Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Sun Jun 01, 2025 11:01 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 707 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28 ... 36  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2025
PostPosted: Tue Apr 29, 2025 1:18 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 24915
Location: Bondi Beach
Crusader wrote:
bondiblue wrote:
Crusader wrote:
If De Koning is going, then we need a ready-made replacement on a better (cheaper) rate. I can’t see that coming through the MSD.

Pittonet & Skull, with Young, Lemmey & McKay as the relief is an ok ruck solution… but still probably one short.

We’d be sailing a bit close to the wind injury-wise if we add a development ruck, and a state league stalwart does nothing for us in the here & now.

If we are going to take another top up player this year (#46 on the list), I think it has to address one of the options that we’ve lost.

Ben, Lucas & Binns aren’t Jagga, but they’re pretty close to ready. Docherty & Lord are already on the fringes… I think we’re ok for mids.

Cincotta (hopefully) comes back. Cowan is already back. Newman is confident, but it’s a long shot… still, I think we’re ok for half backs.

We were already light on for goal kickers when Kemp went down. Cripps is doing pretty well, but repurposing our best mid can’t be the answer. We need a medium forward.


Next year O’Keefe may be finding his groove. Let’s see where he’s at by end of year. Wasn’t that good last week imo. He’s bigger, and perhaps stronger this year, but I’m not seeing that aggression he showed in his first year.

If Pitto gets injured we would rely on Young and O’Keefe, or Young and McKay. That’s competitive but vs Marshall and TDK, or Darcy and Jackson, or O’Reiley and Tilthorpe, or Cameron and Cox….etc I feel if we can find a stronger ruck against the big bodied rucks would be handy.

I’ve got fingers crossed O’Keefe improves his forward craft, because there’s a spot there since Kemp went down. Someone like TDK who can mark and hunt ground ball.

Yeah, I guess what I’m saying is that if we’re replacing De Koning, it’ll be with Cameron or Darcy. Not a Crossley or Downie type.

We’ll probably spend every bit if that $1.1m on the table to find one.


I noticed your post re dead set think O'Farrell is ready to step up.

He's not big and strong, but he's a damn good footballer and bloody good mark. He wouldnt be out of place.

One huge preseason and who knows.....this kid is a keeper.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2025
PostPosted: Sat May 03, 2025 10:31 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 6:36 am
Posts: 6343
Missed the game
Obviously a poor day


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2025
PostPosted: Sun May 04, 2025 6:23 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2011 10:17 pm
Posts: 2052
Something has to give at the end of this season

We have fallen into the trap again of investing too much salary into too few players

It has come at the expense of player depth in the squad

As soon as we suffer a few injuries, we get exposed

There is little quality youth in the seconds. Bringing Doherty back in the team smacked of desperation. He is finished.

May mean we allow TDK to go and find multiple players that meet our needs.

I think we are a muddling side at best and it is time to take a step back and regenerate the list


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2025
PostPosted: Sun May 04, 2025 9:30 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 6:36 am
Posts: 6343
[quote="WOW"]Something has to give at the end of this season

We have fallen into the trap again of investing too much salary into too few players

It has come at the expense of player depth in the squad

As soon as we suffer a few injuries, we get exposed

There is little quality youth in the seconds. Bringing Doherty back in the team smacked of desperation. He is finished.

May mean we allow TDK to go and find multiple players that meet our needs.

I think we are a muddling side at best and it is time to take a step back and regenerate the list[/
quote]


And you have to do it at the end of this year
With Tasmania coming in
I’m happy to have DeKoning go and with a big salary get a top 5 pick compo
Ruckman are disposable and O’Keefe can develop
Happy to trade McKay
If we pay half his salary at least it frees up a players wage
That’s 2 first rounders and Jagga Smith
And there is talent in the lower leagues
Find them and recruit them for a bag of chips
Clearly list management has been poor
No depth
If we don’t do this we are going to be average at best for the next few years


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2025
PostPosted: Sun May 04, 2025 3:04 pm 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2005 12:18 pm
Posts: 9736
Location: Australia
keogh wrote:
WOW wrote:
Something has to give at the end of this season

We have fallen into the trap again of investing too much salary into too few players

It has come at the expense of player depth in the squad

As soon as we suffer a few injuries, we get exposed

There is little quality youth in the seconds. Bringing Doherty back in the team smacked of desperation. He is finished.

May mean we allow TDK to go and find multiple players that meet our needs.

I think we are a muddling side at best and it is time to take a step back and regenerate the list[/
quote]


And you have to do it at the end of this year
With Tasmania coming in
I’m happy to have DeKoning go and with a big salary get a top 5 pick compo
Ruckman are disposable and O’Keefe can develop
Happy to trade McKay
If we pay half his salary at least it frees up a players wage
That’s 2 first rounders and Jagga Smith
And there is talent in the lower leagues
Find them and recruit them for a bag of chips
Clearly list management has been poor
No depth
If we don’t do this we are going to be average at best for the next few years


I have to agree with these last two posts, there was a good article on Hawthorn in the age today, how they’ve been ruthless in moving players if there’s a hint that they’re clogging the list. They’ve moved some in too early but overall they’ve faired very well not holding onto good players too long with sentimentality. They’ve contrast with this Essendon* holding on too long to layers but we aren’t that far behind, Essendon* are just worse.

Watching the twos we have O’Keefe and Pittonet running around doing a good job. We can afford to let TDK go for a couple of good draft picks. Same with Harry, we have Young, Lemmey and O’Keefe who could all fill his role at minimum pay while we get a few good draft picks. Docherty’s time has come too.

We give too many chances to players like Acres, McGovern, and Motlop.

We need to be ruthless in team selection and ruthless in not holding onto too many highly paid players.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2025
PostPosted: Sun May 04, 2025 3:24 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter

Joined: Thu May 11, 2006 6:11 pm
Posts: 14965
This from BF by one of the ITK posters;

Club not budging on offer to TDK
Assumption at this stage is that he is leaving and taking the $$ elsewhere.
Mentioned in the media during the week that TDK's contract negotiations is impacting other Carlton player deals... however it's also holding up a potential deal for a very good player that have lined up and can only bring in if TDK leaves.
This year the club will look to strengthen the list management team.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2025
PostPosted: Sun May 04, 2025 3:26 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2017 1:55 pm
Posts: 6438
kezza wrote:
This from BF by one of the ITK posters;

Club not budging on offer to TDK
Assumption at this stage is that he is leaving and taking the $$ elsewhere.
Mentioned in the media during the week that TDK's contract negotiations is impacting other Carlton player deals... however it's also holding up a potential deal for a very good player that have lined up and can only bring in if TDK leaves.
This year the club will look to strengthen the list management team.

If true, good to see some logic being applied.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2025
PostPosted: Sun May 04, 2025 4:24 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 8:42 pm
Posts: 2458
Location: Princess Park
Without a first rounder this year we've got to trade to get an early pick.

It's H for me, rather keep TDK if we can.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2025
PostPosted: Sun May 04, 2025 4:49 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 6:36 am
Posts: 6343
I reckon Hudson O’ Keefe is going ok
Has gone past Pitto
Judging by the stats today only Binns ,O’Keefe and Boyd deserve a game on Friday night


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2025
PostPosted: Sun May 04, 2025 5:36 pm 
Offline
formerly Fevola

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 1:57 pm
Posts: 4760
Problem is that TDk is a restricted free agent. Depends where we finish, we won’t get anywhere the value that he is worth. The money thrown around he is worth 2 first rounders and we won’t get that.

We are hampered unless we match and trade.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2025
PostPosted: Sun May 04, 2025 6:44 pm 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2005 12:18 pm
Posts: 9736
Location: Australia
keogh wrote:
I reckon Hudson O’ Keefe is going ok
Has gone past Pitto
Judging by the stats today only Binns, O’Keefe, and Boyd deserve a game on Friday night


O’Keefe mainly played as a key forward and relieving ruck, Pittonet was much more dominant in the ruck than O’Keefe and played very well. O’Keefe really impressed as a key forward. The problem is that we already have Harry and Young as options for key fwd/second ruck, and I don’t think O’Keefe is any better than Young yet in that role as Young has been in good form in that role this year. So not sure what role you’d have Hudson play if you selected him as the only tall role open is as key defender replacing Young.

Agree on Binns and Boyd, Lucas and Ben also went ok, but didn’t demand a promotion.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2025
PostPosted: Sun May 04, 2025 9:16 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 7:40 pm
Posts: 7259
sinbagger wrote:
keogh wrote:
I reckon Hudson O’ Keefe is going ok
Has gone past Pitto
Judging by the stats today only Binns, O’Keefe, and Boyd deserve a game on Friday night


O’Keefe mainly played as a key forward and relieving ruck, Pittonet was much more dominant in the ruck than O’Keefe and played very well. O’Keefe really impressed as a key forward. The problem is that we already have Harry and Young as options for key fwd/second ruck, and I don’t think O’Keefe is any better than Young yet in that role as Young has been in good form in that role this year. So not sure what role you’d have Hudson play if you selected him as the only tall role open is as key defender replacing Young.

Agree on Binns and Boyd, Lucas and Ben also went ok, but didn’t demand a promotion.


I watched the Magoo's today and everything you have stated is spot on Sin's . Binns just keeps finding the football and on that alone he should get a go . Trouble withs Binns though is he doesn't attack the ball hard enough and that alone will get you in the bad books with Voss . All the same , I would give him a go rather than die wondering whether he has the kahunas or not . Boydy , geez he's playing angry . Seems to be getting in a lot of blue's . Probably the frustration of playing in the seconds . I"ll take my hat off to HOK coz he has come on in leaps and bounds with his Achilles heal in overhead marking . Improved out of sight in this aspect of his game .

_________________
All my dangerous friends


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2025
PostPosted: Mon May 05, 2025 10:44 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 24915
Location: Bondi Beach
Mickstar wrote:
sinbagger wrote:
keogh wrote:
I reckon Hudson O’ Keefe is going ok
Has gone past Pitto
Judging by the stats today only Binns, O’Keefe, and Boyd deserve a game on Friday night


O’Keefe mainly played as a key forward and relieving ruck, Pittonet was much more dominant in the ruck than O’Keefe and played very well. O’Keefe really impressed as a key forward. The problem is that we already have Harry and Young as options for key fwd/second ruck, and I don’t think O’Keefe is any better than Young yet in that role as Young has been in good form in that role this year. So not sure what role you’d have Hudson play if you selected him as the only tall role open is as key defender replacing Young.

Agree on Binns and Boyd, Lucas and Ben also went ok, but didn’t demand a promotion.


I watched the Magoo's today and everything you have stated is spot on Sin's . Binns just keeps finding the football and on that alone he should get a go . Trouble withs Binns though is he doesn't attack the ball hard enough and that alone will get you in the bad books with Voss . All the same , I would give him a go rather than die wondering whether he has the kahunas or not . Boydy , geez he's playing angry . Seems to be getting in a lot of blue's . Probably the frustration of playing in the seconds . I"ll take my hat off to HOK coz he has come on in leaps and bounds with his Achilles heal in overhead marking . Improved out of sight in this aspect of his game .



I agree with both posts above….
OKeefes marking has gone to another level I think because he’s stronger and fitter but moreso because he’s moving around, not standing on a spot.but…..

Pitto is a heavier set ruckman who can compete with the Marshalls, Darcy’s, OReillys Nankervis types, and I don’t think OKeefe is at that stage yet,

I thought of Crusader watching the VFL. I thought he looked more capable than ever. I’d like to see him Fwd- Ruck if Young was needed in defense or ruck.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2025
PostPosted: Thu May 08, 2025 3:37 pm 
Offline
Horrie Clover

Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2021 2:17 pm
Posts: 388
just a Question ,charlie do we trade him while he still has value and get a couple of early picks ,i just don't trust his legs anymore i dont want same scenario in 26 ??????


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2025
PostPosted: Thu May 08, 2025 5:04 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2005 4:04 pm
Posts: 7548
Location: Bendigo
jpulice1969 wrote:
just a Question ,charlie do we trade him while he still has value and get a couple of early picks ,i just don't trust his legs anymore i dont want same scenario in 26 ??????

Just an answer… No. @#$%&! off.

_________________
"The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter" - Winston Churchill.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2025
PostPosted: Thu May 08, 2025 5:08 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:32 am
Posts: 10534
WOW wrote:
Something has to give at the end of this season

We have fallen into the trap again of investing too much salary into too few players

It has come at the expense of player depth in the squad

As soon as we suffer a few injuries, we get exposed

There is little quality youth in the seconds. Bringing Doherty back in the team smacked of desperation. He is finished.

May mean we allow TDK to go and find multiple players that meet our needs.

I think we are a muddling side at best and it is time to take a step back and regenerate the list


Simple answer to all of this is No. including salary into too few. Offers from others were much, much more.
Problem is we delisted our depth and now find ourselves exposed with kids not ready.
I’m not going to name the players delisted and traded but they were our depth.
Just sh1t management……either drafting, developing, trading, etc.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2025
PostPosted: Fri May 09, 2025 10:12 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 24915
Location: Bondi Beach
SurreyBlue wrote:
WOW wrote:
Something has to give at the end of this season

We have fallen into the trap again of investing too much salary into too few players

It has come at the expense of player depth in the squad

As soon as we suffer a few injuries, we get exposed

There is little quality youth in the seconds. Bringing Doherty back in the team smacked of desperation. He is finished.

May mean we allow TDK to go and find multiple players that meet our needs.

I think we are a muddling side at best and it is time to take a step back and regenerate the list


Simple answer to all of this is No. including salary into too few. Offers from others were much, much more.
Problem is we delisted our depth and now find ourselves exposed with kids not ready.
I’m not going to name the players delisted and traded but they were our depth.
Just sh1t management……either drafting, developing, trading, etc.


Spot on.

Surround Charlie with players with the right tools, in form and hungry for success, and his value to the team is immense.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2025
PostPosted: Tue May 13, 2025 3:18 pm 
Offline
Horrie Clover

Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2021 2:17 pm
Posts: 388
wow charlie stays move on


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2025
PostPosted: Tue May 13, 2025 8:04 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter

Joined: Thu May 11, 2006 6:11 pm
Posts: 14965
I just watched the Fox show The Midweek tackle.
Motlop keen to stay and a contract will be done.
Newman will not be put on the long term injury list and a new contract will be done sooner rather than later.
Kemp will wait until later in the year.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: List Management 2025
PostPosted: Tue May 13, 2025 11:03 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:32 am
Posts: 10534
Hope we don’t wait too long for Kemp and allow someone to swoop. I’ll be pissed.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 707 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28 ... 36  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: DesEnglish, Google [Bot], GWS, windy and 55 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group