Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Mon Jun 23, 2025 8:30 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 482 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ... 25  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Sep 07, 2009 4:09 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:17 am
Posts: 8128
Big Kahuna Boot wrote:
..it was very stupid, what he did, and how he tried to reason/justify/explain what he did.. ..and a reprimand isn't enough for 'attempted' eye gouging.. ..otherwise, what else was he trying to do with shitelli's face..?.. ..pressure point stuff has got to be garbagio.. ..and yes, he has tarnished his reputation, and ppl saying he hasn't aren't being honest with themselves.. ..he's gouged brown, and it 'looks' like he was trying to gouge shitelli.. ..if he wasn't, what on earth was he trying to do..??!!.. ..he;s done it once before, and it looked like he was trying to do it again.. ..ppl might have forgotton about the brown incident a couple of years ago, but Juddles just went and reminded them.. ..and they won't forget so quickly a second time around..


the vibe..? :lol:

_________________
There's so much I could say...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 07, 2009 4:11 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:17 am
Posts: 8128
Big Kahuna Boot wrote:
budzy wrote:

not for the first time, the penalty does not fit the crime, IMO



..do you honestly believe a reprimand is enough for what he 'attempted' to do..?.. ..do you think Lynchy only deserved a reprimand for all those haymakers that missed wakes..?.. ..pure and simple, both were attempts to hurt.. ..and a reprimand isn't enough for intent.. ..if Juddles said in the heat of the moment, he slipped, got bumped etc etc then he could argue any contact was purely accidental..and then maybe a reprimand would suffice.. ..but the numbskull declared to all and sundry he intentionally attempted to do something dodgey.. ..and for that, he's got to cop it..


you're carrying on like Eddie was thismorning ..calm down.

_________________
There's so much I could say...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 07, 2009 4:13 pm 
Offline
Geoff Southby

Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 1:29 pm
Posts: 5913
Location: Melbourne
2 weeks seems about right. A stupid thing to do. Out of character yes, but he did it nonetheless.

Lucky for Juddy we're not playing finals this week - would've been the most untimely suspension in our club's history.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 07, 2009 4:13 pm 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:52 am
Posts: 9106
Location: Nth Fitzroy
Should have jst got him later the way Bateman got Lloyd.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 07, 2009 4:15 pm 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2005 9:27 pm
Posts: 5270
What a complete geek to try out a pressure point in a game of AFL!!!

The TBM household thinks it's hilarious :grin: :grin:

We also think 1 week would suffice.

_________________
The problem will be made. for the solution to be sold, to your face before your eyes, tolerance is now the new danger


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 07, 2009 4:16 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter

Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 6:54 pm
Posts: 14686
Location: The Vodka Train
..Budzy, i'm very calm on this matter.. ..though sat night i was screaming at him "what are you doing??!!" as i was watching, especially since we were looking ripe for a victory.. ..my issue is the posters watering it all down as if it's nothing, if it was another team's player doing it, let alone to one of our players, we'd be organising the peasants and handing out pitchforks.. ..and Juddles did himself claim to be trying to hurt shitelli with the whole pressure point rubbish.. ..which is intentionally trying to do something dodgey.. ..he said it..

_________________
..if you can't be good, be good at it..


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 07, 2009 4:18 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter

Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 6:54 pm
Posts: 14686
Location: The Vodka Train
club29 wrote:
Should have jst got him later the way Bateman got Lloyd.


..no, he should have gotten him later, legally.. ..how bates got away with 1 week is another disgrace, but probably a discussion for another thread.. ..how he clocked monga across the head deserved much more than 1 week, and he's just very lucky monga's got a thick head..

_________________
..if you can't be good, be good at it..


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 07, 2009 4:19 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:57 pm
Posts: 4307
Location: Strathmore
what a load of crap... 2 weeks...... Richmond player whack Buddy in the mouth, cuts his lip and draw blood yet has no case to answer.

take the 2 weeks judd and don't show up at the brownlow this year and never ever speak to the media/radio unless the club wants you too or do any afl work again.

_________________
31-3-2015 - R.I.P AFL, corrupted lying pricks
12-5-2015 - Go WADA
18-8-2015 - Suffer Hird* u lying flower
12-1-2016 - CAS goes bang, happy new year.. Drugcheats forever..


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 07, 2009 4:20 pm 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:52 am
Posts: 9106
Location: Nth Fitzroy
Juddy being the sort of bloke he is will be more concerned about Riscitelli. I am sure he is on the phone right now making sure he is ok.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 07, 2009 4:40 pm 
Offline
Horrie Clover
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 3:17 pm
Posts: 333
Bewilderingly stupid from anyone, really, but particularly so when it's Judd. Perhaps his intelligence has been overestimated, or is he just too 'clever' for his own good?

Very disappointed with his seemingly nonchalant, blasé attitude after the fact, but perhaps it's the stark reminder we need that the bloke is just a footballer, after all.

I'm embarrassed, and I'm embarrassed for him.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 07, 2009 4:49 pm 
Offline
Horrie Clover

Joined: Mon May 30, 2005 1:35 pm
Posts: 344
GET ONTO OUR LEGAL TEAM......... The charge is contact to the face... the pressure point isn't on his "face" it was on the back of his neck.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 07, 2009 4:52 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 1:12 pm
Posts: 1291
Location: Sydney
budzy wrote:
Quote:
misconduct over making unreasonable contact with the face


so they couldn't prove 'eye gouging'??


Exactly!! The charge was for "unreasonable contact to the face". It's hardly eye gouging, not even close.

People need to calm down a bit instead of getting caught up in the hysteria! :roll:

Three weeks for touching someone's face :? :garthp:

_________________
When Dick became President, it was as if everyone at Carlton came out of the hailstorm and into the sunshine - Stephen Kernahan

YARRAN!!





.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 07, 2009 5:34 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 10:58 am
Posts: 2134
Forget the two weeks - the big story is why the hell can Judd be held and scragged and kicked and mauled every time he goes near the ball and the umpires only pay a free kick for him once in a blue moon.


The highlight for me with the match against Brisbane was seeing one free kick for Judd - he deserves about 5 minimum per match.


The week prior the Adelaide tagger was holding him around the waist nearly every time there was a ball up.


The question has to be asked - what was Richitelli and his salary cap concession team mates doing to Judd prior to the incident to provoke him?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 07, 2009 6:28 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:26 am
Posts: 14731
Location: Comparing orange boners with Hirdy
budzy wrote:
Big Kahuna Boot wrote:
budzy wrote:

not for the first time, the penalty does not fit the crime, IMO



..do you honestly believe a reprimand is enough for what he 'attempted' to do..?.. ..do you think Lynchy only deserved a reprimand for all those haymakers that missed wakes..?.. ..pure and simple, both were attempts to hurt.. ..and a reprimand isn't enough for intent.. ..if Juddles said in the heat of the moment, he slipped, got bumped etc etc then he could argue any contact was purely accidental..and then maybe a reprimand would suffice.. ..but the numbskull declared to all and sundry he intentionally attempted to do something dodgey.. ..and for that, he's got to cop it..


you're carrying on like Eddie was thismorning ..calm down.

Its BKBs' Yarran v Rich debate all over again :lol:

_________________
Greg Swann wrote:
Essendon* cheated, simple as that


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 07, 2009 6:30 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:54 am
Posts: 2361
Location: September Baby!!!!
He was trying to do this


Image

_________________
Ecclesiastes 1:4, "One generation passes away, and another generation comes: but The Blues abide forever."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 07, 2009 6:58 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:29 am
Posts: 6418
Location: Casa Da Carlton - The Place to Be
flower rubbish.

buddy ko's a bloke, and gets 2 weeks, 1 week if pleading guilty (he shouldnt have got anything)
judd gets 3 weeks, 2 if plead guilty for putting his hand in someones face.

its a flower joke, how you can ko a bloke and get 1 week, while putting your hand in the face of someone and get two weeks, is simply and utterly beyond my comprehension.

ive said it before and i will say it again, putting you hand in someones face is not a flower eye guage. if he eye guaged him, or even attempted to eye guage him risctelli would have to be taken of the field, eyes checked, vision would have been blurred and wouldnt not have been able to continue playing.

so he must have been so clearly distraught and savaged by the ordeal that he left the field right? he didnt even leave the flower contest!!! its a joke!!

stupid yes, but it has no more intent than wrestling, in fact, one could say it was wrestling!!! so why is it deemed anymore serious that a "jumper punch" i can tell you, you can do alot more damage with a jumper punch, than you can a hand in the face ffs!!

_________________
Got to love the stare Down by Setanta on Llyod :)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 07, 2009 7:07 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2005 11:48 am
Posts: 2891
He should have gone with the Chewbacca defence.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 07, 2009 7:08 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 6:42 pm
Posts: 2833
ScottSaunders wrote:
!@#$%& rubbish.

buddy ko's a bloke, and gets 2 weeks, 1 week if pleading guilty (he shouldnt have got anything)
judd gets 3 weeks, 2 if plead guilty for putting his hand in someones face.

its a !@#$%& joke, how you can ko a bloke and get 1 week, while putting your hand in the face of someone and get two weeks, is simply and utterly beyond my comprehension.

ive said it before and i will say it again, putting you hand in someones face is not a !@#$%& eye guage. if he eye guaged him, or even attempted to eye guage him risctelli would have to be taken of the field, eyes checked, vision would have been blurred and wouldnt not have been able to continue playing.

so he must have been so clearly distraught and savaged by the ordeal that he left the field right? he didnt even leave the !@#$%& contest!!! its a joke!!

stupid yes, but it has no more intent than wrestling, in fact, one could say it was wrestling!!! so why is it deemed anymore serious that a "jumper punch" i can tell you, you can do alot more damage with a jumper punch, than you can a hand in the face ffs!!



Here here SS :clap:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 07, 2009 7:20 pm 
Offline
Horrie Clover

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 7:58 am
Posts: 356
Location: Melbourne
Can you intentionally make contact behind a guy's ear (i.e. back of his head), yet also intentionally make contact with the face??
Surely it's one or the other.
If, as he stated in the media, his intent was the pressure point behind the ear, then the contact to the face becomes incidental, and therefore could only be viewed as accidental, reckless or negligent, which would reduce the activation points, and potentially weeks served.

There's nothing in this and everyone knows it.
Fight it and win!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 07, 2009 7:21 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 11:51 am
Posts: 4606
Location: lygon street
simply must challenge. The MRP have guessed at what happened at best. Judd should never have said a word about the incident. That is even dumber than the actual incident itself. What shit way to end the season. Unbelievable

_________________
Fat, drunk, and stupid is no way to go through life, son.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 482 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ... 25  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: GreatEx, Traveller86 and 61 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group