kezza wrote:
Mots87 wrote:
Why would we trade Gibbs has got me stuffed. Playing his best football now, still only 27 and has proved to be very resilient. I can understand us wanting to get another top ten pick but not at that cost. From what I have seen of this draft there are no real standouts not like last year. It appears this draft is a lot me even and possibly runs a bit deeper in quality. We are not overloaded with talent at the moment, no point in giving one away.
Every year someone suggests we trade Gibbs, I am with you I dont understand it. He is one of our best and still has years of footy ahead of him.
You might not
agree with it, fair enough, but to not
understand it is a bit of a glib statement. People have reasoned that getting an extra, high, draft pick is needed for us to get the required talent on the list to peak at the right time for the so-called 'premiership window'. You don't trade your captain but you need to trade quality to get quality back. We are not getting a PP so Gibbs is reasoned to be the only option to achieve another pick at about the middle of the first round (or higher).
Anyway, the trouble this year is that there is depth but not a lot of talent at the high end. The fear for me is that because we are deemed to need heaps of midfielders, we won't ride with the strength of the draft with each successive pick but instead pick for need. This is like cutting corners and reduces our chances of getting the best value out of later selections. Having higher picks negates that to a degree.
Who do we want deep in the draft, the next Aliir Aliir or the next Tom Temay (he was drafted as a potential tagging midfielder, not as a back pocket)? If people say we need to keep looking for quality midfielders, then we'll need higher picks.