eldorado wrote:
You guys are getting carried away over nothing.
hawthorn was trying to stop Carlton scoring goals, not a personal vendetta against fevola.
When you guys played a normal forward line, Hawthorn marked a normal forward line.
When Carlton made it abundently clear that they were going to ridiculous lengths to ensure Fev took the last kick, Hawthorn had to counter that.
It was Carlton that decided that the whole focus was not winning or competing, but to get Fev his ton.
I've thought about this a lot. There's merit in what eldorado says. But I think of the good old days when we were the most arrogant, most ruthless sons of bitches in the league. I'm pretty sure we WOULDN'T have employed Hawthorn's/Clarkson's tactics purely because we had such out and out champions who could nail the opposition forwards one on one 90% of the time. Waite, Lofts, Southby, Silvagni, Sexton, Dean, etc. In fact, I reckon the forementioned players would have been
filthy if such a lack of confidence was shown in their abilities.
I suspect that's why it niggles so much. That, and the fact a few of their players punched the air when the siren went. To me that was a clear indication that their's was a personal vendetta.
So, yeah - not good form. But not illegal. What we must ensure is that we tear them apart next time - revenge is a dish best served cold. The improvements required over the summer have been documented and discussed ad nauseum on this and other websites. For me, the most striking aspect of Saturday night's game was the sheer
size and
strength of those hawks players. I mean, the thighs of some of their players were
as big as the
chests on some of our
skinny kids.
To the gym Batman.