Sydney Blue wrote:
Effes wrote:
http://www.foxsports.com.au/afl/afl-premiership/carlton-could-offer-mick-malthouse-continuing-employment-when-his-deal-expires-in-2015/story-e6frf3e3-1227134775170
Quote:
CARLTON president Mark Logiudice says he is “not a big fan of contracts” and has indicated coach Mick Malthouse could be offered continuing employment when his deal with the Blues expires at the end of next season.
Making the right noises
I agree with the contract basis
But will Mick
In regards to no more quick fixes that's sort of a contradiction as they went and drafted 4 blokes who have been in the system for 2-4 years instead of going from ground up.
It also screams loudly that they are not expecting a quick rise up the ladder
Talk about a negative assessment. All evidence to date on this change in strategy (of recruiting players with 2-3 years experience) has been a successful one. Or do you feel that Docherty and Everitt have been abject failures? The football department have gone to great effort to explain that they were concerned with our list balance in terms of age profile. Do you think that they have just made this up to justify their trading direction? Or could you concede that yes they are spot on and something needed to be done to fill in the 22-24 year old gap. Lets not forget that the cause of this has been the atrocious recruiting during the ratten years, and the subsequent delisting of these players leaving a hole. Should this be ignored? so that by the time Judd is gone, murphy and Gibbs are looking to retire, that finally our "ground up "players are maturing? Or should we make a strategy (that has paid off so far) by recruiting Docherty, Everitt, Jaksch, Jones , Dick and Whiley.
This years additions are yet to be tried and yet you are being critical- what about giving them a chance? Or would you prefer to just have a speculative whinge for the sake of it?
I also would have thought that recruiting more mature bodied but still young players in on the contrary screaming that they intend to play finals sooner rather than later.