CK95 wrote:
CarltonClem wrote:
The problem that has been partly pointed out to some extent is the lack of space CAUSED BY PLAYERS ALL GOING TO THE SAME CONTEST, this only helps the defence, particularly if our forward pressure is poor.
The number of times that players have led to the same spot, the same flank, the same pocket and left the other flank/pocket wide open with no options anywhere near that space is ridiculous.
There was no one front and square yesterday either. Not taking marks in F50 is one problem but if you can't mark you get it off the ground - we didn't do that either. Midfielders, again, didn't work hard enough. Forward line, didn't work hard enough.
Also we desperately miss players that can apply forward line pressure and actually keep the ball in the fwd 50. Like Hickmont & Hamill did in 99/2000. Where were the forced turnovers, chases, bumps, & TACKLES THAT STUCK in the fwd line on Sat.
But to me the other main thing it comes down to is our lack of height. When the ball came into their 50, we were forced to man up, when it came into ours, they could afford to zone off and away they went.
Gorget about zoning off and forward pressure, lack of height.
WE COULDN'T and DIDN'T want to get the bloody ball!!! All the rest is secondary. Talk about game plans all you like - first option is get the bloody thing, second option, chase tackle and harrass the opposition till you get the bloody thing. Football is a terribly simple game. If you get it and weant it more than the opposition you win the game.
We didn't want it, nor did we try and get it anywhere near as much as what they did.
Complete lack of passion from our so-called stars. Whitnall was just ok, but as a backman!!
I hope one thing happened after the game. And that is that as Dennis was scanning the room he singled out Fevola and said to him in no uncertain terms - "You owe this team 10 next week Fev!!!"