Mitch for PM wrote:
Blue Sombrero wrote:
Hornet wrote:
kingkerna wrote:
Blue Sombrero wrote:
We don't want ninth.
We want 14th.
Do you still hold this brilliant view?
No, we will fight all the way, get to ninth, a position we have ridiculed Richmond for occupying but which all of a sudden looks attractive to some, get pick 10 or 11 instead of pick 5 or 6 and call the last seven weeks a resounding success.
I can't see the value in it.
I don't post very often, but sometimes people annoy me enough to make me bother.
Thankfully in the supporter circles I speak to face to face and hopefully within the supporters on here, people DO see the value in it. People actually prefer to see a few the club win the maximum possible games per year. People actually DO prefer to put what the MC judge to be the best possible team on the field each week. People actually DO prefer to finish 9th rather than 14th. Let alone the hope of 8th and at least one finals game to get excited about.
That doesn't mean not playing any kids. I'd live to see plenty of them get a run this year strategically where MC believe it increases our chance to win the game, not just for the sake of it.
People annoy you enough to post and you've only done it 14 times?
People annoy me enough to post and I think I've been annoyed about 8,000 times.
You should read more of Synbad's stuff you'd post more often.
If you insert the word, 'some' about four times into your post, it would be less annoying.
Some people here and in the wider supporter group actually do want to play kids instead of those who won't be here next year and end up with a higher draft pick if we lose. If that makes you annoyed, so be it but it's a fact.
Login
Register
FAQ
