The Rhino wrote:
The more I think about it, the more I think the season will depend on the third ruckman. Not just whether the style of play across the league finally allows for teams to play three ruckmen with some success, but also whether the MC give it the appropriate amount of time, rather than persevering with it for too long, and making sure that the best 2 ruckmen are picked.
No easy task all things considered. We get that right, especially with the new ruck rules, and I reckon it's a huge difference.
That's a good point you make.
There's a lot of good players with good skills on our list, and one would have to make way for a 3rd ruckman in the 22. Rob Peter to pay Paul, and lose a bit of ground speed too in a game that requires speed and stamina.
I've been a fan of playing 3 ruckmen IF they were all:
- in top/good form
-able to play a forward role well
- mobile with good speed (get around the ground and link up)
-dominant ruckmen
No point in carrying anyone with the IC rules as they are and the workload expected of the midfielders.
So pressure is on for ruckmen to stay healthy, fit and strong but be desperate to make one of the ruck spots theirs to lose...so they've got to win their battles week in week out and snag a couple of goals and feed the talented midfield that will include stints from Betts, Garlett, Walker, along with the other quality mids.
The more I think about it the more I believe there will be only 2 ruckmen if our tall KP's are fit (Jammo, Hendo, Laidler, Waite and Casboult). The deision MM will make is how many talls he has playing, and it wont be all of them.
May the best 2 ruckmen be there on the last day of September. Fingers crossed.
Great problem to have.