Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Sun Jun 01, 2025 11:03 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 115 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue May 13, 2025 9:43 am 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 1:09 pm
Posts: 5914
Sydney Blue wrote:
Blue Vain wrote:
Cazzesman wrote:
St Kilda v Carlton - Coaches votes


7 Nick Haynes CARL
6 George Hewett CARL
5 Nasiah Wanganeen-Milera STK
5 Harry McKay CARL
4 Jack Sinclair STK
2 Patrick Cripps CARL
1 Jack Silvagni CARL

Regards Cazzesman


So our 2 highest ranking players were acquired as free agents? No draft picks involved?
Can't be right. I thought our list management was atrocious. :?
Mind you, they're probably top 5 in our B&F as well.
Cherry picked one game to justify recruitment.
Just a little reminder we are 4 wins 5 losses
We need to win 9 out 14 games to scrape into the bottom of the 8. 7 of those 14 games are against teams that are currently sitting higher on the ladder with another game interstate where we have only won about 4 games in the last 40 years and another on a ground we just played at last week and got flogged by 60 points

Sure one game of coaches votes surely vindicates our recruitment



Sent from my SM-F956B using Tapatalk

Win the next 4 and we need 5 from 10

_________________
░L░I░N░K░I░N░B░I░O ░


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 13, 2025 1:41 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 24915
Location: Bondi Beach
keogh wrote:
bondiblue wrote:
keogh wrote:
GreatEx wrote:
windy wrote:
Thanks for that Keogh.


:) I was looking at the Haynes thread yesterday and keogh still hasn't said anything except he's crap


Yeah he has been good after a slow start
But the thing is why did we get him
Because are window is open
Face it it’s shut
What we needed defensively is another key back and another running half back creative with ball in hand
Where I really got it wrong was underrating JOS
Been terrific

Captain obvious would say we need a running half back but know we go for a 32 interceptor who is an average kick. I know we didn’t get Houston but still
Haynes is not creative with ball in hand
Reckon Saad is a shadow of the player he was too


Haynes Doesn’t take the game on
And often plays loose in defence on smaller forwards
Does it a bit easy


You don't know anything about Haines and yet you still have a go at him every week....because of his age. WTF
You must laugh at Geelong and Collingwood.

Haines is a great kick. He's craetive and penetrating. He's a quick decision maker. That's why he's a cut above most.
He sees the game clearer than most. He watches it unfold. Its a knack, a skill and something most players wish they have. You should appreciate what he does have that others don't.

You've read the reasons why we convinced Haines to play for us but choose to forget the explananations to continue your shameless attack on his existence at Carlton.

Give the guy a break.

Youre the only one I know in Australia giving him a bake.

He doesnt intercept marks because he's playing against a smaller player. You're thinking of those 2 marks he took out marking Close v Cats one on one. He takes 10 a game.

His opponents dont kickl goals against him. round 1 when he had his shocking moments (2), his opponent only kicked 1 goal. His opponents haven't been able to get off his leash, but Haines gets away from them wiith ease to helphis team mates because he sees the game unfold. Its an art. He turns his artform into an elite interception.

Blind Freddy can see how important he is to us.

Fair suck of the Sav.

Our window is still open. Not closed because you said so.
Its a long season. Enjoy the wins.
See Swans 2004. We play the same ugly style of pressure and contest. It works. We only just got started.


The game continues to evolve
One area that has become really important is HBF that are creative with their kicking
We have 2 down back who can do that
Mc Govern who is hot and cold with his disposal
Saad who has dropped off. Opposition teams make sure he is sat on more
I would like to see Boyd given a go because he could be that player
Haynes Is courageous
He reads it well and is a good interceptor
But the knock on him is his age for a start
You don’t recruit a guy his age unless you think you have a specific need to get there quickly
That need is a guy who can create by foot through the back half
Haynes doesn’t do that
For a guy who plays where he plays he should be gaining more than 223 m and have one inside 50 per game as was the case last night
That’s the knock on him and the club recruiting him to play

What is obvious is the difference between the top teams and teams like us and StKilda is forward ball movement
Look at Thursday nights game
Collingwood have 28 less inside 50s and win with no key forwards

Haynes has improved
But he doesn’t add to what we need


Winning Premierships depends on game plan, personnell and injury...an a bit of luck.

There's no one game plan that stands out from the rest, and not all game plans are the same.
To suggest the "modern" game is whatever you think, and its innovative is naive.

Teams struggle to score against us and we play a style that takes away strengths of other teams.
Our kicking for goal has been what has let us down playing "our way". Injury hasn't helped either.

To suggest 223m gained is not good enough for the role Haynes plays, tells me you have inside knowledge on the role Haynes plays or you're making up an argument.
That is so naive. We play team defense. Sometimes our designated kicker is Newman, other weeks it was Gov, other weeks it was Saady...it is dependent on match ups and strategy, and we don't let the opposition know who its going to be in the game or in different quarters. Players are versatile to play more than one role during a game. Haynes is mobile enoughg to play tall or small. That is our weapon with SOS and Haynes coming into the team.

We have Gov and Haynes playing intercept roles at times.
Can you tell me how many metres gained both should be giving us. You know you don't have the answer, because measuring players by their av metres gained assumes they play the same role week in week out. They don't.

So good to see posts above give you more reasons why we traded in Haynes. Allowing O'Farrell to develop in the VFL is very important reason indeed and I'm grateful for it.

Its good to see Haynes in AA form again, to remind the naysayers what he is all about.

Give the bloke a break from your unreasonable potshots

Our window is open till it is closed. I'm glad our team doesnt give up as easily as some supporters. 14 more games to go.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 13, 2025 2:26 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 26, 2016 1:04 pm
Posts: 1200
Location: Brisbane
I havent watched the replay yet, but I feel Haynes lack of meters gained will be due to our kicking backwards and sideways a lot to slow the game down, nothing like a 40m kick back to Weiters to kill off your gains :)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 13, 2025 2:36 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 6:36 am
Posts: 6343
Bondi
It’s too early to say who will be the better teams this year
Hawthorn were 3 and 6 and went into week 2 of the finals
One thing that is fairly certain
To win you have to be in the top 5 defensive teams based on scores against
You can be mid table for points for to win a flag
Defense is more important than attack
We are 3 rd for forwards 50 entries yet are 10th for scoring
So we don’t move to ball with efficiency
We are 4 Th for scores against which is great
We need some of our defenders to become attacking to help with ball efficiency


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 14, 2025 10:58 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 24915
Location: Bondi Beach
keogh wrote:
Bondi
It’s too early to say who will be the better teams this year

Exactly my point. Same applies to writing off teams after 1 round, or after 9 rounds on 4 wins 5 losses

Hawthorn were 3 and 6 and went into week 2 of the finals
One thing that is fairly certain
To win you have to be in the top 5 defensive teams based on scores against
You can be mid table for points for to win a flag
Defense is more important than attack
We are 3 rd for forwards 50 entries yet are 10th for scoring
So we don’t move to ball with efficiency
We are 4 Th for scores against which is great
We need some of our defenders to become attacking to help with ball efficiency


Our defense is fine. Take out the game vs Crows and we have the best defense.
Our midfield group is as good as anyones. Take out the Crwos game, and they have beaten all opponents every week.
Our forward 50 entries are the highest in the comp if we take out the Crows game.

Three things to improve to make us a Flag contender is with our forward craft:

We have ample forward entry but waste most opportunities in the comp because we fail to connect.
Its our execution from set shots that WAS the problem in the first 4 rounds.
Our small forwards were missing till Durdin came along, and struggled when Williams got injured.

The above 3 issues are fixable.
Fix those and we are dangerous, and can beat anyone.

When we lowered our eyes vs Geelong game, the connection and execution worked.

Point is, our window is open, till its closed on us.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 15, 2025 4:00 pm 
Offline
Trevor Keogh
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 17, 2012 12:00 pm
Posts: 733
Watched the replay the other night. Couldn't watch live.

Just want to give a special mention to Walshie.

Most players would give their left knacker to rack up the figures that are considered subpar for him. What I loved about this game was his smarts, strength and discipline. He's about to break out big time (injuries permitting - he really needs a good run at it).

Although he had no goals (I think), he might as well be credited with at least three, such was his influence on goals in each of the first, second and I think last(?) quarters. Watch it again. Just brilliant. And not spraying his disposals or getting hopelessly caught with the ball. He also almost pulled down a match saving mark in the oppo's goal square, i.e. he doesn't shirk the defensive side of his game.

This is one high pick prodigy who deserves to realise greater heights than the already breathtaking plateau he's been sitting on.

_________________
'People demand freedom of speech as a compensation for the freedom of thought which they seldom use.'
Soren Kierkegaard


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 15, 2025 5:07 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 24915
Location: Bondi Beach
Fenwick Snap wrote:
Watched the replay the other night. Couldn't watch live.

Just want to give a special mention to Walshie.

Most players would give their left knacker to rack up the figures that are considered subpar for him. What I loved about this game was his smarts, strength and discipline. He's about to break out big time (injuries permitting - he really needs a good run at it).

Although he had no goals (I think), he might as well be credited with at least three, such was his influence on goals in each of the first, second and I think last(?) quarters. Watch it again. Just brilliant. And not spraying his disposals or getting hopelessly caught with the ball. He also almost pulled down a match saving mark in the oppo's goal square, i.e. he doesn't shirk the defensive side of his game.

This is one high pick prodigy who deserves to realise greater heights than the already breathtaking plateau he's been sitting on.


:clap: :clap: well said

Walshy looked so strong. Shrugged off tackles...he reminds me of Nathan Buckley....gets his kick and handball away.

I looked at his influence on the game rather than total possessions. 7 one percenters. And that voice is so strong his instructions are heard over half the ground

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 16, 2025 8:05 pm 
Offline
Trevor Keogh
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 17, 2012 12:00 pm
Posts: 733
:beer:

_________________
'People demand freedom of speech as a compensation for the freedom of thought which they seldom use.'
Soren Kierkegaard


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 18, 2025 7:10 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2021 12:58 pm
Posts: 2008
West Coast are putting this result into perspective.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 18, 2025 8:16 pm 
Offline
John James
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:19 pm
Posts: 677
Location: KG
Traveller86 wrote:
West Coast are putting this result into perspective.


How about the Geelong result? Does that put things in perspective too?

Selective argument.

_________________
No Guts, No Glory


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 18, 2025 8:28 pm 
Online
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2013 2:16 pm
Posts: 14511
Location: Sydney
This game had a unique set of circumstances and incentive for WCE that make it impossible to draw any conclusions from


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 18, 2025 8:35 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 21, 2005 5:15 pm
Posts: 7331
windy wrote:
Traveller86 wrote:
West Coast are putting this result into perspective.


How about the Geelong result? Does that put things in perspective too?

Selective argument.

Select another game in the past 12 months that compares to the Geelong win... and you can't say Geelong

_________________
“I would rather have questions that can't be answered than answers that can't be questioned.” ― Richard Feynman


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 18, 2025 9:05 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 5:28 pm
Posts: 4932
windy wrote:
Traveller86 wrote:
West Coast are putting this result into perspective.


How about the Geelong result? Does that put things in perspective too?

Selective argument.

Funnily enough St Kilda beat Geelong in Rd 2

_________________
There is no footy god


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 18, 2025 9:29 pm 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2005 12:18 pm
Posts: 9736
Location: Australia
Humpers wrote:
windy wrote:
Traveller86 wrote:
West Coast are putting this result into perspective.


How about the Geelong result? Does that put things in perspective too?

Selective argument.

Funnily enough St Kilda beat Geelong in Rd 2


Well that puts it all into perspective!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 19, 2025 10:27 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 24915
Location: Bondi Beach
sinbagger wrote:
Humpers wrote:
windy wrote:
Traveller86 wrote:
West Coast are putting this result into perspective.


How about the Geelong result? Does that put things in perspective too?

Selective argument.

Funnily enough St Kilda beat Geelong in Rd 2


Well that puts it all into perspective!


I don't know how anyone can be so sure about anything this year. Its an open field.
As usual, the 2 things that will impact results will be form and injury.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 115 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot], GWS and 54 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group