Goltzenberg wrote:
Yea lets set some standards. If we expect CFC players to be A grade citizens i think the members should be too.
Grand Final day - All Carlton Members
*No member can have more then 3 beers during the grand final game.
*No member can be over 0.05
*You can not urinate on the lemon tree, must use toilet (Would be unprofessional)
* Must leave toilet seat down.
* No yelling during the game, as that may disturb neighbours.
* Have to watch the game wearing neat casual/suit. (Must be professional members)
* Need to be home by 9PM.
Any more standards?
----------------------------------------------------
I think fev will always be a dick when he drinks, im not saying that what he did is ok, its not, but geez, lets just move on.
Fev gets pissed, is a bit of a dick drunk, embarrasses himself and he wont be invited back to next years brownlow. End of story.
He is far better then the following:
* Didak in car with bikies with bullets shot
* Heath shaw/didak crash a car drunk.
* St Kilda players accused of rape.
* Collingwood player caught drink driving - lose TAC sponsorship
* Wayne Carey sleeping with another players wife
* Buddy Franklin in fight over the weekend in Perth.
*Tarrant in fights
* Ben Cousins doing drugs.
* Michael Jordan having an affair with 6 women
* Charles Barkley spitting on a girl in the crowd of a NBA game.
There are a lot more.
suck it up princesses and move on.
To quote the Cohen Bros - not sure I quite agree with your detective work there Goltz...
"If we expect CFC players to be A grade citizens i think the members should be too."
Incorrect - the CFC players are very highly paid members of an industry which relies on the footy going public, the corporate world and the television networks to fund it. Given the success of the industry, the players will be front and centre in the public eye like it or not. if you don't like it don't sign a contract - simple. There are 40,000 members of the CFC (and countless other supporters) who have expectations as to the behavior of those that are given the HONOUR to wear the CFC. When you damage the CFC brand you damage all elements of the club - the brand, the professionalism, the reputation and ultimately the on field performance.
As for your list ... i think Fev's antics (Stole clothes from a laundramat, put a barman in a headlock in Ireland sent home from Australian team, urinated on a shop window in public five days before the first game of the season etc etc) are very comparable with your list and ...
* Didak in car with bikies with bullets shot
* Heath shaw/didak crash a car drunk.
Didak and Shaw were suspended for 6 weeks inc finals and both followed up with best ever seasons* St Kilda players accused of rape.
Week administration that didn't take action - Butters and Thomas have since been replaced and look at the result * Collingwood player caught drink driving - lose TAC sponsorship
Point proven - they lost TAC sponsorship - sponsors don't grow on trees* Wayne Carey sleeping with another players wife
Kangaroos have never recovered from that* Buddy Franklin in fight over the weekend in Perth.
*Tarrant in fights
Fev's accumulated antics are far worse then these...* Ben Cousins doing drugs.
Yes - and look what's happened to that club since...lost spiritual leader (Cousins) lost best ever player (Judd) and struggling at the bottom of the table...And if it's true that Gibbs g'friend was in tears then that's problematic. Remember what happened with one A Hammill. All it took was a few ill chosen comments from John Elliot and we lost a great player. I'm not saying Bryce is going to return to SA cause his gfriend got upset, but sometimes when something's on your mind it doesn't take much to tip your decision one way or another.
It's 2009 - to all those that say all he did was get a bit drunk etc you're not seeing the big picture. If your club aint professional then you won't win the big one - simple as that. And the club IS the players. No more excuses cause he's just a bloke having some fun. If it was Swan, Icke or Ratten doing the same thing would you be so forgiving - of course not.