Very, very, very, very, very wierdly...
...I'm with Melvey.
If the club is serious about going green then GO GREEN.
The environmental benefits of what's being proposed aren't much greater than what's now standard for a bullshit "5 star" housing project (which is currently ridiculously low).
If we want to be seen to be leaders in the area we should be setting out to be carbon neutral at the least and preferably having a positive impact on the environment. There are that many ways we can do it and they're all relatively affordable over the medium term (and will in fact pay for themselves within a 10 year time frame).
John M wrote:
Because even a five minute study of Visy Park would tell you that the environmental story is little more than window dressing. It's a high-performance centre for elite athletes, with some community access. The 'green' tinge is a nice way for Visy's sponsorship to have some relevance, and for the money Visy pays to Juddy to remain legit.
Why put the greenwash on a development that's a lame-arsed attempt at being green when there's enough there to sell it as an elite training facility?
By connecting VISY to a project that's only paying lip-service to environmental issues all they due is question the validity of VISY's own green credentials.
As Melvey effectively said (did I really write that?

) there's no need to talk up the lame parts of this. It's all a bit "
Beyond
Petroleum" for mine.
Maybe the building's green credentials will be worked up over the rest of the design phase but if you were going to launch this as a "green building" then you'd want to be listing quite a few more benefits than what's currently been shown.
Had we done this properly (and I mean really properly) then the world's media would have been knocking on the door to know about the professional sporting club that is paving the way to a genuine green future.
I can't hear them knocking...
Other than that - great that the players will finally have some decent facilities.