Michael Jezz wrote:
That's right Malthouse had 2 seasons and 9 games to rebuild a list. I am not sure you ever openly faced the mortgage the Ratten years put on our future. It was Pagan who developed Fevola, Gibbs, Murphy, despite his failures.
Hmmmmm not sure about that
Michael Jezz wrote:
Then Malthouse took over a basket case and at least you can see that over the two years Cripps, Buckley, Holman, Casboult et al learnt something.
Agree, but he got paid a lot to teach them
Michael Jezz wrote:
Malthouse has personality faults and should have played the kids 6 weeks earlier but by and large he left the place in a better state than what he found it. And if you value culture and honesty, it was Malthouse who went to the board and said get real, we have a weak list. It was Malthouse who put a line in the sand with Garlett and Robinson for lieing to the Coach. I support those decisions. Not to Mention the difficulty in motivating a group after the president and ceo said everyone is up for trade.
Agree with this.
Michael Jezz wrote:
Media performances & personality are secondary to coaching ability in my assessment of the coach. I am not putting a line through Barker but I was really disappointed in our performance against Fremantle. He was our forward coach, he played forward, we are scoring less than 10 goals a game. Our forwards didn't lead.
But I thought TC has already proclaimed Barker as the new coach... after the win against Port ....
Michael Jezz wrote:
The method and the process is everything when you are going through a development phase. Barker is a good team guy but maybe he is too simplistic, maybe he isn't a great development coach. The bottom line is you see things in such simple terms that everything is based on personalities and simple one liners like "writing off Barker after 6 games". I won't judge any coach that we employ on a win loss basis while we are building the foundation but I will be skeptical when there are huge gaps in the way we play such as the basics of leading, tackling, defending and disposal efficiency. I just think there is a lot of feel good factor and it is only going to get harder from here.
That's the Carlton way !