Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Thu Jun 19, 2025 4:45 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 149 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Mar 08, 2011 12:57 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Mon May 31, 2010 10:07 pm
Posts: 1984
AGRO wrote:
Pokie revenue should not really be promoted as any sort of club saviour financially - and the Board/Administration should work on plans to ensure strong revenue growth from membership, merchandise, corporate and community support and involvement.


I agree with this. Happy to take the money when it's there to wipe our debt, but it's not unforeseeable that laws could change and dry up that stream of revenue. Shouldn't have all your eggs in one basket.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 08, 2011 1:07 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2008 6:46 am
Posts: 28227
Stamos wrote:
AGRO wrote:
Pokie revenue should not really be promoted as any sort of club saviour financially - and the Board/Administration should work on plans to ensure strong revenue growth from membership, merchandise, corporate and community support and involvement.


I agree with this. Happy to take the money when it's there to wipe our debt, but it's not unforeseeable that laws could change and dry up that stream of revenue. Shouldn't have all your eggs in one basket.


every social conscience has it's price :cool:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 08, 2011 1:10 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 9:51 am
Posts: 4919
Stamos wrote:
I agree with this. Happy to take the money when it's there to wipe our debt, but it's not unforeseeable that laws could change and dry up that stream of revenue. Shouldn't have all your eggs in one basket.


That egg is a new egg in another basket.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 08, 2011 5:39 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston

Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2006 8:59 am
Posts: 8631
Agreement reached in cardboard cartel case

http://www.theage.com.au/business/agree ... 1bm2a.html

_________________
Cheats never prosper (except in the AFL)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 08, 2011 9:53 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 21543
Location: North of the border
AGRO wrote:
Goltzenberg wrote:
Just some ideas. I don't think pokies should be the ultimate way of making money for the club outside of memberships n sponsorships



I think that this will ultimately lead to member apathy and contribute to a she'll be right approach by members who see that we are "bullet proofed" from further financial crisis.

Very similar to the way we didnt grow memberships during the 80s/90s when the Elliott Administration pursued the corporate dollar at the expense of total member involvement.

Pokie revenue should not really be promoted as any sort of club saviour financially - and the Board/Administration should work on plans to ensure strong revenue growth from membership, merchandise, corporate and community support and involvement.



By the time Wilkie and Gillard finish with pokies they will no be making you a cent the changes to pokies with the swipe cards and chips are set to wipe most pokie places out with most machines not able to take the technology or it costing $5-10k to adapt

_________________
If you allow the Government to change the Laws in an emergency
They will create an Emergency to change the Laws


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 09, 2011 5:31 am 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2008 6:46 am
Posts: 28227
Sydney Blue wrote:
AGRO wrote:
Goltzenberg wrote:
Just some ideas. I don't think pokies should be the ultimate way of making money for the club outside of memberships n sponsorships



I think that this will ultimately lead to member apathy and contribute to a she'll be right approach by members who see that we are "bullet proofed" from further financial crisis.

Very similar to the way we didnt grow memberships during the 80s/90s when the Elliott Administration pursued the corporate dollar at the expense of total member involvement.

Pokie revenue should not really be promoted as any sort of club saviour financially - and the Board/Administration should work on plans to ensure strong revenue growth from membership, merchandise, corporate and community support and involvement.



By the time Wilkie and Gillard finish with pokies they will not be making you a cent the changes to pokies with the swipe cards and chips are set to wipe most pokie places out with most machines not able to take the technology or it costing $5-10k to adapt


and what a great day that will be !

The wretched things are nothing but a scourge on society.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 09, 2011 6:30 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 31, 2007 8:15 pm
Posts: 6748
Location: Echuca
Is there data detailing what percentage of people playing pokies have a gambling problem?

_________________
The problem with Socialism is, you eventually run out of other people's money.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 09, 2011 7:20 am 
Offline
Geoff Southby

Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 1:29 pm
Posts: 5913
Location: Melbourne
murraycray wrote:
Is there data detailing what percentage of people playing pokies have a gambling problem?


Yeah, I saw it in a Vic Govt report two years ago, but don't have it at hand. Google will probably help you.

BUT the one thing I remember is how astounded I was at the definitions they used for "problem gambling". The thresholds were, to my mind at least, incredibly high.

They had something like four categories, and the top category was "problem gambler" but I remember the second category... not even the one before problem gambler, was something like 3-4 pokies sessions a week, and losses of around $100 a week or something. Not exactly sure but I remember thinking "whoah... that's not right."

To my mind, if you're spending that kind of money and you're not earning a good salary (and let's face it, most pokies players aren't exactly high-rollers) you've got a problem.

So they list four types of pokies players "at risk" but only one of those types as a "problem gambler". I reckon that's quite deceitful, designed purely to make the problem seem as begign as possible.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 19, 2011 4:24 pm 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2005 3:54 pm
Posts: 5274
Location: Melbourne
TruBlueBrad wrote:
I had my 3rd call from someone on behalf of the club in the last 6 months trying to sell the $200 raffle tickets this morning.

Im still not sure what bothers me most

1. They call during the working day and start talking and babbling on and say they wont take up much of your time rather than asking if you have time.
2. They ask how you think 'the boys' will go this season and talk football when they clearly have no clue. Im assuming we're using a third party (call was from a mobile phone?) can't we bring it in-house and save some money?
3. When I said I can't he asked if I had friends or family who are Blues supporters I could split the cost with...how about you sell 4 times the tickets at $50 instead.

I'm a member, I did the Blue Believer thing, I've joined SOC, it bothers me a little they're so pushy on this. The process really puts me off buying a ticket.


I got a call the other day asking about the $200 raffle ticket and I responded "Thanks but I already bought one of those a while back." Her response "Yes sir we're aware you bought one in July but we're offering you the chance to buy another one to give yourself a greater chance." That's so kind of them.

_________________
"We used to sit around and talk about how bad the game plan was." Anthony Koutoufides


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 19, 2011 5:31 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:17 am
Posts: 8128
TheGame wrote:
TruBlueBrad wrote:
I had my 3rd call from someone on behalf of the club in the last 6 months trying to sell the $200 raffle tickets this morning.

Im still not sure what bothers me most

1. They call during the working day and start talking and babbling on and say they wont take up much of your time rather than asking if you have time.
2. They ask how you think 'the boys' will go this season and talk football when they clearly have no clue. Im assuming we're using a third party (call was from a mobile phone?) can't we bring it in-house and save some money?
3. When I said I can't he asked if I had friends or family who are Blues supporters I could split the cost with...how about you sell 4 times the tickets at $50 instead.

I'm a member, I did the Blue Believer thing, I've joined SOC, it bothers me a little they're so pushy on this. The process really puts me off buying a ticket.


I got a call the other day asking about the $200 raffle ticket and I responded "Thanks but I already bought one of those a while back." Her response "Yes sir we're aware you bought one in July but we're offering you the chance to buy another one to give yourself a greater chance." That's so kind of them.


tightarses...!

:wink:

_________________
There's so much I could say...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 14, 2011 8:04 am 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 9:27 am
Posts: 28528
Location: Free Beer!!
TruBlueBrad wrote:
I had my 3rd call from someone on behalf of the club in the last 6 months trying to sell the $200 raffle tickets this morning.

Im still not sure what bothers me most

1. They call during the working day and start talking and babbling on and say they wont take up much of your time rather than asking if you have time.
2. They ask how you think 'the boys' will go this season and talk football when they clearly have no clue. Im assuming we're using a third party (call was from a mobile phone?) can't we bring it in-house and save some money?
3. When I said I can't he asked if I had friends or family who are Blues supporters I could split the cost with...how about you sell 4 times the tickets at $50 instead.

I'm a member, I did the Blue Believer thing, I've joined SOC, it bothers me a little they're so pushy on this. The process really puts me off buying a ticket.


Had another call regarding this on Thursday.

:banghead:

Could this club do anymore to piss off its supporters?

_________________
"The ability to speak doesn't make you intelligent." Qui-Gon Jinn 15-05-2005

"there’s more chance of me becoming the full forward for the [Western Bulldogs] than there is of any change in the Labor Party." Julia Gillard 18-05-2010


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 14, 2011 8:07 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 7:14 pm
Posts: 1109
Location: Not Telling
All clubs do the raffle and call their members. I don't mind it especially if it helps raise money for the club.

_________________
Delulio is a member of TISM


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 14, 2011 8:17 am 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 9:27 am
Posts: 28528
Location: Free Beer!!
I don't mind it either, provided you're providing people with the inspiration to purchase them, but when you have a membership department that discourages people to join through their incompetence, a communications department thats biggest weakness is communication and you're calling people 4 times to purchase...I think you need to look at how things are being done.

_________________
"The ability to speak doesn't make you intelligent." Qui-Gon Jinn 15-05-2005

"there’s more chance of me becoming the full forward for the [Western Bulldogs] than there is of any change in the Labor Party." Julia Gillard 18-05-2010


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 14, 2011 9:27 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 6:29 am
Posts: 13689
There are boundaries. 4 times is 2 maybe 3 times too much.

_________________
The measure of a life is a measure of love and respect
So hard to earn, so easily burned
In the fullness of time
A garden to nurture and protect

#DopeThenStash


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 14, 2011 9:51 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 23, 2009 8:30 pm
Posts: 23921
bluechucky wrote:
There are boundaries. 4 times is 2 maybe 3 times too much.

:lol:

_________________
That’s not a political statement — it’s a harsh reality, and we must act,” she said. “He is a clear and present danger to the things that keep us strong and free. I support impeachment.”


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 14, 2011 4:10 pm 
Offline
Bert Deacon

Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 2:47 pm
Posts: 580
The Age are estimating a return of $13.6 Million to the Club from Pokies in 2012. The Club will have a total of 260 machines with Cwood the next at 191. Not sure what to feel bout this. Will be great to clear the debt and back some $ but ...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 14, 2011 4:16 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2010 7:37 pm
Posts: 2288
Location: Bendigo
anfield wrote:
The Age are estimating a return of $13.6 Million to the Club from Pokies in 2012. The Club will have a total of 260 machines with Cwood the next at 191. Not sure what to feel bout this. Will be great to clear the debt and back some $ but ...


I tend to agree, love the idea of debt reduction but hate the concept of pokies period.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 14, 2011 5:04 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2008 6:46 am
Posts: 28227
Once the Xenophon/Wilkie pokie legislation is passed and implemented I wont have a problem with pokie revenue.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 14, 2011 9:36 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Thu May 11, 2006 6:11 pm
Posts: 15001
TruBlueBrad wrote:
TruBlueBrad wrote:
I had my 3rd call from someone on behalf of the club in the last 6 months trying to sell the $200 raffle tickets this morning.

Im still not sure what bothers me most

1. They call during the working day and start talking and babbling on and say they wont take up much of your time rather than asking if you have time.
2. They ask how you think 'the boys' will go this season and talk football when they clearly have no clue. Im assuming we're using a third party (call was from a mobile phone?) can't we bring it in-house and save some money?
3. When I said I can't he asked if I had friends or family who are Blues supporters I could split the cost with...how about you sell 4 times the tickets at $50 instead.

I'm a member, I did the Blue Believer thing, I've joined SOC, it bothers me a little they're so pushy on this. The process really puts me off buying a ticket.


Had another call regarding this on Thursday.

:banghead:

Could this club do anymore to piss off its supporters?

The club also called my home a few weeks ago. My daughter is a concession member as she is a student, they asked her if she would like to buy a $200 raffle ticket. She obviously said no and they said they would ring me later, which thankfully they havent.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 14, 2011 11:08 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Sun May 22, 2005 11:58 pm
Posts: 4058
Location: South Yarra
bluegirl72 wrote:
bluechucky wrote:
There are boundaries. 4 times is 2 maybe 3 times too much.

:lol:


What's a third of 4?


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 149 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 42 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group