Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Sun Jun 29, 2025 9:00 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 155 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Sep 08, 2007 6:01 pm 
Offline
Horrie Clover
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2007 10:41 am
Posts: 395
Location: Juddville
BlueWorld wrote:
218 - Carrazzo
212 - Scotland
144 - Waite
142 - Houlihan
126 - Simpson (5th)
94 - Fevola
90 - Fisher
86 - Bentick
74 - Gibbs
58 - Walker (10th)
53 - Murphy
43 - Lappin
42 - Bannister
36 - Koutoufides
33 - Betts (15th)
30 - Bower
26 - Thornton- 7th last year
25 - Stevens
22 - Saddington
18 - Jackson (20th)
16 - Whitnall
15 - Kennedy
10 - Ohailpin
9 - Hartlett
6 - Wiggins (25th)
6 - Blackwell
6 - Russell
4 - Young
4 - Jamison
2 - Cloke (30th)

0 - Hampson
0 - Austin
0 - Ackland :twisted:


How Waite finished ahead of Fisher is mind boggling. Anyway congrats to Carazz. Well done and richly deserved.

_________________
" Koutoufides has taken the last quarter by the scruff of the neck..." Commentary Drew Morphett Last Qtr '99 Prelim. Pure Gold.

Thanks for the memories Kouta. You are and always will be a True Blue Carlton Legend. #43.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Sep 08, 2007 6:08 pm 
Offline
Garry Crane

Joined: Wed Dec 06, 2006 3:26 pm
Posts: 236
thedominator wrote:
BlueWorld wrote:
218 - Carrazzo
212 - Scotland
144 - Waite
142 - Houlihan
126 - Simpson (5th)
94 - Fevola
90 - Fisher
86 - Bentick
74 - Gibbs
58 - Walker (10th)
53 - Murphy
43 - Lappin
42 - Bannister
36 - Koutoufides
33 - Betts (15th)
30 - Bower
26 - Thornton- 7th last year
25 - Stevens
22 - Saddington
18 - Jackson (20th)
16 - Whitnall
15 - Kennedy
10 - Ohailpin
9 - Hartlett
6 - Wiggins (25th)
6 - Blackwell
6 - Russell
4 - Young
4 - Jamison
2 - Cloke (30th)

0 - Hampson
0 - Austin
0 - Ackland :twisted:


How Waite finished ahead of Fisher is mind boggling. Anyway congrats to Carazz. Well done and richly deserved.


I know, Waite was appaling in some games.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Sep 08, 2007 6:11 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Tue May 16, 2006 8:57 pm
Posts: 6836
i think fisher's consistency wasn't rewarded, he didn't really have a bad game but he only had 2 or 3 great games with about 15 very good games. if it was the old system of a 10-9-8-7-6-5-4-3-2-1 voting system i'm sure fish would have faired a lot better. as for waite, i think his 3rd placing was justified but there's no doubt the voting system suited him a lot more than it did fish.

_________________
Last edited by true_blue3 on Mon Sep 26, 1981 5:07 pm; edited 92 times in total


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Sep 08, 2007 7:06 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:28 pm
Posts: 3768
Quote:
Waite was appaling in some games.
Whether you're 6th best or worst it makes no difference. Waite had 4 games where he had the most votes. Fisher only 1.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Sep 08, 2007 7:51 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2005 10:52 am
Posts: 12809
true_blue3 wrote:
i think fisher's consistency wasn't rewarded, he didn't really have a bad game but he only had 2 or 3 great games with about 15 very good games. if it was the old system of a 10-9-8-7-6-5-4-3-2-1 voting system i'm sure fish would have faired a lot better. as for waite, i think his 3rd placing was justified but there's no doubt the voting system suited him a lot more than it did fish.


If you have a look at the TC MVP, Fisher only got votes in 3 games throughout the season compared to Waite's 7. This is reflected in the B&F votes as well. Not sure what point I'm making, but we can't really complain about Fish being lower than Waite when TC voted exactly the same way.

_________________
Cer 'ch 'n alluog Blues


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Sep 08, 2007 8:00 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Tue May 16, 2006 8:57 pm
Posts: 6836
thehalford wrote:
true_blue3 wrote:
i think fisher's consistency wasn't rewarded, he didn't really have a bad game but he only had 2 or 3 great games with about 15 very good games. if it was the old system of a 10-9-8-7-6-5-4-3-2-1 voting system i'm sure fish would have faired a lot better. as for waite, i think his 3rd placing was justified but there's no doubt the voting system suited him a lot more than it did fish.


If you have a look at the TC MVP, Fisher only got votes in 3 games throughout the season compared to Waite's 7. This is reflected in the B&F votes as well. Not sure what point I'm making, but we can't really complain about Fish being lower than Waite when TC voted exactly the same way.


yeah nah i agree with you, the point i was trying to make was that giving votes from 5 down has worked against fisher and for waite, in saying that i believe waite did actually have a better season.

_________________
Last edited by true_blue3 on Mon Sep 26, 1981 5:07 pm; edited 92 times in total


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Sep 08, 2007 8:42 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 18042
nytdog wrote:
Blue Vain wrote:
nytdog wrote:
I'm sure BV would be hating seeing Waitey up the top there.
:?

Why?


Cause you don't rate him at all


Dont put words in my mouth.
I stated that he can be brilliant at times and abysmal at others. This does nothing to change my mind.
Out of 22 games this year, he appeared in our best players 6 times. Heath Scotland was in our best players 12 times.

That and the fact that he was leading the AFL for errors confirms to me that his best and worst are too far apart to be a top quality player.

By the way, I also stated that Whitnall should be traded last year after winning the B&F. You would have struggled to comprehend that one as well no doubt.

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Last edited by Blue Vain on Sat Sep 08, 2007 10:05 pm, edited 2 times in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Sep 08, 2007 8:46 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:04 am
Posts: 28377
Location: *Currently banned*
Blue Vain wrote:
nytdog wrote:
Blue Vain wrote:
nytdog wrote:
I'm sure BV would be hating seeing Waitey up the top there.
:?

Why?


Cause you don't rate him at all


I stated that he can be brilliant at times and abysmal at others. This does nothing to change my mind.
Out of 22 games this year, he appeared in our best players 6 times. Heath Scotland was in our best players 12 times.

That and the fact that he was leading the AFL for errors confirms to me that his best and worst are too far apart to be a top quality player.

By the way, I also stated that Whitnall should be traded last year after winning the B&F. You would have struggled to comprehend that one as well no doubt.


You ever happy?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Sep 08, 2007 8:55 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2005 10:52 am
Posts: 12809
true_blue3 wrote:
thehalford wrote:
true_blue3 wrote:
i think fisher's consistency wasn't rewarded, he didn't really have a bad game but he only had 2 or 3 great games with about 15 very good games. if it was the old system of a 10-9-8-7-6-5-4-3-2-1 voting system i'm sure fish would have faired a lot better. as for waite, i think his 3rd placing was justified but there's no doubt the voting system suited him a lot more than it did fish.


If you have a look at the TC MVP, Fisher only got votes in 3 games throughout the season compared to Waite's 7. This is reflected in the B&F votes as well. Not sure what point I'm making, but we can't really complain about Fish being lower than Waite when TC voted exactly the same way.


yeah nah i agree with you, the point i was trying to make was that giving votes from 5 down has worked against fisher and for waite, in saying that i believe waite did actually have a better season.


I agree with you too. I think I was backing up your argument.

Don't mind me, I don't know what I'm doing... :oops:

Well done Carrots :-D

_________________
Cer 'ch 'n alluog Blues


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Sep 08, 2007 9:59 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 18042
verbs wrote:
You ever happy?


:lol:

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Sep 08, 2007 10:03 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:04 am
Posts: 28377
Location: *Currently banned*
Blue Vain wrote:
verbs wrote:
You ever happy?


:lol:


An obvious no. :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Sep 08, 2007 10:34 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 01, 2005 8:24 pm
Posts: 2821
Location: In The Boot Of Brendan Fevola Car
Good win to Andrew on the best and fairest award,hopefully the jinx doesn't fall on him also in the next 2 seasons.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Sep 08, 2007 10:46 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 01, 2005 8:24 pm
Posts: 2821
Location: In The Boot Of Brendan Fevola Car
Rhys26 wrote:
Great stuff Carrazz a worthy winner. There will be no best and fairest curse for Andrew.
Also great years by Houla and Scotland both deserved to finish as high as they did. Houla was probably unlucky not to finish 3rd.
How the crack did Lance Whitnall get 16 votes?? I'm convinced we still have some dummies left in high places at the carlton footy club.
Any proper club by now would have retired him.
HA HA :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Sep 08, 2007 10:57 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 01, 2005 8:24 pm
Posts: 2821
Location: In The Boot Of Brendan Fevola Car
Jarusa wrote:
Ratten did a presentation about what he wants for nex year.

Was really happy to hear him mention that he will be putting the acid on 3rd 4th and 5th year players to provide the improvement needed in the team to climb the ladder next year.

Mr Pratt also mentioned that the players could expect the mother of all end of season trips if they make the eight next year. :-D


A trip to the Moon maybe,now you can't match that,hopefully not Vegas,i think the kids will go nuts in the casino.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Sep 09, 2007 2:56 am 
Offline
Vale 1953-2020
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 11, 2005 1:23 am
Posts: 11671
nytdog wrote:
Blue Vain wrote:
nytdog wrote:
I'm sure BV would be hating seeing Waitey up the top there.
:?

Why?


Cause you don't rate him at all


What a strange comment.... :?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Sep 09, 2007 10:11 am 
Offline
Bob Chitty

Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2005 10:10 am
Posts: 881
Location: Netherlands
I'm amazed that Kennedy would finish above Setanta!!! Are they for real??!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Sep 09, 2007 2:29 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2005 10:49 am
Posts: 1651
Congrats to Carrots whatever that means as i still do not rate our B&F and haven't for the last 6 years. Voting process is flawed for a start and the fact that Carrots won (with all due respect) symbolises where this club is at.

Opposition clubs generally allow Carrots to rack up stats because HE DOES NOT HURT THE OPPOSITION with clinical disposal or on the scoreboard. Nothing personal but it's my view.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 10, 2007 5:00 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Fri Dec 08, 2006 2:21 am
Posts: 1684
Location: Parkville
thedominator wrote:
BlueWorld wrote:
218 - Carrazzo
212 - Scotland
144 - Waite
142 - Houlihan
126 - Simpson (5th)
94 - Fevola
90 - Fisher
86 - Bentick
74 - Gibbs
58 - Walker (10th)
53 - Murphy
43 - Lappin
42 - Bannister
36 - Koutoufides
33 - Betts (15th)
30 - Bower
26 - Thornton- 7th last year
25 - Stevens
22 - Saddington
18 - Jackson (20th)
16 - Whitnall
15 - Kennedy
10 - Ohailpin
9 - Hartlett
6 - Wiggins (25th)
6 - Blackwell
6 - Russell
4 - Young
4 - Jamison
2 - Cloke (30th)

0 - Hampson
0 - Austin
0 - Ackland :twisted:


How Waite finished ahead of Fisher is mind boggling. Anyway congrats to Carazz. Well done and richly deserved.



Basically because its a shit judging system. It rewards players that have stand out games rather than consistency.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 10, 2007 5:15 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Fri Dec 08, 2006 2:21 am
Posts: 1684
Location: Parkville
Blue Vain wrote:
nytdog wrote:
Blue Vain wrote:
nytdog wrote:
I'm sure BV would be hating seeing Waitey up the top there.
:?

Why?


Cause you don't rate him at all


Dont put words in my mouth.
I stated that he can be brilliant at times and abysmal at others. This does nothing to change my mind.
Out of 22 games this year, he appeared in our best players 6 times. Heath Scotland was in our best players 12 times.

That and the fact that he was leading the AFL for errors confirms to me that his best and worst are too far apart to be a top quality player.

By the way, I also stated that Whitnall should be traded last year after winning the B&F. You would have struggled to comprehend that one as well no doubt.


Here are your own words... I don't need to put words in your mouth. I think this more than truly proves you don't rate him

Blue Vain wrote:
His disposal is too sloppy, runs over the ball too much, goes to ground too often and has too many brain explosions.
He is a worthwhile wildcard up forward but shouldnt be let near the backline.

If he wasnt a F/S, I'd trade him in a heartbeat.

He made 6 critical errors. More than anyone on the ground. AGAIN!
Unfortunately it is a common occurence for Jarrad.
If we could get a second round pick for him, I'd take it in a heartbeat.

Waiteys been making the same mistakes consistently for years.
You stick to blind faith and I'll support the rebuilding of a strong team.

I personally think Jarrad Waite has a long way to become a very good player and have thought so for years. He fails to understand his limitations and too often tries to do the miraculous when the percentage play is the best option.
As I stated earlier, he is a worthwhile wildcard up forward at the moment but I would take an early 2nd rounder (18-25) for him no worries.
Unfortunately he is one of those players who doesnt have a true position in the current game. He cant hold down a key position on a consistent basis and with Fish, Kennedy and Fevola in our future forwardline, I dont think we can afford another tall player with limited defensive abilities.

Jarrad has been named in our best players 6 times this year.
Now lets remember, up to 6 players get named in our best players each week!
Compare that to Scotland who has been in our best 12 times or a second year player like Murphy who has been in our best 11 times.

I doubt either of those 2 would be completely happy with their season but at least they offer some sort of consistency.

As Effes stated, Jarrad is leading the AFL for clangers. Sure his best is quite good but it is too often overshadowed by the very very poor.


:lol: Enough evidence for you.

Btw, I only joined TC in Dec 06 - well past the point where we could have traded Whitnal. So I guess you'll never know what my views were on that topic. :wink:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 10, 2007 8:52 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 18042
Blue Vain wrote:
Jarrad has been named in our best players 6 times this year.
Now lets remember, up to 6 players get named in our best players each week!
Compare that to Scotland who has been in our best 12 times or a second year player like Murphy who has been in our best 11 times.

I doubt either of those 2 would be completely happy with their season but at least they offer some sort of consistency.

As Effes stated, Jarrad is leading the AFL for clangers. Sure his best is quite good but it is too often overshadowed by the very very poor.


As I've said many times, Waitey has lots of ability but his consistency is poor.
Using a 3rd place in our B&F doesnt alter that view at all.

Nytdog wrote:
Basically because its a shit judging system. It rewards players that have stand out games rather than consistency.


Good to see you agree. :wink:

I'd love to see Waite improve his consistency because that would mean he's eventually becoming a quality performer.
Seeing Carlton players improve is something I love seeing, I get no pleasure from seeing them underachieve.

Stating that I'd hate seeing him finish 3rd was a foolish comment.
Do we understand each other?

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 155 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 25 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group