Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Sat May 10, 2025 11:41 pm

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 53 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Walls says Trade Fevola
PostPosted: Tue May 24, 2005 8:37 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Sun May 22, 2005 11:58 pm
Posts: 4058
Location: South Yarra
On "On the Couch" last night, Walls was talking about our list, and suggested that Fevola should be traded, the rationale being that he's worth more to a good team than he is to Carlton. I've thought along the same lines myself.

We can't get good quality ball often enough and deliver it well enough to him. We aren't going to win a flag for a few years with the list we have.

Look at Richmond - they trade Ottens for 2 high picks, to go with pick 1, 3, and 19 and have 5 top 20 picks - instant rebuild! We can do the same, or we can sit on Fev and have him and us frustrated until he's traded in 2 years, or until we are a decent team, by which time he may be 27-28.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 24, 2005 8:43 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:04 pm
Posts: 48542
Location: Prison Island
hate to say it but i agree with walls - trade now while he is worth something . Fevola wont be worth squat after 2 years of our crap midfield kicking the ball over his head.

5 top 20 picks would be fantastic. ( The PPs we will get this year included)

Waite, Fisher, O'Hailpin and any of our future picks can cover for Fev.

_________________
*(grow - fun - gah) :fight:

Yeah but whatabout your whataboutism.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 24, 2005 8:47 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:04 pm
Posts: 48542
Location: Prison Island
Trade him now - get 5 top players from the draft all under the age of 20
and a gun recruit from another club in the 20 - 23 age bracket and make the finals next year.

This sounds much better - trade him

_________________
*(grow - fun - gah) :fight:

Yeah but whatabout your whataboutism.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 24, 2005 8:50 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:59 pm
Posts: 2966
Location: La La Land
Yes I saw that too, he also said that he would trade both Fev & Whitnall.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 24, 2005 8:52 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:46 am
Posts: 2547
Location: Melbourne
I've been arguing this for most of this year. Trade Fevola for some top draft picks or a young midfield gun and a top 10 pick. He's little bit too Richo-like for my tastes and having a forwardline that isn't Fevolacentric might not be a bad idea.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 24, 2005 8:54 pm 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 3:10 pm
Posts: 9404
Location: Back 50 of the Tiger Den
It's sad isn't it.

For mine, he is an unreal player. Easily in the top 3 forwards of the game.
Yet, he isn't playing that way at Carlton.

Only really confirms what Synbad has been saying about him. With the delivery he is getting, Fevola will never become the player he is meant to be.

He'd be better suited at Brisbane or West Coast, I reckon.

_________________
Writer for SuperCoach Paige www.scpaige.com.au
Twitter - @johnfeeney24


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 24, 2005 8:55 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 3:11 pm
Posts: 1959
Location: Elwood
There can be only one ....

Fev or Lance.. mmmm. i know who i'd keep and trade...

_________________
I know a little secret. And i'm not sharing.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 24, 2005 8:59 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 9:26 pm
Posts: 4719
Location: Parliament House, Canberra
Why don't we construct a midfield first?

I wouldn't take anything Walls says as gospel, I'd treat it critically. FF who can kick the ball a mile have hands like he does don't come around often.

We're better off trading a flanker like Houlihan - who might still garner a decent pick. He's young and he's got enough experience.

Get Houlihan to deliver the ball to Fev you say. Fair point - but the point is that until we get Houlihan the ball, he's not much use. He's a Camporeale-type but younger.

IMO we have so many HBF-types we can trade one of the them for a decent pick that might get us a decent KP player or a genuine midfielder with good skills and good grunt.

_________________
"A good composer does not initiate. He steals."

- Igor Stravinsky


Last edited by CarltonClem on Tue May 24, 2005 8:59 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 24, 2005 8:59 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:04 pm
Posts: 48542
Location: Prison Island
Quote:
There can be only one ....

Fev or Lance.. mmmm. i know who i'd keep and trade...


If you could you would have to trade both. But you have to look at market value and i dont think we can get anything of worth for Whitnall.

On that basis you would keep Whitnall and sign him up for under 200k a season.

Fevs market value is very high , probably higher than his value to us. on that basis you trade Fev and cleanup with the talent/picks we get and more than likely money we would save.

Fev is not worth 500K + for Carlton , maybe at West coast , brisbane, St kilda or Geelong he would be worth 500k + but not for us. We need more for 500K and unfortunately we wont get that from Fev in our team.

_________________
*(grow - fun - gah) :fight:

Yeah but whatabout your whataboutism.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 24, 2005 9:01 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:58 pm
Posts: 2194
Location: Melbourne
If I was Fev I would ask to be traded to West Coast or Geelong. He would give the tonne a good shake I reckon and be an AA full forward. Matthew Lloyd was a gun in a gun team and now Essendon* are shit so is he. Fev ain't shit for us but in a good team he would be a superstar, probably better (if he isn't already) than Lloyd.

If I was Pagan I would keep him. In the next 3-5 years when we are in the finals Fev will only be 27-29 - in the peak of his career. Look at teams like West Coast and Geelong, they would do anything for a true FF. Just because we pick up young kids doesn't mean in 3-5 years we will have a replacement FF.

Keep the Shag!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 24, 2005 9:02 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:04 pm
Posts: 48542
Location: Prison Island
We have potential replacements for Fev now in Waite , Fisher , Setanta

not to mention we could pick up a forward in the draft

_________________
*(grow - fun - gah) :fight:

Yeah but whatabout your whataboutism.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 24, 2005 9:38 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
Riewoldts body language isnt flash when theyre losing neither is Gehrigs and neither is Lloyds....

Its a full forward thinggy....

Fevola= Superstar /Superman
Carlton team currently = Kryptonite.
He wont be going anywhere anyway.....

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 24, 2005 9:42 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2005 11:48 am
Posts: 2891
If we miss the priority pick this year it's a real long way back, a couple of good picks for Fevola (I doubt we'll get a trade for Whitnall) could speed things up a bit. Or course, we could speed things up and find we have no one to kick the ball to cause we traded away our gun FF.

It is a conundrum .... but I think not negotiating a contact till after the end of the season to keep our options open is a good start.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 24, 2005 9:44 pm 
Offline
John James

Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 8:04 pm
Posts: 615
Fevola has elite talent.

If the only reason we are trading him is to get draft picks we might get another Murray Vance and we have swapped a player with another 150 quality games in him for a dud.

If he wants $600k per year and we don't think he deserves that, then we trade for draft picks.

You never know what could happen, what if another Nick Stevens drops into our laps at year end and all of a sudden the opposition has to cover two Nick Stevens'. How much more potent does Fev become with two Nick Stevens delivering the ball to him?

I do agree though that we need to be open to acquiring early draft picks, so need to listen to everything that is offered up.

_________________
Get comfortable being uncomfortable


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 24, 2005 9:45 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
And the face of the club will be who?????????
I can see all the kids wanting to wear Lances number... or Bannisters.. or Digbys.,...or ummmmmmm.....Sporneys....

Not exactly fashionable at the moments are we???

Nah... he wont go anywhere..... :P

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 24, 2005 9:47 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 6:29 am
Posts: 13684
Robert Heatley wrote:
You never know what could happen, what if another Nick Stevens drops into our laps at year end and all of a sudden the opposition has to cover two Nick Stevens'. How much more potent does Fev become with two Nick Stevens delivering the ball to him?


The priority Pick is great, but the above is better.

Finishing bottom 2 means we have an early pick for an uncontracted senior player. This in itself will give us leverage to target name players, with the risk that the player will walk out on a club.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 24, 2005 10:24 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:28 pm
Posts: 3768
CarltonClem wrote:
Why don't we construct a midfield first?

I wouldn't take anything Walls says as gospel, I'd treat it critically. FF who can kick the ball a mile have hands like he does don't come around often.

We're better off trading a flanker like Houlihan - who might still garner a decent pick. He's young and he's got enough experience.

Get Houlihan to deliver the ball to Fev you say. Fair point - but the point is that until we get Houlihan the ball, he's not much use. He's a Camporeale-type but younger.

IMO we have so many HBF-types we can trade one of the them for a decent pick that might get us a decent KP player or a genuine midfielder with good skills and good grunt.


You won't get a high pick for a flanker anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 24, 2005 10:34 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 1:12 pm
Posts: 1291
Location: Sydney
I can see the merits for trading him but I want to keep Fev. He's one of the few genuine match winners in a list threadbare on talent. He's still relatively young so should be around for many more years (hopefully by our next premiership). Gun Full Forwards don't grow on trees.

_________________
When Dick became President, it was as if everyone at Carlton came out of the hailstorm and into the sunshine - Stephen Kernahan

YARRAN!!





.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 24, 2005 10:39 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:04 pm
Posts: 48542
Location: Prison Island
we cant afford to be paying him the money he wants 500K for what 50 - 60 goals a game ? Thats around 10k a goal . A bit steep i think.

500k with a midfield supply of a top team and 100 goals a game. 5k per goal. More worth that kind of money at another club.

As for being fashionable and selling merchandise, people will buy 30 guernseys, 1 guernseys or 14 guernseys (next year) not to mention the top youngsters we get.

_________________
*(grow - fun - gah) :fight:

Yeah but whatabout your whataboutism.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 24, 2005 10:42 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:58 pm
Posts: 2194
Location: Melbourne
grrofunger wrote:
we cant afford to be paying him the money he wants 500K for what 50 - 60 goals a game ? Thats around 10k a goal . A bit steep i think.

500k with a midfield supply of a top team and 100 goals a game. 5k per goal. More worth that kind of money at another club.

As for being fashionable and selling merchandise, people will buy 30 guernseys, 1 guernseys or 14 guernseys (next year) not to mention the top youngsters we get.


So that's 1100-1320 goals a season. I don't know about you but I'd be satisfied with that. :wink:


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 53 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Cazzesman, Google [Bot], Majestic-12 [Bot], Yarsii and 104 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group