Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Thu Jul 03, 2025 5:13 pm

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 140 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 7  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Feb 25, 2007 8:08 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:34 am
Posts: 8888
Location: 8888
Should be a good game. I think the Hawks are in it to win the NAB Cup this year so it will be a good comparison for us to see where we are at.

Worried about their runners though. We may be stretched if they click like they did at times tonight.

Can't wait to see Waitey on Franklin!!

_________________
Mjonc signing off at 8888


Last edited by mjonc on Thu Mar 01, 2007 9:30 pm, edited 2 times in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Feb 25, 2007 8:17 pm 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:38 am
Posts: 5824
Location: home
Hoping they will play Croad on Fev. He will kick ten, all from hands in the back :twisted:

_________________
The most terrifying words in the English language are: I'm from the government and I'm here to help.

Ronald Reagan


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Feb 25, 2007 8:23 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 8:23 am
Posts: 48684
Location: Canberra
killpies wrote:
Hoping they will play Croad on Fev. He will kick ten, all from hands in the back :twisted:


:lol:

Just so long as we have a red hot go, I'll be happy.

_________________
Click here to follow TalkingCarlton on twitter
TalkingCarlton Posting Rules


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Feb 25, 2007 8:32 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2005 3:48 pm
Posts: 1392
Saturday
Hawthorn v Carlton (Aurora Stadium, 6:10pm, Ten)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Feb 25, 2007 8:38 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:57 pm
Posts: 1417
Location: Blue Yonder
Points of note:

- Hawthorn early on were a bit behind Melbourne

- Hawthorn runners got on top

- The last quarter Franklin turned it on from supply and kicked 4 from left of screen left hand pocket on the run.

Lesson:

If we start off the way we did against Essendon* and obviously play four quarters we will be ok.

The match up on Franklin will be ultra important, would start with Thornton.

Hawks mid field I would rate more explosive than Essendons, Mitchell, Hodge, Crawford in particular exposed Melbourne from what I saw in the last.

We can get this right, the Hawks are ok, but we can back ourselves here.

Defensively they are going to be shaky with Fev, Kennedy, Whitnall, FIsher and Betts.

In the midfield we can hurt them if Stevo, Murph, Walks, Simmo, and Houla bring their games and run, run, run.

I am not that worried after seeing our options down back against Essendon* ( not worried not in the sense that we are it and a bit now, but we have options defensively), I think Thornton can take Frankin, we have Ohailpin or Waite for Roughhead, and even Walks can slide back and take Williams.

Franklin - Thornton

Williams - Walker

Roughead - Ohailpin

Ackland / Cloke can hurt Hawthorn if smart enough?

Can't wait.

_________________
Supporting the Blues No Matter What


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Feb 25, 2007 8:40 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:10 pm
Posts: 1718
Location: Romsey, Victoria
camelboy wrote:
killpies wrote:
Hoping they will play Croad on Fev. He will kick ten, all from hands in the back :twisted:


:lol:

Just so long as we have a red hot go, I'll be happy.

Remember kids, it's not about winning, its about getting out there and giving it your best. :P


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Feb 25, 2007 8:43 pm 
Offline
Rod McGregor

Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2005 8:38 am
Posts: 163
Location: MELBOURNE
Can I ask what happened to Bower and Hartlett last night. Not sure why they didn't play but I would rather see either of these two in verus a Saddington for instance.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Feb 25, 2007 8:53 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 9:00 am
Posts: 23123
KERMIT wrote:
Can I ask what happened to Bower and Hartlett last night. Not sure why they didn't play but I would rather see either of these two in verus a Saddington for instance.


Was explained to me today by a very learned man (dannyboy) that the reasoning behind playing those guys in the 2's this week was to make sure they got 4 full quarters of footy into them.

_________________
|♥♥♥♥♥♥| http://www.blueseum.org |♥♥♥♥♥♥|


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Feb 25, 2007 9:05 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 2:32 pm
Posts: 33043
Location: Back in reality
I'd rate one of Bower, Carlos, Waite or Walker to go on Franklin, maybe even trying them in that order.

Thornton is a great defender for us, but I don't think his smarts are going to make up the ground on Franklin's raw athletic ability. If Franklin is remotely smart about the way he goes about next week's game, T-Bird will be left thumping the turf in his wake.

But as I said, it's all about how Franklin goes about it, and how he's used. I really don't see any harm in sticking Carlos on him, looking over the Hawks forward line he should be the number 1 target this year, and as Barnesy said, Walker can account for Williams.

Maybe if they switch Croad forward, but if we bring Bower in for the game, we always have someone with the speed and agility to match up on either of those two should Waite or Carlos prove not to be up to the task.

Ahhh a little depth (and I think I've been saying that every year for the past 4 years).

_________________
29 different attributes,
And only 7 that you like;
20 ways to see the world,
Or 20 ways to start a fight.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Feb 25, 2007 9:06 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:04 pm
Posts: 48548
Location: Prison Island
Dwayne Russell thinks Hawthorn are flag contenders this year :lol:

_________________
*(grow - fun - gah) :fight:

Yeah but whatabout your whataboutism.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Feb 25, 2007 9:11 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 2:32 pm
Posts: 33043
Location: Back in reality
grrofunger wrote:
Dwayne Russell thinks Hawthorn are flag contenders this year :lol:

I think they're a good chance for the 8.

Certainly have the ability to cause matchup problems in places (Franklin and Birchall are two names that come to mind) but they do have a bit of a question mark at the number two ruck position, and full back.

But yeah, tommi has a fitting way of describing Dwayne Russell.

_________________
29 different attributes,
And only 7 that you like;
20 ways to see the world,
Or 20 ways to start a fight.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Feb 25, 2007 9:15 pm 
Offline
Bob Chitty

Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 4:26 pm
Posts: 834
grrofunger wrote:
Dwayne Russell thinks Hawthorn are flag contenders this year :lol:


Dwayne Russell is an idiot. I felt like reaching through my TV and punching him in the face with all that Hawthorn crap he was talking about. :x :x :x


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Feb 25, 2007 9:18 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Tue May 16, 2006 8:57 pm
Posts: 6836
grrofunger wrote:
Dwayne Russell thinks Hawthorn are flag contenders this year :lol:


remember what happened last time someone tipped the hawks for the flag. :roll:

_________________
Last edited by true_blue3 on Mon Sep 26, 1981 5:07 pm; edited 92 times in total


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Feb 25, 2007 9:20 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:04 am
Posts: 28377
Location: *Currently banned*
Hawthorn are definitely a level above us. I was glad they won, as we seem to play well against Melbourne and Hawthorn spanked us last year, so at least we will get a realistic idea as to where we are at after next Saturday's game.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Feb 25, 2007 9:23 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Wed Jun 22, 2005 7:25 pm
Posts: 1655
Do u think walks can play on Franklin? Both atheltic! Just put it out there as an possiblity, interested in your thoughts???

_________________
"I can't wait to win a premiership with this club" - Fev


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Feb 25, 2007 9:32 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 9:27 am
Posts: 28528
Location: Free Beer!!
Waite should play on Franklin

_________________
"The ability to speak doesn't make you intelligent." Qui-Gon Jinn 15-05-2005

"there’s more chance of me becoming the full forward for the [Western Bulldogs] than there is of any change in the Labor Party." Julia Gillard 18-05-2010


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Feb 25, 2007 9:32 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Tue May 16, 2006 8:57 pm
Posts: 6836
Fevolution wrote:
Do u think walks can play on Franklin? Both atheltic! Just put it out there as an possiblity, interested in your thoughts???


if o'hailpin and waite both fail i think he could. franklin isn't really a high marking or pack marking player and walker we know can jump 10 metres high and at ground level walker can probably beat him which is franklin's biggest strength

_________________
Last edited by true_blue3 on Mon Sep 26, 1981 5:07 pm; edited 92 times in total


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Feb 25, 2007 9:51 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 29, 2006 2:54 pm
Posts: 2521
I'm also gald we are playing the hawks. I think they are a year or 2 ahead of us at the moment. But hopefully our boys can prove me wrong, and get up. The battle is in the middle of the park. Mitchell Hodge and Crawford will be hard to handle, but i think our midfield depth may be better. So when there blokes are rotating through, we have to take advantage.

Our forwards will beat their defenders, while their forwards will test our backs. I think if we break even in the middle, we should sneak a win.

_________________
@cecil_anderson


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Feb 25, 2007 10:23 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 4:22 pm
Posts: 4678
Location: Melbourne
Don't know about Thornton on Franklin..........although i think he's beaten him before IIRC.

I'd be going for Waite or Setanta.

_________________
"We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, then, is not an act, but a habit"
- Aristotle


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Feb 25, 2007 10:25 pm 
Offline
Ken Hands
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2005 3:23 pm
Posts: 436
Why are so many posters focussing on negating Franklin. No doubt he is a quality player but if we stop the easy supply to him, he won't be in a position to trouble the scoreboard.How we manage Hodge will be the most telling factor. He is their quarterback. We have plenty of athletic types who could nullify Buddy in our defence and let's not forget what Walker did to Croad last year. So who do we match up on Hodge to stop his damaging disposal.? Not only is he a great long penetrating kick (best in the business out of defence ahead of Gilbee and Goddard) he also possesses great vision in spotting unmarked midfielders. We need to stop his supply from their defensive zone. Hawthorn defenders always look for him at every opportunity. Would like to see Rusell be given the chance to run with him and stop him from getting his customary easy possession. Has the pace and is not bad in the air otherwise it may have to be Walker or een Gibbs. Gibbs could end up hurting Hodge should he play loose because unlike the others he certainly knows show to kick a goal or two. Stop Hodge and we proceed to the third round as simple as that. I rate our midfield slightly ahead of Hawthorns, so I can't see too much pressure being exerted on our backline. I rate Essendon*'s tall man department a lot stronger than Hawthorns and we successfully cut them out of the game. Our reliance on Fev is still a major problem for us but overall I believe we match up well against Hawthor just like Essendon*.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 140 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 7  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Crusader, Google [Bot] and 56 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group