DownUnderChick wrote:
What if Rich decides to go home?
What if Rich wanting to go home was the reason he dropped down to whatever he dropped down to?
What if our club didn't want to invest in a short term proposition?
..i agree, no garuntee's with any interstater and the go-home factor.. ..like i said previously, it got us juddles and knockers, could lose us the gibblet.. ..you never know.. ..like you say, Rich may wanna go home at some point.. ..goin' purely by a hunch, but i don't think he's the sort, he strikes me already as a one club type.. ..he's a perfect fit for the way that team plays, and now especially with Vossy as coach he's like his protege..
..the point is, if Rich goes home in 4 years, the brions get 4 years outta him.. ..what kills clubs is slow blooming kids that wanna go home just as they're about to hit their straps.. ..lookit knockers fer example, if he comes good we reap the development freo invested in him.. ..except for freo at least, they didn't give up a top ten pick for knockers in the first place.. ..or thommo leavin' the dee's to go back to adelaide..
..and yeah i appreciate yer point regarding short term proposition DuC.. ..but the way i look at it, if a kid [any kid] takes years to come on, they're not automatically a longterm proposition just cos they're on yer list for years and years.. ..it's about playin' the seniors for me.. ..if a kid takes 3 years to play good afl footy, and you get say another 2 yrs of afl footy outta them, then sure they're a 5 year proposition on your list, but you've only gotten 2 years productive return outta a 5 year investment.. ..so in actuality that kid goes from long term list proposition to short term afl producing player..
..now, if our list gave us that luxury, and we're set up well enough to use our top ten pick on a kid with huge 'potential', then sure why not i guess.. ..but i think our list isn't close to being able to take that approach.. ..especially when we had the opportunity to address a greater flaw in our side with genuine quality..