Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Sat May 10, 2025 6:21 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 56 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun May 08, 2005 8:12 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:10 am
Posts: 4827
Mick....the paddock is outdated..you need a great clearance rate to beat the flood and other tactics similar. I agree with 50/50 you can have more success but my point is that aint always possible and you need marking talls who can take a grab when the flood is on and the paddock has the entire opposition herd grazing in it....a Brown, Reiwoldt,Tredrae ,Hall etc can still be dangerous even with poor midfield input..we cant have a CHF who is totally dependent on good delivery...its the good CHF..key position players who takes the marks against the run of play.
Lance will never be that player IMO...maybe if we can get a Brown then Lance can fill other roles but 500K a year for a player who needs it lace out..?????


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun May 08, 2005 8:13 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2005 8:39 am
Posts: 7507
Location: Within the Tao except when I am here.
A lot of your post makes sense Tyrant.

_________________
A pessimist sees the difficulty in every opportunity; an optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty" -Winston Churchill

L.M 35-06


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun May 08, 2005 8:16 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Sat Apr 09, 2005 9:27 pm
Posts: 1376
Location: Melbourne
that almost makes good sense Tyrant now to see if that can be implimented and Bingo forward problem solved as long as we get decent delivery in the forward line and the midfield know where to kick it.

Well it soulded like you made sense now just has to be put into action lol


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: TYRANTS FOR DEATH
PostPosted: Sun May 08, 2005 8:27 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 7:40 pm
Posts: 7185
Good for you Death.Absolutely agree regards Lance.Reckon Dennis needs to let him try it his way.What the bloody hell can you lose.Lance is a marvel at opening up the play for others.
We are all doom and gloom at the moment,but at least you have had a go Death.Sat down,nutted it out,and come up with an alternative.Might be a complete disaster but id sooner stuff up trying something than twiddling my thumbs and hope..........Always a tad outside left field our TFDeath.

_________________
All my dangerous friends


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun May 08, 2005 8:43 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:35 am
Posts: 20169
Location: 父 父 父 父 父 父
BlueWorld wrote:
bluehammer wrote:
To single out players after the most woeful team effort since Rd 22 2002 is a disgrace

I'm happy to heap scorn on the team as a whole because there were 23 weak links out there yesterday.



When we lost to Essendon*?

22 players. Who's the 23rd?


Denis Pagan.

He was outcoached yesterday.

But you did get me on the other one. I meant 2003 against North...

_________________
Congratulations CK95


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun May 08, 2005 8:47 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2005 6:23 am
Posts: 1687
Location: Smorgyland Village North Carlton
Whilst picking over the corpse of a performance yesterday........
If T-Lo gets game next week it should be considered down payment for his brother.
To borrow from Billy's wife in City Slickers he need to go to Preston and "find his smile".
Having written this he'll put in a blinder.
I can't see dead people, but a can see Sporn, and DeLuca, would enjoy some "hey honey look at me" red time with a giant white ant on their chest.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun May 08, 2005 9:08 pm 
Offline
Adrian Gallagher
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:50 pm
Posts: 74
Location: Dimension X
...FEV - FF
WAITE - CHF
FISHER/Setanta - 3rd target
LAPPIN/BETTS/etc etc - around them
WHITNALL - anywhere he wants...

Love the thinking behind this. Lance set free would be of benefit because he's so creating. BUT, Lappin back into the backline (to be creative too) and someone else, medium-small to support Eddie at ground level.

_________________
Galaxies in the grain...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun May 08, 2005 9:29 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:24 am
Posts: 1217
Location: Melbourne
Synbad wrote:
I think the problem with Lance is he is over 100 kgs again.


Is this because he has an injury, or has he stopped doing the work?

_________________
"Two roads diverged in a wood,
and I,
I took the one less travelled by,
and that has made all the difference."

Robert Frost


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 08, 2005 9:53 pm 
Offline
Bob Chitty
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:44 pm
Posts: 890
Al Bundy the legend wrote:
What happen to Whitnall he was so good at the wizard cup i think the next 15 weeks we will see if he will be playing for Carlton next year.Today was the day he should have kicked a bag of goals but he didn't do much.


For G-d's SAKE
What did you want him to do yesterday?

I suppose you blame Teague for not being able to stop Stafford as well!!!!!!

_________________
Stay tuned We're in for a BUMPY ride


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 08, 2005 10:03 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
SHHH! wrote:
Al Bundy the legend wrote:
What happen to Whitnall he was so good at the wizard cup i think the next 15 weeks we will see if he will be playing for Carlton next year.Today was the day he should have kicked a bag of goals but he didn't do much.


For G-d's SAKE
What did you want him to do yesterday?

I suppose you blame Teague for not being able to stop Stafford as well!!!!!!

the problem with Lance is he is like a credit card... after a while you have to start getting back into the black... hes been living off credit for a few years and he is one that is under the microscope when the team is down.
We need to see some deposits in the account.
So even if he it wasnt his fault that we lost again he hasnt been making deposits to bring us back into the black.. hes on a big wicket!!! He needs to perform like he would have to in any business environment.. Footy is the only business environment you can live as extravagently for so long as some of these guys have.

Its frustrating isnt it?
What do we want him to do???

Well Lance knows whats required and being just another rat on a sinking ship isnt enough... Give the man a bucket and let him bail some of the water out.!!!

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun May 08, 2005 11:37 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 9:26 pm
Posts: 4719
Location: Parliament House, Canberra
The problem that has been partly pointed out to some extent is the lack of space CAUSED BY PLAYERS ALL GOING TO THE SAME CONTEST, this only helps the defence, particularly if our forward pressure is poor.

The number of times that players have led to the same spot, the same flank, the same pocket and left the other flank/pocket wide open with no options anywhere near that space is ridiculous.

There was no one front and square yesterday either. Not taking marks in F50 is one problem but if you can't mark you get it off the ground - we didn't do that either. Midfielders, again, didn't work hard enough. Forward line, didn't work hard enough.

_________________
"A good composer does not initiate. He steals."

- Igor Stravinsky


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 09, 2005 1:57 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:06 pm
Posts: 35682
Location: Half back flank
CarltonClem wrote:
The problem that has been partly pointed out to some extent is the lack of space CAUSED BY PLAYERS ALL GOING TO THE SAME CONTEST, this only helps the defence, particularly if our forward pressure is poor.

The number of times that players have led to the same spot, the same flank, the same pocket and left the other flank/pocket wide open with no options anywhere near that space is ridiculous.

There was no one front and square yesterday either. Not taking marks in F50 is one problem but if you can't mark you get it off the ground - we didn't do that either. Midfielders, again, didn't work hard enough. Forward line, didn't work hard enough.


Also we desperately miss players that can apply forward line pressure and actually keep the ball in the fwd 50. Like Hickmont & Hamill did in 99/2000. Where were the forced turnovers, chases, bumps, & TACKLES THAT STUCK in the fwd line on Sat.

But to me the other main thing it comes down to is our lack of height. When the ball came into their 50, we were forced to man up, when it came into ours, they could afford to zone off and away they went.

_________________
#DonTheStash


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 09, 2005 2:13 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:17 am
Posts: 8128
CK95 wrote:
Also we desperately miss players that can apply forward line pressure and actually keep the ball in the fwd 50. Like Hickmont & Hamill did in 99/2000. Where were the forced turnovers, chases, bumps, & TACKLES THAT STUCK in the fwd line on Sat.


I agree. Here's a quote taken from Bozman's Bullants match review in talkingbullants
http://www.talkingcarlton.com/phpBB2/vi ... php?t=1997
Quote:
Bryan - have seen bryan play a few times - he didnt seem to dominate at the tap outs - but still played a nice game and did one thing that impressed me immensely - he was chasing a defender who was taking the ball out of the backline and another player tried to shephard him. Instead of doing the houla thing and avoiding the shepherder - bryan actually gained speed, ran straight throught the guy, put him on his ass, and then the person with the ball, not expecting bryan to get thru was in all sorts and turned the ball over. great stuff.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 09, 2005 2:28 pm 
Offline
Garry Crane

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:18 pm
Posts: 296
Location: Outside Demetriou's Office - shhh!
CK95 wrote:
CarltonClem wrote:
The problem that has been partly pointed out to some extent is the lack of space CAUSED BY PLAYERS ALL GOING TO THE SAME CONTEST, this only helps the defence, particularly if our forward pressure is poor.

The number of times that players have led to the same spot, the same flank, the same pocket and left the other flank/pocket wide open with no options anywhere near that space is ridiculous.

There was no one front and square yesterday either. Not taking marks in F50 is one problem but if you can't mark you get it off the ground - we didn't do that either. Midfielders, again, didn't work hard enough. Forward line, didn't work hard enough.


Also we desperately miss players that can apply forward line pressure and actually keep the ball in the fwd 50. Like Hickmont & Hamill did in 99/2000. Where were the forced turnovers, chases, bumps, & TACKLES THAT STUCK in the fwd line on Sat.

But to me the other main thing it comes down to is our lack of height. When the ball came into their 50, we were forced to man up, when it came into ours, they could afford to zone off and away they went.


Gorget about zoning off and forward pressure, lack of height.

WE COULDN'T and DIDN'T want to get the bloody ball!!! All the rest is secondary. Talk about game plans all you like - first option is get the bloody thing, second option, chase tackle and harrass the opposition till you get the bloody thing. Football is a terribly simple game. If you get it and weant it more than the opposition you win the game.

We didn't want it, nor did we try and get it anywhere near as much as what they did.

Complete lack of passion from our so-called stars. Whitnall was just ok, but as a backman!!

I hope one thing happened after the game. And that is that as Dennis was scanning the room he singled out Fevola and said to him in no uncertain terms - "You owe this team 10 next week Fev!!!"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 09, 2005 2:55 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:41 pm
Posts: 4623
Laguna...sure you're not Pagan???

Going to be intersting against the cats...not a lot of big forwards but one small goal kicker out (Chapman)....containing Ablett form kicking goals will be tricky but doable...may mean we can actually have a forward structure of Whitts, Fev (right in the goal square), Betts (please stay down- even lead into space). ..
we'll see...here's hoping for a good game!

_________________
“Every single element of the Club has to be the best in the league, meticulously and methodically, and only by doing this will we be elite and challenge for number 17.”
Greg Lee


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 09, 2005 3:46 pm 
Offline
formerly Josh Kaplan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:19 pm
Posts: 2187
Gee Tyrant speaks sense
Hope the clubs reading this post and a few others on this forum at the moment. Couldnt do any harm...
What are our connections to the club like now with this new forum btw?


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 56 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Timmy D and 140 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group