realfooty wrote:
Instead, Ratten blamed his side's poor conversion in front of goal on the night and over-use of handball, especially in the second quarter in which the Dockers kicked seven goals to five. "Today we had more shots than the opposition and we lost," he said. "There was a fair bit of supply going in there; it's maybe the way we go about it we need to change a little bit."
Is Ratten serious? I thought Freo wasted more good opportunities than us. There's a reason we don't kick enough goals from forwrad entries. We took about two marks all night in our forward 50 - how many did Freo take? and we play as slowly as possible out of our back 50 and as wide as possible. We look confused and disconcerted, too aware of what space we're supposed to be standing in and too frightened to try anything daring or dashing. And nowhere near desperate enough.
MAybe Ratts will be a good coach but apart from his status as an ex Carlton player, why did he deserve a contract extension half way through his current contract? No-one else was after him. We have a coaching panel that is almost exclusively ex Carlton players with no previous coaching experience. Are they the absolute best available? Is Lappin the best forward coach in the AFL?
Early days but at this stage Ratts is clearly behnd Knights as a coach and Kinights looked to be a desperation move by the Bombers and to be getting a wooden spoon list.
We need to have a coach that thinks up new ideas and is ahead of the game, not one who slavishly tries to copy current strategies like Hawthorn's zone and Swans possession game at a time when imaginative coaches are unpicking those tactics.
Maybe the players aren't executing the plans, but it is the coaches job to ensure they do, and also t get his team playing desperately every week, not just when they feel like it.
If we had 4 changes after the Hawks game, surely there needs to be some after that performance.