Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Tue Jun 17, 2025 7:42 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 2194 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54 ... 110  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2016
PostPosted: Tue Aug 09, 2016 5:01 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2005 7:01 pm
Posts: 1030
TruBlueBrad wrote:
May as well have Jones on the list for next year. We have enough players to de-list this year, we'll need to cut someone again next year.


Don't go for that "logic" sorry. If paying out Jones is an option I'd rather do it now, and if it means another year for a youngster who may have more upside (e.g Foster or Rainbow) I'd much rather do that than hang on to Jones, we know what we get from him.

I was thinking if we don't have to count the Walker and Jamison contracts in the 2017 cap we could do something useful with it, like pay out Jones/Gorringe/someone else or frontload some other contracts to free up more money in 2018 or beyond. Hence my original question.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2016
PostPosted: Tue Aug 09, 2016 5:03 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Fri May 06, 2005 1:40 pm
Posts: 3457
AK43 wrote:
What's the salary cap implications of Jamison and Walker retiring now? Both were contracted next year.


I expect that they will both have negotiated pay-outs. Walker retired due to injury, so we'll be partially compensated through insurance. Anyone who thinks that their 'contract' for next year is what they'll be paid out doesn't understand how contracts work.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2016
PostPosted: Tue Aug 09, 2016 6:24 pm 
Offline
Serge Silvagni

Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 7:56 pm
Posts: 934
bluechampion wrote:
AK43 wrote:
What's the salary cap implications of Jamison and Walker retiring now? Both were contracted next year.


I expect that they will both have negotiated pay-outs. Walker retired due to injury, so we'll be partially compensated through insurance. Anyone who thinks that their 'contract' for next year is what they'll be paid out doesn't understand how contracts work.


so enlighten us


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2016
PostPosted: Tue Aug 09, 2016 7:22 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 2:10 pm
Posts: 2868
padre wrote:
bluechampion wrote:
AK43 wrote:
What's the salary cap implications of Jamison and Walker retiring now? Both were contracted next year.


I expect that they will both have negotiated pay-outs. Walker retired due to injury, so we'll be partially compensated through insurance. Anyone who thinks that their 'contract' for next year is what they'll be paid out doesn't understand how contracts work.


so enlighten us


Please


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2016
PostPosted: Tue Aug 09, 2016 7:36 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 8:42 pm
Posts: 2466
Location: Princess Park
DesEnglish wrote:
padre wrote:
bluechampion wrote:
AK43 wrote:
What's the salary cap implications of Jamison and Walker retiring now? Both were contracted next year.


I expect that they will both have negotiated pay-outs. Walker retired due to injury, so we'll be partially compensated through insurance. Anyone who thinks that their 'contract' for next year is what they'll be paid out doesn't understand how contracts work.


so enlighten us


Please


Good question by AK43, please tell us Bluechampion.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2016
PostPosted: Tue Aug 09, 2016 8:06 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2005 10:49 am
Posts: 1650
Surely Walker & Jamo's wage will have to be included in our salary cap.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2016
PostPosted: Tue Aug 09, 2016 8:09 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2008 6:46 am
Posts: 28227
Rod Waddell wrote:
Surely Walker & Jamo's wage will have to be included in our salary cap.

Not if they're legitimately injured and unable to go on, surely ?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2016
PostPosted: Tue Aug 09, 2016 9:40 pm 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:52 am
Posts: 9105
Location: Nth Fitzroy
Rexy wrote:
Rod Waddell wrote:
Surely Walker & Jamo's wage will have to be included in our salary cap.

Not if they're legitimately injured and unable to go on, surely ?


Surely the AFL are due to throw us a bone.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2016
PostPosted: Tue Aug 09, 2016 9:46 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 9:27 am
Posts: 28528
Location: Free Beer!!
AK43 wrote:
TruBlueBrad wrote:
May as well have Jones on the list for next year. We have enough players to de-list this year, we'll need to cut someone again next year.


Don't go for that "logic" sorry. If paying out Jones is an option I'd rather do it now, and if it means another year for a youngster who may have more upside (e.g Foster or Rainbow) I'd much rather do that than hang on to Jones, we know what we get from him.

I was thinking if we don't have to count the Walker and Jamison contracts in the 2017 cap we could do something useful with it, like pay out Jones/Gorringe/someone else or frontload some other contracts to free up more money in 2018 or beyond. Hence my original question.


Fair enough, that makes sense.

_________________
"The ability to speak doesn't make you intelligent." Qui-Gon Jinn 15-05-2005

"there’s more chance of me becoming the full forward for the [Western Bulldogs] than there is of any change in the Labor Party." Julia Gillard 18-05-2010


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2016
PostPosted: Tue Aug 09, 2016 10:35 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Fri May 06, 2005 1:40 pm
Posts: 3457
The way contracts are reported is somewhat erroneous. A player usually earns x amount if they achieve conditions a, b and c.

For example, a base contract is worth x amount, but increases if the player plays senior footy and gets match payments. Just as they might receive a bonus payment for finishing as a B&F winner or all-Australian. Older player sometimes have trigger clauses; play a certain number of games, or at a certain level and trigger another year.

We usually hear ball-park figures of the maximum a player might earn per-year, not what they actually earn.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2016
PostPosted: Tue Aug 09, 2016 10:43 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2006 11:55 pm
Posts: 12544
Location: Brisbane
bluechampion wrote:
The way contracts are reported is somewhat erroneous. A player usually earns x amount if they achieve conditions a, b and c.

For example, a base contract is worth x amount, but increases if the player plays senior footy and gets match payments. Just as they might receive a bonus payment for finishing as a B&F winner or all-Australian. Older player sometimes have trigger clauses; play a certain number of games, or at a certain level and trigger another year.

We usually hear ball-park figures of the maximum a player might earn per-year, not what they actually earn.


Thank you.

So what were Walker's and Jamo's minimum payments for next year?

_________________
THEY LIKE TO SEND UP!!!!!!!!

Until each team plays each other the same number of times, the AFL, as a fair dinkum competition, cannot be taken seriously.

He (Mr Swann) said the honour and pride associated with the club's traditional navy blue jumper was priceless.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2016
PostPosted: Tue Aug 09, 2016 11:51 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:52 pm
Posts: 2044
Jamison, walker, smith, whiley, dick, tutt
That is 6 which covers 5 draft picks plus 1 player from another club.

I suggest any other exits will be part of a trade. A player for a player or pick

Plus Wood off the
It is highly unlikely Carlton will delist the likes of Graham, Everett, Buckley, Jones, Gorringe or Bokehurst. Trade yes but delist, I doubt it


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2016
PostPosted: Wed Aug 10, 2016 12:01 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 12:02 am
Posts: 1724
club29 wrote:
Rexy wrote:
Rod Waddell wrote:
Surely Walker & Jamo's wage will have to be included in our salary cap.

Not if they're legitimately injured and unable to go on, surely ?


Surely the AFL are due to throw us a bone.


As far as I'm aware the contracts counts in next years salary cap as in Buddy's salary is included in Sydney's cap for 10yrs regardless of whether he retires or not that's been discussed in the media for a couple of years.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2016
PostPosted: Wed Aug 10, 2016 12:10 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2015 5:55 pm
Posts: 4435
I would have thought they'd negotiate a reduction in what is due to the player, because of their injuries, and then ask that the payments be spread in a way (ie: how it is spread over the 2 years) that benefits the club (free up space next year) and the player (tax purposes, perhaps?).

So, could be something like this...

Walker was originally due $400k this year and next year, but will now get $600k total, all in this year, so this means we save $400k next year.

But I am not an accountant nor a player manager so am only speculating and could be well off in my thoughts.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2016
PostPosted: Wed Aug 10, 2016 12:27 pm 
Offline
Bruce Comben

Joined: Fri Feb 05, 2016 12:14 pm
Posts: 2
We may not have room in the cap as I would HOPE we'd be frontloading all our good palyers contracts.
- Docherty
- Cripps
- Gibbs
- Murphy
- Kreuzer

That way, we pay them nothing at the end of their contracts and we can grab some decent players via free agency. Then it all evens out.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2016
PostPosted: Wed Aug 10, 2016 1:04 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Thu May 11, 2006 6:11 pm
Posts: 15001
club29 wrote:
Rexy wrote:
Rod Waddell wrote:
Surely Walker & Jamo's wage will have to be included in our salary cap.

Not if they're legitimately injured and unable to go on, surely ?


Surely the AFL are due to throw us a bone.

Of course they will. :mad:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2016
PostPosted: Wed Aug 10, 2016 1:07 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Thu May 11, 2006 6:11 pm
Posts: 15001
bluedog wrote:
bluechampion wrote:
The way contracts are reported is somewhat erroneous. A player usually earns x amount if they achieve conditions a, b and c.

For example, a base contract is worth x amount, but increases if the player plays senior footy and gets match payments. Just as they might receive a bonus payment for finishing as a B&F winner or all-Australian. Older player sometimes have trigger clauses; play a certain number of games, or at a certain level and trigger another year.

We usually hear ball-park figures of the maximum a player might earn per-year, not what they actually earn.


Thank you.

So what were Walker's and Jamo's minimum payments for next year?

Walker would have been on the veterans list so not all is included anyway. Not sure about Jamo, cant remember how many years he has been at the club and not sure if being on the rookie list counts.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2016
PostPosted: Wed Aug 10, 2016 2:31 pm 
Offline
Horrie Clover
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2008 1:54 pm
Posts: 313
Location: A Simmo chip pass from Glenferrie Oval
Michael Jezz wrote:
Jamison, walker, smith, whiley, dick, tutt
That is 6 which covers 5 draft picks plus 1 player from another club.

I suggest any other exits will be part of a trade. A player for a player or pick

Plus Wood off the
It is highly unlikely Carlton will delist the likes of Graham, Everett, Buckley, Jones, Gorringe or Bokehurst. Trade yes but delist, I doubt it


Add DVR & Foster to the delist. Wont get anything for Gorringe....


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2016
PostPosted: Wed Aug 10, 2016 5:57 pm 
Offline
Garry Crane

Joined: Thu Oct 22, 2015 10:09 pm
Posts: 210
Why would we have to pay jamo and walker anything? If they have retired it means they have walked away from the contract. Doesn't make sense for us to pay them otherwise couldn't any player sign a massive contract then retire and still get paid?

Also I've Been told from a reliable source Tom Mitchell to Carlton is all but a done deal


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2016
PostPosted: Wed Aug 10, 2016 6:59 pm 
Offline
formerly Blue Boots

Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2012 12:18 am
Posts: 1901
Dk wrote:
Why would we have to pay jamo and walker anything? If they have retired it means they have walked away from the contract. Doesn't make sense for us to pay them otherwise couldn't any player sign a massive contract then retire and still get paid?

Also I've Been told from a reliable source Tom Mitchell to Carlton is all but a done deal

Keep us informed on Mitchell. For what price as well?

_________________
Essendon-Only team to have ever been found guilty of salary cap breaches in a premiership year!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 2194 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54 ... 110  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Majestic-12 [Bot] and 30 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group