Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Mon Jun 16, 2025 9:46 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 231 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ... 12  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat Oct 13, 2012 5:43 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 18022
Goltzenberg wrote:
Only way you will stop this is if you ban all players from socialising.


Nonsense.
When did Juddy last walk into a pub and belt someone......or Carrots?
It has nothing to do with players socialising, its about people having self control and social responsibility. Scotland is a fool and a repeat offender.

Also your point about it having nothing to do with the AFL is interesting. It was Scotlands defence team that introduced a probable AFL penalty into the equation.
He received a lighter penalty because apparently Carlton were going to give him several weeks.

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 13, 2012 6:49 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:35 pm
Posts: 2432
Blue Vain wrote:
Goltzenberg wrote:
Only way you will stop this is if you ban all players from socialising.


Nonsense.
When did Juddy last walk into a pub and belt someone......or Carrots?
It has nothing to do with players socialising, its about people having self control and social responsibility. Scotland is a fool and a repeat offender.

Also your point about it having nothing to do with the AFL is interesting. It was Scotlands defence team that introduced a probable AFL penalty into the equation.
He received a lighter penalty because apparently Carlton were going to give him several weeks.


This. He got off because he's an AFL player. Everyone knows it.
Repeat offender.
Perfect opportunity for the club to set an example and signal to the playing group.
Muck up and you get punished, no matter who you are.
We have always been loathe to punish our players properly. NAB suspension??? :roll:
Culture starts at the top.

_________________
I just want my old club back ... (edit) maybe I have!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 13, 2012 6:54 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 31, 2007 8:15 pm
Posts: 6748
Location: Echuca
Can't help thinking the reason he finished up in court in the first place, was that he IS an AFL player.

_________________
The problem with Socialism is, you eventually run out of other people's money.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 13, 2012 7:27 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:35 pm
Posts: 2432
murraycray wrote:
Can't help thinking the reason he finished up in court in the first place, was that he IS an AFL player.


The others charged weren't AFL players. And they had convictions recorded, unlike our boy.

_________________
I just want my old club back ... (edit) maybe I have!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 13, 2012 7:43 am 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:04 am
Posts: 28377
Location: *Currently banned*
He needs something to wake him up. If he escaped penalty from the courts, we must act otherwise he will maybe think he can just do whatever he like, though at 32 one would think he is old enough to realise belting someone like he did could be fatal.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 13, 2012 8:20 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:32 am
Posts: 10575
Goltzenberg wrote:
Its a Criminal issue dealt in the courts. 2 year good behaviour bond and a fine should be enough.

Dont agree that the afl needs to be involved. The fact that he has the whole offseason to think about it will be enough. If this happened during the season you would suspend due to media & political correctness, would have more impact but being so long before the season starts It doesnt really have any impact if he just misses games. Just hurts the club in the end.

What l dont get in all of this is heath helps bounces and doesnt get involved then goes back in to find his shoes and hits a guy. His bro is a bit special apparently and im sure there was probably something said about his bro to react that way. You never know, heath could of walked back in and the guy said your bros a xxxx and hes just thumped him. I dont know if half of you guys on here ever go out in pubs n bars but it is a different world and after a few beers your not really worried about getting suspended for a few games if your bros getting picked on And insulted. Only way you will stop this is if you ban all players from socialising. Missing games for this incident next year wont mean dick to scotland.


:clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: .... get the picture .... :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 13, 2012 9:29 am 
Offline
Vale 1953-2020
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 11, 2005 1:23 am
Posts: 11671
SurreyBlue wrote:
Goltzenberg wrote:
Its a Criminal issue dealt in the courts. 2 year good behaviour bond and a fine should be enough.

Dont agree that the afl needs to be involved. The fact that he has the whole offseason to think about it will be enough. If this happened during the season you would suspend due to media & political correctness, would have more impact but being so long before the season starts It doesnt really have any impact if he just misses games. Just hurts the club in the end.

What l dont get in all of this is heath helps bounces and doesnt get involved then goes back in to find his shoes and hits a guy. His bro is a bit special apparently and im sure there was probably something said about his bro to react that way. You never know, heath could of walked back in and the guy said your bros a xxxx and hes just thumped him. I dont know if half of you guys on here ever go out in pubs n bars but it is a different world and after a few beers your not really worried about getting suspended for a few games if your bros getting picked on And insulted. Only way you will stop this is if you ban all players from socialising. Missing games for this incident next year wont mean dick to scotland.


:clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: .... get the picture .... :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap:

You guys seriously need to eat a concrete sandwich. If you're the kind of softcock who sooks it when your brother is getting insulted, then don't go out to pubs with him at two in the morning. Stay at home with your box of tissues.

Fairdinkum, this mythology of being tough cos you have fights in pubs is weird.

_________________
Never argue with idiots. They drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience!!!

After Monday and Tuesday, even the calendar says W T F .........
Visit http://fromthemoshpit.com/


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 13, 2012 10:17 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 12:30 pm
Posts: 2864
First we had the apologists for Fevola, now we have the apologists for Scotland.

Next it will be the apologists for Robinson...or McLean...or the 18 year old kid we're about to draft...

Time for the Club to step up and set a standard of uncompromising professionalism on and off the field.

Interesting article in today's The Age about leadership and culture at Collingwood. They reckon in order to win a flag, they need to get better at both. And they are miles ahead of us already.

http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-news/m ... 27iiu.html

Quote:
Added Walsh: ''What I do know is our discipline, our attitude - if that's linked to culture, it is something we would feel needs to improve if we are going to be around in the last week of September.''

_________________
Mens sana in corpore sano.

Bring back the laurel wreath logo!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 13, 2012 10:21 am 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:04 am
Posts: 28377
Location: *Currently banned*
What's your beef with Robinson?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 13, 2012 10:25 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 21, 2005 5:15 pm
Posts: 7360
iirc, Lance Franklin was punched at a bar a few years ago... instead of retaliating, he walked out with his gf and told the club of what just occurred. Is he a wuss or an AFL footballer aware of his public stature?

Heath walks up to a guy and king hits him because he may have said something mean to or about his brother. In the process he tarnished himself but more importantly to me, the brand that is the Carlton football club, again. For that reason alone, the club must come down on him hard... not to mention the 'culture' message they'll be sending out to the playing group.

I fear the only wuss in this whole episode will be the CFC

_________________
“I would rather have questions that can't be answered than answers that can't be questioned.” ― Richard Feynman


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 13, 2012 10:44 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 12:30 pm
Posts: 2864
verbs wrote:
What's your beef with Robinson?


No beef with Robinson. Was trying to pick random examples, although Robinson does have some form.

_________________
Mens sana in corpore sano.

Bring back the laurel wreath logo!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 13, 2012 10:52 am 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:04 am
Posts: 28377
Location: *Currently banned*
Siegfried wrote:
verbs wrote:
What's your beef with Robinson?


No beef with Robinson. Was trying to pick random examples, although Robinson does have some form.


No he doesn't. There was a rumour of a scuffle three years ago with no punches thrown. No police charges, no drunken debacles, no fights, no drug taking. He's a model citizen.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 13, 2012 11:09 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 12:30 pm
Posts: 2864
verbs wrote:
Siegfried wrote:
verbs wrote:
What's your beef with Robinson?


No beef with Robinson. Was trying to pick random examples, although Robinson does have some form.


No he doesn't. There was a rumour of a scuffle three years ago with no punches thrown. No police charges, no drunken debacles, no fights, no drug taking. He's a model citizen.


I stand corrected then. The point was, if you suspend Scotland, make him realise how he's let everyone down through stupid behaviour, penalise him in missed match payments, then he is less likely to stuff up again, and other players, whoever they are, get a clear sign of the consequences of them stuffing up. Whether it's Robinson, McLean, new draftee, Simpson, Laidler, Bell, whoever.

_________________
Mens sana in corpore sano.

Bring back the laurel wreath logo!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 13, 2012 12:12 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:04 am
Posts: 28377
Location: *Currently banned*
Agree.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 13, 2012 2:05 pm 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 7:43 am
Posts: 5175
Location: Corner of Queen and Collins
I couldn't care less what other Clubs do or do not do and do not see their penalties as relevant.

Scotland is a leader of the club and has brought his name and the Club's name down with a cowardly act. I'd give him 4 weeks as a club penalty.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 13, 2012 2:27 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:26 am
Posts: 14730
Location: Comparing orange boners with Hirdy
A penalty might not "mean dick to Scotland", but it will hopefully send a message to the rest of the list and set a standard

_________________
Greg Swann wrote:
Essendon* cheated, simple as that


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 13, 2012 2:56 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 1:03 pm
Posts: 1845
Location: Brisbane, QLD
Double edged sword.

Heath deserves a decent punishment to send the message to the group that this sort of stuff won't be tolerated. 2-3 weeks should be sufficient.

On the other hand, I'm a big believer in the 'talk shit, get hit' ethos as well. I don't talk shit to any randoms out in clubs so I don't get involved in fights. I don't look for them and will more often than not walk away from potential volatile situations ie. rowdy, mouthy drunks who could be a problem later.

I've hung out with Heath on a few occassions while we've both been VERY drunk. I've found him to be a top bloke and in control...a 'happy drunk' if you will. Anyone who doesn't go in to bat for their family is a bit weird in my book, it's almost instinct. We'll never know the full details but this guy sounds like an absolute [REDACTED] and probably got what he deserved - maybe a little more but you grab the bull, you get the horns.

Would it have been an issue had Heath not returned for Round 2? Unsure. He does have form though and the Club need to make an example. Like lots of rules though, we may not necessarily agree with them when not looking strictly black/white, but we uphold them anyways. 2-3 weeks for mine, regular season.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 13, 2012 3:06 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Sat Aug 27, 2011 2:06 pm
Posts: 1098
Siegfried wrote:
First we had the apologists for Fevola, now we have the apologists for Scotland.

Next it will be the apologists for Robinson...or McLean...or the 18 year old kid we're about to draft...

Time for the Club to step up and set a standard of uncompromising professionalism on and off the field.

Interesting article in today's The Age about leadership and culture at Collingwood. They reckon in order to win a flag, they need to get better at both. And they are miles ahead of us already.

http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-news/m ... 27iiu.html

Quote:
Added Walsh: ''What I do know is our discipline, our attitude - if that's linked to culture, it is something we would feel needs to improve if we are going to be around in the last week of September.''

So has there been a change in leadership and culture in the space of 2 years or was it a long injury list that prevented Collingwood from winning the flag this year?
As for Scotland, he has priors and this is very disappointing and really the last thing the club needs right now even though it did occur a while ago.
Someone may be able to find an article when Scotland's last incident happened, i am pretty sure Kernahan mentioned something along the lines of him being on his last chance.
Will be so glad to see the end of 2012.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 13, 2012 3:09 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 7:13 pm
Posts: 21075
Location: Missing Kouta
kennyhunter wrote:
murraycray wrote:
Can't help thinking the reason he finished up in court in the first place, was that he IS an AFL player.


The others charged weren't AFL players. And they had convictions recorded, unlike our boy.

Heath will be saving kittens from burning buildings.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 13, 2012 4:28 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 31, 2007 8:15 pm
Posts: 6748
Location: Echuca
I'm not saying Heath shouldn't cop a whack. The court imposed a 2 year good behaviour bond, community service, and a fine (?).
Carlton will fine him 5 Large, and suspend him. I think that's sufficient.

Let me ask those baying for blood, who among you has gone through life without ever punching another person ?

_________________
The problem with Socialism is, you eventually run out of other people's money.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 231 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ... 12  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: ByteDanceSpider, Mickstar and 49 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group