Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Thu Jun 19, 2025 11:36 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 6139 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55 ... 307  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Oct 17, 2012 9:07 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Mon May 31, 2010 10:07 pm
Posts: 1984
ThePsychologist wrote:
Look at Collingwood.

Have brought in Lynch, Young, Pick 17 & 19.

All they have lost is Wellingham & Dawes who are easily replaced and sold at the height of their value.

More opportunity will be given to Paine, Seedsman, Elliot, Witt, Mooney, William & Yagamoor.

Their core best 22-25 is still there, they have improved their list, bought in some more A grade talent (vital) and have not hurt their opportunity at a premiership in 2013. If anything they have improved their "window".


There is so much wrong in this post.
Firstly, they don't yet have Young, and it's now looking like they won't take him.
Wellingham and Dawes out does actually weaken their list. Rather than improving their window, which is now shut, they have tried to go for a quick 2nd window.

I think the Pies have done very well out of this trade period, however, their list is in a different position to ours.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 17, 2012 9:09 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Mon May 31, 2010 10:07 pm
Posts: 1984
ThePsychologist wrote:
Stamos wrote:
ThePsychologist wrote:
Is that list improvement?


No. No it is not.


Explain why?


Because we lose vital players and we lose depth, and we bring in a complete spud in Jessie White.
White is a considerably worse footballer than Joseph.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 17, 2012 9:18 am 
Offline
formerly cj69

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:52 am
Posts: 7893
Stamos wrote:
ThePsychologist wrote:
Stamos wrote:
ThePsychologist wrote:
Is that list improvement?


No. No it is not.


Explain why?


Because we lose vital players and we lose depth, and we bring in a complete spud in Jessie White.
White is a considerably worse footballer than Joseph.


As I said White is an EXAMPLE of having a forward/ruck back up. I don't know how you can compare Joseph & White. In list analysis it is irrelevant.

Are Warnock, Jamsion & Duigan really that vital? Good players yes but IMO very replaceable. As I have said they can all be replaced by what's on our list already. We saw the advantage this season of bringing in McInnes, Casboult & White and how they can perform.

The improvement in 2013 I see from players like Yarran, Lucas, Robinson, Henderson, Watson, Casboult, Buckley, Touhy, Hampson, Laidler, Gibbs, McInnes & Bootsma. Plus on top of this we can add 3 potential A grade players which are hard to get.

Also eases pressure on our salary cap.

_________________
#NewBlues beginning 25th August 2015


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 17, 2012 9:24 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Mon May 31, 2010 10:07 pm
Posts: 1984
Jamison is vital, and given our history of ruck injuries, so is Warnock. I don't want our flag hopes resting solely on Kreuzer's fitness.

Sure Duigan is replaceable, however given the dearth of leadership at our club, I think he is worth more to our list than what we could gain in a trade.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 17, 2012 9:28 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2011 9:27 am
Posts: 2345
ThePsychologist wrote:
Yep. Let's just say for example we trade:

Warnock for First round pick
Jamison for First round pick
Garlett for Second round pick
Duigan to PA for Jacobs
Trade second round pick for Jesse White

Delist Curnow, Kerr, Russell, Thornton, Bower & Joseph.

The players we trade are easily covered by our list and gone at the height of their value. We then have 3 picks in the first round and add a good young on baller in Jacobs and a forward/ruck back up in White.

We still have Casboult, Watson, Buckley, Dale, Lucas, Bootsma, Gibbs, White, Yarran, McCarthy, Mitchell, McInnes, OKeefe which I expect most to step up in 2013 plus some more exciting young "A" grade talent (eg. Stringer, Membrey & Colquhoun).

Our core best 22-25 is still there.

Is that list improvement?


Maybe if we were guaranteed those trades and knew what our targets were to be in terms of quality and list balance.

If we can't get a first for Warnock, do we take the second?
If we can't get a first for Jamison do we just take a second?
Why would we give away Garlett? Even in a bad year his pressure was terrific and adds something unique to our forward set-up
Duigan for Jacobs? All fine on paper, but that deal could not be done.
Jesse White :)

Using the term first rounder doesn't really say that much, as there is a huge gap between #1 and #22 and that gap is even larger in the second round.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 17, 2012 9:35 am 
Offline
formerly cj69

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:52 am
Posts: 7893
Stamos wrote:
Jamison is vital, and given our history of ruck injuries, so is Warnock. I don't want our flag hopes resting solely on Kreuzer's fitness.

Sure Duigan is replaceable, however given the dearth of leadership at our club, I think he is worth more to our list than what we could gain in a trade.


I'll have to disagree re: Jamison. At his best he is good but injury prone and getting older. White was very good late in the year and Henderson & Watson supported by Laidler & McInness is a good mix and IMO doesnt lose anything.

Warnock is the key injury worry in the ruck, he played 5 games this year and 58 in 6 seasons. We still have Kruezer, Hampson supported by Casboult, Rowe and White and recruit a mature aged "rookie" player like Seaby/Graham as a back up in case of injury and maybe a young "Sam Jacobs".

Duigan is 28 but IMO is not in our best 22. Guys like Murphy, Henderson, Carrazzo will step up and support Judd as leaders under MM.

_________________
#NewBlues beginning 25th August 2015


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 17, 2012 9:41 am 
Online
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 18028
ThePsychologist wrote:
Stamos wrote:
Jamison is vital, and given our history of ruck injuries, so is Warnock. I don't want our flag hopes resting solely on Kreuzer's fitness.

Sure Duigan is replaceable, however given the dearth of leadership at our club, I think he is worth more to our list than what we could gain in a trade.


I'll have to disagree re: Jamison. At his best he is good but injury prone and getting older. .


Why would someone gives us a first rounder for an injury prone defender who you dont rate?

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 17, 2012 9:47 am 
Offline
formerly cj69

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:52 am
Posts: 7893
Blue Vain wrote:
ThePsychologist wrote:
Stamos wrote:
Jamison is vital, and given our history of ruck injuries, so is Warnock. I don't want our flag hopes resting solely on Kreuzer's fitness.

Sure Duigan is replaceable, however given the dearth of leadership at our club, I think he is worth more to our list than what we could gain in a trade.


I'll have to disagree re: Jamison. At his best he is good but injury prone and getting older. .


Why would someone gives us a first rounder for an injury prone defender who you dont rate?


Generally a needs basis. Why would someone give pick 20 for Dawes? What did Hawthorn give up for Lake who is older and whose form and injury has been average for the last few years. What did we give up for Warnock? WCE payed 17 for Wellingham. What did we pay for McLean?

You don't know until you ask. :wink:

_________________
#NewBlues beginning 25th August 2015


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 17, 2012 10:03 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Mon May 31, 2010 10:07 pm
Posts: 1984
ThePsychologist wrote:
I'll have to disagree re: Jamison. At his best he is good but injury prone and getting older. White was very good late in the year and Henderson & Watson supported by Laidler & McInness is a good mix and IMO doesnt lose anything.

Warnock is the key injury worry in the ruck, he played 5 games this year and 58 in 6 seasons. We still have Kruezer, Hampson supported by Casboult, Rowe and White and recruit a mature aged "rookie" player like Seaby/Graham as a back up in case of injury and maybe a young "Sam Jacobs".

Duigan is 28 but IMO is not in our best 22. Guys like Murphy, Henderson, Carrazzo will step up and support Judd as leaders under MM.


White has been decent when he has played, but please, he is not in Jamo's class. And he is even more injury prone than Jamo.
I like Watson, but we shouldn't be relying on him to hold Full back for 25 games this year. I love Laidler and McInnes, but they don not play the same role as Jamo, or at least certainly shouldn't be as a first option.

All our rucks are injury worries. Pretty much all AFL rucks are injury worries. That's why it's good to have 3.
Casboult and Rowe are pinch hitters at best. Seaby, Graham and Jessie White are list cloggers.

Again, I think Duigan's worth to us is more than his trade value, which would be minimal.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 17, 2012 10:05 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Mon May 31, 2010 10:07 pm
Posts: 1984
ThePsychologist wrote:
You don't know until you ask. :wink:


And sometimes, asking the question flowers your list, which is exactly what happened when Crazy Vossy asked the question of Bradshaw and Rishcitelli.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 17, 2012 12:35 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Sat Sep 09, 2006 2:01 pm
Posts: 2099
Stamos wrote:
Jamison is vital, and given our history of ruck injuries, so is Warnock. I don't want our flag hopes resting solely on Kreuzer's fitness.

Sure Duigan is replaceable, however given the dearth of leadership at our club, I think he is worth more to our list than what we could gain in a trade.


Jamison is also a leader and we have bugger all of them on our list.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 17, 2012 2:41 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 22, 2010 5:52 pm
Posts: 2289
Location: Geelong
Stamos wrote:
ThePsychologist wrote:
You don't know until you ask. :wink:


And sometimes, asking the question flowers your list, which is exactly what happened when Crazy Vossy asked the question of Bradshaw and Rishcitelli.


That's a great point Stamos and one that seems to be regularly overlooked during the annual trade frenzy. List stability and subsequently player morale is also important.

We sacked the coach because, theoretically, the list was good enough and he wasn't. Let's see what MM can do before we start discarding players who have shown they are capable but perhaps didn't go so well in 2012.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 17, 2012 9:08 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Sun Dec 23, 2007 11:51 am
Posts: 1291
Stamos wrote:
ThePsychologist wrote:
Look at Collingwood.

Have brought in Lynch, Young, Pick 17 & 19.

All they have lost is Wellingham & Dawes who are easily replaced and sold at the height of their value.

More opportunity will be given to Paine, Seedsman, Elliot, Witt, Mooney, William & Yagamoor.

Their core best 22-25 is still there, they have improved their list, bought in some more A grade talent (vital) and have not hurt their opportunity at a premiership in 2013. If anything they have improved their "window".


There is so much wrong in this post.
Firstly, they don't yet have Young, and it's now looking like they won't take him.
Wellingham and Dawes out does actually weaken their list. Rather than improving their window, which is now shut, they have tried to go for a quick 2nd window.

I think the Pies have done very well out of this trade period, however, their list is in a different position to ours.


Dawes is not in Collingwood's best 22, so how does that weaken their list? They didn't have to trade him ala Brown at the Weagles

Wellingham has never finished in the top 15 of their B & F; there are at least 6 better mids (if not more) on their list and that is not including Blair, Fasolo etc or any of the kids who played this year and likely to overtake him next season!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 18, 2012 3:21 pm 
Offline
formerly cj69

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:52 am
Posts: 7893
Stamos wrote:
ThePsychologist wrote:
You don't know until you ask. :wink:


And sometimes, asking the question flowers your list, which is exactly what happened when Crazy Vossy asked the question of Bradshaw and Rishcitelli.


Not if done properly. The Brisbane example is a bad one.

Whatever we believe I just get the strong impression we have just sat on our hands during this whole period. With FA you would think we could of added 1-2 players that would of improved our list.

Is the issue we have effectively no coach and a list manager who has never done this before?

_________________
#NewBlues beginning 25th August 2015


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 18, 2012 3:42 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Fri May 06, 2005 1:40 pm
Posts: 3458
I got my membership renewal stuff in the post today. We can choose to have our membership card feature one of the following players in 2013:

Walker, Carrazzo, Robinson, Betts, Kreuzer, Judd, Murphy, Gibbs, Jamison, Simpson or Yarran.

That's half a side. More importantly, those 11 would seem to be untouchables. Now, I realise that there are people who would fully expect our media & communications department and membership departments to be just the sort who'd include a player who was almost immediately traded as an option for members cards... but I reckon you'll find those 11 are pretty much sure to be here in 2013.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 18, 2012 4:11 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2007 9:12 pm
Posts: 4426
ThePsychologist wrote:
Stamos wrote:
Jamison is vital, and given our history of ruck injuries, so is Warnock. I don't want our flag hopes resting solely on Kreuzer's fitness.

Sure Duigan is replaceable, however given the dearth of leadership at our club, I think he is worth more to our list than what we could gain in a trade.


I'll have to disagree re: Jamison. At his best he is good but injury prone and getting older. White was very good late in the year and Henderson & Watson supported by Laidler & McInness is a good mix and IMO doesnt lose anything.

Warnock is the key injury worry in the ruck, he played 5 games this year and 58 in 6 seasons. We still have Kruezer, Hampson supported by Casboult, Rowe and White and recruit a mature aged "rookie" player like Seaby/Graham as a back up in case of injury and maybe a young "Sam Jacobs".

Duigan is 28 but IMO is not in our best 22. Guys like Murphy, Henderson, Carrazzo will step up and support Judd as leaders under MM.

Couldn't agree more re Duigan and Warnock is surplus....I get the feeling that MM has requested season one as being one where he assesses the list. He may believe there is potential that wasn't realised by Ratts and co and wants a year to see who is up to the challenge....

_________________
"Truth, for the tyrants, is the most terrible and cruel of all bindings; it is like an incandescent iron falling across their chests. And it is even more agonizing than hot iron, for that only burns the flesh, while truth burns its way into the soul"     — Lauro Aguirre


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Oct 19, 2012 7:48 am 
Offline
formerly cj69

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:52 am
Posts: 7893
Stamos wrote:
ThePsychologist wrote:
Look at Collingwood.

Have brought in Lynch, Young, Pick 17 & 19.

All they have lost is Wellingham & Dawes who are easily replaced and sold at the height of their value.

More opportunity will be given to Paine, Seedsman, Elliot, Witt, Mooney, William & Yagamoor.

Their core best 22-25 is still there, they have improved their list, bought in some more A grade talent (vital) and have not hurt their opportunity at a premiership in 2013. If anything they have improved their "window".


There is so much wrong in this post.
Firstly, they don't yet have Young, and it's now looking like they won't take him.


Hmmmmm

_________________
#NewBlues beginning 25th August 2015


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Oct 19, 2012 8:24 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Mon May 31, 2010 10:07 pm
Posts: 1984
ThePsychologist wrote:
Stamos wrote:
There is so much wrong in this post.
Firstly, they don't yet have Young, and it's now looking like they won't take him.


Hmmmmm


:oops: The lesson here is don't believe what you read in the press :donk:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Oct 19, 2012 9:22 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 22, 2010 5:52 pm
Posts: 2289
Location: Geelong
Agree with the comments that Collingwood got overs for Wellingdog. Sheeet ... now I'll have hope he plays well. :roll:

Dawes though .. not so sure. He was quite a reasonable player under MM, and he should be coming into his prime. I think Buckley might have stuffed him up by playing him out of position. Hopefully he tears it up for the D's.

Agree with the comment that MM needs to year to assess the list under his game plan before getting too keen with axe.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Oct 19, 2012 9:51 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Mon May 31, 2010 10:07 pm
Posts: 1984
BigKev wrote:
Agree with the comments that Collingwood got overs for Wellingdog. Sheeet ... now I'll have hope he plays well. :roll:


Nup, we hope he goes average at the Ducks, and the the Filth bugger up pick #17


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 6139 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55 ... 307  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Blue Vain, DesEnglish, Majestic-12 [Bot] and 15 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group