one is when we beat someone else to a player.... we always hear someone else is going to take someone but we beat them to it....

we get that alot too.....

we beat collingwood to watson.. etc.... but he slipped down to us....

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 09, 2013 9:40 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Sat Oct 14, 2006 11:28 am
Posts: 6450
How much coin would a Wells or Hine be in? Only asking because I have no idea though I reckon I'd get pretty close on all senior coaches....

_________________
"I will rejoice in their anguish, delight in their failure and revel in our success"

We are Carlton, @#$%&! the rest !!!!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 09, 2013 9:41 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
i wonder if our recruiters ever think they didnt slip down to us... just noone wants them....

and the other club never wanted some players we think we beat them to... just they trick us.....

:lol:

i have had many a night laughing about these two scenarios with other carlton people... cracks us up every time...

also loved getting brock with eleven and after we do the deal... shake hands and pay the draft pick... we then want them to give us something a lesser pick back....

thats with melbourne mind you...toyed with by the mighty Dees.....

no wonder we gave up 3 top 20s for juddy... and will give 3 top 10s probably for boyd... we announce to the world what we want ....

next year i can just see it.... we will package up murph and bryce for a number 1 pick... cos its a new shiny number one pick.. not old one like ours....

get pick for jacobs... use on hbfer ... delist or trade down .......

list managers....!!!

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 09, 2013 9:43 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
teagueyubeauty wrote:
How much coin would a Wells or Hine be in? Only asking because I have no idea though I reckon I'd get pretty close on all senior coaches....

im not sure... but we just bought 5,000 memberships or thereabouts to make the clubs membership look good for the board....

i know what i would be doing....

oh and debolfo is a resident historian around the club paid and kept by the pratts....

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 09, 2013 10:06 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 3:08 pm
Posts: 3253
Dominator_7 wrote:
2012 Menzel
Temay
Graham

2011 – Bootsma ?
Rowe ?
Buckley (F/S)

2010 National Draft
Pick 18: Matthew Watson, Calder Cannons ? G
Pick 34: Patrick McCarthy*, Glenelg ?
Pick 42: Luke Mitchell*, Calder Cannons ?
Pick 67: Andrew McInnes*, Dandenong Stingrays
Pick 70: Nick Duigan, Norwood ? G
Pick 85: Jeffery Garlett, Promoted Rookie
Pick 99: David Ellard, Promoted Rookie G
Pick 108: Simon White, Promoted Rookie

2009 National Draft

Pick 12: Kane Lucas, East Fremantle ?
Pick 43: Marcus Davies, North Hobart ? G
Pick 59: Rohan Kerr*, Dandenong Stingrays
Pick 72: Sam Jacobs, Promoted Rookie

Pick 85: Aaron Joseph, Promoted Rookie ? G

2008 National Draft

Pick 6: Chris Yarran, Swan Districts
Pick 40: Mitch Robinson, Tassie Devils ?
Pick 65: Rhys O'Keeffe, North Adelaide G
Pick 80: Caleb Tiller*, Murray Bushrangers
Pick 85: Pass

2007 National Draft

Pick 1 - Priority Selection : Matthew Kreuzer, Northern Knights U18
Pick 36 : Steven Browne, West Perth, WA
Pick 46 : Dennis Armfield, Swan Districts, WA
Pick 65 : Not utilised

2006 National Draft

Pick 1 : Bryce Gibbs, Glenelg, SANFL
Pick 17 - Priority Selection: Shaun Hampson, Mt Gravatt, Queensland ?
Pick 19 : Shaun Grigg, North Ballarat
Pick 35 : Mark Austin, Glenelg, SANFL
Pick 51 : Clinton Benjamin*, Claremont, WA
Pick 67 : Joe Anderson, Darwin, NT
Pick 81 : Not utilised


2005 National Draft

Pick 1 - Priority Selection: Marc Murphy, Oakleigh Chargers U18
Pick 4 : Josh Kennedy, East Fremantle, WAFL
Pick 20 : Paul Bower, Peel Thunder, WAFL
Pick 36 : Jake Edwards, Western Jets U18


2004 National Draft
Pick 9 : Jordan Russell, West Adelaide, SANFL
Pick 25 : Adam Hartlett, West Adelaide, SANFL
Pick 41 : Luke Blackwell, Swan Districts, WAFL - (Father/Son selection)
Pick 73 : Chris Bryan, Frankston, VFL
Pick 77 : Anthony Raso*, Dandenong Stingrays


Underlined = Delisted or Traded
? + Questionable decisions
G + Gone (most likely)

Check out how many years have been absolute wipe outs.
Absolutely disgraceful performance by WH ove a long period of time/
Surely he, and even Shane Rogers wont survive beyond this year.


We have never invested in the system and this despite we were buggered by the AFL in 2002 and 2003. Should have been doing everything to getting right come 2004.

Its a cultural thing with the Blues - believing one big name will solve the issue. In 1999 we traded away pick 16 and 31 for Stephen o'rielly and Michael Mansfield and finally used pick 60 on Richard Kelly?..

It goes deeper than WH and Shane R. ....eg how well did we go in the 2000 draft.....???...pick 4 Luke Livingston, pick 11 Trent Sporn and pick 15 Simon Wiggins.

In 2001, we didn't pick until 39 and we chose Jusin Davies....because of course we traded in and out to pick up Eccles, Gallagher, Justin Murphy (again), McKernan and Lindsay Smith???

It's a club thing and unfortunately we have never demonstrated any ability to draft wisely and build our own.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 09, 2013 10:27 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
i wonder if boyd will be better than nicnat

hmmmmmmmm

hows wc going???

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 09, 2013 10:32 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
WC have NicNat... Cox
Darling and Kennedy.....

I wnder how Boyd would stack up against that foursome

but they dont have a midfield..........

......

..
.

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 09, 2013 10:52 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2005 8:15 pm
Posts: 4842
Synbad wrote:
Pafloyul wrote:
Synbad wrote:
JackWorrall wrote:
Agreed that the drafting history looks dreadful, and obviously the recruiters have to bear some of the responsibility, but player development has to also be brought into question.

After many of these drafts, many here were saying what a great job the recruiters had done.

yeah cos everyone was slipping to us.. did anyone wonder that noone was slipping they were just passed on???


That's right, we were selecting certain all Australian U/18s but many of us didn't realise that sometimes the same logic applies as to why drafting Morrish Medal winners is not always a good idea. There's much more to than simply drafting players with junior accolades, especially when you give away so many picks in the meat of the draft.

You only have to read the rundown post draft each year to get a hint of how underwhelming we've done. That might sound superficial but you get the hint that Carlton have never really 'rebuilt' at all. We've simply topped up but with a few more kids than we used to.

Carlton virtually admitted one year that it was seeking players in the draft that the other clubs didn't want. They described it as drafting players that might slip when other teams were seeking certain 'types'. Now I maintain that if they were good enough, they probably wouldn't get through regardless. It sounds more like we were seeking scraps because we are cheap and scared of doing the hard work. We've probably treated most drafts the same way.



That was the talls draft
Watson
McArthy
Mitchell.



It might have been the 'talls' draft, I can't remember, I didn't associate it with anyone we picked up afterward, I just thought it was a peculiar statement at the time. Actually, I thought it was another draft because I think the implication was that we didn't have many selections and came in a bit later than usual. I think it may have been the Josh Bootsma draft with our commitment to Buckley. They may have thought the same logical tactic that snared us the three talls the previous year might work again despite different circumstances and needs.

_________________
Just because I'm offended, doesn't mean I'm wrong.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 09, 2013 10:59 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston

Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2006 8:59 am
Posts: 8631
Pickle wrote:
Our 150th is shaping as a laugh for the rest of the comp. Just like our last year at PP.



Just like our Centenary year in 1964 (10th - Our lowest position in history) :cry:

Gordon Collis winning the Brownlow was the only bright light in a miserable Centenary year

But 1n 1965 - The coup :thanks:

_________________
Cheats never prosper (except in the AFL)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 10, 2013 12:14 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Sun Nov 19, 2006 1:24 pm
Posts: 1354
Poor trading reflects badly on the recruiters which is unfair.

Giving up picks 24 for Warnock and 12 for Mclean robs the recruiters of the opportunity of those selections. If say we kept those picks and selected good players then the recruiters "average" improves. If we had two young players playing well we would be looking at the list in a better light.

If one of them was say a key defender/forward and the other a midfielder then our list would be enhanced.

I hate trade period because we are shithouse at it because we pay way over for our acquisitions. We still have not learnt from the McGuane, Davenport, O'Reilly and Mansfield trades.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 10, 2013 5:37 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Sat Oct 14, 2006 11:28 am
Posts: 6450
Synbad wrote:
teagueyubeauty wrote:
How much coin would a Wells or Hine be in? Only asking because I have no idea though I reckon I'd get pretty close on all senior coaches....

im not sure... but we just bought 5,000 memberships or thereabouts to make the clubs membership look good for the board....

i know what i would be doing....

oh and debolfo is a resident historian around the club paid and kept by the pratts....

The reason I ask is if say they're on 300k a year doubling it to 600k doesn't seem too extravagant "to get the best".

_________________
"I will rejoice in their anguish, delight in their failure and revel in our success"

We are Carlton, @#$%&! the rest !!!!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 10, 2013 8:01 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
teagueyubeauty wrote:
Synbad wrote:
teagueyubeauty wrote:
How much coin would a Wells or Hine be in? Only asking because I have no idea though I reckon I'd get pretty close on all senior coaches....

im not sure... but we just bought 5,000 memberships or thereabouts to make the clubs membership look good for the board....

i know what i would be doing....

oh and debolfo is a resident historian around the club paid and kept by the pratts....

The reason I ask is if say they're on 300k a year doubling it to 600k doesn't seem too extravagant "to get the best".

I lnow its why i said if u bought 5k membersips 3 games each...at around $70 ... its 350

but then that wouldnt pimp your immediate membership figures would it?

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 10, 2013 8:49 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 6:36 am
Posts: 6386
7 pages of sensational reading
I have been saying all this stuff for years
Well done Bruce
Replace the board
Piss Sticks and the Pratt family off
clean out all the deadwood
accept the list is crap and start again
get the best recruiters who will pick good players
no more stupid narrow minded quick fix solutions Judd Warnock McLean trades
pick players that are versatile and are not soft
Like Bruce I stopped watching
seen it all before
and I am over it
Gibbs Gartlett Betts and Yarran should not get paid for that game
give Hendo the captaincy and as I said earlier this season Murphy aint a captain and never will be
once again the club flowers up
they should all be dropped
bring in Buckley Temay Graham
see how they go
at least it will give something to look forward to
go on Mick
drop these soft pathetic pricks
show that the club stands for some integrity
because our board has none
zero
the board is a sulphur fart
the stench lingers by there presence
this club is [REDACTED] at the moment
the board must go

BLUE SKY DIEING


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 10, 2013 8:51 am 
Offline
Serge Silvagni

Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2012 11:12 am
Posts: 915
Love how KB asked Bruce

KB: do you think it was the right decision to sack Ratten and replace him with Mick
BRUCE: absolutely 100%

Those still banging on about sacking Ratten clearly don't know much of what took place last year. Brett Ratten was a poor manager, lacked people skills, lacked leadership, lacked man management and he had almost 80% of the people at Visy Park offside.

He made no effort to get to know his players and play a role that's just more than just a footy coach was pathetic.

The way he spoke to non football related staff was appalling.

The fact that he couldn't work out that his methods and looooong hours of teaching off a projectors screen wasn't sinking in was damning.

He had lost the players well before that. To hear players mocking the coach and taking the piss out of him right behind his back shows just the total lack of respect they had for him.

Which other president would have to walk into the change rooms and deliver a motivation speech to try get the boys to find some passion within........ I can't think of any


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 10, 2013 8:52 am 
Offline
Serge Silvagni

Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2012 11:12 am
Posts: 915
As one person at the club said to me, Ratten is a good assistant coach..... We need a good senior coach.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 10, 2013 8:55 am 
Offline
Serge Silvagni

Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2012 11:12 am
Posts: 915
Back to Bruce.

He put acid on the club. He is demanding the club become ruthless again and go out and get the bat people for these jobs.

Swanny and McKay to deliver us a Stephen wells or a Derek Hine to head up our recruiting team.

This club isn't the best because the best recruiters are working at other teams. THEY NEED TO BE AT OUR CLUB so go get em


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 10, 2013 9:17 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 6:36 am
Posts: 6386
trublu wrote:
Love how KB asked Bruce

KB: do you think it was the right decision to sack Ratten and replace him with Mick
BRUCE: absolutely 100%

Those still banging on about sacking Ratten clearly don't know much of what took place last year. Brett Ratten was a poor manager, lacked people skills, lacked leadership, lacked man management and he had almost 80% of the people at Visy Park offside.

He made no effort to get to know his players and play a role that's just more than just a footy coach was pathetic.

The way he spoke to non football related staff was appalling.

The fact that he couldn't work out that his methods and looooong hours of teaching off a projectors screen wasn't sinking in was damning.

He had lost the players well before that. To hear players mocking the coach and taking the piss out of him right behind his back shows just the total lack of respect they had for him.

Which other president would have to walk into the change rooms and deliver a motivation speech to try get the boys to find some passion within........ I can't think of any




Thing is who ultimately is responsible for employing him for 5 and half years and sacking him with a year to go on his contract and paying him out half a mill


THE flower BOARD

If Virgin went to shit Branson cops the blame
If Microsoft went to shit Gates cops the blame
because the top dog is the one ultimately responsible

ITS CALLED LIFE

MM has inherited a shit list because the club has been shit because surprise surprise
THE BOARD IS SHIT

Ratten gets appointed because he is a favourite son
a 95 premieship mate of sticks
McKay is doing a shit job as well


We cant move forward properly until this board goes with Sticks and the Pratts walking off into the sunset


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 10, 2013 9:21 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
One of the things abut our people is theyre media shy.
Apart from Swann.. who loves to go on radio and talk footy matters... Were shy of the media... you could use thw term were "introverts".... they find it very difficult to get in the media and connect in some way....

I reckon our playing list reflects the off field group....

Were never on the front foot..!!!

introverts........ yes introverts.... where have i heard that before???

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 10, 2013 10:25 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 18017
trublu wrote:
Love how KB asked Bruce

KB: do you think it was the right decision to sack Ratten and replace him with Mick
BRUCE: absolutely 100%

Those still banging on about sacking Ratten clearly don't know much of what took place last year. Brett Ratten was a poor manager, lacked people skills, lacked leadership, lacked man management and he had almost 80% of the people at Visy Park offside.

He made no effort to get to know his players and play a role that's just more than just a footy coach was pathetic.

The way he spoke to non football related staff was appalling.

The fact that he couldn't work out that his methods and looooong hours of teaching off a projectors screen wasn't sinking in was damning.

He had lost the players well before that. To hear players mocking the coach and taking the piss out of him right behind his back shows just the total lack of respect they had for him.

Which other president would have to walk into the change rooms and deliver a motivation speech to try get the boys to find some passion within........ I can't think of any


..and yet the shit coach had better results with the same players?

Go figure. :screwy:
Did Bruce have the reasons for that from his birds eye view in Queensland?

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 231 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ... 12  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Mickstar, piquet and 36 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group