Bad News - Scotland & Campo Cited

killpies · **Posted:** Tue Apr 12, 2005 8:12 am

H/S article: Tribunal: Blues want Pie to testify

ScottSaunders · **Posted:** Tue Apr 12, 2005 9:57 am

scotland will get off.

its not an eye gouge

you can see that he is "grabbing" but the second he realises its a face you can see he hand release it.

if lockyer testifying and showing no scratches or anything like that, and considering his history, i reckon he has a real show to get off.

campo - reckless - take the week

camel · **Posted:** Tue Apr 12, 2005 10:02 am

I'm surprised Lockyer has escaped scrutiny for the jab to the head of Davies which is what I'm guessing led to Scotland's actions, as in Heath was retaliating after seeing his teammate get a smack in the chops.

Whatever, Scotland's actions don't look good. If he got off Scot free I'd be surprised.

I also reckon Campo should take the week that's been offered.

Kaptain Kouta · **Joined:** Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:41 pm **Posts:** 63509

A part of me still wants to see Campo contest the charge, lose and get 2 weeks. 1 for the offence, and the other for being an a-grade flower when his team needed leadership.

Blue Bird · **Posted:** Tue Apr 12, 2005 10:09 am

tommi wrote:

Yeah nah..........

not good for Scotland........but Campo's
now got 692.19 points..........!

is that good.......or bad.........?

i think it's good........i mean 692.19 points....
that's a lot of points.....as far as points go........!

good for you Campo........your the points leader......!

kindest regards tommi

Yes but Tommi stats don't mean anything. :wink:

Mrs Caz · **Posted:** Tue Apr 12, 2005 10:11 am

Release from the club:

Scott Camporeale has accepted a one-game suspension for striking Collingwood's Brodie Holland during last Saturday's match at the MCG.

Blue Bird · **Posted:** Tue Apr 12, 2005 10:20 am

Thanks Caz.

Very disappointing Campo. You are one of our leaders and it will mean a heavier load for your team-mates next week. Having said that God I wish we had someone with a bit of mongrel who would take out the taggers. :evil:

SurreyBlue · **Joined:** Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:32 am **Posts:** 10477

Blue Bird wrote:

Having said that God I wish we had someone with a bit of mongrel who would take out the taggers. :evil:

They would only get suspended every second week BB. Unlike other teams, we are not allowed to protect our own players.

buzzaaaah · **Joined:** Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:31 am **Posts:** 17892

Blue Bird wrote:

Thanks Caz.

Very disappointing Campo. You are one of our leaders and it will mean a heavier load for your team-mates next week. Having said that God I wish we had someone with a bit of mongrel who would take out the taggers. :evil:

I think your second statement is very important. While we all think Campo should have known better it is very difficult for a "non physical" player like Campo to take the punishment that he does without reacting ever. He gets no support from the umpires and Carlton hasnt got a player who intimidates the competition. If an Adelaide player gets roughed up, Riccuito is there, for brisbane its Voss, Michael, Brown, Kangas its Archer, so on so on
We need a mongrel that puts a bit of fear in opposition players.

Big Danny G · **Joined:** Wed Mar 09, 2005 10:13 pm **Posts:** 219

buzzaaaah wrote:

Blue Bird wrote:

Thanks Caz.

Very disappointing Campo. You are one of our leaders and it will mean a heavier load for your team-mates next week. Having said that God I wish we had someone with a bit of mongrel who would take out the taggers. :evil:

I think your second statement is very important. While we all think Campo should have known better it is very difficult for a "non physical" player like Campo to take the punishment that he does without reacting ever. He gets no support from the umpires and Carlton hasnt got a player who intimidates the competition. If an Adelaide player gets roughed up, Riccuito is there, for brisbane its Voss, Michael, Brown, Kangas its Archer, so on so on
We need a mongrel that puts a bit of fear in opposition players.

Setanta

No1Blue · **Joined:** Mon Apr 11, 2005 5:29 pm **Posts:** 2712

the fact thata failed appeal at the tribunal means an extra week suspension is a disgrace. That rule is totally unfair and I think something needs tobe done about it. Every player should have the right to contest a decision.

Why should you be shot down for it? What do you guys think?

The Vet · **Posted:** Tue Apr 12, 2005 7:47 pm

Quote:

Carlton also confirmed midfielder Scott Camporeale would undergo surgery this week to repair a fractured cheekbone, suffered in a clash of heads with Magpie Andrew Williams.

[url=http://foxsports.news.com.au/story/0,8659,12834000-23211,00.html]Blues to pin faith in defence
[/url]

phoenix johnson · **Posted:** Tue Apr 12, 2005 7:50 pm

Quote:

Blues recruits Troy Longmuir (from Fremantle) and Callum Chambers (West Coast) are in line to make their Carlton debuts, with Camporeale out and Heath Scotland before the tribunal tonight.

Finally...

Bluesboy70 · **Joined:** Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:19 pm **Posts:** 140

Blue Bird wrote:

Thanks Caz.

Very disappointing Campo. You are one of our leaders and it will mean a heavier load for your team-mates next week. Having said that God I wish we had someone with a bit of mongrel who would take out the taggers. :evil:

Both got what they deserved (No Campo should have got longer for stupidity) Strip this idiot of the V/C now and give to someone that deserves it like Lappin. Good to have some mongrel, but idiocy as shown by Campo should not be tolerated

Bad News - Scotland & Campo Cited

Who is online