club29 wrote:
Synbad wrote:
dadadadada wrote:
Sydney had their backs to the wall and were desperate to win ... they were going to be tough to crack in the second half.
good tactic to push an extra man from full forward line to half forward line ... allowed us opportunities to isolate Fev and Kreuzer and by upping the number at half forward helped us to maintain possession in that area and feed the Judds, Murphs, Simmo and Gibbs of this world running through.
Beating a side you have always struggled with is always a positive.
Of course its a positive.
But you go in with a positive outlook against a really shit team.. why use good players with negative roles??
Theyre shit!!!!!
Anyway.... glad the pre game plan went out the door... all that thought put in and then thrown out in the Useless Bin...
Crazy talk Synbad.
Even if man on man was his plan B its still his plan. You will find all coaches tinker and change matchups. Some before the first bounce.
It will be a struggle to take you serious if you keep this line of thinking up.
I dont care if you think im serious or not.
The set up was overly cautious.
Give an explanation on why Gibbs was a tagger... or i cant take you seriously...
Considering Swans has one something like one game in the last seven... and theyre really crap!!!
Ratts coaching reminds me of Master Chefs Julies puddle pudding....
Started off in her head as one thing.. and by the time its done.. its all a balls up and changed into something different to get them through...
Happens every week.
When were allowed to play cos whatever it is hasnt been working... usually we do better....
Happens with our starts every week.
Sometimes it lasts the whole game.
I call it the Ratts puddle gameplan....
Still if Ratts can somehow conjure up some kind of Stephen Bradbury /Julie flag victory.. i would take that.... but highly unlikely...