Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Tue Jul 01, 2025 3:21 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 10 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun May 27, 2007 8:46 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2007 5:32 pm
Posts: 1392
Location: Hobart
The Footy show today made much of Richo's non-mark because of the hands in the back. But have a look at Welsh's mark with five minutes to go inn the last quarter.
If his hands weren't in Hartletts back then I'll go he (whatever that means)

_________________
one you knock back is one you never have


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun May 27, 2007 10:29 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 5:18 pm
Posts: 1625
Location: Deep Blue Sea
Yep .... same thing ...... stupid rule. The rule must go !!!

_________________
"IF YOU FAIL TO PREPARE, YOU'RE PREPARED TO FAIL" - Mark Spitz


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 28, 2007 3:23 pm 
Offline
Bob Chitty

Joined: Wed May 03, 2006 8:22 pm
Posts: 816
That rule does not apply to us I've decided. There was some shocking examples of it last week - the two paid against Houlihan, yet in the second one Campbell had pushed back into Houlihan with two hands right in the middle of Whitnall's back.

That Welsh one was a disgrace and much worse than the one Fev was paid against him in the game against the Saints (that stopped our momentum). Also moments later in the Crows game, Fev got another shove in his back.

I think Fev must be the only forward in the competition that has had that free kick paid against him more than he has been awarded it!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 28, 2007 3:58 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 12:01 pm
Posts: 34549
Location: The Brown Wedge
Can't remember the quarter, but Simmo was paid one against in the goalsquare and from memory he used his hips to hold his ground.

Anyone remember this?

I wanna find the time and 1/4 to send in to KB and ask him to explain if that's an umpire error, or a correct interpretation of the rule :?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 28, 2007 4:06 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:32 am
Posts: 10613
The Duke wrote:
Can't remember the quarter, but Simmo was paid one against in the goalsquare and from memory he used his hips to hold his ground.


His so small the umpire must have confused his hip for his hands. :roll:
Seriously all this hysteria about "hands in the back" is just plain silly as the rule has been there since football's inception. It's just the AFL/Umpires let the glories 80's/90's high fliers (Capper) get away with it and hense open up the loop hole.
Get a brain AFL and stop making changes to suit in the first place. Remindes me of the bending of the elbow in cricket rule or should I say the "Muli" (can't spell his name) rule.! :oops:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 28, 2007 4:19 pm 
Offline
Horrie Clover

Joined: Mon Nov 27, 2006 1:43 pm
Posts: 322
The Duke wrote:
Can't remember the quarter, but Simmo was paid one against in the goalsquare and from memory he used his hips to hold his ground.

Anyone remember this?

I wanna find the time and 1/4 to send in to KB and ask him to explain if that's an umpire error, or a correct interpretation of the rule :?


i remeber this free,
i don't think the free was paid against simpson for hands in the back but the umpire said that the ball was not within 5 meters of the contest and simpson impeded his opponent

by the letter of the law technially there but not in the spirit of the game. IMO was good body positioning by simpson

the think that cost him is that the ball went over simpsons head, if he had of managed to get a hand to the ball it may have bene a different story.

lets go back to 1 umpire, so then we can only have 1 of them stuff the game up.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 28, 2007 4:25 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:00 pm
Posts: 24653
Location: Kaloyasena
BIBI01 wrote:
The Duke wrote:
Can't remember the quarter, but Simmo was paid one against in the goalsquare and from memory he used his hips to hold his ground.

Anyone remember this?

I wanna find the time and 1/4 to send in to KB and ask him to explain if that's an umpire error, or a correct interpretation of the rule :?


i remeber this free,
i don't think the free was paid against simpson for hands in the back but the umpire said that the ball was not within 5 meters of the contest and simpson impeded his opponent

by the letter of the law technially there but not in the spirit of the game. IMO was good body positioning by simpson

the think that cost him is that the ball went over simpsons head, if he had of managed to get a hand to the ball it may have bene a different story.

lets go back to 1 umpire, so then we can only have 1 of them stuff the game up.



Everyone knows I am not a Lance fan - but the one thing that he used to do was use his body intelligently in a marking or rucking contest - that element has been taken out of his game - because Jeff "The Bozo" Gieschen uses Lance as an example in that flowering Rules DVD.

Any time Lance uses his body in a marking contest the umpires free kick him in an almost "Pavlov's Dog" response. :roll:

Poor old Simmo copped it here as well - because the umpires saw a Carlton Jumper. Like ringing the dinner bell the umpire salivated and paid the free kick.

:roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll:

_________________
"Hence you will not say that Greeks fight like heroes but that heroes fight like Greeks"?

Winston Churchill


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 28, 2007 4:43 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:32 am
Posts: 10613
Couldn't agree more Agro. One thing that used to make it wonderfull was the body on body contest (without hands), yet the AFL in their wisdom decided to take this out of the game as well.

I like Basketball, always have always will, if only they could play it on a bigger ground where players could use their athleticism to run up and down the ground instead of a small sardine can, we would have the perfect game. :P

Just incase anyone was wondering, yep that was sarcasm.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 28, 2007 6:03 pm 
Offline
formerly Army the Wonderkid
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2005 8:30 pm
Posts: 2058
Location: The Burbs
I was really hoping this was a thread about Richard Marx - alas, I should've known better.

_________________
Formerly: Ackland the Wonderkid / Army the Wonderkid / quivering mess / molsey / Tony Lynn Fan Club


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 28, 2007 6:06 pm 
Offline
formerly Army the Wonderkid
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2005 8:30 pm
Posts: 2058
Location: The Burbs
BIBI01 wrote:
i remeber this free,
i don't think the free was paid against simpson for hands in the back but the umpire said that the ball was not within 5 meters of the contest and simpson impeded his opponent

by the letter of the law technially there but not in the spirit of the game. IMO was good body positioning by simpson


Except when you looked at to the top corner of the screen as Simmo went the bump and lo and behold, there was a football, about 2 metres above his head.

Shocking decision by a wanker of an Umpire giving away a goal to a team that didnt deserve it.

_________________
Formerly: Ackland the Wonderkid / Army the Wonderkid / quivering mess / molsey / Tony Lynn Fan Club


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 10 posts ] 

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Majestic-12 [Bot] and 45 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group