Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Thu May 08, 2025 2:53 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2166 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55 ... 109  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Aug 28, 2012 12:12 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2006 11:39 am
Posts: 30269
Location: riding shotgun on Agros Karma Train
phsyco don't you think we should go through a process?

_________________
Between our dreams and actions lies this world


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 28, 2012 12:13 pm 
Offline
Ken Hands
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2011 9:30 am
Posts: 475
Location: Glenelg
Effes wrote:
Do we really want a coach who won't accept criticism/negative feedback

viewtopic.php?p=1310019#p1310019

Is this what we want at the club?

Remember how many dollars the club will be committing to this!


Yes.

We want 17. At all costs.

The game is about winning flags. Not being likeable.

_________________
"He was found guilty in June 2008 of assault with intent to cause bodily harm, an offence which carries a maximum penalty of 20 years jail."
And people are making his return to footy somewhat of a fairytale?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 28, 2012 12:16 pm 
Offline
Laurie Kerr
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jun 23, 2012 9:53 am
Posts: 139
judd2fev wrote:
[GoogleVideo][/GoogleVideo]
Effes wrote:
Why can't the new coach be an untried coach?


Voss says hello :lol:

Ratts says hello ; p


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 28, 2012 12:18 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:37 pm
Posts: 19221
Location: afl.virtualsports.com.au
buzzaaaah wrote:
MM finished coaching in 2011. His last 2 years were 1st and 2nd.
Now, how can you suggest he is a massive risk and someone like Scott Burns or Ken Hinkley would be a safer option.
There is no logic there


Why were Collingwood so keen to not have him as senior coach if he is so good?

Maybe they could see the writing on the wall....that he is no longer up to it?

For once can't this club do things properly?

Why can't Malthouse go through the interview process if he wants the job so badly - if he comes out as the number 1 candidate then fair enough he can have the job.

_________________
"You are being watched. The government has a secret system. A machine that spies on you every hour of every day. I know because I built it." - Finch


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 28, 2012 12:21 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:37 pm
Posts: 19221
Location: afl.virtualsports.com.au
Adelaide Blue wrote:
Effes wrote:
Do we really want a coach who won't accept criticism/negative feedback

viewtopic.php?p=1310019#p1310019

Is this what we want at the club?

Remember how many dollars the club will be committing to this!


Yes.

We want 17. At all costs.

The game is about winning flags. Not being likeable.


To give yourself the best chance you want to have the best of everything...how do we know there aren't assistants out there at the moment who may be better than Malthouse?

Malthouse should put himself through the interview process like the rest of them - if he is willing to do that and comes out #1 then fair enough.

But too often this club doesn't go through a proper process....get the old Carlton chequebook out - this club thinks it is still the VFL.

_________________
"You are being watched. The government has a secret system. A machine that spies on you every hour of every day. I know because I built it." - Finch


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 28, 2012 12:24 pm 
Offline
Geoff Southby

Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 1:29 pm
Posts: 5913
Location: Melbourne
Effes wrote:
buzzaaaah wrote:
MM finished coaching in 2011. His last 2 years were 1st and 2nd.
Now, how can you suggest he is a massive risk and someone like Scott Burns or Ken Hinkley would be a safer option.
There is no logic there


Why were Collingwood so keen to not have him as senior coach if he is so good?

Maybe they could see the writing on the wall....that he is no longer up to it?

For once can't this club do things properly?

Why can't Malthouse go through the interview process if he wants the job so badly - if he comes out as the number 1 candidate then fair enough he can have the job.


Who's doing the interviewing process though?

The football people on the board - Sticks Kernahan and Bear Gleeson? I wouldn't trust them to interview for my PA.

Swann? I don't have a heap of confidence in him either.

To be honest, I'd love to borrow Brian Cook for a month, and get him to do it. But that isn't going to happen.

I'm shit-scared of the club attempting to follow a process, when the most important part of following a process is the experience, intelligence, and instincts of those making the decisions.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 28, 2012 12:27 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 8:12 pm
Posts: 15582
Location: Upper Swan.
JohnM wrote:
Effes wrote:
buzzaaaah wrote:
MM finished coaching in 2011. His last 2 years were 1st and 2nd.
Now, how can you suggest he is a massive risk and someone like Scott Burns or Ken Hinkley would be a safer option.
There is no logic there


Why were Collingwood so keen to not have him as senior coach if he is so good?

Maybe they could see the writing on the wall....that he is no longer up to it?

For once can't this club do things properly?

Why can't Malthouse go through the interview process if he wants the job so badly - if he comes out as the number 1 candidate then fair enough he can have the job.


Who's doing the interviewing process though?

The football people on the board - Sticks Kernahan and Bear Gleeson? I wouldn't trust them to interview for my PA.

Swann? I don't have a heap of confidence in him either.

To be honest, I'd love to borrow Brian Cook for a month, and get him to do it. But that isn't going to happen.

I'm shit-scared of the club attempting to follow a process, when the most important part of following a process is the experience, intelligence, and instincts of those making the decisions.


What if the interview panel was Matthews, Walls, Fitzpatrick or other suitable candidates?

_________________
I hope Essendon* folds.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 28, 2012 12:49 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter

Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 6:54 pm
Posts: 14686
Location: The Vodka Train
..lookit, Malty is 58/9.. ..easily still capable of coaching.. ..just 2 years ago he had a cutting edge gameplan that took them to a GF victory.. ..the following years others learnt from it, but he was still good enough to be a top team and make the GF.. ..this year, the young Buckley has shown some good signs, and is a polished media performer.. ..but the team's gone backwards in pretty much every stat, is not a clear cut contender, and could very well miss the granny..

..bottom line, IF eddie was not running the pies, and if he didn't have a love for Bucks.. ..or likewise, if Bucks had no urge to be a senior coach, Malty would still be coaching the pies.. ..make no mistake..

_________________
..if you can't be good, be good at it..


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 28, 2012 12:57 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 4:22 pm
Posts: 4678
Location: Melbourne
Verbal Gint wrote:
judd2fev wrote:
[GoogleVideo][/GoogleVideo]
Effes wrote:
Why can't the new coach be an untried coach?


Voss says hello :lol:

Ratts says hello ; p



Chris Scott says Hello. :-)

_________________
"We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, then, is not an act, but a habit"
- Aristotle


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 28, 2012 12:57 pm 
Offline
formerly cj69

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:52 am
Posts: 7893
Big Kahuna Boot wrote:
..lookit, Malty is 58/9.. ..easily still capable of coaching.. ..just 2 years ago he had a cutting edge gameplan that took them to a GF victory.. ..the following years others learnt from it, but he was still good enough to be a top team and make the GF.. ..this year, the young Buckley has shown some good signs, and is a polished media performer.. ..but the team's gone backwards in pretty much every stat, is not a clear cut contender, and could very well miss the granny..

..bottom line, IF eddie was not running the pies, and if he didn't have a love for Bucks.. ..or likewise, if Bucks had no urge to be a senior coach, Malty would still be coaching the pies.. ..make no mistake..


Yep :thumbsup:

_________________
#NewBlues beginning 25th August 2015


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 28, 2012 1:00 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:42 pm
Posts: 6896
Big Kahuna Boot wrote:

..bottom line, IF eddie was not running the pies, and if he didn't have a love for Bucks.. ..or likewise, if Bucks had no urge to be a senior coach, Malty would still be coaching the pies.. ..make no mistake..



Yeah I do agree with this. It's an inescapable fact, Malthouse would have just coached out his days and left on his terms, probably in a year or two's time.

It is why Malthouse feels like he has unfinished business. Going out on his terms.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 28, 2012 1:00 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:06 pm
Posts: 35660
Location: Half back flank
cimm1979 wrote:
The whole MM "if I don't coach next year, I never will" should be a massive warning to the people making the decisions.

AFAIC it's MM saying "I'm available and I have no intention of going through a process so don't !@#$%& around"

Well if Ratt's is gone then surely we need to open the position to everyone who may be suitable. I know the current thinking is we need an proven coach, but that belief is driven by the perception the club itself isn't a place that can support a newbie, even if he is shown to be the best available.

This position would command between $500k and $1.0m, surely there is more than one candidate?

If the club structure is so poor it can't support the next big thing in coaching surely the structure should be fixed so it does.

By picking MM do we miss out on a Scott, Clarkson, Sanderson, Longmire or even the next MM, Woosha, Roos, Lyon or Mathews.?

Will the current group of players fall for his endless stories of the ANZAC's, The Roman Legions or Hannibal?

MM is as much a risk as anyone else. If they appoint him fine, but don't do it because they reckon it will drag in an extra 5000 members and that he is the possessor of the secret recipe, because he doesn't. Do it because he is absolutely the best candidate.



Sums up my thoughts on the whole thing.

_________________
#DonTheStash


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 28, 2012 1:04 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 8:12 pm
Posts: 15582
Location: Upper Swan.
Synbad wrote:
cimm1979 wrote:
The whole MM "if I don't coach next year, I never will" should be a massive warning to the people making the decisions.

AFAIC it's MM saying "I'm available and I have no intention of going through a process so don't !@#$%& around"

Well if Ratt's is gone then surely we need to open the position to everyone who may be suitable. I know the current thinking is we need an proven coach, but that belief is driven by the perception the club itself isn't a place that can support a newbie, even if he is shown to be the best available.

This position would command between $500k and $1.0m, surely there is more than one candidate?

If the club structure is so poor it can't support the next big thing in coaching surely the structure should be fixed so it does.

By picking MM do we miss out on a Scott, Clarkson, Sanderson, Longmire or even the next MM, Woosha, Roos, Lyon or Mathews.?

Will the current group of players fall for his endless stories of the ANZAC's, The Roman Legions or Hannibal?

MM is as much a risk as anyone else. If they appoint him fine, but don't do it because they reckon it will drag in an extra 5000 members and that he is the possessor of the secret recipe, because he doesn't. Do it because he is absolutely the best candidate.


For what its worth..... MM knows he has the job unofficially.

He says to do it now... but also says after october.

he says he doesnt cut another coaches lunch but left a year early from wce.

it s just smoke and mirrors.... he doesnt wanna come to carlton as the man who killed ratts......

i think u r all trying to read too much into the mm speculation.

he gets hassled by media and plays his game.....


Looks like least your scepticism extends to the new regime as well Synners.

Looks like a quick fix to appease the fragile ego's of the board to me.

_________________
I hope Essendon* folds.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 28, 2012 1:12 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
the time for an unproven coach was 5 to 3 years ago.... even 2 years ago

we stayed with ratts....

we have a terrible culture..... and by the clubs own admission they dont believe we can fix our terribe culture enough to bring in an unproven.

MM at least will have a vission on what needs to happen.

And he will understand this footy club better than most candidates.

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 28, 2012 1:15 pm 
Offline
formerly cj69

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:52 am
Posts: 7893
Synbad wrote:
we have a terrible culture..... and by the clubs own admission they dont believe we can fix our terribe culture enough to bring in an unproven.

MM at least will have a vission on what needs to happen.

And he will understand this footy club better than most candidates.


Yes. Interesting comments by Maclure on that as well.

_________________
#NewBlues beginning 25th August 2015


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 28, 2012 1:22 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 6:27 pm
Posts: 4129
ThePsychologist wrote:
Synbad wrote:
we have a terrible culture..... and by the clubs own admission they dont believe we can fix our terribe culture enough to bring in an unproven.

MM at least will have a vission on what needs to happen.

And he will understand this footy club better than most candidates.


Yes. Interesting comments by Maclure on that as well.


Just watched Blue Print. Big fan of Maclure. Should be on the Board?

_________________
TC suffers from the social media illness - the death of respect and constructive discourse by keyboard.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 28, 2012 1:24 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 12:30 pm
Posts: 2862
I think there is a risk with whoever you appoint as coach, as well as a risk with keeping Ratten. It's part of the game, nothing is guaranteed. And we could get the best coach in the land, but the recruiting might cost us, or injuries. Footy is full of risk.

No doubt the Club's processes have been lacking ever since process became a necessity in football. The decision to appoint Ratten, when he had one year's experience as an assistant at Melbourne, and a few years at Norwood in the Eastern Football League (!), and then surround him with Lappin, Montgomery and Harvey, NONE of whom had any experience as an assistant coach, is something that the board should have resigned over. If that had happened in the corporate world, they would not have survived, simple as that. And yes, the sacking of Brittain for Pagan, the reappointment of Ratten last year...all decisions that have come back to bight the Club on the bum. Interesting to think who the common denominator is - but that's a discussion for the Sticks thread.

I have no doubt (and have posted on here several times over the last 4 or 5 years) that the problem at Carlton starts at the very top - the President and board. However, we're talking about the coach here.

I agree with ThePsychologist that we need a hard nosed bastard to come in and demand that all section of the club do things the right way. I posted elsewhere that Ferguson has never been particularly liked by his players. When Chelsea won the EPL, Mourinho walked around to congratulate his players, shaking their hands. Not one of them looked him in the eye. Not one. There was no love in that relationship. Respect, yes. Fear, certainly. But no love. I'm not saying this is what we need, but we do need someone who can walk in from day 1 and insist 'its my way or the highway'. And give the Club the bloody good shake up it needs, from President down.

Can a first up coach do this? Maybe, but doubtful. Changing the culture of a club is bloody hard work, and takes time. What we do know is that Malthouse (and Roos and Matthews and Thompson) could absolutely do that. Only one of those is available of course. Could they coach a team in the right way gameplan wise to win a flag? Who knows, but we know they've done it before. A first-up coach would have much more difficulty changing the culture, and may or may not have the ability to coach the team to a flag. So while there is risk with any coach, I think there is less with Malthouse. He's won flags before, at 2 clubs. He's rebuilt and energised clubs and changed the culture, so we know he can do that. Would he be doing it for the right reasons? We don't know. But he has a proven track record of doing exactly what we need to happen at our Club, and that's the bottom line. And that's why he's worth a million a year.

_________________
Mens sana in corpore sano.

Bring back the laurel wreath logo!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 28, 2012 1:28 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 8:12 pm
Posts: 15582
Location: Upper Swan.
Synbad wrote:
the time for an unproven coach was 5 to 3 years ago.... even 2 years ago

we stayed with ratts....

we have a terrible culture..... and by the clubs own admission they dont believe we can fix our terribe culture enough to bring in an unproven.

MM at least will have a vission on what needs to happen.

And he will understand this footy club better than most candidates.


The culture won't change given the clubs financial position.

There is no incentive for the cash providers to reduce the debt because they lose their influence.

So it's a club united behind MM?

For how long?

The right coach is the right coach. I don't agree that there should ever be a cut off point.

_________________
I hope Essendon* folds.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 28, 2012 1:31 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 8:12 pm
Posts: 15582
Location: Upper Swan.
mikkey wrote:
ThePsychologist wrote:
Synbad wrote:
we have a terrible culture..... and by the clubs own admission they dont believe we can fix our terribe culture enough to bring in an unproven.

MM at least will have a vission on what needs to happen.

And he will understand this footy club better than most candidates.


Yes. Interesting comments by Maclure on that as well.


Just watched Blue Print. Big fan of Maclure. Should be on the Board?


Talks in generalisations but he is entertaining.

_________________
I hope Essendon* folds.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 28, 2012 1:32 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
The problem is the leadership of this club knows not what to do and keeps looking elsewhere for answers...

Which is what alot of people have been saying all along.

Its obvious now....... i think!!!

Rudderless...

We will become competitive in the league with a new coach....

But we sure as hell are going to be left behind in the big club stakes.

Regime change is necessary.... and it needs to be done now

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2166 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55 ... 109  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 301 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group