Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Fri Jun 27, 2025 6:05 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 175 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 10, 2008 2:44 pm 
Offline
Adrian Gallagher
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2007 5:50 pm
Posts: 98
Location: Gate 3, Princes Park
Melvey wrote:

If i lined up Paul Roos, John Worsfold, Mark Williams and Brett Ratten and asked you to choose one to coach your team who would you choose

Mark Williams will be coaching my side.


Ratts has coached against 2 out of these 3 coaches.
He has beaten both.
Too quick to judge.....i hope this thread is kept in the archives and roled out again in 15 months time.

_________________
Friends, Carltonians, countrymen, lend me your ears
Now is the time - The time is now.
If you want it, come and claim it....if you dare.
One day, very very soon.....we will ride again.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 10, 2008 3:59 pm 
Offline
formerly Josh Kaplan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:19 pm
Posts: 2187
Quote:
Its also pretty obvious we have a game plan in place and the players are just getting used to it...compare it to the pagan years.


See right there is the mentality we need to get rid of.
Lets not compare naything to the Pagan years, lets compare everything we do to the Clarkson years at Hawthorn, or the Roos years ets.
Enough of this mentality that "things ar ebetter then they were under Pagan." No shit- we got rid of Pagan because he was the worst possible coach for our situation.
Lets set and abide by the highest of standards.. once again, Ratts will be judged at the end of this year by the board and everyone who matters, and as Ive said many times, we need to undergo ongoing critical appraisals of his coaching to be the best club in the country once again.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 10, 2008 4:04 pm 
Online
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 21588
Location: North of the border
Josh Kaplan wrote:
Quote:
Its also pretty obvious we have a game plan in place and the players are just getting used to it...compare it to the pagan years.


See right there is the mentality we need to get rid of.
Lets not compare naything to the Pagan years, lets compare everything we do to the Clarkson years at Hawthorn, or the Roos years ets.
Enough of this mentality that "things ar ebetter then they were under Pagan." No shit- we got rid of Pagan because he was the worst possible coach for our situation.
Lets set and abide by the highest of standards.. once again, Ratts will be judged at the end of this year by the board and everyone who matters, and as Ive said many times, we need to undergo ongoing critical appraisals of his coaching to be the best club in the country once again.



Fair point

_________________
If you allow the Government to change the Laws in an emergency
They will create an Emergency to change the Laws


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 10, 2008 4:29 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2005 10:12 am
Posts: 1730
Josh Kaplan wrote:
Quote:
Its also pretty obvious we have a game plan in place and the players are just getting used to it...compare it to the pagan years.


See right there is the mentality we need to get rid of.
Lets not compare naything to the Pagan years, lets compare everything we do to the Clarkson years at Hawthorn, or the Roos years ets.
Enough of this mentality that "things ar ebetter then they were under Pagan." No shit- we got rid of Pagan because he was the worst possible coach for our situation.
Lets set and abide by the highest of standards.. once again, Ratts will be judged at the end of this year by the board and everyone who matters, and as Ive said many times, we need to undergo ongoing critical appraisals of his coaching to be the best club in the country once again.


Good test this week for Ratts.
Malthouse won’t give Fev the space like he did last time.
We need more options then just bomb into Fev….we need to be smart rather then taking the easy option of just bombing it.
I reckon we will win or lose depending on how our forward line functions. At the very least we will break even with their midfield. They won’t have the capacity to go with Judd, Murphy, Stevens, Gibbs and Scotland.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 10, 2008 4:33 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:00 pm
Posts: 24647
Location: Kaloyasena
Rhys26 wrote:
Good test this week for Ratts.
Malthouse won’t give Fev the space like he did last time.
We need more options then just bomb into Fev….we need to be smart rather then taking the easy option of just bombing it.



Did you happen to notice the player that kicked 3 goals in the last quarter against Port Adelaide? :wink: :P

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

_________________
"Hence you will not say that Greeks fight like heroes but that heroes fight like Greeks"?

Winston Churchill


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 10, 2008 4:35 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:32 am
Posts: 10613
Agree Rhys. We should win the midfield battle and quite easily.
Our defence has done enough to indicate it will at the very least break even. It's our forward line that needs to start to put things together now and that will depend on structure and ball movement into it.

We should win this.

ps. They have no match up for Fev either. 8)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 10, 2008 4:40 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:12 am
Posts: 10408
Location: Coburg
Josh Kaplan wrote:
Quote:
Its also pretty obvious we have a game plan in place and the players are just getting used to it...compare it to the pagan years.


See right there is the mentality we need to get rid of.
Lets not compare naything to the Pagan years, lets compare everything we do to the Clarkson years at Hawthorn, or the Roos years ets.
Enough of this mentality that "things ar ebetter then they were under Pagan." No shit- we got rid of Pagan because he was the worst possible coach for our situation.
Lets set and abide by the highest of standards.. once again, Ratts will be judged at the end of this year by the board and everyone who matters, and as Ive said many times, we need to undergo ongoing critical appraisals of his coaching to be the best club in the country once again.


but if we do that Josh then lets compare them at the same stages.

Ratts first year v Clarkson's first year

not Ratts first year versus Clarkson's 3rd (or whatever).

_________________
This type of slight is alien in the more cultured part of the world - Walsh. Its up there with mad dogs, Englishmen and the midday sun!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 10, 2008 4:42 pm 
Offline
formerly Josh Kaplan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:19 pm
Posts: 2187
Quote:
but if we do that Josh then lets compare them at the same stages.

Ratts first year v Clarkson's first year

not Ratts first year versus Clarkson's 3rd (or whatever).


But if we chase the equivalent of a Clarkson 3rd year in Rattens first year, we need to be able to crystal ball a bit dont we?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 10, 2008 5:08 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2005 10:12 am
Posts: 1730
AGRO wrote:
Rhys26 wrote:
Good test this week for Ratts.
Malthouse won’t give Fev the space like he did last time.
We need more options then just bomb into Fev….we need to be smart rather then taking the easy option of just bombing it.



Did you happen to notice the player that kicked 3 goals in the last quarter against Port Adelaide? :wink: :P

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:


Sure did Agro. But I noticed that same player at one stage was in defence manning up on Westoff....strange move


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 10, 2008 5:23 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 12:32 pm
Posts: 3021
I think in 2008 we have got by more on spirit than a well drilled game plan.

How long does it take for a young team to execute a new game plan?

I think the biggest issue we have is we go to Fevola all the time, because we don't have any other target. We desperately need a Kreuzer to step up as a forward, or if he is seen as a ruck then we need to recruit a forward. Don't be surprised if we go flat out for a goal kicker during trade week.

That said, there are teams that don't even have one gun forward, who get good results, so is it the coach that needs to be looked at?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 10, 2008 5:36 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Tue May 16, 2006 8:57 pm
Posts: 6836
Virgin Blue wrote:
That said, there are teams that don't even have one gun forward, who get good results, so is it the coach that needs to be looked at?


the doggies have scored 60+ points more than any other team this year yet their leading goalkicker is 10th in the coleman and their 2nd leading goalkicker is 20th.

we need our mids to run harder, both forward and back. if we can get 6-7 goals a game out of juddy, murphy, gibbs, stevens, simpson (who are all very capable of kicking goals) added to 3-6 from fev, 1-2 each from fisher, fev and betts then that's about 17 a game just from them.

_________________
Last edited by true_blue3 on Mon Sep 26, 1981 5:07 pm; edited 92 times in total


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 10, 2008 9:24 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:22 pm
Posts: 1499
Location: Sydney
Josh Kaplan wrote:
Quote:
but if we do that Josh then lets compare them at the same stages.

Ratts first year v Clarkson's first year

not Ratts first year versus Clarkson's 3rd (or whatever).


But if we chase the equivalent of a Clarkson 3rd year in Rattens first year, we need to be able to crystal ball a bit dont we?


Clarkson didnt have the list we have but he also didnt mind shooting his mouth off a bit prematurely in his first year.

People rave about Paul Roo's and justifiably too but he only got the gig in the first place because of passionate support.

Woosha learnt from us in the first place and to be honest how much of his success can now be attributed to luck. West Coast had an obvious problem to those in the know - now he is either stupid or turns a blind eye.

Like you said let Ratts be judged on his season - preferably two in my opinion given we allowed pagan to let the cancer spread,


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 10, 2008 10:05 pm 
Offline
Bert Deacon
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 07, 2006 7:36 pm
Posts: 557
Location: In the coach's box
For all those that call Ratten conservative, think about how much the side has changed since last year. A number of players have been given first games or a regular spot without being 'Denised' (i.e sitting on the pine) such as Bower, Grigg, Hampson, Kreuzer, Browne, Armfield, Russell.

That's 1/3rd of the side....

_________________
17 4 10


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 10, 2008 10:12 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:00 pm
Posts: 24647
Location: Kaloyasena
Rhys26 wrote:
AGRO wrote:
Rhys26 wrote:
Good test this week for Ratts.
Malthouse won’t give Fev the space like he did last time.
We need more options then just bomb into Fev….we need to be smart rather then taking the easy option of just bombing it.



Did you happen to notice the player that kicked 3 goals in the last quarter against Port Adelaide? :wink: :P

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:


Sure did Agro. But I noticed that same player at one stage was in defence manning up on Westoff....strange move



I'm tipping he is going to spend a whole lot more time deep in our forward line in the back half of this season. :wink: :lol:

_________________
"Hence you will not say that Greeks fight like heroes but that heroes fight like Greeks"?

Winston Churchill


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jun 11, 2008 12:56 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 2:32 pm
Posts: 33043
Location: Back in reality
true_blue3 wrote:
Virgin Blue wrote:
That said, there are teams that don't even have one gun forward, who get good results, so is it the coach that needs to be looked at?


the doggies have scored 60+ points more than any other team this year yet their leading goalkicker is 10th in the coleman and their 2nd leading goalkicker is 20th.

we need our mids to run harder, both forward and back. if we can get 6-7 goals a game out of juddy, murphy, gibbs, stevens, simpson (who are all very capable of kicking goals) added to 3-6 from fev, 1-2 each from fisher, fev and betts then that's about 17 a game just from them.

The doggies also let quite a bit in the other way. They're a skilful side playing to their strengths. That's what I'd take away from their success.

_________________
29 different attributes,
And only 7 that you like;
20 ways to see the world,
Or 20 ways to start a fight.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 175 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Majestic-12 [Bot], Ocker and 39 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group