killpies wrote:
peabody wrote:
On trade returns, I think we would be doing very well if we can get a 3rd rounder for either of Dow or Fisher. More likely to see early 4th, pick swaps or futures.
It is only natural to want to see a return on our draft investment, but we have very little leverage with players so clearly out of our best 22. What leverage we do have isn't worth using for the very minor pick upgrades it might net us.
I am more frustrated with the lack of development we put into them, and also with the rationale behind their drafting in the first place. Dow, LOB, SPS, Stocker, Setterfield etc all walked into the club with the same glaring deficiencies they walked out with. You don't get 2nd round picks in exchange for players like that.
A player with 2 yrs to run and 100 games under his belt, being offered a 4 +1 yr contract. You don't get much more leverage than that
Yes, and that is why we will get
something in return for Fisher (cf. Dow).
It still won't be that much. We can threaten to Fisher hostage in the VFL to squeeze the maximum return out of North. But even then we're talking moving a couple of places up the draft (maybe future late 3rd to mid-early 3rd round).
But that stance carries risks as well as potential rewards, notably the corrosive effect of having a player at the club who desperately doesn't want to be there. Players take notice of that sort of treatment.
I don't think the coaching staff rate him in our best 28. We should be happy with any return we can get.