Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Tue Jun 17, 2025 6:15 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 2029 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55 ... 102  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Our new coach - 2016
PostPosted: Wed Jul 22, 2015 12:15 pm 
Offline
Vale 1953-2020
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 11, 2005 1:23 am
Posts: 11671
cimm1979 wrote:
padre wrote:
dannyboy wrote:
My two bits.

Carlton failed when Pagan was the coach - sacked the coach. How much was Pagan's fault, how much the Board's? - Pagan is gone Board remains...

Carlton failed when Ratten was the coach - sacked the coach. How much was Ratten's fault, how much the Board's? - Ratten is gone Board remains...

Carlton failed when Malthouse was coach - sacked the coach. How much was Malthouse's fault, how much the Board's? - Malthouse is gone Board remains...

we keep arguing about the various coaches but really, the thread is there and it isn't the coach. Good luck for the new bloke, I give him three years and then the knives will start again and I bet... just bet... the Board will remain...


Well yes. If you dont win a premiership thats a fail under your criteria. Using that criteria many other clubs failed over this period and moved their coaches on. So what is your point? That we are somehow worse than those other clubs? How?


Have you been asleep for 12 years?

No, only since "criterion" stopped being a word.

_________________
Never argue with idiots. They drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience!!!

After Monday and Tuesday, even the calendar says W T F .........
Visit http://fromthemoshpit.com/


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Our new coach - 2016
PostPosted: Wed Jul 22, 2015 1:17 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:52 pm
Posts: 2044
Blue Vain wrote:
ThePsychologist wrote:
Blue Vain wrote:
Michael Jezz wrote:
cimm1979 wrote:
You're right.

You're no expert.


That is right, at least I call it as it is. You probably judge a coach on his media performances. Barker was played forward, coached our forward line an our forwards arent leading to the right spots. We arent scoring 10 goals a game. Get over the feel good factor and while you are at it what makes you an expert


More insightful brilliance.
You couldn't wait to tell us how Malthouse would need years to clean up Rattens mess and you're laying the boots in to Barker after 6 games. :lol:
Funnily enough you weren't gobbing off after he won consecutive games but after hard fought losses against top 8 sides, you've got the knife out.


Maybe he see's something you don't? Just maybe. He has the right to an opinion.


As do I. He's a hypocrite.
He defended Malthouse to the hilt because he needed multiple years to turn around the failures of the previous coach. And when anyone did question Malthouse, he branded them "haters".
Then he has the temerity to criticise Barker after what, 6 games in the role. :lol:
Sorry but 2 and a half years of shit can't be rectified in a month and a half. That's my opinion.


That's right Malthouse had 2 seasons and 9 games to rebuild a list. I am not sure you ever openly faced the mortgage the Ratten years put on our future. It was Pagan who developed Fevola, Gibbs, Murphy, despite his failures. Then Malthouse took over a basket case and at least you can see that over the two years Cripps, Buckley, Holman, Casboult et al learnt something. Malthouse has personality faults and should have played the kids 6 weeks earlier but by and large he left the place in a better state than what he found it. And if you value culture and honesty, it was Malthouse who went to the board and said get real, we have a weak list. It was Malthouse who put a line in the sand with Garlett and Robinson for lieing to the Coach. I support those decisions. Not to Mention the difficulty in motivating a group after the president and ceo said everyone is up for trade. Media performances & personality are secondary to coaching ability in my assessment of the coach. I am not putting a line through Barker but I was really disappointed in our performance against Fremantle.
He was our forward coach, he played forward, we are scoring less than 10 goals a game. Our forwards didn't lead. The method and the process is everything when you are going through a development phase. Barker is a good team guy but maybe he is too simplistic, maybe he isn't a great development coach. The bottom line is you see things in such simple terms that everything is based on personalities and simple one liners like "writing off Barker after 6 games". I won't judge any coach that we employ on a win loss basis while we are building the foundation but I will be skeptical when there are huge gaps in the way we play such as the basics of leading, tackling, defending and disposal efficiency. I just think there is a lot of feel good factor and it is only going to get harder from here.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Our new coach - 2016
PostPosted: Wed Jul 22, 2015 2:01 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2008 1:06 pm
Posts: 3995
Location: Steven Seagal's Martial Arts Academy
Michael Jezz wrote:


That's right Malthouse had 2 seasons and 9 games to rebuild a list. I am not sure you ever openly faced the mortgage the Ratten years put on our future. It was Pagan who developed Fevola, Gibbs, Murphy, despite his failures.

Hmmmmm not sure about that

Michael Jezz wrote:
Then Malthouse took over a basket case and at least you can see that over the two years Cripps, Buckley, Holman, Casboult et al learnt something.

Agree, but he got paid a lot to teach them

Michael Jezz wrote:
Malthouse has personality faults and should have played the kids 6 weeks earlier but by and large he left the place in a better state than what he found it. And if you value culture and honesty, it was Malthouse who went to the board and said get real, we have a weak list. It was Malthouse who put a line in the sand with Garlett and Robinson for lieing to the Coach. I support those decisions. Not to Mention the difficulty in motivating a group after the president and ceo said everyone is up for trade.

Agree with this.

Michael Jezz wrote:
Media performances & personality are secondary to coaching ability in my assessment of the coach. I am not putting a line through Barker but I was really disappointed in our performance against Fremantle. He was our forward coach, he played forward, we are scoring less than 10 goals a game. Our forwards didn't lead.

But I thought TC has already proclaimed Barker as the new coach... after the win against Port ....

Michael Jezz wrote:
The method and the process is everything when you are going through a development phase. Barker is a good team guy but maybe he is too simplistic, maybe he isn't a great development coach. The bottom line is you see things in such simple terms that everything is based on personalities and simple one liners like "writing off Barker after 6 games". I won't judge any coach that we employ on a win loss basis while we are building the foundation but I will be skeptical when there are huge gaps in the way we play such as the basics of leading, tackling, defending and disposal efficiency. I just think there is a lot of feel good factor and it is only going to get harder from here.

That's the Carlton way !


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Our new coach - 2016
PostPosted: Wed Jul 22, 2015 2:14 pm 
Offline
Serge Silvagni

Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 7:56 pm
Posts: 934
cimm1979 wrote:
padre wrote:
dannyboy wrote:
My two bits.

Carlton failed when Pagan was the coach - sacked the coach. How much was Pagan's fault, how much the Board's? - Pagan is gone Board remains...

Carlton failed when Ratten was the coach - sacked the coach. How much was Ratten's fault, how much the Board's? - Ratten is gone Board remains...

Carlton failed when Malthouse was coach - sacked the coach. How much was Malthouse's fault, how much the Board's? - Malthouse is gone Board remains...

we keep arguing about the various coaches but really, the thread is there and it isn't the coach. Good luck for the new bloke, I give him three years and then the knives will start again and I bet... just bet... the Board will remain...


Well yes. If you dont win a premiership thats a fail under your criteria. Using that criteria many other clubs failed over this period and moved their coaches on. So what is your point? That we are somehow worse than those other clubs? How?


Have you been asleep for 12 years?


I must have been. But at least when i wake up i haven't lost my intelligence or courtesy


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Our new coach - 2016
PostPosted: Wed Jul 22, 2015 2:47 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 2:32 pm
Posts: 33043
Location: Back in reality
dannyboy wrote:
My two bits.

Carlton failed when Pagan was the coach - sacked the coach. How much was Pagan's fault, how much the Board's? - Pagan is gone Board remains...

Carlton failed when Ratten was the coach - sacked the coach. How much was Ratten's fault, how much the Board's? - Ratten is gone Board remains...

Carlton failed when Malthouse was coach - sacked the coach. How much was Malthouse's fault, how much the Board's? - Malthouse is gone Board remains...

we keep arguing about the various coaches but really, the thread is there and it isn't the coach. Good luck for the new bloke, I give him three years and then the knives will start again and I bet... just bet... the Board will remain...

Also 6 presidents and 4 factions later.

_________________
29 different attributes,
And only 7 that you like;
20 ways to see the world,
Or 20 ways to start a fight.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Our new coach - 2016
PostPosted: Wed Jul 22, 2015 4:06 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2011 3:17 pm
Posts: 2646
Michael Jezz wrote:
That's right Malthouse had 2 seasons and 9 games to rebuild a list. I am not sure you ever openly faced the mortgage the Ratten years put on our future. It was Pagan who developed Fevola, Gibbs, Murphy, despite his failures. Then Malthouse took over a basket case and at least you can see that over the two years Cripps, Buckley, Holman, Casboult et al learnt something. Malthouse has personality faults and should have played the kids 6 weeks earlier but by and large he left the place in a better state than what he found it. And if you value culture and honesty, it was Malthouse who went to the board and said get real, we have a weak list. It was Malthouse who put a line in the sand with Garlett and Robinson for lieing to the Coach. I support those decisions. Not to Mention the difficulty in motivating a group after the president and ceo said everyone is up for trade. Media performances & personality are secondary to coaching ability in my assessment of the coach. I am not putting a line through Barker but I was really disappointed in our performance against Fremantle.
He was our forward coach, he played forward, we are scoring less than 10 goals a game. Our forwards didn't lead. The method and the process is everything when you are going through a development phase. Barker is a good team guy but maybe he is too simplistic, maybe he isn't a great development coach. The bottom line is you see things in such simple terms that everything is based on personalities and simple one liners like "writing off Barker after 6 games". I won't judge any coach that we employ on a win loss basis while we are building the foundation but I will be skeptical when there are huge gaps in the way we play such as the basics of leading, tackling, defending and disposal efficiency. I just think there is a lot of feel good factor and it is only going to get harder from here.



yes psych is right, everybody has an opinion but been hallucinogenic is a whole other matter :screwy:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Our new coach - 2016
PostPosted: Wed Jul 22, 2015 5:04 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 18024
Michael Jezz wrote:
I am not putting a line through Barker but I was really disappointed in our performance against Fremantle.
He was our forward coach, he played forward, we are scoring less than 10 goals a game.



Barker was our defensive coach.

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Our new coach - 2016
PostPosted: Wed Jul 22, 2015 5:13 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2008 6:46 am
Posts: 28227
Blue Vain wrote:
Michael Jezz wrote:
I am not putting a line through Barker but I was really disappointed in our performance against Fremantle.
He was our forward coach, he played forward, we are scoring less than 10 goals a game.



Barker was our defensive coach.

I thought he did both ?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Our new coach - 2016
PostPosted: Wed Jul 22, 2015 5:19 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2012 3:29 pm
Posts: 7074
Forward coach first. Went to the backline when we lost Gavin Brown (which I still maintain was a massive mistake).


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Our new coach - 2016
PostPosted: Wed Jul 22, 2015 5:22 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2008 6:46 am
Posts: 28227
emtwenty wrote:
Forward coach first. Went to the backline when we lost Gavin Brown (which I still maintain was a massive mistake).

Obviously Brown saw the writing on the wall.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Our new coach - 2016
PostPosted: Wed Jul 22, 2015 5:29 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:12 am
Posts: 10400
Location: Coburg
jimmae wrote:
dannyboy wrote:
My two bits.

Carlton failed when Pagan was the coach - sacked the coach. How much was Pagan's fault, how much the Board's? - Pagan is gone Board remains...

Carlton failed when Ratten was the coach - sacked the coach. How much was Ratten's fault, how much the Board's? - Ratten is gone Board remains...

Carlton failed when Malthouse was coach - sacked the coach. How much was Malthouse's fault, how much the Board's? - Malthouse is gone Board remains...

we keep arguing about the various coaches but really, the thread is there and it isn't the coach. Good luck for the new bloke, I give him three years and then the knives will start again and I bet... just bet... the Board will remain...

Also 6 presidents and 4 factions later.


brilliant, problem solved obviously nothing to worry about, Carlton has this well in hand.

_________________
This type of slight is alien in the more cultured part of the world - Walsh. Its up there with mad dogs, Englishmen and the midday sun!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Our new coach - 2016
PostPosted: Wed Jul 22, 2015 5:30 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:52 pm
Posts: 2044
redback wrote:
Michael Jezz wrote:
That's right Malthouse had 2 seasons and 9 games to rebuild a list. I am not sure you ever openly faced the mortgage the Ratten years put on our future. It was Pagan who developed Fevola, Gibbs, Murphy, despite his failures. Then Malthouse took over a basket case and at least you can see that over the two years Cripps, Buckley, Holman, Casboult et al learnt something. Malthouse has personality faults and should have played the kids 6 weeks earlier but by and large he left the place in a better state than what he found it. And if you value culture and honesty, it was Malthouse who went to the board and said get real, we have a weak list. It was Malthouse who put a line in the sand with Garlett and Robinson for lieing to the Coach. I support those decisions. Not to Mention the difficulty in motivating a group after the president and ceo said everyone is up for trade. Media performances & personality are secondary to coaching ability in my assessment of the coach. I am not putting a line through Barker but I was really disappointed in our performance against Fremantle.
He was our forward coach, he played forward, we are scoring less than 10 goals a game. Our forwards didn't lead. The method and the process is everything when you are going through a development phase. Barker is a good team guy but maybe he is too simplistic, maybe he isn't a great development coach. The bottom line is you see things in such simple terms that everything is based on personalities and simple one liners like "writing off Barker after 6 games". I won't judge any coach that we employ on a win loss basis while we are building the foundation but I will be skeptical when there are huge gaps in the way we play such as the basics of leading, tackling, defending and disposal efficiency. I just think there is a lot of feel good factor and it is only going to get harder from here.



yes psych is right, everybody has an opinion but been hallucinogenic is a whole other matter :screwy:


Another blanket one line statement absent any facts. Go write for the Herald Sun


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Our new coach - 2016
PostPosted: Wed Jul 22, 2015 5:39 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:12 am
Posts: 10400
Location: Coburg
aboynamedsue wrote:
dannyboy wrote:
My two bits.

Carlton failed when Pagan was the coach - sacked the coach. How much was Pagan's fault, how much the Board's? - Pagan is gone Board remains...

Carlton failed when Ratten was the coach - sacked the coach. How much was Ratten's fault, how much the Board's? - Ratten is gone Board remains...

Carlton failed when Malthouse was coach - sacked the coach. How much was Malthouse's fault, how much the Board's? - Malthouse is gone Board remains...

we keep arguing about the various coaches but really, the thread is there and it isn't the coach. Good luck for the new bloke, I give him three years and then the knives will start again and I bet... just bet... the Board will remain...


I agree that our boards have failed us for a long time.





But, to be fair, nobody who was on the boards which appointed Pagan and Ratten remain on the board. Just sayin'.

But the principal of more board accountability is absolutely right



and how those Boards transitioned

and what we look for in a Board

and how we've gone wrong with our Boards in the past.

I agree things are looking better and all my fingers are crossed...and if we go through the process and if we do not trade - I couldn't give a flying fig who we could get, keep the @#$%&! picks as a matter of principle, just once, keep the @#$%&! picks - and if we can somehow work out what is Carlton's brand? It's style? It's leadership group and so on and so forth. Things are sounding better but lets just see shall we? 'Cos recent history says we may change boards but we don't change direction (except the coach thing... and so we arrive back at the first point.)

_________________
This type of slight is alien in the more cultured part of the world - Walsh. Its up there with mad dogs, Englishmen and the midday sun!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Our new coach - 2016
PostPosted: Wed Jul 22, 2015 5:52 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 2:32 pm
Posts: 33043
Location: Back in reality
dannyboy wrote:
jimmae wrote:
dannyboy wrote:
My two bits.

Carlton failed when Pagan was the coach - sacked the coach. How much was Pagan's fault, how much the Board's? - Pagan is gone Board remains...

Carlton failed when Ratten was the coach - sacked the coach. How much was Ratten's fault, how much the Board's? - Ratten is gone Board remains...

Carlton failed when Malthouse was coach - sacked the coach. How much was Malthouse's fault, how much the Board's? - Malthouse is gone Board remains...

we keep arguing about the various coaches but really, the thread is there and it isn't the coach. Good luck for the new bloke, I give him three years and then the knives will start again and I bet... just bet... the Board will remain...

Also 6 presidents and 4 factions later.


brilliant, problem solved obviously nothing to worry about, Carlton has this well in hand.

I'm just saying, if there was a magic bullet, we would have found it by now.

Just need to prune, and analyse and ask questions and drive change. The board seem to be with that program now, despite all the uproar around the time of Malthouse's sacking.

_________________
29 different attributes,
And only 7 that you like;
20 ways to see the world,
Or 20 ways to start a fight.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 22, 2015 6:48 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 21541
Location: North of the border
How does sacking an under performing staff member who has been given 2 3 or even 5 years to prove their worth equate to the board not doing their job properly.
Sure the process of appointment might be wrong but these appointments had a proven track record.

The Board would have failed more if they had kept Pagan Ratten and Malthouse

_________________
If you allow the Government to change the Laws in an emergency
They will create an Emergency to change the Laws


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Our new coach - 2016
PostPosted: Wed Jul 22, 2015 7:02 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2012 11:06 am
Posts: 1826
Michael Jezz wrote:
redback wrote:
Michael Jezz wrote:
That's right Malthouse had 2 seasons and 9 games to rebuild a list. I am not sure you ever openly faced the mortgage the Ratten years put on our future. It was Pagan who developed Fevola, Gibbs, Murphy, despite his failures. Then Malthouse took over a basket case and at least you can see that over the two years Cripps, Buckley, Holman, Casboult et al learnt something. Malthouse has personality faults and should have played the kids 6 weeks earlier but by and large he left the place in a better state than what he found it. And if you value culture and honesty, it was Malthouse who went to the board and said get real, we have a weak list. It was Malthouse who put a line in the sand with Garlett and Robinson for lieing to the Coach. I support those decisions. Not to Mention the difficulty in motivating a group after the president and ceo said everyone is up for trade. Media performances & personality are secondary to coaching ability in my assessment of the coach. I am not putting a line through Barker but I was really disappointed in our performance against Fremantle.
He was our forward coach, he played forward, we are scoring less than 10 goals a game. Our forwards didn't lead. The method and the process is everything when you are going through a development phase. Barker is a good team guy but maybe he is too simplistic, maybe he isn't a great development coach. The bottom line is you see things in such simple terms that everything is based on personalities and simple one liners like "writing off Barker after 6 games". I won't judge any coach that we employ on a win loss basis while we are building the foundation but I will be skeptical when there are huge gaps in the way we play such as the basics of leading, tackling, defending and disposal efficiency. I just think there is a lot of feel good factor and it is only going to get harder from here.



yes psych is right, everybody has an opinion but been hallucinogenic is a whole other matter :screwy:


Another blanket one line statement absent any facts. Go write for the Herald Sun

Did you expect anything less,watch the delussional cheerleaders follow.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Our new coach - 2016
PostPosted: Wed Jul 22, 2015 7:16 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2011 3:17 pm
Posts: 2646
Michael Jezz wrote:
redback wrote:
Michael Jezz wrote:
That's right Malthouse had 2 seasons and 9 games to rebuild a list. I am not sure you ever openly faced the mortgage the Ratten years put on our future. It was Pagan who developed Fevola, Gibbs, Murphy, despite his failures. Then Malthouse took over a basket case and at least you can see that over the two years Cripps, Buckley, Holman, Casboult et al learnt something. Malthouse has personality faults and should have played the kids 6 weeks earlier but by and large he left the place in a better state than what he found it. And if you value culture and honesty, it was Malthouse who went to the board and said get real, we have a weak list. It was Malthouse who put a line in the sand with Garlett and Robinson for lieing to the Coach. I support those decisions. Not to Mention the difficulty in motivating a group after the president and ceo said everyone is up for trade. Media performances & personality are secondary to coaching ability in my assessment of the coach. I am not putting a line through Barker but I was really disappointed in our performance against Fremantle.
He was our forward coach, he played forward, we are scoring less than 10 goals a game. Our forwards didn't lead. The method and the process is everything when you are going through a development phase. Barker is a good team guy but maybe he is too simplistic, maybe he isn't a great development coach. The bottom line is you see things in such simple terms that everything is based on personalities and simple one liners like "writing off Barker after 6 games". I won't judge any coach that we employ on a win loss basis while we are building the foundation but I will be skeptical when there are huge gaps in the way we play such as the basics of leading, tackling, defending and disposal efficiency. I just think there is a lot of feel good factor and it is only going to get harder from here.



yes psych is right, everybody has an opinion but been hallucinogenic is a whole other matter :screwy:


Another blanket one line statement absent any facts. Go write for the Herald Sun



You talk about lack of facts, everything you say is just blatantly wrong no one can be F!@#$% arguing your micky love post but here is some quick revision
I’m not one to support Ratten but we finished on 11 wins with a decimated list when ratten was sacked and played finals three years running before that, hardly basket case
micky finished with us on the bottom how is that in better shape
how did he develop the kids? By berating them in public, by playing them in 1 quarter then dropping them, by honing their skills with a dysfunctional game plan ( isn’t it funny how they all improved after he left)
micky told us we needed a rebuild after playing finals, but then again micky said a lot of things that had no merit to his benefit
leading, tackling, defending, disposal efficiency all improved when micky was canned
assistants are under the instructions of the senior coach, he makes the final decisions not the line coach’s, how hard is that to understand
we had no f!@#$^&* forwards while the mother was there and no one to kick to up the ground, how do you kick a winning score

we don’t know the answer to barker just yet but I do know micky made an absolute mess of us while he was here


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Our new coach - 2016
PostPosted: Wed Jul 22, 2015 7:18 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2012 11:06 am
Posts: 1826
On cue !


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Our new coach - 2016
PostPosted: Wed Jul 22, 2015 7:18 pm 
Offline
formerly cj69

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:52 am
Posts: 7893
redback wrote:
Michael Jezz wrote:
That's right Malthouse had 2 seasons and 9 games to rebuild a list. I am not sure you ever openly faced the mortgage the Ratten years put on our future. It was Pagan who developed Fevola, Gibbs, Murphy, despite his failures. Then Malthouse took over a basket case and at least you can see that over the two years Cripps, Buckley, Holman, Casboult et al learnt something. Malthouse has personality faults and should have played the kids 6 weeks earlier but by and large he left the place in a better state than what he found it. And if you value culture and honesty, it was Malthouse who went to the board and said get real, we have a weak list. It was Malthouse who put a line in the sand with Garlett and Robinson for lieing to the Coach. I support those decisions. Not to Mention the difficulty in motivating a group after the president and ceo said everyone is up for trade. Media performances & personality are secondary to coaching ability in my assessment of the coach. I am not putting a line through Barker but I was really disappointed in our performance against Fremantle.
He was our forward coach, he played forward, we are scoring less than 10 goals a game. Our forwards didn't lead. The method and the process is everything when you are going through a development phase. Barker is a good team guy but maybe he is too simplistic, maybe he isn't a great development coach. The bottom line is you see things in such simple terms that everything is based on personalities and simple one liners like "writing off Barker after 6 games". I won't judge any coach that we employ on a win loss basis while we are building the foundation but I will be skeptical when there are huge gaps in the way we play such as the basics of leading, tackling, defending and disposal efficiency. I just think there is a lot of feel good factor and it is only going to get harder from here.



yes psych is right, everybody has an opinion but been hallucinogenic is a whole other matter :screwy:


I don't think that's fair at all. The piece I highlighted above is quite rational and makes a lot of sense. IMO Michael Jezz is asking some legimate questions.

_________________
#NewBlues beginning 25th August 2015


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Our new coach - 2016
PostPosted: Wed Jul 22, 2015 7:29 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2011 3:17 pm
Posts: 2646
Trigger wrote:
On cue !


what facts or your fiction


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 2029 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55 ... 102  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 55 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group