Mick coached well. Made the adjustments we needed to win ... we coulda won by 4 goals by the end.

Garlett's kicking for goal is deplorable. I swear every time robinson gets the ball he kicks it straight to them.

Murphy played the best game I've seen him have since Judd was in his prime. Daisy was clever, Buckley could be a gun, Menzel has potential, and Everitt did some good things.

Probably more positives that I woulda thought possible.

Very sad that after 10 years of recruiting we have so many dumb footballers? Wayne Hughes legacy

I'm not too disappointed. I wanted heads to roll at Qtr time but they applied themselves and had a crack. Humid nights always make kicking at goal difficult. We are so undermanned for this time of year it's not funny.

I just wish Rowe would really grab the game by the balls.

They say stupidity is doing the same things over and over and expecting a different result. We're the kings of stupidity because we stuffed up our rebuild. Every week we take to the field with:

A slow and unaccountable midfield
No height or size in the key positions
Limited ball winning ability
No superstars
Limited ruckmen

But we have no depth to cover any of these deficiencies because we never draft. The Psychologist could answer this, but when was the last draft where we took more than three players? Was it 2010? The reason I ask is that you're hitting and hoping to fill deficiencies when you take one player in the vain effort of filling a gap - especially when your draft record in the second and third rounds is as poor as ours.

To finish things off, the club never levels with us. Each year they recruit rather than draft and hint that we are heading for top 4. I kind of get the trade for Thomas because Micky would have wanted to get someone in to show the others how to play his brand of footy. But trades for Docherty and Everitt were beyond me in a draft which seemed to have a bit of depth until about pick forty.

To demonstrate what I'm on about, here's a question: if you want to add pace to our midfield from outside tonight's squad, who are you going to call up? It's an indictment on our list management.

lets not do a hirdy here,,,the buck stops at the top...kernahan and swann fault for allowing wayne hughes to stay on for so long and then to side with hughes when he wanted matthew Watson and ratts wanted jack darling !!!

and lets not forget that hughes went for kruser instead of Dangerfield and lucas instead of fyfe and he only was sacked this year ...laughable!!!

..lazy, they like that shoot out style, but it won't get you all the way.. ..and team was built that way, will take some undoing..

They say stupidity is doing the same things over and over and expecting a different result. We're the kings of stupidity because we stuffed up our rebuild. Every week we take to the field with:

A slow and unaccountable midfield
No height or size in the key positions
Limited ball winning ability
No superstars
Limited ruckmen

But we have no depth to cover any of these deficiencies because we never draft. The Psychologist could answer this, but when was the last draft where we took more than three players? Was it 2010? The reason I ask is that you're hitting and hoping to fill deficiencies when you take one player in the vain effort of filling a gap - especially when your draft record in the second and third rounds is as poor as ours.

To finish things off, the club never levels with us. Each year they recruit rather than draft and hint that we are heading for top 4. I kind of get the trade for Thomas because Micky would have wanted to get someone in to show the others how to play his brand of footy. But trades for Docherty and Everitt were beyond me in a draft which seemed to have a bit of depth until about pick forty.

To demonstrate what I'm on about, here's a question: if you want to add pace to our midfield from outside tonight's squad, who are you going to call up? It's an indictment on our list management.

Been saying it for years

We can't @#$%&! kick

THIS - at least our Reds are flying