Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Mon Jun 16, 2025 1:15 am

Board index » TalkingCarlton » TalkingCarlton

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 7 of 19
  [ 361 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ... 19  Next
  Print view Previous topic | Next topic 
Author Message
Big Kahuna Boot
PostPosted: Sat Apr 20, 2013 11:17 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter

Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 6:54 pm
Posts: 14686
Location: The Vodka Train
Synbad wrote:
Battle of the Titans.

Warnock will be tall...Jacobs needs to jump in the last quarter..
Dont worry.. he wont let us down... :thumbsup:


..jacobs hasnt been having the same start to this year he had last season.. ..he's been good, but isnt in form.. ..we should be able to work him over with knockers and hampson, jenkins isnt 1st ruck standard..

_________________
..if you can't be good, be good at it..
Top
 Profile  
 
cimm1979
PostPosted: Sat Apr 20, 2013 11:19 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 8:12 pm
Posts: 15582
Location: Upper Swan.
Big Kahuna Boot wrote:
Synbad wrote:
Battle of the Titans.

Warnock will be tall...Jacobs needs to jump in the last quarter..
Dont worry.. he wont let us down... :thumbsup:


..jacobs hasnt been having the same start to this year he had last season.. ..he's been good, but isnt in form.. ..we should be able to work him over with knockers and hampson, jenkins isnt 1st ruck standard..


Adelaide's drug program was stopped after Essendon*'s.

They haven't had time to change it to be competitive in 2013.

_________________
I hope Essendon* folds.
Top
 Profile  
 
DenimUndies
PostPosted: Sat Apr 20, 2013 11:20 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2006 8:28 pm
Posts: 1642
Location: .?../*%$#@
Thought Davies also made a massive contribution to tonight's win... His hamstring injury was instrumental in reducing the number of turnovers off HBF
Top
 Profile  
 
Taff
PostPosted: Sat Apr 20, 2013 11:21 pm 
Offline
John Nicholls
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:22 pm
Posts: 9603
Location: Beijing
HTP wrote:
Am I the only one around here who thought Kade Simpson had a good game?


I thought he finished the game strongly and loved his goal at the end. Significant improvement on previous weeks.

_________________
"our electorate seeks less to be informed and more to be validated." Sad times.
Top
 Profile  
 
Synbad
PostPosted: Sat Apr 20, 2013 11:22 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
aboynamedsue wrote:
I liked the way that we won without Judd or Simmo having big games, and no Betts, Waite & Kreuzer, with lesser lights like Curnow, Tuohy, Armfield, White (first half) really playing their roles...

Isnt good to not rely on any huge name player ... starting to resemble a TEAM
Everyone tackling chasing and being involved.

The elephant in the room is Chris Judd.
Instead of being "give it to the champ"

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.
Top
 Profile  
 
Smurph
PostPosted: Sat Apr 20, 2013 11:22 pm 
Offline
Laurie Kerr

Joined: Tue Sep 07, 2010 7:50 pm
Posts: 107
DenimUndies wrote:
Synbad wrote:
jake_h03 wrote:
Synbad wrote:
Been saying it all along.

Warnock >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hampson

And good to see we have a coach not a supporter in charge ....


As a ruckman. Not in the forward line though

Warnock is number 1 ruck around here... i hope this drove it home.. and K is a much better player to have on the ground than Hampson.. Hammer does a couple of good things... and alot of shit things...

There is a football ledger!!!.... people shoud keep note of it...



Totally agreequote]

X 2. Rowe ans Waite forward, warnock number one ruck nd kreuzer doing his thing around the ground.

Great game, great team effort
Top
 Profile  
 
club29
PostPosted: Sat Apr 20, 2013 11:22 pm 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:52 am
Posts: 9105
Location: Nth Fitzroy
Big Kahuna Boot wrote:
..great game, more team orientated play and it's what we make us much better.. ..awesome protection for yazz running into goal..

....in regards to Knockers, for a guy playing 1st ruck, he only managed a few extra hitouts compared to hampson.. ..had less disposals, marks, 1%s.. ..basically, he had a decent game nothing special however.. ..i dont think he's a straight up superior tap ruck.. ..he's better at negating the opposite ruckman in he taps, but he rarely dominates hitouts and doest have a high hitout to advanatge ration..so i think he's extra height seduces ppl.. ..but he doesnt use his height anywhere near enough.. ..he does have a month to put his case fwd..


Agree BKB. I like Warnocks game but comparing him to hampson seems odd. They played different positions. Thought Hampsons first quarter was good but he faded a bit after that. At times he drew a few opponents and spilt the ball well. Not a great game but was ok.

Synbads suggestion of Kruezer in - Hampson out is probably more the point. Kruezer wants first ruck. It will be a big decision in a couple of weeks time when hopefully all are fit.
Top
 Profile  
 
choo
PostPosted: Sat Apr 20, 2013 11:23 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 29, 2006 10:37 pm
Posts: 1585
Location: The Clinic across the road.
DenimUndies wrote:
Thought Davies also made a massive contribution to tonight's win... His hamstring injury was instrumental in reducing the number of turnovers off HBF


inappropriate

_________________
"I'll tell you what I didn't do;
I never injected anyone."
AD 3/3/14
Top
 Profile  
 
Wojee
PostPosted: Sat Apr 20, 2013 11:23 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:17 am
Posts: 35135
How good were Armfield and Garlett's shepherds? Can't remember seeing anything quite like that before.

_________________
"One of my favorite philosophical tenets is that people will agree with you only if they already agree with you. You do not change people's minds." - Frank Zappa
Top
 Profile  
 
DenimUndies
PostPosted: Sat Apr 20, 2013 11:25 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2006 8:28 pm
Posts: 1642
Location: .?../*%$#@
choo wrote:
DenimUndies wrote:
Thought Davies also made a massive contribution to tonight's win... His hamstring injury was instrumental in reducing the number of turnovers off HBF


inappropriate


I know, and I feel remorseful
Top
 Profile  
 
Stamos
PostPosted: Sat Apr 20, 2013 11:25 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Mon May 31, 2010 10:07 pm
Posts: 1984
verbs wrote:
Thank !@#$%& for that. A team kicking inaccurately and it wasn't us.


Um, it was, they were just worse :oops:
Top
 Profile  
 
MIL
PostPosted: Sat Apr 20, 2013 11:25 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Sat Jul 01, 2006 9:43 pm
Posts: 4745
club29 wrote:
Big Kahuna Boot wrote:
..great game, more team orientated play and it's what we make us much better.. ..awesome protection for yazz running into goal..

....in regards to Knockers, for a guy playing 1st ruck, he only managed a few extra hitouts compared to hampson.. ..had less disposals, marks, 1%s.. ..basically, he had a decent game nothing special however.. ..i dont think he's a straight up superior tap ruck.. ..he's better at negating the opposite ruckman in he taps, but he rarely dominates hitouts and doest have a high hitout to advanatge ration..so i think he's extra height seduces ppl.. ..but he doesnt use his height anywhere near enough.. ..he does have a month to put his case fwd..


Agree BKB. I like Warnocks game but comparing him to hampson seems odd. They played different positions. Thought Hampsons first quarter was good but he faded a bit after that. At times he drew a few opponents and spilt the ball well. Not a great game but was ok.

Synbads suggestion of Kruezer in - Hampson out is probably more the point. Kruezer wants first ruck. It will be a big decision in a couple of weeks time when hopefully all are fit.


the BIG conundrum. I vote for 206 as THE ruck and let Krooz and Hammer fight it out for the spot. Sheesh......
Top
 Profile  
 
DenimUndies
PostPosted: Sat Apr 20, 2013 11:26 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2006 8:28 pm
Posts: 1642
Location: .?../*%$#@
Wojee wrote:
How good were Armfield and Garlett's shepherds? Can't remember seeing anything quite like that before.



Those shepherds were the highlights of tonight's game for mine
Top
 Profile  
 
Synbad
PostPosted: Sat Apr 20, 2013 11:26 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
Nah K is a special player.. and a team player...
Warnock is the better ruckman.

Kreuzer will always give us more value than Hampson on the field... its because Kreuzer is a selfless FOOTBALLER who always plays to the advantage of the team...

Watch n see how the chemistry between Warnock number 1 ruckman and Kreuzer the footballer is a the perfect combination. :thumbsup:

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.
Top
 Profile  
 
chubbyruss
PostPosted: Sat Apr 20, 2013 11:26 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston

Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2006 8:59 am
Posts: 8631
Surprisingly we have held both Richmond & WCE goalless in the 4th Qtr

_________________
Cheats never prosper (except in the AFL)
Top
 Profile  
 
Blueboy74
PostPosted: Sat Apr 20, 2013 11:27 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2009 2:30 pm
Posts: 4584
Location: Blisstonia.
Wojee wrote:
How good were Armfield and Garlett's shepherds? Can't remember seeing anything quite like that before.


Agreed. Curnow also layed a crucial one on the wing prior to Mclean's? goal in the 3rd quarter.

_________________
"They're [REDACTED]'
Top
 Profile  
 
aboynamedsue
PostPosted: Sat Apr 20, 2013 11:27 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2007 9:09 pm
Posts: 6047
Synbad wrote:
aboynamedsue wrote:
I liked the way that we won without Judd or Simmo having big games, and no Betts, Waite & Kreuzer, with lesser lights like Curnow, Tuohy, Armfield, White (first half) really playing their roles...

Isnt good to not rely on any huge name player ... starting to resemble a TEAM
Everyone tackling chasing and being"


Yeah, agreed but let's not get too carried away with 1 win...

Tonight will mean nothing if the Crows clean us up next week.....

_________________
It's never as good as it looks and it's never as bad as it seems.
Top
 Profile  
 
Stamos
PostPosted: Sat Apr 20, 2013 11:30 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Mon May 31, 2010 10:07 pm
Posts: 1984
WOW wrote:
HTP wrote:
Am I the only one around here who thought Kade Simpson had a good game?


he was awful

luckily he kicked the sealer


Had a good 1st quarter, then was awful.
Fortunately, he made up for that dropped mark by kicking the sealer (brilliantly set up by AJ). Shave the beard please).
Top
 Profile  
 
jake_h03
PostPosted: Sat Apr 20, 2013 11:31 pm 
Offline
John Nicholls
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 9:35 am
Posts: 9059
Location: Melbourne
DenimUndies wrote:
Thought Davies also made a massive contribution to tonight's win... His hamstring injury was instrumental in reducing the number of turnovers off HBF


Hahaha. Funny because its true

_________________
:lol: :-D :) :? :( :x :evil:
Top
 Profile  
 
Big Kahuna Boot
PostPosted: Sat Apr 20, 2013 11:32 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter

Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 6:54 pm
Posts: 14686
Location: The Vodka Train
..the process.... ..i believe..

_________________
..if you can't be good, be good at it..
Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 7 of 19
  [ 361 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ... 19  Next

Board index » TalkingCarlton » TalkingCarlton

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: ByteDanceSpider, Google [Bot], Majestic-12 [Bot] and 48 guests

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group